Examining the Validity of the Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire in the Assessment of Police Candidates

Abstract

A well-validated test of normal personality functioning is necessary in preemployment evaluations of candidates for public safety positions. In this study, we evaluated the construct validity and predictive validity of one such measure, the Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire (MPQ), in a large sample of candidates for law enforcement positions. We examined associations between MPQ scale scores and biographical data, clinician suitability ratings on the 10 established California Commission on Peace Officer and Standards and Training (POST) psychological screening dimensions, and (for a subsample) posthire performance outcome data. MPQ scores generally demonstrated a conceptually expected pattern of associations with criterion variables, supporting their construct validity. Scores related to negative emotionality were particularly salient predictors of a range of POST-10 suitability ratings. Scales assessing aspects of positive emotionality, impulsivity, as well as absorption, emerged as the best predictors of posthire performance problems.

Keywords

Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire police candidates public safety personnel predictive validity

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Psychological Association. (2018). Professional practice guidelines for occupationally mandated psychological evaluations. American Psychologist, 73, 186-197.

Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Pub. L. No. 101-336, §2, 104 Stat. 328 (1991).

Avdeyeva

T. V.

Tellegen

Ben-Porath

Y. S.

(2012). Empirical correlates of low scores on MMPI-2/MMPI-2-RF Restructured Clinical Scales in a sample of university students. Assessment, 19, 388-393.

Ben-Porath

Y. S.

Almagor

Hoffman-Chemi

Tellegen

(1995). A cross-cultural study of personality with the Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 26, 360-373.

Ben-Porath

Y. S.

Tellegen

(2008/2011). Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2-Restructured Form: Manual for administration, scoring and interpretation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Block

J. H.

Block

(1980). The role of ego-control and ego-resiliency in the organization of behavior. In Collins

W. A.

(Ed.), Minnesota symposia on child psychology (Vol. 13, pp. 39-101). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Cattell

R. B.

Cattell

A. K.

Cattell

H. E. P.

(1993). 16PF Questionnaire–Fifth edition. Champaign, IL: IPAT.

Church

A. T.

(1994). Relating the Tellegen and five-factor models of personality structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 898-909.

Cleveland

W. S.

(1979). Robust locally weighted regression and smoothing scatterplots. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74, 829-836.

10.

Cohen

(1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155-159.

11.

Corey

D. M.

(2016, October). Assessment protocols, procedures and pass rates for psychological evaluations of police candidates: A contemporary national survey. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Association of Chiefs of Police, Police Psychological Services Section, San Diego, CA.

12.

Corey

D. M.

Ben-Porath

Y. S.

(2018). Assessing police and other public safety personnel using the MMPI-2-RF: A practical guide. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

13.

Corey

D. M.

Borum

(2013). Forensic assessment for high risk occupations. In Otto

R. K.

Weiner

I. B.

(Eds.), Handbook of psychology (Vol. 11, pp. 246-269). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

14.

Corey

D. M.

Sellbom

Ben-Porath

Y. S.

(2018). Risks associated with overcontrolled behavior in police officer recruits. Psychological Assessment, 30, 1691-1702.

15.

Cuijpers

Smit

Penninx

B. W.

de Graaf

ten Have

Beekman

A. T.

(2010). Economic costs of neuroticism: A population-based study. Archives of General Psychiatry, 67, 1086-1093.

16.

Depue

R. A.

Lenzenweger

M. F.

(2001). A neurobehavioral dimensional model of personality disorders. In Livesley

W. J.

(Ed.), The handbook of personality disorders (pp. 136-176). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

17.

Depue

R. A.

Lenzenweger

M. F.

(2005). A neurobehavioral model of personality disturbance. In Lenzenweger

M. F.

Clarkin

J. F.

(Eds.), Major theories of personality disorder (2nd ed., pp. 391-453). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

18.

Eysenck

H. J.

Eysenck

S. B. G.

(1975). Manual of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire. London, England: Hodder and Stoughton.

19.

Gough

H. G.

Bradley

(1996). CPI Manual–Third edition. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

20.

Hunter

J. E.

Schmidt

F. L.

(2004). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

21.

Harkness

A. R.

Tellegen

Waller

(1995). Differential convergence of self-report and informant data for Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire traits: Implications for the construct of negative emotionality. Journal of Personality Assessment, 64, 185-204.

22.

Johnson

Roberts

, & Associates, Inc. (2011). Psychological History Questionnaire (PsyQ) for law enforcement and other public safety applicants. Oakland, CA: Author.

23.

Kilcullen

R. N.

White

L. A.

Mumford

M. D.

Mack

(1995). Assessing the construct validity of rational biodata scales. Military Psychology, 7(1), 17-28.

24.

Kremen

A. M.

Block

(2002). Absorption: Construct explication by Q-sort assessments of personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 252-259.

25.

Krueger

R. F.

Caspi

Moffitt

T. E.

Silva

P. A.

McGee

(1996). Personality traits are differentially linked to mental disorders: A multitrait–multidiagnosis study of an adolescent birth cohort. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 105, 299-312.

26.

Krueger

R. F.

Hicks

B. M.

Patrick

C. J.

Carlson

S. R.

Iacono

W. G.

McGue

(2002). Etiologic connections among substance dependence, antisocial behavior and personality: Modeling the externalizing spectrum. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 111, 411-424.

27.

Krueger

R. F.

McGue

Iacono

W. G.

(2001). The higher-order structure of common DSM mental disorders: Internalization, externalization, and their connections to personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 1245-1259.

28.

Lahey

B. B.

(2009). Public health significance of neuroticism. American Psychologist, 64, 241-256.

29.

Lenzenweger

M. F.

McClough

J. F.

Clarkin

J. F.

Kernberg

O. F.

(2012). Exploring the interface of neurobehaviorally linked personality dimensions and personality organization in borderline personality disorder: The Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire and Inventory of Personality Organization. Journal of Personality Disorders, 26, 902-918.

30.

Leone

Van der Zee

K. I.

van Oudenhoven

J. P.

Perugini

Ercolani

A. P.

(2005). The cross-cultural generalizability and validity of the Multicultural Personality Questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 1449-1462.

31.

Markon

K. E.

Krueger

R. F.

Watson

(2005). Delineating the structure of normal and abnormal personality: An integrative hierarchical approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 139-157.

32.

Mitchell

C. L.

(2017). Preemployment psychological screening of police officer applicants: Basic considerations and recent advances. In Mitchell

C. L.

Dorian

E. H.

(Eds.), Police psychology and its growing impact on modern law enforcement (pp. 28-50). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.

33.

Moorman

E. L.

Samuel

D. B.

(2018). Representing schizotypal thinking with dimensional traits: A case for the Five Factor Schizotypal Inventory. Psychological Assessment, 30, 19-30.

34.

Ones

D. S.

Viswesvaran

Schmidt

F. L.

(1993). Comprehensive meta-analysis of integrity test validities: Findings and implications for personnel selection and theories of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 679-703.

35.

Patrick

C. J.

Kramer

M. D.

(2017). Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire (MPQ). In Zeigler-Hill

Shackelford

T. K.

(Eds.), Encyclopedia of personality and individual differences. Basel, Switzerland: Springer. Retrieved from https://patrickcnslab.psy.fsu.edu/wiki/images/4/4e/PatrickKramer_EncyclIndivDiffs_MPQentry_2017.pdf

36.

Patrick

C. J.

Kramer

M. D.

Verona

Tellegen

Kaemmer

(2013). Development and preliminary validation of a simplified wording form of the Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire. Assessment, 20, 405-418.

37.

Reaves

B. A.

(2010). Local police departments, 2007. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics.

38.

Sellbom

Ben-Porath

Y. S.

(2005). Mapping the MMPI–2 restructured clinical scales onto normal personality traits: Evidence of construct validity. Journal of Personality Assessment, 85, 179-187.

39.

Sellbom

Fischler

G. L.

Ben-Porath

Y. S.

(2007). Identifying MMPI-2 predictors of police officer integrity and misconduct. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 985-1004.

40.

Serafino

G. F.

(2010). Fundamental issues in police psychological assessment. In Weiss

P. A.

(Ed.), Personality assessment in police psychology: A 21st century perspective (pp. 29-55). Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.

41.

Spilberg

S. W.

Corey

D. M.

(2018). POST peace officer psychological screening manual (3rd ed.). Sacramento: California Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training.

42.

Tackett

J. L.

Lahey

(2017). Neuroticism. In Widiger

T. A.

(Ed.), The Oxford handbook of the five factor model (pp. 39-56). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

43.

Tarescavage

A. M.

Brewster

Corey

D. M.

Ben-Porath

Y. S.

(2015). Use of pre-hire MMPI-2-RF police candidate scores to predict supervisor ratings of post-hire performance. Assessment, 22, 411-428.

44.

Tarescavage

A. M.

Corey

D. M.

Ben-Porath

Y. S.

(2015). Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2-Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF) predictors of police officer problem behavior. Assessment, 22, 116-132.

45.

Tarescavage

A. M.

Corey

D. M.

Ben-Porath

Y. S.

(2016). A prorating method for estimating MMPI-2-RF scores from MMPI responses: Examination of score fidelity and illustration of empirical utility in the PERSEREC police integrity study sample. Assessment, 23, 173-190.

46.

Tarescavage

A. M.

Corey

D. M.

Gupton

H. M.

Ben-Porath

Y. S.

(2015). Criterion validity and practical utility of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2-Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF) in assessments of police officer candidates. Journal of Personality Assessment, 97, 382-394.

47.

Tarescavage

A. M.

Fischler

Cappo

Hill

Corey

D. M.

Ben-Porath

Y. S.

(2015). Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2-Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF) predictors of police officer problem behavior and collateral self-report test scores. Psychological Assessment, 27, 125-137.

48.

Tellegen

Ben-Porath

Y. S.

(2008/2011). MMPI-2-RF (Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2-Restructured Form): Technical manual. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

49.

Tellegen

Waller

N. G.

(2008). Exploring personality through test construction: Development of the Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire. In Boyle

G. J.

Matthews

Saklofske

D. H.

(Eds.), Handbook of personality theory and testing: Vol. II. Personality measurement and assessment (pp. 261-292). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

50.

Tellegen

Lykken

D. T.

Bouchard

T. J.

Jr. Wilcox

Segal

N. L.

Rich

(1988). Personality similarity in twins reared apart and together. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 1051-1058.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.44 MB