The alternative model for personality disorders in the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) is considered an important step toward a possibly better conceptualization of personality pathology in older adulthood, by the introduction of levels of personality functioning (Criterion A) and trait dimensions (Criterion B). Our main aim was to examine age-neutrality of the Short Form of the Severity Indices of Personality Problems (SIPP-SF; Criterion A) and Personality Inventory for DSM-5–Brief Form (PID-5-BF; Criterion B). Differential item functioning (DIF) analyses and more specifically the impact on scale level through differential test functioning (DTF) analyses made clear that the SIPP-SF was more age-neutral (6% DIF, only one of four domains showed DTF) than the PID-5-BF (25% DIF, all four tested domains had DTF) in a community sample of older and younger adults. Age differences in convergent validity also point in the direction of differences in underlying constructs. Concurrent and criterion validity in geriatric psychiatry inpatients suggest that both the SIPP-SF scales measuring levels of personality functioning (especially self-functioning) and the PID-5-BF might be useful screening measures in older adults despite age-neutrality not being confirmed.
Al-DajaniN.GralnickT. M.BagbyR. M. (2016). A psychometric review of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5): Current status and future directions. Journal of Personality Assessment, 98, 62-81.
2.
American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text rev.). Washington, DC: Author.
3.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013a). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington. VA: Author.
AndersonJ. M.SelbomM.SalekinR. T. (2016). Utility of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5: Brief form (PID-5-BF) in the measurement of maladaptive personality and psychopathology. Assessment. doi:10.1177/1073191116676889
6.
BachB.Maples-KellerJ. L.BoS.SimonsenE. (2015, December7). The alternative DSM-5 personality disorder traits criterion: A comparative examination of three self-report forms in a Danish population. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 7, 124-135. doi:10.1037/per0000162
7.
BachB.MarkonK.SimonsenE.KruegerR. F. (2015). Clinical utility of the DSM-5 alternative model of personality disorders: Six cases from practice. Journal of Psychiatric Practice, 21, 3-25.
8.
BalsisS.GleasonM. E.WoodsC. M.OltmannsT. F. (2007). An item response theory analysis of DSM-IV personality disorder criteria across younger and older age groups. Psychological Aging, 22, 171-185.
9.
BalsisS.SegalD. L.DonahueC. (2009). Revising the personality disorder diagnostic criteria for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders–Fifth Edition (DSM-5): Consider the later life context. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 79, 452-460.
10.
BenderD. SMoreyL. C.SkodolA. E. (2011). Toward a model for assessing level of personality functioning in DSM-5, part 1: A review of theory and methods. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93, 332-346.
11.
BerghuisH.KamphuisJ. H.VerheulR. (2014). Specific personality traits and general personality dysfunction as predictors of the presence and severity of personality disorders in a clinical sample. Journal of Personality Assessment, 96, 410-416.
12.
CamilliG.CongdonP. (1999). Application of a method of estimating DIF for polytomous test items. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 24, 323-341.
CohenJ. (2009). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15.
CooperL. D.BalsisS.OltmannsT. F. (2014). Aging: Empirical contribution a longitudinal analysis of personality disorder dimensions and personality traits in a community sample of older adults: Perspectives from selves and informants. Journal of Personality Disorders, 28, 151-165.
16.
CuthbertB. N.InselT. R. (2013). Toward the future of psychiatric diagnosis: The seven pillars of RDoC. BMC Medicine, 11, 126-134.
17.
DebastI.van AlphenS. P. J.RossiG.TummersJ. H. A.BolwerkN.DerksenJ. J. L.RosowskyE. (2014). Personality traits and personality disorders in late middle and old age: Do they remain stable? A literature review. Clinical Gerontologist, 37, 253-271.
DeVellisR. F. (2003). Scale development: Theory and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20.
EatonN. R.KruegerR. F.OltmannsT. F. (2011). Aging and the Structure and Long-Term Stability of the Internalizing Spectrum of Personality and Psychopathology. Psychology and Aging, 26, 987–993. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0024406
21.
FewL. R.MillerJ. D.RothbaumA. O.MellerS.MaplesJ.TerryD. P.. . . MacKillopJ. (2013). Examination of the Section III DSM-5 diagnostic system for personality disorders in an outpatient clinical sample. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 122, 1057-1069.
22.
FossatiA.SommaA.BorroniS.MaffeiC.MarkonK. E.KruegerR. F. (2015). A head-to-head comparison of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) with the personality diagnostic questionnaire–4 (PDQ-4) in predicting the general level of personality pathology among community dwelling subjects. Journal of Personality Disorders, 24, 1-13. doi:10.1521/pedi_2105_29_184
23.
HopwoodC. J.ZimmermannJ.PincusA. L.KruegerR. F. (2015). Connecting personality structure and dynamics: Towards a more evidence-based and clinically useful diagnostic scheme. Journal of Personality Disorders, 29, 431-448.
24.
KaganJ. (1969). The three faces of continuity in human development. In GoslinD. A. (Ed.), Handbook of socialization theory and research (pp. 53-65). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
25.
KruegerR. F. (2005). Continuity of axes I and II: Toward a unified model of personality, personality disorders, and clinical disorders. Journal of Personality Disorders, 19, 233-261.
26.
KruegerR. F.DerringerJ.MarkonK. E.WatsonD.SkodolA. E. (2012). Initial construction of a maladaptive personality trait model and inventory for DSM-5. Psychological Medicine, 42, 1879-1890.
27.
KruegerR. F.HopwoodC. J.WrightA. G. C.MarkonK. E. (2014). DSM-5 and the path toward empirically based and clinically useful conceptualization of personality and psychopathology. Clinical Psychological: Science and Practice, 21, 245-261.
28.
KruegerR. F.MarkonK. E. (2014). The role of the DSM-5 personality trait model in moving toward a quantitative and empirically based approach to classifying personality and psychopathology. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 10, 477-501.
29.
LiuI. M.AgrestiA. (1996). Mantel–Haenszel-type inference for cumulative odds ratio with a stratified ordinal response. Biometrics, 52, 1223-1234.
30.
MaplesJ. L.CarterN. T.FewL. R.CregoC.SamuelD. B.WilliamsonR. L.. . . MillerJ. D. (2015). Testing whether the DSM-5 personality disorder trait model can be measured with a reduced set of items: An item response theory investigation of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5. Psychological Assessment, 27, 1195-1210.
31.
MarkonK. E.QuiltyL. C.BagbyR. M.KruegerR. F. (2013). The development and psychometric properties of an informant-report form of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5). Assessment, 20, 370-383.
32.
MillsapR. E.EversonH. T. (1993). Methodology review: Statistical approaches for assessing measurement bias. Applied Psychological Measurement, 17, 297-334. doi:10.1177/014662169301700401
33.
MoreyL. C.BensonK. T. (2016). An investigation of adherence to diagnostic criteria, revisited: clinical diagnosis of the DSM-IV/DSM-5 Section II personality disorders. Journal of Personality Disorders, 30, 130-144. doi:10.1521/pedi_2015_29_188
34.
MoreyL. C.BensonK. T.BuschA. J.SkodolA. E. (2015). Personality disorders in DSM-5: Emerging research on the alternative model. Current Psychiatry Reports, 17, 558. doi:10.1007/s11920-015-0558-0
35.
MoreyL. C.BerghuisH.BenderD. S.VerheulR.KruegerR. F.SkodolA. E. (2011). Toward a model for assessing level of personality functioning in DSM-5, part II: Empirical articulation of a core dimension of personality pathology. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93, 347-353.
36.
MoreyL. C.SkodolA. E.OldhamJ. M. (2014). Clinician judgments of clinical utility: A comparison of DSM-IV-TR personality disorders and the alternative model for DSM-5 personality disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 123, 398-405.
37.
OltmannsT. F.BalsisS. (2011). Personality disorders in later life: Questions about the measurement, course, and impact of disorders. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 7, 321-349.
38.
OltmannsT. F.PowersA. D. (2012). Knowing our pathology. In VazireS.WilsonT. D. (Eds.), Handbook of self-knowledge (pp. 258-273). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
39.
PendersK. A. P.RossiG.MetsemakersJ. F. M.Duimel-PeetersI. G. P.van AlphenS. P. J. (2015). Diagnostic accuracy of the Gerontological Personality disorder Scale (GPS) in Dutch general practice. Aging & Mental Health, 20, 318-328. doi:10.1080/13607863.2015.1008989
40.
PenfieldR. D. (2007). DIFAS 4.0. Differential item functioning analysis system: User’s manual (Unpublished manuscript). School of Education, University of Miami, FL.
41.
PenfieldR. D. (2010). Distinguishing between net and global DIF in polytomous items. Journal of Educational Measurement, 47, 129-149.
42.
PenfieldR. D.AlginaJ. (2003). Applying the Liu–Agresti estimator of the cumulative common odds ratio to DIF detection in polytomous items. Journal of Educational Measurement, 40, 353-370.
43.
PenfieldR. D.AlginaJ. (2006). A generalized DIF effect variance estimator for measuring unsigned differential test functioning in mixed format tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 43, 295-312.
44.
Rodriguez-SeijasC.EatonN. R.KruegerR. F. (2015). How transdiagnostic factors of personality and psychopathology can inform clinical assessment and intervention. Journal of Personality Assessment, 97, 425-435.
45.
RossiG.DebastI.van AlphenS. P. J. (2017): Measuring personality functioning in older adults: Construct validity of the Severity Indices of Personality Functioning–Short Form (SIPP-SF). Aging & Mental Health, 21, 703-711.
46.
RossiG.Van den BroeckJ.DierckxE.SegalD. L.van AlpenS. P. J. (2014). Personality assessment among older adults: The value of personality questionnaires unraveled. Aging & Mental Health, 18, 936-940.
47.
SamuelD. B.HopwoodC. J.KruegerR. F.ThomasK. M.RuggeroC. J. (2013). Comparing methods for scoring personality disorder types using maladaptive traits in DSM-5. Assessment, 20, 353-361.
SuzukiT.SamuelD. B.PahlenS.KruegerR. F. (2015). DSM-5 alternative personality disorder model traits as maladaptive extreme variants of the five-factor model: An item-response theory analysis. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 124, 343-354.
50.
TackettJ. L.BalsisS.OltmannsT. F.KruegerR. F. (2009). A unifying perspective on personality pathology across the life span: Developmental considerations for the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Development and Psychopathology, 21, 687-713.
51.
van AlphenS. P. J. (2006). Diagnostiek van persoonlijkheidsstoornissen bij ouderen. Een bijdrage aan de ontwikkeling van een screeningsinstrument [Diagnosis of personality disorders in older adults. A contribution to the construction of a screening instrument] (Doctoral thesis). Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen, Nijmegen. Retrieved from http://repository.ubn.ru.nl/bitstream/handle/2066/27409/27409.pdf
52.
van AlphenS. P. J.RossiG.SegalD. L.RosowskyE. (2013). Issues regarding the proposed DSM-5 personality disorders in geriatric psychology and psychiatry. International Psychogeriatrics, 25, 1-5.
53.
van AlphenS. P. J.van DijkS. D. M.VidelerA. C.RossiG.DierckxE.BouckaertF.Oude VoshaarR. C. (2015). Personality disorders in older adults: Emerging research issues. Current Psychiatry Reports, 17, 538-544.
54.
Van den BroeckJ.BastiaansenL.RossiG.DierckxE.De ClercqB. (2013). Age-neutrality of the trait facets proposed for personality disorders in DSM-5: A DIFAS analysis of the PID-5. Journal of Psychopathological Behavior and Assessment, 35, 487-494.
55.
Van der HeijdenP. T.EggerJ. I. M.DerksenJ. J. L. (2010). Comparability of scores on the MMPI-2-RF scales generated with the MMPI-2 and MMPI-2-RF booklets. Journal of Personality Assessment, 92, 254-259.
56.
Van der HeijdenP. T.IngenhovenT.BerghuisH.RossiG. (2014). DSM-5 persoonlijkheidsvragenlijst: PID-5-NL [DSM-5 personality inventory. Dutch translation of The Personality Inventory for DSM-5® (PID-5)–Adult, 2011 (American Psychiatric Association)]. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Boom.
57.
VerheulR.AndreaH.BerghoutC. C.DolanC.BusschbachJ. J.van der KroftP. J.. . . FonagyP. (2008). Severity Indices of Personality Problems (SIPP-118): Development, factor structure, reliability, and validity. Psychological Assessment, 20, 23-34. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.20.1.23
58.
WaughM. H.HopwoodC. J.KruegerR. F.MoreyL. C.PincusA. L.WrightA. G. C. (2017). Psychological assessment with the DSM-5 Alternative Model for Personality Disorders: Tradition and innovation. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 48, 79-89.
59.
WidigerT. A.SimonsenE.KruegerR.LivesleyJ. W.VerheulR. (2005). Personality disorder research agenda for the DSM-5. Journal of Personality Disorders, 19, 315-338.
60.
ZimmermannJ.BöhnkeJ. R.EschstruthR.MathewsA.WenzelK.LeisingD. (2015). The latent structure of personality functioning: Investigating Criterion A from the Alternative Model for Personality Disorders in DSM-5. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 124, 532-548.
61.
ZumboB. D. (1999). A handbook on the theory and methods of differential item functioning (DIF): Logistic regression modeling as a unitary framework for binary and Likert-type (ordinal) item scores. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Directorate of Human Resources Research and Evaluation, Department of National Defense.
62.
ZwickR.ThayerD. T.MazzeoJ. (1997). Descriptive and inferential procedures for assessing differential item functioning in polytomous items. Applied Measurement in Education, 10, 321-334.
