Suicide remains the second leading cause of death among young adults aged 15 years and older. Given its negative impact, it is essential to conduct studies that offer a greater understanding of the reasons young adults give for not engaging in suicide-related behaviors. The Reasons for Living Inventory for Young Adults is designed to explore this idea. This novel 24-item instrument measures four protective dimensions of reasons: Peer Acceptance and Support, Family Sources of Support, Faith-Related Support, and Personal Perceived Strength. The current investigations include two validation studies designed to examine further the psychometric properties of this instrument. Participants were undergraduate students at a state university in the U.S. Southwest. The first aim of the study was to evaluate the dimensionality of the instrument. We used confirmatory and bifactor confirmatory factor analyses to address this goal. The second aim was to examine the evidence for reliability estimates and concurrent validity. Results from both studies provided adequate support for a four-factor model across methods, acceptable internal consistency reliability, and concurrent validity for the dimensions of this instrument.
Public Significance Statement: Suicide remains a significant mental health concern for young adults. The present studies found empirical support for the psychometric properties of a new measure for assessing four dimensions of the target construct: Peer-Acceptance and Social Support, Family Sources of Support, Faith-Related Support, and Personal Perceived Strength.
BakhiyiC. L.CalatiR.GuillaumeS.CourtetP. (2016). Do reasons for living protect against suicidal thoughts and behaviors? A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 77, 92-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2016.02.019
4.
BandalosD. L. (2008). Is parceling really necessary? A comparison of results from item parceling and categorical variable methodology. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 15(2), 211-240. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510801922340
5.
BeckA. T.KovacsM.WeissmanA. (1979). Assessment of suicidal intention: The scale for suicide ideation. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 47(2), 343-352. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.47.2.343
6.
BentlerP. M. (2009). Alpha, dimension-free, and model-based internal consistency reliability. Psychometrika, 74(1), 137-143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-008-9100-1
7.
BowenN.GuoS. (2012). Structural equation modeling: Pocket guides to social research methods. Oxford University Press.
8.
BryanC. J.BryanA. O.AnestisM. D.AnestisJ. C.GreenB. A.EtienneN.MorrowC. E.Ray-SannerudB. (2016). Measuring moral injury: Psychometric properties of the Moral Injury Events Scale in two military samples. Assessment, 23(5), 557-570. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191115590855
9.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2013). Web-based Injury Statistics Query and Reporting System (WISQARS). https://www.cdc.gov/injury/wisqars/
10.
CicchettiD. V.SparrowS. S. (1990). Assessment of adaptive behavior in young children. In JohnsonJ. H.GoldmanJ. (Eds.), Developmental assessment in clinical child psychology: A handbook (pp. 173-196). Pergamon Press.
11.
ClumG. A.PatsiokasA. T.LuscombR. L. (1979). Empirically based comprehensive treatment program for parasuicide. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 47(5), 937-945. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.47.5.937
12.
ColeD. A. (1989). Validation of the Reasons for Living Inventory in general and delinquent adolescent samples. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 17(1), 13-27. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00910767
13.
CrawfordM.RossiterG. (2006). Reasons for living: Education and young people’s search for meaning, identity and spirituality: A handbook. Australian Council for Educational Research.
14.
DiStefanoC.MorganG. B. (2014). A comparison of diagonal weighted least squares robust estimation techniques for ordinal data. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 21(3), 425-438. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.915373
15.
DobrovE.ThorellL. H. (2004). “Reasons for Living”: Translation, psychometric evaluation and relationships to suicidal behavior in a Swedish random sample. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry, 58(4), 277-285. https://doi.org/10.1080/08039480410005783
16.
EdelsteinB. A.HeiselM. J.McKeeD. R.MartinR. R.KovenL. P.DubersteinP. R.BrittonP. C. (2009). Development and psychometric evaluation of the Reasons for Living—Older Adults Scale: A suicide risk assessment inventory. The Gerontologist, 49(6), 736-745. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnp052
17.
EllisJ. B.LamisD. A. (2007). Adaptive characteristics and suicidal behavior: A gender comparison of young adults. Journal of Death Studies, 31(9), 845-854. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481180701537303
18.
EllisJ. B.SmithP. C. (1991). Spiritual well-being, social desirability and reasons for living: Is there a connection?International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 37(1), 57-63. https://doi.org/10.1177/002076409103700108
19.
EspositoC.SpiritoA.BoergersJ.DonaldsonD. (2003). Affective, behavioral and cognitive functioning in adolescents with multiple suicide attempts. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 33(4), 389-399. https://doi.org/10.1521/suli.33.4.389.25231
20.
GarrettK. M.WaehlerC. A.RogersJ. A. (2012). A protocol analysis of the reasons for living scale items with a sample of gay, lesbian, and bisexual adults. Suicidology Online, 3(1), 72-82.
GrahamC.ThomasL. (2002). Using reasons for living to connect to American Indian healing traditions. Journal of Social Work & Social Welfare, 29(1), 55-75.
23.
GreeningL.StoppelbeinL. (2002). Religiosity, attributional style, and social support as psychosocial buffers for African American and White adolescents’ perceived risk for suicide. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 32(4), 404-417. https://doi.org/10.1521/suli.32.4.404.22333
24.
GuertinT.Lloyd-RichardsonE.SpiritoA.DonaldsonD.BoergersJ. (2001). Self-mutilative behavior in adolescents who attempt suicide by overdose. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 40(9), 1062-1069. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004583-200109000-00015
25.
GutierrezP. M.OsmanA.BarriosF. X.KopperB. A.BakerM. T.HaraburdaC. M. (2002). Development of the Reasons for Living Inventory for Young Adults. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58(4), 339-357. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.1147
26.
GutierrezP. M.OsmanA.KopperB. A.BarriosF. X. (2000). Why young people do not kill themselves: The Reasons for Living Inventory for Adolescents. Journal of Child Psychology, 29(2), 177-187. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15374424jccp2902_4
27.
GutierrezP. M.OsmanA.KopperB. A.BarriosF. X.BaggeC. L. (2000). Suicide risk assessment in a college student population. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 47(4), 403-413. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.47.4.403
28.
HinkleD. E.WiersmaW.JursS. G. (2003). Applied statistics for the behavioral sciences. Journal of Educational Statistics, 15(1), 84-87. https://doi.org/10.2307/1164825
29.
IvanoffA.JangS. J.SmythN. J.LinehanM. M. (1994). Fewer reasons for staying alive when you are thinking of killing yourself: The Brief Reasons for Living Inventory. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 16(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02229062
30.
JoinerT. E.RuddM. D. (1996). Disentangling the interrelations between hopelessness, loneliness, and suicidal ideation. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 26(1), 19-26.
31.
JuneA.SegalD. L.CoolidgeF. L.KlebeK. (2009). Religiousness, social support and reasons for living in African American and European American older adults: An exploratory study. Aging & Mental Health, 13(5), 753-760. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607860902918215
32.
KopaczM. S.CreanH. F.ParkC. L.HoffR. A. (2018). Religious coping and suicide risk in a sample of recently returned veterans. Archives of Suicide Research, 22(4), 615-627. https://doi.org/10.1080/13811118.2017.1390513
33.
KralikK. M.DanforthW. J. (1992). Identification of coping ideation and strategies preventing suicidality in a college-age sample. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 22(2), 167-186.
LinehanM. M.GoodsteinJ. L.NielsenS. L.ChilesJ. A. (1983). Reasons for staying alive when you are thinking of killing yourself: The Reasons for Living Inventory. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51(2), 276-286. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.51.2.276
36.
LloydE. E.KelleyM. L.HopeT. (1997, April). Self-mutilation in a community sample of adolescents: Descriptive characteristics and provisional prevalence rates [Poster presentation]. Society for Behavioral Medicine, New Orleans, LA.
37.
MaloneK. M.OquendoM. A.HaasG. L.EllisS. P.LiS.MannJ. J. (2000). Protective factors against suicidal acts in major depression: Reasons for living. American Journal of Psychiatry, 157(7), 1084-1088. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.157.7.1084
38.
MansolfM.ReiseS. P. (2016). Exploratory bifactor analysis: The Schmid-Leiman orthogonalization and Jennrich-Bentler analytic rotations. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 51(5), 698-717. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2016.1215898
39.
McDonaldR. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Lawrence Erlbaum.
NockM. K.PrinsteinM. J. (2004). A functional approach to the assessment of self-mutilative behavior. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72(5), 885-890. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.72.5.885
42.
NockM. K.PrinsteinM. J. (2005). Contextual features and behavioral functions of self mutilation among adolescents. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 114(1), 140-146. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.114.1.140
43.
OquendoM. A.DragatsiD.Harkavy-FriedmanJ.DervicK.CurrierD.BurkeA. K.GrunebaumM. F.MannJ. J. (2005). Protective factors against suicidal behavior in Latinos. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 193(7), 438-443. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.nmd.0000168262.06163.31
44.
OsmanA.BaggeC. L.GutierrezP. M.KonickL. C.KopperB. A.BarriosF. X. (2001). The Suicidal Behaviors Questionnaire-Revised (SBQ-R): Validation with clinical and nonclinical samples. Journal of Assessment, 8(4), 443-454. https://doi.org/10.1177/107319110100800409
45.
OsmanA.DownsW. R.KopperB. A.BarriosF. X.BakerM. T.OsmanJ. R.BesettT. M.LinehanM. M. (1998). The Reasons for Living for Adolescents: Development and psychometric properties. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 54(8), 1063-1078. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4679(199812)54:8<1063::AID-JCLP6>3.0.CO;2-Z
46.
OsmanA.GutierrezP. M.BaggeC. L.FreedenthalS.PiraniS. (2015). The Reasons for Living Inventory for Young Adults-II (RFL-YA-II) [Unpublished manuscript]. Department of Psychology, The University of Texas at San Antonio.
47.
OsmanA.GutierrezP. M.BarriosF.FreedenthalS.LozanoG. (2010). Development and initial psychometric properties of the University of Texas at San Antonio Future Disposition Inventory. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 66(4), 410-429. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20660
48.
OsmanA.JonesK.OsmanJ. R. (1991). The Reasons for Living Inventory: Psychometric properties. Psychological Reports, 69(1), 271-278. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1991.69.1.271
49.
OsmanA.KopperB. A.BarriosF.GutierrezP. M.BaggeC. L. (2004). Reliability and validity of the Beck Depression Inventory–II with adolescent psychiatric inpatients. Journal of Psychological Assessment, 16(2), 120-132. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.16.2.120
50.
OsmanA.LamisD. A.BaggeC. L.FreedenthalS.BarnesS. M. (2016). The Mindful Attention Awareness Scale: Further examination of dimensionality, reliability, and concurrent validity estimates. Journal of Personality Assessment, 98(2), 189-199. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2015.1095761
51.
PintoA.WhismanM. A.ConwellY. (1998). Reasons for living in a clinical sample of adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 21(4), 397-405. https://doi.org/10.1006/jado.1998.0173
52.
PiraniS.BrownS.LopezI.OsmanA. (2015, October). Reasons young adults give for not killing themselves: Development and properties of the Reasons for Living Inventory in Young Adults II (RFL-YA-II) [Poster presentation]. Society for the Advance of Chicanos and Native Americans in Science, Washington, DC.
53.
RaykovT.MarcoulidesG. A. (2015). A direct latent variable modeling-based method for point and interval estimation of coefficient alpha. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 75(1), 146-156. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164414526039
54.
ReiseS. P. (2012). Invited paper: The rediscovery of bifactor measurement models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 47(5), 667-696. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2012.715555
55.
ReiseS. P.MooreT. M.HavilandM. G. (2013). Applying unidimensional item response theory models to psychological data. In GeisingerK. F.BrackenB. A.CarlsonJ. F.HansenJ.-I. C.KuncelN. R.ReiseS. P.RodriguezM. C. (Eds.), APA handbook of testing and assessment in psychology(pp. 101-119). American Psychological Association.
56.
ReiseS. P.ScheinesR.WidamanK. F.HavilandM. G. (2013). Multidimensionality and structural coefficient bias in structural equation modeling: A bifactor perspective. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73(1), 5-26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164412449831
57.
RevelleW.ZinbargR. E. (2009). Coefficients alpha, beta, omega, and the glb: Comments on Sijtsma. Psychometrika, 74(1), 145-154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-008-9102-z
58.
Richardson-VejlgaardR.SherL.OquendoM. A.LizardiD.StanleyB. (2009). Moral objections to suicide and suicidal ideation among mood disordered Whites, Blacks, and Hispanics. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 43(4), 360-365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2008.03.008
59.
RiegerS. J.PeterT.RobertsL. W. (2015). “Give me a reason to live!” Examining reasons for living across levels of suicidality. Journal of Religion & Health, 54(6), 2005-2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-014-9893-4
60.
RinconiL.TestoniI.ZamperiniA. (2009). Validation of the Italian version of the Reasons for Living Inventory. Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 3(1), 151-159.
61.
RodriguezA.ReiseS. P.HavilandM. G. (2016). Evaluating bifactor models: Calculating and interpreting statistical indices. Psychological Methods, 21(2), 137.
62.
RogersJ. R.HanlonP. J. (1996). Psychometric Analysis of the College Student Reasons for Living Inventory. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 29(1), 13-24.
63.
SijtsmaK. (2009). On the use, the misuse, and the very limited usefulness of Cronbach’s alpha. Psychometrika, 74(1), 107-120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-008-9101-0
64.
SisaskM.VärnikA.KolvesK.BertoloteJ. M.BolhariJ.BotegaN. J.FleischmannA.VijayakumarL.WassermanD. (2010). Is religiosity a protective factor against attempted suicide: A cross-cultural case-control study. Archives of Suicide Research, 14(1), 44-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/13811110903479052
65.
StreetJ. C.TahaF.JonesA. D.JonesK. A.CarrE.WoodsA.WoodallS.KaslowN. J. (2012). Racial identity and reasons for living in African American female suicide attempters. Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology, 18(4), 416-423. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029594
66.
ten BergeJ. M.SočanG. (2004). The greatest lower bound to the reliability of a test and the hypothesis of unidimensionality. Psychometrika, 69(4), 613-625. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289858
67.
WalkerR. L.AlabiD.RobertsJ.ObasiE. M. (2010). Ethnic group differences in reasons for living and the moderating role of cultural worldview. Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology, 16(3), 372-378. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019720
68.
WangM. C.LightseyO. R.PietruszkaT.UrukA. C.WellsA. G. (2007). Purpose in life and reasons for living as mediators of the relationship between stress, coping, and suicidal behavior. Journal of Positive Psychology, 2(3), 195-204. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760701228920
69.
WangM. C.LightseyO. R.Jr.TranK. K.BonaparteT. S. (2013). Examining suicide protective factors among black college students. Journal of Death Studies, 37(3), 228-247. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2011.623215
70.
WestfieldJ. S.CardinD.DeatonW. L. (1992). Development of the college student Reasons for Living Inventory. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 22(4), 442-452.
71.
ZinbargR. E.RevelleW.YovelI.LiW. (2005). Cronbach’s α, Revelle’s β, and McDonald’s ω H: Their relations with each other and two alternative conceptualizations of reliability. Psychometrika, 70(1), 123-133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-003-0974-7
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
