The Interpersonal Transaction Scales–8 (ITS-8): A Circumplex-Based,Behaviorally Anchored Instrument Based on the CLOIT-R

Abstract

Using the Checklist of Interpersonal Transactions–Revised (CLOIT-R; Kiesler, 2004) as a basis, a new behaviorally anchored instrument was developed with a graded-response scale, simplified item wording, substantially fewer items, and improved consistency with the interpersonal circumplex. In a community sample (Study 1), the graded response format with simplified items showed improved octant-scale reliabilities, as well as circular structure and convergent validity comparable to the CLOIT-R. Items that performed consistently across community and undergraduate samples (Study 2) were then selected to produce an inventory with half as many items as the CLOIT-R, but with good octant-scale reliabilities and excellent circular structure. Finally, in a therapy context (Study 3), the new inventory showed excellent reliability and validity for ratings of both clients and therapists. This 48-item inventory, the Interpersonal Transaction Scales–8 (ITS-8), may be used for both self- and other-ratings in everyday interactions, as well as for observer ratings of therapeutic interactions.

Keywords

interpersonal theory interpersonal circle circumplex structure complementarity scale development therapy dyads CLOPT-R

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anchin

J. C.

Pincus

A. L.

(2010). Evidence-based interpersonal psychotherapy with personality disorders: Theory, components, and strategies. In Magnavita

J. J.

(Ed.), Evidence-based treatment of personality dysfunction: Principles, methods, and processes (pp. 113-166). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Andrews

J. W. D.

(1989). Integrating visions of reality: Interpersonal diagnosis and the existential vision. American Psychologist, 44, 803-817.

Ansell

Pincus

(2004). Interpersonal perceptions of the Five-Factor Model of personality: An examination using the structural summary method for circumplex data. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 167-201.

Carson

R. C.

(1969). Interaction concepts of personality. Chicago, IL: Aldine.

Carson

R. C.

(1982). Self-fulfilling prophesy, maladaptive behavior, and psychotherapy. In Anchin

J. C.

Kiesler

D. J.

(Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal therapy (pp. 64-77). Elmsford, NY: Pergamon Press.

Curran

P. G.

(2016). Methods for the detection of carelessly invalid responses in survey data. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 66, 4-19.

Freedman

M. B.

Leary

T. F.

Ossorio

A. G.

Coffey

H. S.

(1951). The interpersonal dimension of personality. Journal of Personality, 20, 143-161.

Gurtman

M. B.

(1994). The circumplex as a tool for studying normal and abnormal personality: A methodological primer. In Strack

Lorr

(Eds.), Differentiating normal and abnormal personality (pp. 243-263). New York, NY: Springer.

Hopwood

C. J.

Bornstein

R. F.

(2014). Multimethod clinical assessment. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

10.

Horowitz

L. M.

Strack

S. S.

(2011). Handbook of interpersonal psychology: Theory, research, assessment and therapeutic interventions. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

11.

Hubert

Arabie

(1987). Evaluating order hypotheses within proximity matrices. Psychological Bulletin, 102, 172-178.

12.

Kiesler

D. J.

(1983). The 1982 Interpersonal Circle: A taxonomy for complementarity in human transactions. Psychological Review, 90, 185-214.

13.

Kiesler

D. J.

(1991). Interpersonal methods of assessment and diagnosis. In Snyder

C. R.

Forsyth

D. R.

(Eds.), Handbook of social and clinical psychology: The health perspective (pp. 438-468). Elmsford, NY: Pergamon Press.

14.

Kiesler

D. J.

(1996). Contemporary interpersonal theory and research: Personality, psychopathology, and psychotherapy. New York, NY: Wiley.

15.

Kiesler

D. J.

(2004). Manual for the Checklist of Interpersonal Transactions-Revised (CLOIT-R) and the Checklist of Psychotherapy Transactions-Revised (CLOPT-R): A 2004 update. Richmond: Virginia Commonwealth University.

16.

Kiesler

D. J.

Goldston

C. S.

Schmidt

J. A.

(1991). Manual for the Check List of Interpersonal Transactions-Revised (CLOIT-R) and the Check List of Psychotherapy Transactions-Revised (CLOPT-R). Richmond: Virginia Commonwealth University.

17.

Leary

T. F.

(1957). Interpersonal diagnosis of personality. New York, NY: Ronald.

18.

Locke

K. D.

(2011). Circumplex measures of interpersonal constructs. In Horowitz

L. M.

Strack

(Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal psychology (pp. 313-324). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

19.

Moskowitz

D. S.

Zuroff

D. C.

(2004). Flux, pulse, and spin: Dynamic additions to the personality lexicon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 880-893.

20.

Oppenheimer

D. M.

Meyvis

Davidenko

(2009). Instructional manipulation checks: Detecting satisficing to increase statistical power. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 967-872.

21.

Pincus

A. L.

Sadler

Woody

Roche

M. J.

Thomas

Wright

A. G. C.

(2014). Assessing interpersonal dynamics. In Hopwood

C. J.

Bornstein

R. F.

(Eds.), Multimethod assessment of personality and psychopathology (pp. 51-91). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

22.

Rappaport

L. M.

Moskowitz

D. S.

D’Antono

(2014). Naturalistic interpersonal behavior patterns differentiate depression and anxiety symptoms in the community. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 61, 253-263.

23.

Sadler

Ethier

Woody

(2011). Interpersonal complementarity. In Horowitz

L. M.

Strack

(Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal psychology: Theory, research, assessment and therapeutic interventions (pp. 123-142). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

24.

Sadler

Woody

McDonald

Lizdek

Little

(2015). A lot can happen in a few minutes: Examining dynamic patterns within an interaction to illuminate the interpersonal nature of personality disorders. Journal of Personality Disorders, 29, 526-546. doi:10.1521/pedi.2015.29.4.526

25.

Thomas

K. A.

Clifford

(2017). Validity and Mechanical Turk: An assessment of exclusion methods and interactive experiments. Computers in Human Behavior, 77, 184-197.

26.

Tracey

T. J. G.

(1997). RANDALL: A Microsoft FORTRAN program for a randomization test of hypothesized order relations. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57, 164-168.

27.

Tracey

T. J. G.

(2012). Problems with single interest scales: Implications of the general factor. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 81, 378-384.

28.

Tracey

T. J. G.

Rounds

Gurtman

(1996). Examination of the general factor with the interpersonal circumplex structure: Application to the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 31, 441-466.

29.

Tracey

T. J. G.

Schneider

P. L.

(1995). An evaluation of the circular structure of the Checklist of Interpersonal Transactions and the Checklist of Psychotherapy Transactions. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 42, 496-507.

30.

Wiggins

J. S.

(1982). Circumplex models of interpersonal behavior in clinical psychology. In Kendall

P. C.

Butcher

J. N.

(Eds.), Handbook of research methods in clinical psychology (pp. 183-221). New York, NY: Wiley.

31.

Wiggins

J. S.

(1995). Interpersonal Adjective Scales: Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

32.

Wiggins

J. S.

(2003). Paradigms of personality assessment. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

33.

Wiggins

J. S.

Trapnell

Phillips

(1988). Psychometric and geometric characteristics of the Revised Interpersonal Adjective Scales (IAS-R). Multivariate Behavioral Research, 23, 517-530.

34.

Zimmerman

Wright

A. G. C.

(2017). Beyond description in interpersonal construct validation: Methodological advances in the circumplex structural summary approach. Assessment, 24, 3-23. doi:10.1177/1073191115621795

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.05 MB

0.15 MB