The Big Five Inventory–2 (BFI-2) is a recently published 60-item questionnaire that measures personality traits within the five-factor model framework. An important aspect of the BFI-2 is that it measures the traits at both the domain and facet levels and also controls acquiescence bias via the balanced number of true- and false-keyed items across the domains and facets. The current research evaluates factorial measurement invariance of a Russian version of the BFI-2 across sex and age within samples of 1,024 university students (Study 1) and 1,029 Internet users (Study 2). Across these samples, men scored lower on the domains of negative emotionality and agreeableness and slightly higher on extraversion. Sex differences were also obtained on various facets. In the Internet sample, age correlated modestly with several Big Five domains in accordance with the well-documented maturity principle. The newly developed Russian version of BFI-2 showed good reliability and validity across both samples. Moreover, random intercept exploratory factor analyses showed that the BFI-2 displayed a hierarchical five-domain-15-facet structure that demonstrated strict measurement invariance across sex and age.
AichholzerJ. (2014). Random intercept EFA of personality scales. Journal of Research in Personality, 53, 1-4. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2014.07.001
2.
AichholzerJ.DannerD.RammstedtB. (2018). Facets of personality and “ideological asymmetries.”Journal of Research in Personality, 77, 90-100. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2018.09.010
BishopD.JacksH.TandyS. B. (1993). The Structure of Temperament Questionnaire (STQ): Results from a U.S. sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 14, 485-487. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(93)90318-W
5.
BleidornW.KlimstraT. A.DenissenJ. J. A.RentfrowP. J.PotterJ.GoslingS. D. (2013). Personality maturation around the world: A cross-cultural examination of social-investment theory. Psychological Science, 24, 2530-2540. doi:10.1177/0956797613498396
6.
CacioppoJ. T.PettyR. E.KaoC. F. (1984). The efficient assessment of need for cognition. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48, 306-307. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa4803_13
7.
CaspiA.RobertsB. W.ShinerR. L. (2005). Personality development: Stability and change. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 453-484. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141913
8.
CheungG. W.RensvoldR. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9, 233-255. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
9.
ChiorriC.MarshH. W.UbbialiA.DonatiD. (2016). Testing the factor structure and measurement invariance across gender of the Big Five Inventory through exploratory structural equation modeling. Journal of Personality Assessment, 98, 88-99. doi:10.1080/00223891.2015.1035381
10.
ChurchA. T.AlvarezJ. M.MaiN. T. Q.FrenchB. F.KatigbakM. S.OrtizF. A. (2011). Are cross-cultural comparisons of personality profiles meaningful? Differential item and facet functioning in the Revised NEO Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 1068-1089. doi:10.1037/a0025290
11.
ClarkM. A.LelchookA. M.TaylorM. L. (2010). Beyond the Big Five: How narcissism, perfectionism, and dispositional affect relate to workaholism. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 786-791. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2010.01.013
12.
CostaP. T.Jr.TerraccianoA.McCraeR. R. (2001). Gender differences in personality traits across cultures: Robust and surprising findings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 322-331. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.81.2.322
13.
DannerD.RammstedtB.BluemkeM.LechnerC.BerresS.KnopfT.. . . JohnO. P. (2019). Das Big Five Inventar 2: Validierung einiges Persönlichkeitsinventars zur Erfassung von 5 Persönlichkeitsdomänen und 15 Facetten [The Big Five Inventory 2: Validate a personality inventory to capture 5 personality domains and 15 facets]. Diagnostica. Advance online publication. doi:10.1026/0012-1924/a000218
14.
DenissenJ. J. A.GeenenR.SotoC. J.JohnO. P.van AkenM. A. G. (2019). The Big Five Inventory–2: Replication of psychometric properties in a Dutch adaptation and first evidence for the discriminant predictive validity of the facet scales. Journal of Personality Assessment. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/00223891.2018.1539004
15.
DienerE.EmmonsR. A.LarsenR. J.GriffinS. (1985). The Satisfaction With Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71-75. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13
16.
EysenckH. J. (1947). Dimensions of personality. Oxford, England: Kegan Paul.
17.
FeitosaJ.JosephD. L.NewmanD. A. (2015). Crowdsourcing and personality measurement equivalence: A warning about countries whose primary language is not English. Personality and Individual Differences, 75, 47-52. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2014.11.017
18.
GebauerJ. E.BleidornW.GoslingS. D.RentfrowP. J.LambM. E.PotterJ. (2014). Cross-cultural variations in Big Five relationships with religiosity: A sociocultural motives perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 1064-1091. doi:10.1037/a0037683
19.
GoldbergL. R. (1993). The structure of phenotypic personality traits. American Psychologist, 48, 26-34. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.48.1.26
20.
GoldbergL. R.JohnsonJ. A.EberH. W.HoganR.AshtonM. C.CloningerC. R.GoughH. G. (2006). The International Personality Item Pool and the future of public-domain personality measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 84-96. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2005.08.007
21.
GreenS. B. (2003). A coefficient alpha for test-retest data. Psychological Methods, 8, 88-101. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.8.1.88
22.
JohnO. P.DonahueE. M.KentleR. L. (1991). The Big Five Inventory—Versions 4a and 54. Berkeley: Institute of Personality and Social Research, University of California.
23.
JohnO. P.NaumannL. P.SotoC. J. (2008). Paradigm shift to the integrative big-five taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues. In JohnO. P.RobinsR. W.PervinL. A. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 114-158). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
24.
HaninY.EysenckS. B. G.EysenckH. J.BarrettP. (1991). A cross-cultural study of personality: Russia and England. Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 265-271. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(91)90112-O
25.
HaslamN.WhelanJ.BastianB. (2009). Big Five traits mediate associations between values and subjective well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 40-42. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2008.09.001
26.
HBO Entertainment; co-executive producers, MartinG.R.R., Gerardis, Vince, Vicinanza, Ralph, Casady, Guymon, & Strauss, Carolyn; producers, Huffam, Mark, & Doelger, Frank; executive producers, Benioff, David, & Weiss, D.B.; created by Benioff, D., & Weiss, D.B.Television 360; Grok! Television; Generator Entertainment; Bighead Littlehead. (2012). Game of thrones. The complete first season. New York, NY: HBO Home Entertainment.
27.
KajoniusP. J.JohnsonJ. (2018). Sex differences in 30 facets of the five-factor model of personality in the large public (N = 320,128). Personality and Individual Differences, 129, 126-130. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2018.03.026
28.
KniazevG. G.MitrofanovaL. G.BocharovV. A. (2010). Валидизация русскоязычной версии опросника Л. Голдберга «Маркеры факторов “Большой Пятерки” [Validization of the Russian version of the Goldberg’s “Big-Five Factor Markers” inventory]. Psikhologicheski Zhurnal, 31, 100-110.
29.
LangF. R.JohnD.LüdtkeO.SchuppJ.WagnerG. G. (2011). Short assessment of the Big Five: Robust across survey methods except telephone interviewing. Behavior Research Methods, 43, 548-567. doi:10.3758/s13428-011-0066-z
30.
MadridH. P.PattersonM. G. (2016). Creativity at work as a joint function between openness to experience, need for cognition and organizational fairness. Learning and Individual Differences, 51, 409-416. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2015.07.010
31.
MargolisS.SchwitzgebelE.OzerD. J.LyubomirskyS. (2018). A new measure of life satisfaction: The Riverside Life Satisfaction Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/00223891.2018.1464457
32.
MarshH. W.MorinA. J. S.ParkerP. D.KaurG. (2014). Exploratory structural equation modeling: An integration of the best features of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 10, 85-110. doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032813-153700
33.
MarshH. W.MuthénB.AsparouhovT.LüdtkeO.RobitzschA.MorinA. J. S.TrautweinU. (2009). Exploratory structural equation modeling, integrating CFA and EFA: Application to students’ evaluations of university teaching. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 16, 439-476. doi:10.1080/10705510903008220
34.
MarshallT. C.LefringhausenK.FerencziN. (2015). The Big Five, self-esteem, and narcissism as predictors of the topics people write about in Facebook status updates. Personality and Individual Differences, 85, 35-40. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2015.04.039
35.
MartinT. A.CostaP. T.OryolV. E.RukavishnikovA. A.SeninI. G. (2002). Applications of the Russian NEO-PI-R. In McCraeR. R.AllikJ. (Eds.), The five-factor model of personality across cultures (pp. 261-277). Boston, MA: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-0763-5_13
36.
McCraeR. R.TerraccianoA., & 78 Members of the Personality Profiles of Cultures Project. (2005). Universal features of personality traits from the observer’s perspective: Data from 50 cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 547-561. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.3.547
MorinA. J. S.ArensA. K.MarshH. W. (2016). A bifactor exploratory structural equation modeling framework for the identification of distinct sources of construct-relevant psychometric multidimensionality. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 23, 116-139. doi:10.1080/10705511.2014.961800
39.
NyeC. D.AllemandM.GoslingS. D.PotterJ.RobertsB. W. (2016). Personality trait differences between young and middle-aged adults: Measurement artifacts or actual trends?Journal of Personality, 84, 473-492. doi:10.1111/jopy.12173
40.
OsinE. N. (2012). Измерение позитивных и негативных эмоций: разработка русскоязычного аналога методики PANAS [Measurement of positive and negative emotions: Development of a Russian analogue of the PANAS measure]. Psychology: Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 9(4), 91-110.
PavotW.DienerE. (2008). The Satisfaction With Life Scale and the emerging construct of life satisfaction. Journal of Positive Psychology, 3, 137-152. doi:10.1080/17439760701756946
43.
RammstedtB.DannerD.SotoC. J.JohnO. P. (2018). Validation of the short and extra-short forms of the Big Five Inventory-2 (BFI-2) and their German adaptations. European Journal of Psychological Assessment. Advance online publication. doi:10.1027/1015-5759/a000481
44.
RammstedtB.FarmerR. F. (2013). The impact of acquiescence on the evaluation of personality structure. Psychological Assessment, 25, 1137-1145. doi:10.1037/a0033323
45.
RammstedtB.GoldbergL. R.BorgI. (2010). The measurement equivalence of Big-Five factor markers for persons with different levels of education. Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 53-61. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2009.10.005
46.
RobertsB. W.WaltonK. E.ViechtbauerW. (2006). Patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life course: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 1-25. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.1.1
47.
RobinsR. W.TracyJ. L.TrzesniewskiK.PotterJ.GoslingS. D. (2001). Personality correlates of self-esteem. Journal of Research in Personality, 35, 463-482. doi:10.1006/jrpe.2001.2324
48.
RosenbergM. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
49.
SadowskiC. J.CogburnH. E. (1997). Need for cognition in the Big-Five factor structure. Journal of Psychology, 131, 307-312. doi:10.1080/00223989709603517
50.
SamuelD. B.SouthS. C.GriffinS. A. (2015). Factorial invariance of the Five-Factor Model rating form across gender. Assessment, 22, 65-75. doi:10.1177/1073191114536772
51.
SchmittD. P.RealoA.VoracekM.AllikJ. (2008). Why can’t a man be more like a woman? Sex differences in Big Five personality traits across 55 cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 168-182. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.1.168
52.
ShchebetenkoS. (2011). Психометрика русской версии Шкалы потребности в познании [Psychometrics of a Russian version of the Need for Cognition Scale]. Vestnik Permskogo Universiteta: Filosofia. Psikhologiya. Soziologiya, 6, 87-100.
53.
ShchebetenkoS. (2014). “The best man in the world”: Attitudes toward personality traits. Psychology: Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 11(4), 129-148.
54.
ShchebetenkoS.KaluginA. Y.MishkevichA. M.SotoC. J.JohnO. P. (2019). “Measurement invariance and sex and age differences of the Big Five Inventory-2: Evidence from the Russian version,” 2017-2018 [Data file and code book]. Retrieved from https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/379m879wpf/1
55.
SlobodskayaH. R.KnyazevG. G.SafronovaM. V.WilsonG. D. (2003). Development of a short form of the Gray–Wilson Personality Questionnaire: Its use in measuring personality and adjustment among Russian adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 1049-1059. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00317-3
56.
SotoC. J.JohnO. P. (2009). Ten facet scales for the Big Five Inventory: Convergence with NEO PI-R facets, self-peer agreement, and discriminant validity. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 84-90. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2008.10.002
57.
SotoC. J.JohnO. P. (2017a). Short and extra-short forms of the Big Five Inventory–2: The BFI-2-S and BFI-2-XS. Journal of Research in Personality, 68, 69-81. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2017.02.004
58.
SotoC. J.JohnO. P. (2017b). The next Big Five Inventory (BFI-2): Developing and assessing a hierarchical model with 15 facets to enhance bandwidth, fidelity, and predictive power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113, 117-143. doi:10.1037/pspp0000096
59.
SotoC. J.JohnO. P.GoslingS. D.PotterJ. (2008). The developmental psychometrics of Big Five self-reports: Acquiescence, factor structure, coherence, and differentiation from ages 10 to 20. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 718-737. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.4.718
60.
SotoC. J.JohnO. P.GoslingS. D.PotterJ. (2011). Age differences in personality traits from 10 to 65: Big Five domains and facets in a large cross-sectional sample. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 330-348. doi:10.1037/a0021717
61.
SpechtJ.EgloffB.SchmukleS. C. (2011). Stability and change of personality across the life course: The impact of age and major life events on mean-level and rank-order stability of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 862-882. doi:10.1037/a0024950
62.
SrivastavaS.JohnO. P.GoslingS. D.PotterJ. (2003). Development of personality in early and middle adulthood: Set like plaster or persistent change?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 1041-1053. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.5.1041
63.
SuzukiT.SouthS. C.SamuelD. B.WrightA. G. C.YalchM. M.HopwoodC. J.ThomasK. M. (2019). Measurement invariance of the DSM–5 Section III pathological personality trait model across sex. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 10, 114-122. doi:10.1037/per0000291
64.
WatsonD.ClarkL. A.TellegenA. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063-1070.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
