Alcohol consumption is an important predictor of a variety of negative outcomes. There is an extensive literature that examines the differences in the estimated level of alcohol consumption between types of assessments (e.g., quantity–frequency [QF] questionnaires, daily diaries). However, it is typically assumed that all QF-based measures are nearly identical in their assessment of the volume of alcohol consumption in a population. Using timeline follow-back data and constructing common QF consumption measures, we examined differences among survey instruments to assess alcohol consumption and heavy drinking. Using three data sets, including clinical to community samples, we demonstrate how scale-specific item characteristics (i.e., number of response options and ranges of consumption assessed by each option) can substantially affect the estimated mean level of consumption and estimated prevalence of binge drinking. Our analyses suggest that problems can be mitigated by employing more resolved measures of quantity and frequency in consumption questionnaires.
AaltoM.AlhoH.HalmeJ. T.SeppaK. (2009). AUDIT and its abbreviated versions in detecting heavy and binge drinking in a general population survey. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 103, 25-29. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2009.02.013
2.
AntonR.O’MalleyS.CirauloD.CislerR. A.CouperD.DonovanD. M.. . . ZwebenA. (2006). Combined pharmacotherapies and behavioral interventions for alcohol dependence. The COMBINE study: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA Journal of the American Medical Association, 295, 2003-2017.
3.
BaborT. F.BrownJ.Del BocaF. K. (1990). Validity of self-reports in applied research on addictive behaviors: Fact or fiction?Behavioral Assessment, 12, 5-31.
4.
BoyntonM. H.RichmanL. S. (2014). An online daily diary study of alcohol use using Amazon’s Mechanical Turk. Drug and Alcohol Review, 33, 456-461. doi:10.1111/dar.12163
5.
Bureau of Labor Statistics, US Department of Labor. (2012). National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1979 Cohort, 1979–2010 (rounds 1–24). Produced and distributed by the Center for Human Resource Research.
6.
CareyK. B.BorsariB.CareyM. P.MaistoS. A. (2006). Patterns and importance of self-other differences in college drinking norms. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 20, 385-393.
7.
CarneyM. A.TennenH.AffleckG.Del BocaF. K.KranzlerH. R. (1998). Levels and patterns of alcohol consumption using timeline follow-back, daily diaries and real-time “electronic interviews.”Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 59, 447-454.
8.
CorraoG.BagnardiV.ZambonA.AricoS. (1999). Exploring the dose-response relationship between alcohol consumption and the risk of several alcohol-related conditions: A meta-analysis. Addiction, 94, 1551-1573.
9.
CourtenayW. H. (2000). Engendering health: A social constructionist examination of men’s health beliefs and behaviors. Psychology of Men & Masculinities, 1, 4-15.
10.
CurranP. J.HussongA. M. (2009). Integrative data analysis: The simultaneous analysis of multiple data sets. Psychological Methods, 14, 81-100. doi:10.1037/a0015914
11.
de GoeijM. C. M.SuhrckeM.ToffoluttiV.van de MheenD.SchoenmakersT. M.KunstA. E. (2015). How economic crises affect alcohol consumption and alcohol-related health problems: A realist systematic review. Social Science & Medicine, 131, 131–146. doi:10.1016/J.SOCSCIMED.2015.02.025
12.
DeHartT.TennenH.ArmeliS.ToddM.MohrC. (2009). A diary study of implicit self-esteem, interpersonal interactions and alcohol consumption in college students. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 720-730.
13.
DulinP. L.AlvaradoC. E.FitterlingJ. M.GonzalezV. M. (2017). Comparisons of alcohol consumption by timeline follow back vs. smartphone-based daily interviews. Addiction Research & Theory, 25, 195-200. doi:10.1080/16066359.2016.1239081
14.
FeunekesG. I.van’t VeerP.van StaverenW. A.KokF. J. (1999). Alcohol intake assessment: The sober facts. American Journal of Epidemiology, 150, 105-112.
15.
GrantB. F.DawsonD. A.StinsonF. S.ChouP. S.KayW.PickeringR. (2003). The Alcohol Use Disorder and Associated Disabilities Interview Schedule–IV (AUDADIS-IV): Reliability of alcohol consumption, tobacco use, family history of depression and psychiatric diagnostic modules in a general population sample. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 71, 7-16.
16.
GrantK. AToniganJ. S.MillerW. R. (1995). Comparison of three alcohol consumption measures: A concurrent validity study. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 56, 168-172.
17.
GreenfieldT. K. (2000). Ways of measuring drinking patterns and the difference they make: Experience with graduated frequencies. Journal of Substance Abuse, 12, 33-49.
18.
HarrisK. M.HalpernC. TWhitselE.HusseyJ.TaborJ.EntzelP.UdryJ. R. (2009). TheNational Longitudinal Study of adolescent to adult health: Research design. Retrieved from http://www.cpc.unc.edu/projects/addhealth/design
19.
HasinD. S.KeyesK. M.HatzenbuehlerM. L.AharonovichE. A.AldersonD. (2007). Alcohol consumption and posttraumatic stress after exposure to terrorism: Effects of proximity, loss, and psychiatric history. American Journal of Public Health, 97, 2268-2275.
20.
HeebJ. L.GmelG. (2005). Measuring alcohol consumption: A comparison of graduated frequency, quantity frequency, and weekly recall diary methods in a general population survey. Addictive Behaviors, 30, 403-413.
21.
KendallM. (1938). A new measure of rank correlation. Biometrika, 30(12), 81-89.
22.
KoppesL. L. J.TwiskJ. W. R.SnelJ.KemperH. C. G. (2002). Concurrent validity of alcohol consumption measurement in a “healthy” population; quantity-frequency questionnaire v. dietary history interview. British Journal of Nutrition, 88, 427-434. doi:10.1079/BJN2002671
23.
LenzeriniM. (2002). Data integration: A theoretical perspective. In Proceedings of the Twenty-First ACM SIGMOD-SIGACT-SIGART Symposium on Principles of Database Systems (pp. 233-246). doi:10.1145/543613.543644
24.
MidanikL. T. (1994). Comparing usual quantity/frequency and graduated frequency scales to assess yearly alcohol consumption: Results from the 1990 US National Alcohol Survey. Addiction, 89, 407-412.
25.
MidanikL. T.TamT. W.GreenfieldT. K.CaetanoR. (1996). Risk functions for alcohol-related problems in a 1988 US national sample. Addiction, 91, 1427-1437.
26.
MillerW. R.ToniganJ. S.LongabaughR. (1995). The Drinker Inventory of Consequences (DrInC): An instrument for assessing adverse consequences of alcohol abuse: Test manual (No. 95). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism.
O’HareT. (1991). Measuring alcohol consumption: A comparison of the retrospective diary and the quantity-frequency methods in a college drinking survey. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 52, 500-502.
PedersenE. R.GrowJ.DuncanS.NeighborsC.LarimerM. E. (2012). Concurrent validity of an online version of the Timeline Followback assessment. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 26, 672-677. doi:10.1037/a0027945
31.
PiaseckiT. M. (2019). Assessment of alcohol use in the natural environment. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 43, 564-577. doi:0.1111/acer.13975
32.
Project MATCH Research Group. (1993). Project MATCH (Matching Alcoholism Treatment to Client Heterogeneity): Rationale and methods for a multisite clinical trial matching patients to alcoholism treatment. Alcoholism, 17, 1130-1145.
33.
RehmJ.GreenfieldT. K.RogersJ. D. (2001). Average volume of alcohol consumption, patterns of drinking, and all-cause mortality: Results from the US National Alcohol Survey. American Journal of Epidemiology, 153, 64-71.
34.
ReynoldsK.LewisB.NolenJ. D. L.KinneyG. L.SathyaB.HeJ. (2003). Alcohol consumption and risk of stroke: A meta-analysis. JAMA Journal of the American Medical Association, 289, 579-588.
35.
RimmE. B.GiovannucciE. L.WillettW. C.ColditzG. A.AscherioA.RosnerB.StampferM. J. (1991). Prospective study of alcohol consumption and risk of coronary disease in men. Lancet, 338, 464-468.
36.
RobinsonS. M.SobellL. C.SobellM. B.LeoG. I. (2014). Reliability of the Timeline Followback for cocaine, cannabis, and cigarette use. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 28, 154-162. doi:10.1037/a0030992
37.
RossowI. (2000). Suicide, violence and child abuse: A review of the impact of alcohol consumption on social problems. Contemporary Drug Problems, 27, 397-433.
38.
SAMSHA’s Center for the Application of Prevention Technologies, Northeast Resource Team (2011). Focus on student binge drinking: The prevalence and consequences. Waltham, MA: Author.
39.
SaundersJ. B.AaslandO. G.BaborT. F.De la FuenteJ. R.GrantM. (1993). Development of the alcohol use disorders identification test (AUDIT): WHO collaborative project on early detection of persons with harmful alcohol consumption-II. Addiction, 88, 791-804.
40.
SearlesJ. S.HelzerJ. E.RoseG. L.BadgerG. J. (2002). Concurrent and retrospective reports of alcohol consumption across 30, 90 and 366 days: Interactive voice response compared with the timeline follow back. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 63, 352-362.
41.
SearlesJ. S.HelzerJ. E.WalterD. E. (2000). Comparison of drinking patterns measured by daily reports and timeline follow back. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 14, 277-286. doi:10.1037/0893-164X.14.3.277
42.
ShiffmanS. (2016). Ecological momentary assessment. In SherK. J. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of substance use and substance use disorders (Vol. 2, pp.466-509). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
43.
SobellL. C.AgrawalS.SobellM. B.LeoG. I.YoungL. J.CunninghamJ. A.SimcoE. R. (2003). Comparison of a quick drinking screen with the timeline followback for individuals with alcohol problems. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 64, 858-861.
44.
SobellL. C.CellucciT.NirenbergT. D.SobellM. B. (1982). Do quantity-frequency data underestimate drinking-related health risks?American Journal of Public Health, 72, 823-828.
45.
SobellL. C.SobellM. B. (1992). Timeline follow-back. In LittenR. Z.AllenJ. P. (Eds.), Measuring alcohol consumption (pp. 41-72). Totowa, NJ: Humana Press.
StahreM.NaimiT.BrewerR.HoltJ. (2006). Measuring average alcohol consumption: The impact of including binge drinks in quantity-frequency calculations. Addiction, 101, 1711-1718. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01615.x
48.
StockwellT.DonathS.Cooper-StanburyM.ChikritzhsT.CatalanoP.MateoC. (2004). Under-reporting of alcohol consumption in household surveys: A comparison of quantity-frequency, graduated-frequency and recent recall. Addiction, 99, 1024-1033.
49.
StrausR.BaconS. D. (1953). Drinking in college. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
50.
TurnerC. (1990). How much alcohol is in a ‘standard drink’? An analysis of 125 studies. British Journal of Addiction, 85, 1171-1175.
51.
TverskyA.KahnemanD. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 207-232.
52.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2007). The Surgeon General’s call to action to prevent and reduce underage drinking. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Surgeon General.
53.
VinsonD. C.MacLureM.ReidingerC.SmithG. S. (2003). A population-based case-crossover and case-control study of alcohol and the risk of injury. Journal of Studies in Alcohol, 64, 358-366.
54.
WechslerH.NelsonT. F. (2001). Binge drinking and the American college students: What’s five drinks?Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 15, 287-291.
55.
WiersR. W.HoogeveenK. J.SergeantJ. A.GunningW. B. (1997). High- and low-dose alcohol-related expectancies and the differential associations with drinking in male and female adolescents and young adults. Addiction, 92, 871-888.
56.
ZemoreS.E.Karriker-JaffeK.MuliaN. (2013). Temporal trends and changing racial/ethnic disparities in alcohol problems: Results from the 2000 to 2010 National Alcohol Surveys. Journal of Addiction Research and Therapy, 4, 160.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
