The Substance Use Risk Profile Scale (SURPS), a widely used self-report questionnaire, assesses four personality traits which predict risk for substance use (i.e., anxiety sensitivity, hopelessness, impulsivity, and sensation seeking). Given its use in research and clinical settings, as well as potential utility, this study aimed to provide a comprehensive psychometric evaluation of the SURPS. Undergraduate participants (N = 718; 69% White; 26% Hispanic, aged 18-25 years, M = 19.00, SD = 1.33) completed a battery of measures, including the SURPS. Tests of measurement invariance, convergent and criterion validity, and internal consistency were conducted, as well as item response theory analyses and a treatment assignment simulation. Several items were removed before partial measurement invariance across gender was established with little information lost. Despite removing several SURPS items, the proposed factor structure was not empirically supported. More work is necessary to determine the predictive utility of assessing these personality traits to predict substance-related outcomes.
BakerF. B. (2001). The basics of item response theory (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: ERIC.
4.
BarnesG. E.CeaN. F.BakerT.HolroydC.StockwellT. (2014). Addiction Prone Personality tests and the prediction of substance use patterns in Canadian undergraduate students. Personality and Individual Differences, 60, S25.
5.
BattistaS. R.PencerA.McGonnellM.DurdleH.StewartS. H. (2013). Relations of personality to substance use problems and mental health disorder symptoms in two clinical samples of adolescents. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 11, 1-12.
6.
BeckA. T.WeissmanA.LesterD.TrexlerL. (1974). The measurement of pessimism: The hopelessness scale. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 861-865.
7.
BorsboomD. (2006). The attack of the psychometricians. Psychometrika, 71, 425-440.
8.
BrowneM. W.CudeckR. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sage Focus Editions, 154, 136-136.
9.
CanfieldM.GilvarryC.KollerS. H. (2014). Psychometric properties of the Substance Use Risk Profile Scale-Brazilian Version. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 13, 204-214.
10.
CaspiA.MoffittT. E.NewmanD. L.SilvaP. A. (1996). Behavioral observations at age 3 years predict adult psychiatric disorders: Longitudinal evidence from a birth cohort. Archives of General Psychiatry, 53, 1033-1039.
11.
CampbellD. T.FiskeD. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81-105.
12.
CastellanosN.ConrodP. (2006). Brief interventions targeting personality risk factors for adolescent substance misuse reduce depression, panic and risk-taking behaviours. Journal of Mental Health, 15, 645-658.
13.
Chandrika IsmailA.De Alwis SeneviratneR.NewcombeP. A.WanigaratneS. (2009). A model of substance abuse risk: Adapting to the Sri Lankan context. Evaluation Review, 33, 83-97.
14.
CloningerC. R. (1987). Neurogenetic adaptive mechanisms in alcoholism. Science, 236, 410-416.
15.
ConrodP. J. (2016). Personality-targeted interventions for substance use and misuse. Current Addiction Reports, 3, 426-436.
16.
ConrodP. J.CastellanosN.MackieC. (2008). Personality-targeted interventions delay the growth of adolescent drinking and binge drinking. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49, 181-190.
17.
ConrodP. J.ComeauN.StewartS. H.MacleanM.WoicikP. (2002, March). Evaluation of the psychometric properties of a brief scale for assessing personality risk for substance abuse in adolescents: The Substance Use Risk Profile Scale (SURPS) applied to adolescent samples. Paper presented at the 34th Banff Conference on Behavioural Science: Adolescent Substance Abuse: Innovative Approaches to Prevention and Treatment, Banff, Alberta, Canada.
18.
ConrodP. J.StewartS. H.ComeauN.MacleanA. M. (2006). Efficacy of cognitive-behavioral interventions targeting personality risk factors for youth alcohol misuse. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 35, 550-563.
19.
CooperM. L. (1994). Motivations for alcohol use among adolescents: Development and validation of a four-factor model. Psychological Assessment, 6, 117-128.
20.
CooperM. L.FroneM. R.RussellM.MudarP. (1995). Drinking to regulate positive and negative emotions: A motivational model of alcohol use. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 990-1005.
21.
CostaP.TerraccianoA.McCraeR. R. (2001). Gender differences in personality traits across cultures: Robust and surprising findings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 322-331.
22.
CoxW. M.KlingerE. (1988). A motivational model of alcohol use. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 97, 168-180.
23.
CoxW. M.KlingerE. (1990). Incentive motivation, affective change, and alcohol use: A model. In CoxW.M., (Ed.), Why people drink: Parameters of alcohol as a reinforcer (pp. 291-314). New York: Gardner Press.
24.
CrossC. P.CoppingL. T.CampbellA. (2011). Sex differences in impulsivity: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 97-130.
25.
CydersM. A. (2015). The misnomer of impulsivity: Commentary on “choice impulsivity” and “rapid-response impulsivity” articles by Hamilton and colleagues. Personality Disorders, 6, 204-205.
26.
de AyalaR. J. (2013). The theory and practice of item response theory. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
27.
DunnT. J.BaguleyT.BrunsdenV. (2014). From alpha to omega: A practical solution to the pervasive problem of internal consistency estimation. British Journal of Psychology, 105, 399-412.
28.
EmbretsonS. E.ReiseS. P. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
29.
Fernández-CalderónF.Díaz-BataneroC.Rojas-TejadaA. J.Castellanos-RyanN.Lozano-RojasÓ. M. (2017). Adaptación a la población española de la Escala de Perfil de Riesgo de Consumo de Drogas (EPRCD) y estudio de sus propiedades psicométricas [Adaptation to the Spanish population of the Substance Use Risk Profile Scale (SURPS) and psychometric properties]. Adicciones, 30, 208-218. doi:10.20882/adicciones.909
30.
FoxJ. (2008). Applied regression analysis, linear models, and related methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31.
GrahamJ. M. (2006). Congeneric and (essentially) tau-equivalent estimates of score reliability: What they are and how to use them. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66, 930-944.
32.
GreenB. O. B.KavanaghD.YoungR. (2003). Being stoned: A review of self-reported cannabis effects. Drug and Alcohol Review, 22, 453-460.
33.
HermidaR. (2015). The problem of allowing correlated errors in structural equation modeling: Concerns and considerations. Computational Methods in Social Sciences, 3(1), 5-17.
34.
HerthK. (1992). Abbreviated instrument to measure hope: Development and psychometric evaluation. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 17, 1251-1259.
35.
HopwoodC. J.DonnellanM. B. (2010). How should the internal structure of personality inventories be evaluated?Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 332-346.
36.
HuL. T.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
37.
HudsonA.WekerleC.StewartS. H. (2014). Associations between personality and drinking motives in adolescents involved in the child welfare system. Personality and Individual Differences, 81, 84-89.
38.
HustadJ. T.PearsonM. R.NeighborsC.BorsariB. (2014). The role of alcohol perceptions as mediators between personality and alcohol-related outcomes among incoming college-student drinkers. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 28, 336-347.
39.
InselT. R. (2014). The NIMH research domain criteria (RDoC) project: Precision medicine for psychiatry. American Journal of Psychiatry, 171, 395-397.
40.
JangK. L.SteinM. B.TaylorS.LivesleyW. J. (1999). Gender differences in the etiology of anxiety sensitivity: A twin study. Journal of Gender-Specific Medicine, 2(2), 39-44.
41.
JurkS.Kuitunen-PaulS.KroemerN. B.ArtigesE.BanaschewskiT.BokdeA. L.. . . FrouinV. (2015). Personality and substance use: Psychometric evaluation and validation of the Substance Use Risk Profile Scale (SURPS) in English, Irish, French, and German adolescents. Alcoholism: Clinical & Experimental Research, 39, 2234-2248.
42.
KazemiD. M.LevineM. J.DmochowskiJ.Van HornK. R.QiL. (2015). Health behaviors of mandated and voluntary students in a motivational intervention program. Preventive Medicine Reports, 2, 423-428.
43.
KotovR.GamezW.SchmidtF.WatsonD. (2010). Linking “big” personality traits to anxiety, depressive, and substance use disorders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 768-821.
44.
KrankM.StewartS. H.O’ConnorR.WoicikP. B.WallA. M.ConrodP. J. (2011). Structural, concurrent, and predictive validity of the Substance Use Risk Profile Scale in early adolescence. Addictive Behaviors, 36, 37-46.
45.
LammersJ.KuntscheE.EngelsR. C.WiersR. W.KleinjanM. (2013). Mediational relations of substance use risk profiles, alcohol-related outcomes, and drinking motives among young adolescents in the Netherlands. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 133, 571-579.
46.
LigginsJ.PihlR. O.BenkelfatC.LeytonM. (2012). The dopamine augmenter L-DOPA does not affect positive mood in healthy human volunteers. PLoS ONE, 7(1), e28370.
47.
LittlefieldA. K.SherK. J. (2010). The multiple, distinct ways that personality contributes to alcohol use disorders. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4, 767-782.
48.
LittlefieldA. K.SherK. J. (2016). Personality and substance use disorders. In SherK. J. (Ed.), Handbook of substance use and substance use disorders (Vol. 1, pp. 351-374). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
49.
LuckeJ. F. (2005). The α and the ω of congeneric test theory: An extension of reliability and internal consistency to heterogeneous tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29, 65-81.
50.
LynamD.SmithG. T.CydersM. A.FischerS.WhitesideS. A. (2007). The UPPS-P: A multidimensional measure of risk for impulsive behavior. Unpublished Technical Report.
51.
MackinnonS. P.KehayesI. L. L.ClarkR.SherryS. B.StewartS. H. (2014). Testing the four-factor model of personality vulnerability to alcohol misuse: A three-wave, one-year longitudinal study. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 28, 1000-1012.
52.
MagidV.MacLeanM. G.ColderC. R. (2007). Differentiating between sensation seeking and impulsivity through their mediated relations with alcohol use and problems. Addictive Behaviors, 32, 2046-2061.
53.
MahuI. T.DoucetC.O’Leary-BarrettM.ConrodP. J. (2015). Can cannabis use be prevented by targeting personality risk in schools? Twenty-four-month outcome of the adventure trial on cannabis use: a cluster-randomized controlled trial. Addiction, 110, 1625-1633.
54.
MalmbergM.KleinjanM.OverbeekG.VermulstA.LammersJ.MonshouwerK.. . . EngelsR. C. (2015). Substance use outcomes in the Healthy School and Drugs program: Results from a latent growth curve approach. Addictive Behaviors, 42, 194-202.
55.
MalmbergM.KleinjanM.VermulstA. A.OverbeekG.MonshouwerK.LammersJ.EngelsR. C. (2012). Do substance use risk personality dimensions predict the onset of substance use in early adolescence? A variable-and person-centered approach. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 41, 1512-1525.
56.
MalmbergM.OverbeekG.MonshouwerK.LammersJ.VolleberghW. A.EngelsR. C. (2010). Substance use risk profiles and associations with early substance use in adolescence. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 33, 474-485.
57.
MartinC. S.LangenbucherJ. W.KaczynskiN. A.ChungT. (1996). Staging in the onset of DSM-IV alcohol symptoms in adolescents: Survival/hazard analyses. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 57, 549-558.
58.
McCabeS. E.CranfordJ. A.BoydC. J.TeterC. J. (2007). Motives, diversion and routes of administration associated with nonmedical use of prescription opioids. Addictive Behaviors, 32, 562-575.
59.
MemetovicJ.RatnerP. A.RichardsonC. G. (2014). Gender-based measurement invariance of the Substance Use Risk Profile Scale. Addictive Behaviors, 39, 690-694.
60.
MillsapR. E. (2011). Statistical approaches to measurement invariance. New York, NY: Routledge.
MoserK.PearsonM. R.HustadJ. T.BorsariB. (2014). Drinking games, tailgating, and pregaming: Precollege predictors of risky college drinking. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 40, 367-373.
63.
MushquashC. J.ComeauN.StewartS. H. (2007). An alcohol abuse early intervention approach with Mi’kmaq adolescents. First Peoples Child & Family Review, 3(2), 17-26.
64.
MushquashC. J.StewartS. H.MushquashA. R.ComeauM. N.McGrathP. J. (2014). Personality traits and drinking motives predict alcohol misuse among Canadian aboriginal youth. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 12, 270-282.
65.
MuthénB. O.SatorraA. (1995). Complex sample data in structural equation modeling. Sociological Methodology, 25, 267-316.
66.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (1998-2017). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
67.
NunnallyJ. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
68.
O’Leary-BarrettM.MasseB.PihlR.StewartS.SeguinJ. R.ConrodP. (2017). A cluster randomized controlled trial evaluating the effects of delaying onset of adolescent substance abuse on cognitive development and addiction following a selective, personality-targeted intervention program: The Co-Venture trial. Addiction, 112, 1871-1881.
69.
OmiyaS.KoboriO.TomotoA.IgarashiY.IyoM. (2015). Personality and substance use in Japanese adolescents: The Japanese version of Substance Use Risk Profile Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 76, 153-157.
70.
PripflJ.NeumannR.KöhlerU.LammC. (2013). Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on risky decision making are mediated by “hot” and “cold” decisions, personality, and hemisphere. European Journal of Neuroscience, 38, 3778-3785.
71.
R Development Core Team. (2011). R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Computer software]. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
72.
RadloffL. S. (1977). The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385-401.
73.
ReiseS. P.MooreT. M.SabbF. W.BrownA. K.LondonE. D. (2013). The Barratt Impulsiveness Scale–11: Reassessment of its structure in a community sample. Psychological Assessment, 25, 631-642.
74.
Robles-GarcíaR.FresánA.Castellanos-RyanN.ConrodP.GómezD.RaffulC.. . . Medina-MoraM. E. (2014). Spanish version of the Substance Use Risk Profile Scale: Factor structure, reliability, and validity in Mexican adolescents. Psychiatry Research, 220, 1113-1117.
75.
Rocky Mountain Behavioral Science Institute. (2003). American Drug and Alcohol Survey. Fort Collins, CO: Author.
76.
SalibaA. J.MoranC.YooY. (2014). The Substance Use Risk Profile Scale: Comparison of norms and outcomes for Australian and Korean adults. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 12, 538-547.
77.
SamejimaF. (1970). Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores. Psychometrika Monograph, 35(1), 139.
78.
SamejimaF. (1996). Evaluation of mathematical models for ordered polychotomous responses. Behaviormetrika, 23(1), 17-35.
79.
SantorD. A.CoyneJ. C. (1997). Shortening the CES-D to improve its ability to detect cases of depression. Psychological Assessment, 9, 233-243.
80.
SAS Institute Inc. (2010). The SAS system for Windows (Release 9.4) [Computer software]. Cary, NC: Author.
81.
SassD. A. (2011). Testing measurement invariance and comparing latent factor means within a confirmatory factor analysis framework. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 29, 347-363.
82.
SchlauchR. C. (2010). Validation of the Substance Use Risk Profile Scale (SURPS) in treatment-seeking substance abusers using cue reactivity methodology (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL.
83.
SchlauchR. C.CraneC. A.HoustonR. J.MolnarD. S.SchlienzN. J.LangA. R. (2015). Psychometric Evaluation of the Substance Use Risk Profile Scale (SURPS) in an inpatient sample of substance users using cue-reactivity methodology. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 37, 231-246.
84.
SetiawanE.PihlR. O.DagherA.SchlagintweitH.CaseyK. F.BenkelfatC.LeytonM. (2014). Differential striatal dopamine responses following oral alcohol in individuals at varying risk for dependence. Alcoholism: Clinical & Experimental Research, 38, 126-134.
85.
SherK. J.BartholowB. D.WoodM. D. (2000). Personality and substance use disorders: A prospective study. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 818-829.
86.
SiuA. (2010). Validation of the Substance Use Risk Profile Scale for adolescents in Hong Kong. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 29, 75-83.
87.
SijtsmaK. (2009). On the use, the misuse, and the very limited usefulness of Cronbach’s alpha. Psychometrika, 74, 107-120.
88.
SteinbergL.SharpC.StanfordM. S.TharpA. T. (2013). New tricks for an old measure: The development of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale–Brief (BIS-Brief). Psychological Assessment, 25, 216-226.
89.
StevensA. K.BlanchardB. E.ShiM.LittlefieldA. K. (2017). Testing measurement invariance of the UPPS-P Impulsive Behavior Scale in Hispanic/Latino and non-Hispanic/Latino college students. Psychological Assessment, 30, 280-285. doi:10.1037/pas0000494
90.
StewartS. H.ZvolenskyM. J.EifertG. H. (2001). Negative-reinforcement drinking motives mediate the relation between anxiety sensitivity and increased drinking behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 31, 157-171.
91.
TaylorS.ZvolenskyM. J.CoxB. J.DeaconB.HeimbergR. G.LedleyD. R.. . . CardenasS. J. (2007). Robust dimensions of anxiety sensitivity: Development and initial validation of the Anxiety Sensitivity Index-3. Psychological Assessment, 19, 176-188.
92.
WangD.HuM.ZhengC.LiuZ. (2017). Psychometric properties of the Chinese shortened version of the Zuckerman–Kuhlman Personality Questionnaire in a sample of adolescents and young adults. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1-8.
93.
WangJ.WangX. (2012). Structural equation modeling: Applications using Mplus: Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
94.
WhelanR.WattsR.OrrC. A.AlthoffR. R.ArtigesE.BanaschewskiT.. . . ConrodP. J. (2014). Neuropsychosocial profiles of current and future adolescent alcohol misusers. Nature, 512, 185-189.
95.
WoicikP. A.StewartS. H.PihlR. O.ConrodP. J. (2009). The Substance Use Risk Profile Scale: A scale measuring traits linked to reinforcement-specific substance use profiles. Addictive Behaviors, 34, 1042-1055.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
