In this study, the predictive and incremental validity of the Stable-2007 beyond the Static-99 was evaluated in an updated sample of N = 638 adult male sexual offenders followed-up for an average of M = 8.2 years. Data were collected at the Federal Evaluation Center for Violent and Sexual Offenders (FECVSO) in Austria within a prospective-longitudinal research design. Scores and risk categories of the Static-99 (AUC = .721; p < .001) and of the Stable-2007 (AUC = .623, p = .005) were found to be significantly related to sexual recidivism. The Stable-2007 risk categories contributed incrementally to the prediction of sexual recidivism beyond the Static-99. Analyzing the dimensional structure of the Stable-2007 yielded three factors, named Antisociality, Sexual Deviance, and Hypersexuality. Antisociality and Sexual Deviance were significant predictors for sexual recidivism. Sexual Deviance was negatively associated with non-sexual violent recidivism. Comparisons with latent dimensions of other risk assessment instruments are made and implications for applied risk assessment are discussed.
AndersonD.HansonR. K. (2010). An actuarial tool to assess risk of sexual and violent recidivism among sexual offenders. In OttoR. K.DouglasK. S. (Eds.), Handbook of violence risk assessment (pp. 251-267). New York, NY: Routledge.
2.
AndrewsD. A.BontaJ. (2000). The Level of Service Inventory–Revised. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Multi-Health Systems.
3.
AndrewsD. A.BontaJ.WormithJ. S. (2006). The recent past and near future of risk and/or need assessment. Crime & Delinquency, 52, 7-27. doi:10.1177/0011128705281756
4.
BarbareeH. E.SetoM. C.LangtonC. M.PeacockE. J. (2001). Evaluating the predictive accuracy of six risk assessment instruments for adult sex offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 28, 490-521. doi:10.1177/009385480102800406
5.
BartoshD. L.GarbyT.LewisD.GrayS. (2003). Differences in the predictive validity of actuarial risk assessments in relation to sex offender type. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 47, 422-438. doi:10.1177/0306624X03253850
6.
BeechA. R.WardT. (2004). The integration of etiology and risk in sexual offenders: A theoretical framework. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 10, 31-63. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2003.08.002
7.
BoccacciniM. T.MurrieD. C.MercadoC.QuesadaS.HawesS.RiceA. K.JeglicE. L. (2012). Implications of Static-99 field reliability findings for score use and reporting. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 39, 42-58. doi:10.1177/0093854811427131
8.
BoerD. P.HartS. D. (2009). Sex offender risk assessment: Research, evaluation, “best-practice” recommendations and future directions. In IrelandJ. L.IrelandC. A.BirchP. (Eds.), Violent and sexual offenders: Assessment, treatment and management (pp. 27-42). London, England: Routledge.
9.
Brouillette-AlarieS.BabchishinK. M.HansonR. K.HelmusL.-M. (2016). Latent constructs of the Static-99R and Static-2002R: A three-factor solution. Assessment, 23, 96-111. doi:10.1177/1073191114568114
10.
Brouillette-AlarieS.HansonR. K. (2015). Comparaison de deux mesures d’évaluation du risque de récidive des délinquants sexuels [Comparison of two measures for assessing the risk of sex offender recidivism]. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement, 47, 292-304. doi:10.1037/cbs0000019
DawesR. M.FaustD.MeehlP. E. (1989). Clinical versus actuarial judgment. Science, 243, 1668-1674. doi:10.1126/science.2648573
13.
DeLongE. R.DeLongD. M.Clarke-PearsonD. L. (1988). Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: A nonparametric approach. Biometrics, 44, 837-845. doi:10.2307/2531595
14.
DorenD. M. (2004). Toward a multidimensional model for sexual recidivism risk. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19, 835-856. doi:10.1177/0886260504266882
15.
DouglasK. S.SkeemJ. L. (2005). Violence risk assessment: Getting specific about being dynamic. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 11, 347-383. doi:10.1037/1076-8971.11.3.347
16.
DucroC.PhamT. (2006). Evaluation of the SORAG and the Static-99 on Belgian sex offenders committed to a forensic facility. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 18, 15-26. doi:10.1007/s11194-006-9003-6
17.
EdensJ. F.BoccacciniM. T. (2017). Taking forensic mental health assessment “out of the lab” and into “the real world”: Introduction to the special issue on the field utility of forensic assessment instruments and procedures. Psychological Assessment, 29, 599-610. doi:10.1037/pas0000475
18.
EherR.Haubner-MacLeanT. (2014). Static-99 und Stable-2007: Anwenderhandbuch und Normwerttabellen [Static-99 and Stable-2007: User’s manual and norm data]. Wien, Austria: Begutachtungs- und Evaluationsstelle für Gewalt- und Sexualstraftäter (BEST).
19.
EherR.MatthesA.SchillingF.Haubner-MacLeanT.RettenbergerM. (2012). Dynamic risk assessment in sexual offenders using STABLE-2000 and the STABLE-2007: An investigation of predictive and incremental validity. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 24, 5-28. doi:10.1177/1079063211403164
20.
EherR.NeuwirthW.FruehwaldS.FrottierP. (2003). Sexualization and lifestyle impulsivity: Clinically valid discriminators in sexual offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 47, 452-467. doi:10.1177/0306624X03253844
21.
EherR.RettenbergerM.GaunersdorferK.Haubner-MacLeanT.MatthesA.SchillingF.MokrosA. (2013). Über die Treffsicherheit der standardisierten Risikoeinschätzungsverfahren Static-99 und Stable-2007 bei aus einer Sicherungsmaßnahme entlassenen Sexualstraftätern. [On the accuracy of the standardized risk assessment procedures Static-99 and Stable-2007 for sexual offenders released from detention]. Forensische Psychiatrie, Psychologie, Kriminologie, 7, 264-272. doi:10.1007/s11757-013-0212-9
22.
EherR.RettenbergerM.SchillingF. (2010). Psychiatrische Diagnosen von Sexualstraftätern [Psychiatric diagnoses of sexual offenders]. Zeitschrift für Sexualforschung, 23, 23-35. doi:10.1055/s-0030-1247274
23.
EherR.RettenbergerM.SchillingF.PfäfflinF. (2008). Failure of Static-99 and SORAG to predict relevant reoffense categories in relevant sexual offender subtypes: A prospective study. Sexual Offender Treatment, 3, 1-14. Retrieved from http://www.sexual-offender-treatment.org/1-2008_02.html
24.
EndrassJ.UrbaniokF.HeldL.VetterS.RosseggerA. (2009). Accuracy of the Static-99 in predicting recidivism in Switzerland. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 53, 482-490. doi:10.1177/0306624X07312952
25.
European Parliament. (2011). Directive 2011/92/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2011 on combating the sexual abuse and sexual exploitation of children and child pornography, and replacing Council Framework Decision 2004/68/JHA. Official Journal of the European Union, L 335. Retrieved from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2011:335:TOC
26.
FergusonG. A. (1976). Statistical analysis in psychology and education (4th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
27.
FirestoneP.BradfordJ. M.Greenberg DavidM.SerranG. A. (2000). The relationship of deviant sexual arousal and psychopathy in incest offenders, extrafamilial child molesters and rapists. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 28, 303-308.
28.
FleissJ. L. (1981). Statistical methods for rates and proportions (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.
29.
FloresA. W.HolsingerA. M.LowenkampC. T.CohenT. H. (2017). Time-free effects in predicting recidivism using both fixed and variable follow-up periods. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 44, 121-137. doi:10.1177/0093854816678649
30.
GroveW. M.MeehlP. E. (1996). Comparative efficiency of informal (subjective, impressionistic) and formal (mechanical, algorithmic) prediction procedures: The clinical–statistical controversy. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 2, 293-323. doi:10.1037/1076-8971.2.2.293
31.
GroveW. M.ZaldD. H.LebowB. S.SnitzB. E.NelsonC. (2000). Clinical versus mechanical prediction: A meta-analysis. Psychological Assessment, 12, 19-30. doi:10.1037//1040-3590.12.1.19
32.
HanczarB.HuaJ.SimaC.WeinsteinJ.BittnerM.DoughertyE. R. (2010). Small-sample precision of ROC-related estimates. Bioinformatics, 26, 822-830. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btq037
33.
HansonR. K. (2017). Assessing the calibration of actuarial risk scales. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 44, 26-39. doi:10.1177/0093854816683956
34.
HansonR. K.BussiereM. T. (1998). Predicting relapse: A meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 348-362.
35.
HansonR. K.HarrisA. J. R. (2000). Where should we intervene? Dynamic predictors of sexual offense recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 27, 6-35. doi:10.1177/0093854800027001002
36.
HansonR. K.HarrisA. J. R. (2001). A structured approach to evaluating change among sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 13, 105-122. doi:10.1023/A:1026600304489
37.
HansonR. K.HarrisA. J. R.HelmusL. M.ThorntonD. (2014). High-risk sex offenders may not be high risk forever. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 29, 2792-2813. doi:10.1177/0886260514526062
38.
HansonR. K.HarrisA. J. R.ScottT.-L.HelmusL. (2007). Assessing the risk of sexual offenders on community supervision (User Report No. 2007-05). Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness Canada.
39.
HansonR. K.HelmusL. M.HarrisA. J. R. (2015). Assessing the risk and needs of supervised sexual offenders: A prospective study using STABLE-2007, Static-99R, and Static-2002R. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 42, 1205-1224. doi:10.1177/0093854815602094
40.
HansonR. K.Morton-BourgonK. E. (2004). Predictors of sexual recidivism: An updated meta-analysis (User Report No. 2004-02). Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness Canada.
41.
HansonR. K.Morton-BourgonK. E. (2005). The characteristics of persistent sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 1154-1163. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.73.6.1154
42.
HansonR. K.Morton-BourgonK. E. (2009). The accuracy of recidivism risk assessments for sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of 118 prediction studies. Psychological Assessment, 21, 1-21. doi:10.1037/a0014421
43.
HansonR. K.ThorntonD. (2000). Improving risk assessments for sex offenders: A comparison of three actuarial scales. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 119-136. doi:10.1023/A:1005482921333
HarrisG. T.LalumièreM. L.SetoM. C.RiceM. E.ChaplinT. C. (2012). Explaining the erectile responses of rapists to rape stories: The contributions of sexual activity, non-consent, and violence with injury. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 221-229. doi:10.1007/s10508-012-9940-8
46.
HartS. D.BoerD. P. (2010). Structured professional judgment guidelines for sexual violence risk assessment: The Sexual Violence Risk-20 (SVR-20) and Risk for Sexual Violence Protocol (RSVP). In OttoR. K.DouglasK. S. (Eds.), Handbook of violence risk assessment (pp. 269-294). New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis.
47.
HelmusL. M.BabchishinK. M. (2017). Primer on risk assessment and the statistics used to evaluate its accuracy. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 44, 8-25. doi:10.1177/0093854816678898
48.
HelmusL. M.HansonR. K.ThorntonD.BabchishinK. M.HarrisA. J. R. (2012). Absolute recidivism rates predicted by STATIC-99R and STATIC-2002R sex offender risk assessment tools vary across samples: A meta-analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 39, 1148-1171. doi:10.1177/0093854812443648
49.
HelmusL. M.ThorntonD.HansonR. K.BabchishinK. M. (2012). Improving the predictive accuracy of STATIC-99 and STATIC-2002 with older sex offenders: Revised age weights. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 24, 64-101. doi:10.1177/1079063211409951
50.
HensonR. K.RobertsJ. K. (2006). Use of exploratory factor analysis in published research: Common errors and some comment on improved practice. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66, 393-416.
51.
HornJ. L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30, 179-185.
52.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
53.
JacksonR. L.HessD. T. (2007). Evaluation for civil commitment of sex offenders: A survey of experts. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 19, 425-448. doi:10.1007/s11194-007-9062-3
54.
KafkaM. P. (2010). Hypersexual disorder: A proposed diagnosis for DSM-V. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 377-400. doi:10.1007/s10508-009-9574-7
55.
KaiserH. F. (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 141-151.
56.
KelleyS. M.BarahalR. M.ThorntonD.OlsonG. (2015). How do professionals assess sexual recidivism risk? An international survey of current practices. Paper presented at the conference of the Massachusetts Adolescent Sex Offender Coalition, Marlborough, MA.
57.
KubingerK. D. (2003). On artificial results due to using factor analysis for dichotomous variables. Psychology Science, 45, 106-110.
58.
LangtonC. M.BarbareeH. E.HansenK. T.HarkinsL.PeacockE. J. (2007). Reliability and validity of the Static-2002 among adult sexual offenders with reference to treatment status. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 616-640. doi:10.1177/0093854806296851
59.
LoboJ. M.Jiménez-ValverdeA.RealR. (2008). AUC: A misleading measure of the performance of predictive distribution models. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 17, 145-151. doi:10.1111/j.1466-8238.2007.00358.x
60.
LoomanJ.AbracenJ. (2012). Long-term follow-up of two groups of sex offenders. Paper presented at the Annual Research and Treatment Conference of the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers, Denver, CO.
61.
MannR. E.HansonR. K.ThorntonD. (2010). Assessing risk for sexual recidivism: Some proposals on the nature of psychologically meaningful risk factors. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 22, 191-217. doi:10.1177/1079063210366039
62.
MartensR.RettenbergerM.EherR. (2017). The predictive and incremental validity of the German adaptation of the Static-2002 in a sexual offender sample released from the prison system. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 22, 164-179. doi:10.1111/lcrp.12080
63.
McGrathR. J.CummingG. F.BurchardB. L.ZeoliS.EllerbyL. (2009). Current practices and emerging trends in sexual abuser management: The Safer Society 2009 North American Survey (Vol. 24). Brandon, VT: Safer Society Press.
64.
McGrathR. J.LasherM. P.CummingG. F. (2012). The Sex Offender Treatment Intervention and Progress Scale (SOTIPS): Psychometric properties and incremental predictive validity with Static-99R. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 24, 431-458. doi:10.1177/1079063211432475
65.
McGrawK. O.WongS. P. (1996). Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychological Methods, 1, 30-46. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.1.1.30
66.
MeehlP. E. (1954). Clinical versus statistical prediction: A theoretical analysis and a review of the evidence. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
67.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (2007-2010). Mplus version 7 user’s guide. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
68.
OlverM. E.WongS. C. P.NicholaichukT.GordonA. (2007). The validity and reliability of the Violence Risk Scale-Sexual Offender version: Assessing sex offender risk and evaluating therapeutic change. Psychological Assessment, 19, 318-329. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.19.3.318
69.
QuinseyV. L.HarrisG. T.RiceM. E.CormierC. A. (2006). Violent offenders: Appraising and managing risk (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
70.
RettenbergerM.BrikenP.TurnerD.EherR. (2015). Sexual offender recidivism among a population-based prison sample. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 59, 424-444. doi:10.1177/0306624X13516732
71.
RettenbergerM.Haubner-MacLeanT.EherR. (2013). The contribution of age to the STATIC-99 risk assessment in a population-based prison sample of sexual offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 40, 1413-1433. doi:10.1177/0093854813492518
72.
RettenbergerM.MatthesA.BoerD. P.EherR. (2010). Prospective actuarial risk assessment: A comparison of five risk assessment instruments in different sexual offender subtypes. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 54, 169-186. doi:10.1177/0306624X08328755
73.
RettenbergerM.MatthesA.SchillingF.EherR. (2011). Die Validität dynamisch-veränderbarer Risikofaktoren bei der Vorhersage einschlägiger Rückfälle pädosexueller Straftäter—Eine Studie über Stable-2000 und Stable-2007 [The validity of dynamic and changeable risk factors for the prediction of sexual recidivism in a sample of pedosexual offenders—A study of Stable-2000 and Stable-2007]. Forensische Psychiatrie, Psychologie, Kriminologie, 5, 45-53. doi:10.1007/s11757-010-0086-z
74.
RettenbergerM.CraigL. A. (2017). Actuarial risk assessment of sexual offenders. In: CraigL. A.RettenbergerM. (Eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell Handbook on the Theories, Assessment, and Treatment of Sexual Offending – Volume II: Assessment (pp. 609-641). Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
75.
RiceM. E.HarrisG. T. (2005). Comparing effect sizes in follow-up studies: ROC area, Cohen’s d, and r. Law and Human Behavior, 29, 615-620. doi:10.1007/s10979-005-6832-7
76.
RockhillB.ByrneC.RosnerB.LouieM. M.ColditzG. (2003). Breast cancer risk prediction with a log-incidence model: Evaluation of accuracy. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 56, 856-861. doi:10.1016/S0895-4356(03)00124-0
SetoM. C. (2005). Is more better? Combining actuarial risk scales to predict recidivism among adult sex offenders. Psychological Assessment, 17, 156-167. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.17.2.156
79.
SjöstedtG.LångströmN. (2001). Actuarial assessment of sex offender recidivism risk: A cross-validation of the RRASOR and the Static-99 in Sweden. Law and Human Behavior, 25, 629-654. doi:10.1023/A:1012758307983
80.
SowdenJ. N.OlverM. E. (2017). Use of the Violence Risk Scale–Sexual Offender Version and the Stable 2007 to assess dynamic sexual violence risk in a sample of treated sexual offenders. Psychological Assessment, 29, 293-303. doi:10.1037/pas0000345
81.
StevensJ. P. (2012). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (5th ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
82.
TabachnickB. G.FidellL. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
83.
ThorntonD. (2002). Constructing and testing a framework for dynamic risk assessment. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 14, 139-153. doi:10.1177/107906320201400205
84.
VelicerW. F. (1976). Determining the number of components from the matrix of partial correlations. Psychometrika, 41, 321-327. doi:10.1007/BF02293557
85.
ViallonV.RagusaS.Clavel-ChapelonF.BénichouJ. (2009). How to evaluate the calibration of a disease risk prediction tool. Statistics in Medicine, 28, 901-916. doi:10.1002/sim.3517
86.
WaltersG. D.DemingA.ElliottW. N. (2009). Assessing criminal thinking in male sex offenders with the psychological inventory of criminal thinking styles. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36, 1025-1036. doi:10.1177/0093854809342200
87.
WongS.OlverM. E.NicholaichukT. P.GordonA. (2003). The Violence Risk Scale: Sexual Offender version (VRS-SO). Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada: Regional Psychiatric Centre and University of Saskatchewan.
