How positively or negatively people generally view others is key for understanding personality, social behavior, and psychopathology. Previous research has measured generalized other-perceptions by relying on either explicit self-reports or judgments made in group settings. With the current research, we overcome the limitations of these past approaches by introducing a novel measurement instrument for generalized other-perceptions: the Online-Tool for Assessing Perceiver Effects (O-TAPE). By assessing perceivers’ first impressions of a standardized set of target people displayed in social network profiles or short video sequences, the O-TAPE captures individual differences in the positivity of other-perceptions. In Study 1 (n = 219), the instrument demonstrated good psychometric properties and correlations with related constructs. Study 2 (n = 142) replicated these findings and also showed that the O-TAPE predicted other-perceptions in a naturalistic group setting. Study 3 (n = 200) refined the nomological network of the construct and demonstrated that the O-TAPE is invulnerable to effects of social desirability.
AbeleA. E.HaukeN.PetersK.LouvetE.SzymkowA.DuanY. (2016). Facets of the fundamental content dimensions: Agency with competence and assertiveness-communion with warmth and morality. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, Article 1810. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01810
2.
AbeleA. E.WojciszkeB. (2007). Agency and communion from the perspective of self versus others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(5), 751-763. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.5.751
3.
American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.
BackM. D.KüfnerA. C. P.DufnerM.GerlachT. M.RauthmannJ. F.DenissenJ. J. A. (2013). Narcissistic admiration and rivalry: Disentangling the bright and dark sides of narcissism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105(6), 1013-1037. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034431
6.
BackM. D.SchmukleS. C.EgloffB. (2010). Why are narcissists so charming at first sight? Decoding the narcissism-popularity link at zero acquaintance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(1), 132-145. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016338
7.
BartholomewK.HorowitzL. M. (1991). Attachment styles among young adults: A test of a four-category model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(2), 226-244.
8.
BowlbyJ. (1988). A secure base. Basic Books.
9.
Brenk-FranzK.EhrenthalJ.FreundT.SchneiderN.StraußB.TieslerF.SchauenburgH.GensichenJ. (2018). Evaluation of the short form of “Experience in Close Relationships” (Revised, German Version “ECR-RD12”): A tool to measure adult attachment in primary care. PLoS ONE, 13(1), e0191254. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191254
10.
BrennanK. A.ClarkC. L.ShaverP. R. (1998). Self-report measurement of adult attachment: An integrative overview. In SimpsonJ. A. (Ed.), Attachment theory and close relationships (pp. 46-76). Guilford Press.
CampbellD. T.MillerN.LubetskyJ.O’ConnellE. J. (1964). Varieties of projection in trait attribution. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 78(15), 1-33. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093872
13.
DienerE. D.EmmonsR. A.LarsenR. J.GriffinS. (1985). The Satisfaction With Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71-75. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13
14.
DufnerM.LeisingD.GebauerJ. E. (2016). Which basic rules underlie social judgments? Agency follows a zero-sum principle and communion follows a non-zero-sum principle. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42(5), 677-687. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216640902
15.
EriksonE. H. (1959). Identity and the life cycle. International Universities Press.
16.
EriksonE. H. (1968). Identity, youth and crisis. Norton.
17.
FournierJ. C.DerubeisR. J.BeckA. T. (2012). Dysfunctional cognitions in personality pathology: The structure and validity of the Personality Belief Questionnaire. Psychological Medicine, 42(4), 795-805. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291711001711
18.
FraleyC. R. (2002). Attachment stability from infancy to adulthood: Meta-analysis and dynamic modeling of developmental mechanisms. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6(2), 123-151. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0602_03
19.
FraleyC. R.WallerN. G.BrennanK. A. (2000). An item response theory analysis of self-report measures of adult attachment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(2), 350-365. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.2.350
20.
GlaesmerH.GrandeG.BraehlerE.RothM. (2011). The German Version of the Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS). European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 27(2), 127-132. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000058
21.
GoldbergL. R. (1990). An alternative “description of personality”: The Big-Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(6), 1216-1229. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.6.1216
22.
GoslingS. D.RentfrowP. J.SwannW. B. (2003). A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(6), 504-528. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00046-1
23.
HahnE.GottschlingJ.SpinathF. M. (2012). Short measurements of personality: Validity and reliability of the GSOEP Big Five Inventory (BFI-S). Journal of Research in Personality, 46(3), 355-359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2012.03.008
24.
HehmanE.SutherlandC. A. M.FlakeJ. K.SlepianM. L. (2017). The unique contributions of perceiver and target characteristics in person perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113(4), 513-529. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000090
25.
HopwoodC. J. (2018). Interpersonal dynamics in personality and personality disorders. European Journal of Personality, 32(5), 499-524. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2155
26.
HopwoodC. J.WrightA. G. C.AnsellE. B.PincusA. L. (2013). The interpersonal core of personality pathology. Journal of Personality Disorders, 27(3), 270-295. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2013.27.3.270
JohnO. P.SrivastavaS. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In PervinL. A.JohnO. P. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 102-138). Guilford Press.
29.
KennyD. A. (1994). Interpersonal perception: A social relations analysis. Guilford Press.
30.
LeckeltM.WetzelE.GerlachT. M.AckermanR. A.MillerJ. D.ChopikW. J.PenkeL.GeukesK.KüfnerA. C. P.HuttemanR.RichterD.RennerK.-H.AllroggenM.BrecheenC.CampbellW. K.GrossmannI.BackM. D. (2018). Validation of the Narcissistic Admiration and Rivalry Questionnaire Short Scale (NARQ-S) in convenience and representative samples. Psychological Assessment, 30(1), 86-96. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000433
31.
LeeK.AshtonM. C. (2004). Psychometric properties of the HEXACO Personality Inventory. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39(2), 329-358. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3902_8
32.
LukeM. A.MaioG. R. (2009). Oh the humanity! Humanity-esteem and its social importance. Journal of Research in Personality, 43(4), 586-601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2009.03.001
33.
MuckP. M.HellB.GoslingS. D. (2007). Construct validation of a short five-factor model instrument. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 23(3), 166-175. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.23.3.166
34.
MuschJ.BrockhausR.BröderA. (2002). Ein Inventar zur Erfassung von zwei Faktoren sozialer Erwünschtheit [An inventory of two factors of social desirability]. Diagnostica, 48(3), 121-129. https://doi.org/10.1026//0012-1924.48.3.121
35.
PaulhusD. L. (1994). Balanced Inventory of Desirable Respond-ing: Reference manual for BIDR Version 6 [Unpublished manuscript]. University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
36.
PaulhusD. L. (2002). Socially desirable responding: The evolution of a construct. In BraunH. I.JacksonD. N.WileyD. E.MessickS. (Eds.), The role of constructs in psychological and educational measurement (pp. 49-69). Lawrence Erlbaum.
37.
PelhamB. W.SwannW. B. (1989). From self-conceptions to self-worth: On the sources and structure of global self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(4), 672–680. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.4.672
38.
RammstedtB.JohnO. P. (2007). Measuring personality in one minute or less: A 10-item short version of the Big Five Inventory in English and German. Journal of Research in Personality, 41(1), 203-212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2006.02.001
39.
RauR.NestlerS.GeukesK.BackM. D.DufnerM. (2019). Can other-derogation be beneficial? Seeing others as low in agency can lead to an agentic reputation in newly formed face-to-face groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 117(1), 201-227. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000250
40.
R Development Core Team. (2008). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
41.
RogersC. R. (1963). The concept of the fully functioning person. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice, 1(1), 17-26. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0088567
42.
RosenbergM. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton University Press.
43.
SchönbrodtF. D.BackM. D.SchmukleS. C. (2012). Tripler: An R package for social relations analyses based on round-robin designs. Behavior Research Methods, 44(2), 455-470. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0150-4
44.
SchriberR. A.ChungJ. M.SorensenK. S.RobinsR. W. (2017). Dispositional contempt: A first look at the contemptuous person. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113(2), 280-309. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000101
45.
SchuppJ.GerlitzJ.-Y. (2014). Big Five Inventory-SOEP (BFI-S). Zusammenstellung sozialwissenschaftlicher Items und Skalen(ZIS) [Compilation of social science items and scales]. https://doi.org/10.6102/zis54
46.
SrivastavaSGuglielmoS.BeerJ. S. (2010). Perceiving others’ personalities: Examining the dimensionality, assumed similarity to the self, and stability of perceiver effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(3), 520-534. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017057
47.
ThielmannI.HilbigB. E. (2018). Is it all about the money? A re-analysis of the link between Honesty-Humility and Dictator Game giving. Journal of Research in Personality, 76(1), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2018.07.002
48.
ThielmannI.ZimmermannJ.LeisingD.HilbigB. E. (2017). Seeing is knowing: On the predictive accuracy of self- and informant reports for prosocial and moral behaviours. European Journal of Personality, 31(4), 404-418. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2112
49.
VazireS. (2010). Who knows what about a person? The self-other knowledge asymmetry (SOKA) model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(2), 281-300. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017908
50.
von CollaniG.HerzbergP. Y. (2003). Eine revidierte Fassung der deutschsprachigen Skala zum Selbstwertgefühl von Rosenberg [A revised version of the German-language Rosenberg self-esteem scale]. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie [Journal of Differential and Diagnostic Psychology], 24(1), 3-7. https://doi.org/10.1024//0170-1789.24.1.3
51.
WieckC.ScheibeS.KunzmannU. (2020). Development and Validation of Film Stimuli To Assess Social-Emotional Processes and Competencies in the Work Context [Manuscript submitted for publication].
WinquistL. A.MohrC. D.KennyD. A. (1998). The female positivity effect in the perception of others. Journal of Research in Personality, 32(3), 370-388. https://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.1998.2221
54.
WoodD.HarmsP.VazireS. (2010). Perceiver effects as projective tests: What your perceptions of others say about you. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(1), 174-190. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019390
55.
WrightsmanL. S. (1992). Assumptions about human nature: Implications for researchers and practitioners (2nd ed.). Sage.
56.
XieS. Y.FlakeJ. K.HehmanE. (2019). Perceiver and target characteristics contribute to impression formation differently across race and gender. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 117(2), 364-385. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000160
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
