Personality Inventory for DSM-5 –Short Form (PID-5-SF): Reliability,Factorial Structure,and Relationship With Functional Impairment in Dual Diagnosis Patients

Abstract

Section III of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders–Fifth edition (DSM-5) has generated a personality paradigm consisting of 25 personality facets identified in five domains. The developed assessment instrument Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) has showed good psychometric properties, but the potential for certain improvements still remain. In this article, a sample of 282 dual diagnosis patients is used to provide evidence of the psychometric properties of the PID-5–Short Form. The mean value of Cronbach’s alpha coefficients reached .73 on the facets and .84 for domains and test–retest values ranged between .57 to .83 for facets and .70 to .87 for the domains. Confirmatory factor analyses conducted showed good fit on both models tested: the five correlated factor structure and hierarchical structure of personality traits. The WHODAS 2.0 domains of understanding and communicating, and participating in society, appear to show the strongest relationship with personality facets. In general, the PID-5–Short Form shows adequate psychometric properties for use in dual diagnosis patients.

Keywords

PID-5 personality disorders reliability validity evidence dual disorders

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Al-Dajani

Gralnick

T. M.

Bagby

R. M.

(2015). A psychometric review of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5): Current status and future directions. Journal of Personality Assessment. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/00223891.2015.1107572

American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (2014). The standards for educational and psychological testing. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/science/programs/testing/standards.aspx

American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlinton, VA.

Anderson

J. L.

Sellbom

Ayearst

Quilty

L. C.

Chmielewski

Bagby

R. M.

(2015). Associations between DSM-5 Section III personality traits and the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory 2-Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF) scales in a psychiatric patient sample. Psychological Assessment, 27, 801-815. doi:10.1037/pas0000096

Anderson

J. L.

Sellbom

Bagby

R. M.

Quilty

L. C.

Veltri

C. O.

Markon

K. E.

Krueger

R. F.

(2013). On the convergence between PSY-5 domains and PID-5 domains and facets implications for assessment of DSM-5 personality traits. Assessment, 20, 286-294.

Anderson

J. L.

Sellbom

Salekin

(2016). Utility of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5–Brief form (PID-5-BF) in the measurement of maladaptive personality and psychopathology. Assessment, 29, 1-12. doi:10.1177/1073191116676889

Ashton

M. C.

Lee

de Vries

R. E.

Hendrickse

Born

M. P.

(2012). The maladaptive personality traits of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) in relation to the HEXACO personality factors and schizotypy/dissociation. Journal of Personality Disorders, 26, 641-659.

Bach

Maples

Simonsen

(2016). The alternative DSM-5 personality disorder traits criterion: A comparative examination of the three self-report forms in a Danish population. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 2, 124-135. doi:10.1037/per0000162

Bach

Sellbom

Simonsen

(2017). Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) in clinical versus nonclinical individuals: Generalizability of psychometric features. Assessment. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1073191117709070

10.

Bagby

R. M.

Sellbom

Ayearst

L. E.

Chmielewski

M. S.

Anderson

J. L.

Quilty

L. C.

(2014). Exploring the hierarchical structure of the MMPI–2–RF personality psychopathology five in psychiatric patient and university student samples. Journal of Personality Assessment, 96, 166-172. doi:10.1080/00223891.2013.825623

11.

Bastiaens

Claes

Smits

De Clercq

De Fruyt

Rossi

. . . DeHert

(2016). The construct validity of the Dutch Personality Inventory for DSM-5 personality disorders (PID-5) in a clinical sample. Assessment, 23, 42-51. doi:10.1177/107319111557506

12.

Bentler

P. M.

(1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238-246.

13.

Bach

Mortensen

E. L.

Simonsen

(2015). Reliability and hierarchical structure of DSM-5 pathological traits in a Danish mixed sample. Journal of Personality Disorders. Advance online publication. doi:10.1521/pedi_2015_29_187

14.

Bollen

K. A.

Long

J. S.

(1992). Tests for structural equation models: Introduction. Sociological Methods & Research, 21(2), 123-131.

15.

Brady

K. T.

Sinha

(2005). Co-occurring mental and substance use disorders: The neurobiological effects of chronic stress. American Journal of Psychiatry, 162, 1483-1493.

16.

Clark

L. A.

(2005). Temperament as a unifying basis for personality and psychopathology. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 114, 505-521.

17.

Combaluzier

Gouvernet

Menant

Rezrazi

(2016). Validation d’une version française de la forme brève de l’inventaire des troubles de la personnalité pour le DSM-5 (PID-5 BF) de Krueger [Validation of a French translation of Krueger’s Personality Inventory for DSM-5 in its brief form (PID-5 BF)]. L’Encéphale. Advance online publication. doi:10.1016/j.encep.2016.07.006

18.

De Clercq

De Fruyt

De Bolle

Van Hiel

Markon

K. E.

Krueger

R. F

. (2014). The hierarchical structure and construct validity of the PID-5 trait measure in adolescence. Journal of Personality, 82, 158-169. doi:10.1111/jopy.12042

19.

De Fruyt

De Clercq

De Bolle

Wille

Markon

Krueger

R. F

. (2013). General and maladaptive traits in a five-factor framework for DSM-5 in a university student sample. Assessment, 20, 295-307. doi:10.1177/1073191113475808

20.

Dhillon

Bagby

R. M.

(2015). The internal and one-week retest reliability of the PID–5 domains and facets. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Psychology, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

21.

Dorans

N. J.

Walker

M. E.

(2007). Sizing up linkages. In Dorans

N. J.

Pommerich

Holland

P. W.

(Eds.), Linking and aligning scores and scales (pp. 179-198). New York, NY: Springer.

22.

Federici

Meloni

Lo Presti

(2009). International literature review on WODAS II. Life Span and Disability, 12(1), 83-110.

23.

Ferrando

Bobes

Gibert

Soto

(2000). 1.1 MINI Entrevista Neuropsiquiátrica Internacional [MINI International Neuropsychiatric Interview]. Madrid, Spain: Instituto IAP.

24.

Few

L. R.

Miller

J. D.

Rothbaum

A. O.

Meller

Maples

Terry

D. P.

. . . MacKillop

(2013). Examination of the Section III DSM-5 diagnostic system for personality disorders in an outpatient clinical sample. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 122, 1057-1069. doi:10.1037/a0034878

25.

Fossati

Krueger

R. F.

Markon

K. E.

Borroni

Maffei

(2013). Reliability and validity of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5): Predicting DSM-IV personality disorders and psychopathy in community-dwelling Italian adults. Assessment, 20, 689-708. doi:10.1177/1073191113504984

26.

Fossati

Somma

Borroni

Markon

K. E.

Krueger

R. F.

(2017). The Personality Inventory for DSM-5 Brief Form: Evidence for reliability and construct validity in a sample of community-dwelling Italian adolescents. Assessment, 24, 615-631. doi:10:1177/107319/1115621793

27.

Gore

W. L.

Widiger

T. A.

(2013). The DSM-5 dimensional trait model and five-factor models of general personality. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 122, 816-821. doi:10.1037./a0032822

28.

Griffin

S. A.

Samuel

D. B.

(2014). A closer look at the lower-order structure of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5: Comparison with the Five-Factor Model. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 5, 406-412. doi:10.1037/per0000074

29.

Gutiérrez

Aluja

Peri

J. M.

Calvo

Ferrer

Baillés

. . . Krueger

R. F.

(2017). Psychometric properties of the Spanish PID-D in a clinical and a community sample. Assessment, 24, 326-336. doi:10.1177/1073191115606518

30.

Hopwood

C. J.

Sellbom

(2013). Implications of DSM-5 personality traits for forensic psychology. Psychological Injury and Law, 6(4), 314-323. doi: 10.1007/s12207-013-9176-5

31.

Hopwood

C. J.

Wright

A. G.

Krueger

R. F.

Schade

Markon

K. E.

Morey

L. C.

(2013). DSM-5 pathological personality traits and the Personality Assessment Inventory. Assessment, 20, 269-285. doi:10.1177/1073191113486286

32.

L. T.

Bentler

P. M.

(1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.

33.

Javaras

K. N.

Zanarini

M. C.

Hudson

J. I.

Greenfield

S. F.

Gunderson

J. G.

(2017). Functional outcomes in community-based adults with borderline personality disorder. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 89, 105-114. doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2017.01.010

34.

Keeley

J. W.

Flanagan

E. H.

McCluskey

D. L.

(2014). Functional impairment and the DSM-5 dimensional system for personality disorder. Journal of Personality Disorders, 28, 657-674.

35.

Krueger

R. F.

Derringer

Markon

Watson

Skodol

A. E.

(2012). Initial construction of a maladaptative personality trait model and inventory for DSM-5. Psychological Medicine, 42, 1879-1890. doi:10.1017/S0033291711002674

36.

Krueger

R. F.

Markon

K. E.

(2006). Reinterpreting comorbidity: A model-based approach to understanding and classifying psychopathology. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 2, 111-133. doi:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.2.022305.095213

37.

Krueger

R. F.

Markon

K. E.

(2014). The role of the DSM-5 personality trait model in moving toward a quantitative and empirically based approach to classifying personality and psychopathology. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 10, 477-501. doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032813-153732

38.

Krueger

R. F.

McGue

Iacono

W. G.

(2001). The higher-order structure of common DSM mental disorders: Internalization, externalization, and their connections to personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 1245-1259. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00106-9

39.

Lorenzo-Seva

ten Berge

J. M.

(2006). Tucker’s congruence coefficient as a meaningful index of factor similarity. Methodology, 2(2), 57-64.

40.

Lozano

O. M.

Rojas

A. J.

Fernández-Calderón

(2017). Psychiatric comorbidity and severity of dependece on substance users: How it impacts on their health-related quality of life? Journal of Mental Health, 26(2), 119-126. doi: 10.1080/09638237.2016.1177771

41.

Maples

J. L.

Carter

N. T.

Few

L. R.

Crego

Gore

W. L.

Samuel

D. B.

. . . Krueger

R. F.

(2015). Testing whether the DSM-5 personality disorder trait model can be measured with a reduced set of items: An item response theory investigation of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5. Psychological Assessment, 27, 1195-1210. doi:10.1037/pas0000120

42.

Markon

K. E.

Krueger

R. F.

Watson

(2005). Delineating the structure of normal and abnormal personality: An integrative hierarchical approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 139-157. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.1.139

43.

Morey

L. C.

Benson

K. T.

Busch

A. J.

Skodol

A. E.

(2015). Personality disorders in DSM-5: Emerging research on the alternative model. Current Psychiatry Reports, 17(4), 1-9. doi:10.1007/s11920.015.0558-0

44.

Morey

L. C.

Krueger

R. F.

Skodol

A. E.

(2013). The hierarchical structure of clinician ratings of proposed DSM-5 pathological personality traits. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 122, 836-841.

45.

Mullins-Sweatt

S. N.

Widiger

T. A.

(2009). Clinical utility and DSM-5. Psychological Assessment, 21, 302-312. doi:10.1037/a0016607

46.

Muthén

Asparouhov

(2011). Beyond multilevel regression modeling: Multilevel analysis in a general latent variable framework. In Hox

Roberts

J. K.

(Eds.), Handbook of advanced multilevel analysis (pp. 15-40). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.

47.

Nunnally

J. C.

Bernstein

I. H.

(1994). The assessment of reliability. Psychometric Theory, 3, 248-292.

48.

Quello

S. B.

Brady

K. T.

Sonne

S. C.

(2005). Mood disorders and substance use disorder: A complex comorbidity. Science & Practice Perspectives, 3(1), 13-21.

49.

Quilty

L. C.

Ayearst

Chmielewski

Pollock

B. G.

Bagby

R. M.

(2013). The psychometric properties of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 in an APA DSM-5 field trial sample. Assessment, 20, 362-369. doi:10.1177/1073191113486183

50.

Ready

R. E.

Watson

Clark

L. A.

(2002). Psychiatric patient– and informant-reported personality: Predicting concurrent and future behavior. Assessment, 9, 361-372. doi:10.1177/1073191102238157

51.

Riegel

K. D.

Preiss

Ksinan

Michalec

Samánková

Harsa

(2017). Psychometric properties of the Czech version of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5: Internal consistency, validity and discrimination capacity of the measure. Ceskoslovenska Psychologie, 61, 128-143.

52.

Roskam

Galdiolo

Hansenne

Massoudi

Rossier

Gicquel

Rolland

J. P.

(2015). The psychometric properties of the French version of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5. PLoS ONE, 10, e0133413. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0133413

53.

Samuel

D. B.

Hopwood

C. J.

Krueger

R. F.

Thomas

K. M.

Ruggero

C. J.

(2013). Comparing methods for scoring personality disorder types using maladaptive traits in DSM-5. Assessment, 20, 353-361. doi:10.1177/1073191113486182

54.

Sellbom

Anderson

J. L.

Bagby

R. M.

(2013). Assessing DSM-5 Section III personality traits and disorders with the MMPI-2-RF. Assessment, 20, 709-722. doi:10.1177/1073191113508808

55.

Sheehan

D. V.

Lecrubier

Sheehan

K. H.

Amorim

Janavs

Weiller

. . . Dunbar

G. C.

(1998). The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI): The development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 59(20), 22-33.

56.

Skodol

A. E.

(2012). Personality disorders in DSM-5. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 8, 317-344.

57.

Streiner

D. L.

(2003). Starting at the beginning: An introduction to coefficient alpha and internal consistency. Journal of Personality Assessment, 80, 99-103.

58.

Strickland

C. M.

Drislane

L. E.

Lucy

Krueger

R. F.

Patrick

C. J.

(2013). Characterizing psychopathy using DSM-5 personality traits. Assessment, 20, 327-338. doi:10.1177/1073191113486691

59.

Suzuki

Samuel

D. B.

Pahlen

Krueger

R. F.

(2015). DSM-5 alternative personality disorder model traits as maladaptive extreme variants of the five-factor model: An item-response theory analysis. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 124, 343-354. doi:10.1037/abn0000035

60.

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2009). Results from the 2005 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: National findings (Office of Applied Statistics, NSDUH Series H-34). Rockville, MD.

61.

Thimm

J. C.

Jordan

Bach

(2016a). Hierarchical structure and cross-cultural measurement invariance of the Norwegian version of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5. Journal of Personality Assessment, 99, 204-210. doi:10.1080/00223891.2016.1223682

62.

Thimm

J. C.

Jordan

Bach

(2016b). The Personality Inventory for DSM-5 Short Form (PID-5-SF): Psychometric properties and association with Big Five traits and pathological beliefs in a Norwegian population. BMC Psychology, 4, 61. doi:10.1186/s40359-016-0169-5

63.

Thomas

K. M.

Yalch

M. M.

Krueger

R. F.

Wright

A. G.

Markon

K. E.

Hopwood

C. J.

(2013). The convergent structure of DSM-5 personality trait facets and five-factor model trait domains. Assessment, 20, 308-311. doi:10.1177/1073191112457589

64.

Üstün

T. B.

Chatterji

Kostanjsek

Rehm

Kennedy

Epping-Jordan

… Pull

(2010). Developing the World Health Organization disability assessment schedule 2.0. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 88(11), 815-823. doi: 10.1590/S0042-96862010001100010

65.

Van den Broeck

Bastiaansen

Rossi

Dierckx

De Clercq

. (2013). Age-neutrality of the trait facets proposed for personality disorders in DSM-5: A DIFAS analysis of the PID-5. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 35, 487-494.

66.

Van den Broeck

Bastiaansen

Rossi

Dierckx

De Clercq

Hofmans

. (2014). Hierarchical structure of maladaptive personality traits in older adults: Joint factor analysis of the PID-5 and the DAPP-BQ. Journal of Personality Disorders, 28, 198-211.

67.

Vélez-Moreno

Rojas

A. J.

Rivera

Fernández-Calderón

Torrico-Linares

Ramírez-López

. . . Lozano

O. M.

(2017). The impact of personality disorders and severity of dependence in psychosocial problems. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 15(5), 1008-1022. doi: 10.1007/s11469-016-9696-9

68.

Verheul

Widiger

T. A.

(2004). A meta-analysis of the prevalence and usage of the personality disorder not otherwise specified (PDNOS) diagnosis. Journal of Personality Disorders, 18, 309-319. doi:10.1521/pedi.2004.18.4.309

69.

Watson

Stasik

S. M.

Clark

L. A.

(2013). Integrating normal and pathological personality: Relating the DSM-5 trait-dimensional model to general traits of personality. Assessment, 20, 312-326.

70.

Weaver

Madden

Charles

Stimson

Renton

Tyrer

. . . Ford

(2003). Comorbidity of substance misuse and mental illness in community mental health and substance misuse services. British Journal of Psychiatry, 183, 304-313. doi:10.1192/bjp.183.4.304

71.

Widiger

T. A.

Samuel

D. B.

(2005). Diagnostic categories or dimensions? A question for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders–Fifth edition. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 114, 494-504. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.114.4.494

72.

Widiger

T. A.

Trull

T. J.

(2007). Plate tectonics in the classification of personality disorder: Shifting to a dimensional model. American Psychologist, 62, 71-83. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.62.2.71

73.

World Health Organization (WHO). (2010). Measuring health and disability: Manual for WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0). Malta: WHO Press.

74.

Wright

A. G. C.

Calabrese

W. R.

Rudick

M. M.

Yam

W. H.

Zelanzy

Williams

T. F.

. . . Simms

L. J.

(2015). Stability of the DSM-5 Section III pathological personality traits and their longitudinal associations with psychosocial functioning in personality disordered individuals. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 124, 199-207. doi:10.1037/abn0000018

75.

Wright

A. G. C.

Pincus

A. L.

Hopwood

C. J.

Thomas

K. M.

Markon

K. E.

Krueger

R. F.

(2012). An interpersonal analysis of pathological personality traits in DSM-5. Assessment, 19, 263-275. doi:10.1177/1073191112446657

76.

Wright

A. G. C.

Simms

L. J.

(2014). On the structure of personality disorder traits: Conjoint analyses of the CAT-PD, PID-5, and NEO-PI3 trait models. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 5, 43-54. doi:10.1037/per0000037

77.

Wright

A. G. C.

Thomas

K. M.

Hopwood

C. J.

Markon

K. E.

Pincus

A. L.

Krueger

R. F.

(2012). The hierarchical structure of DSM-5 pathological personality traits. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 121, 951-957. doi:10.1037/a0027669

78.

Yam

W. H.

Simms

L. J.

(2014). Comparing criterion-and trait-based personality disorder diagnoses in DSM-5. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 123, 802-808. doi:10.1037/a0037633

79.

Zimmermann

Altenstein

Krieger

Holtforth

M. G.

Pretsch

Alexopoulos

. . . Leising

(2014). The structure and correlates of self-reported DSM-5 maladaptive personality traits: Findings from two German-speaking samples. Journal of Personality Disorders, 28, 518-540. doi:10.1521/pedi_2014_28_130