Considerable research has used the Hypomanic Personality Scale (HPS) to assess traits conferring risk for hypomanic and manic episodes. Although the HPS has been shown to be defined by several distinct sets of content, most research has continued to rely exclusively on HPS total scores, due to (a) little research having examined its structure and (b) the discrepant structural results obtained in the few available studies. Therefore, we examined the structure and relations of the HPS in a large sample of community adults (N = 737) receiving psychiatric treatment. Our structural results indicated a five-factor structure of Activation, Charisma, Intellectual Confidence, Lability, and Modesty. Subscales modeling these emergent factors showed divergent patterns of relations with personality and other forms of psychopathology. These findings underscore the importance of examining HPS subscale relations in addition to HPS total scores in future research.
AckermanR. A.WittE. A.DonnellanM. B.TrzesniewskiK. H.RobinsR. W.KashyD. A. (2011). What does the Narcissistic Personality Inventory really measure?Assessment, 18, 67-87.
2.
AltmanE. G.HedekerD.PetersonJ. L.DavisJ. M. (1997). The Altman Self-Rating Mania Scale. Biological Psychiatry, 42, 948-955.
3.
ArditteK. A.ÇekD.ShawA. M.TimpanoK. R. (2016). The importance of assessing clinical phenomena in Mechanical Turk research. Psychological Assessment, 28, 684-691.
4.
BaldassanoC. F. (2005). Assessment tools for screening and monitoring bipolar disorder. Bipolar Disorders, 7, 8-15.
5.
BolderoJ. M.BellR. C.DaviesR. C. (2015). The structure of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory with binary and rating scale items. Journal of Personality Assessment, 97, 626-637.
6.
BrowneM. W.CudeckR. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In BollenK. A.LongJ. S. (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
7.
BuhrmesterM.KwangT.GoslingS. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data?Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3-5.
8.
ClarkL. A.SimmsL. J.WuK. D.CasillasA. (2014). Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality-2nd edition (SNAP-2): Manual for administration, scoring, and interpretation. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame.
EckbladM.ChapmanL. J. (1986). Development and validation of a scale for hypomanic personality. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 95, 214-222.
11.
FinnJ. A.Ben-PorathY.TellegenA. (2015). Dichotomous versus polytomous response options in psychopathology assessment: Method or meaningful variance?Psychological Assessment, 27, 184-193.
12.
GarridoL. E.AbadF. J.PonsodaV. (2013). A new look at Horn’s parallel analysis with ordinal variables. Psychological Methods, 18, 454-474.
13.
GiovanelliA.HoergerM.JohnsonS. L.GruberJ. (2013). Impulsive responses to positive mood and reward are related to mania risk. Cognition and Emotion, 27, 1091-1104.
14.
GorsuchR. L. (1983). Factor analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
15.
HirschfeldR. M. A.WilliamsJ. B. W.SpitzerR. L.CalabreseJ. R.FlynnL.KeckP. E.. . . ZajeckaJ. (2000). Development and validation of a screening instrument for bipolar spectrum disorder: The Mood Disorder Questionnaire. American Journal of Psychiatry, 157, 1873-1875.
16.
HornJ. L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30, 179-185.
17.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
18.
JohnsonS. L.EdgeM. D.HolmesM. K.CarverC. S. (2012). The behavioral activation system and mania. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 8, 243-267.
19.
JohnsonS. L.LeedomL. J.MuhtadieL. (2012). The dominance behavioral system and psychopathology: Evidence from self-report, observational, and biological studies. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 692-743.
20.
KruegerR. F.DerringerJ.MarkonK. E.WatsonD.SkodolA. E. (2012). Initial construction of a maladaptive personality trait model and inventory forDSM-5. Psychological Medicine, 42, 1879-1890.
21.
KwapilT. R.MillerM. B.ZinserM. C.ChapmanL. J.ChapmanJ.EckbladM. (2000). A longitudinal study of high scorers on the Hypomanic Personality Scale. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 109, 222-226.
22.
MaplesJ. L.GuanL.CarterN. T.MillerJ. D. (2014). A test of the International Personality Item Pool representation of the Revised NEO Personality Inventory and development of a 120-item IPIP-based measure of the five-factor model. Psychological Assessment, 26, 1070-1084.
23.
MarshH. W.LüdtkeO.MuthénB.AsparouhovT.MorinA. J. S.TrautweinU.NagengastB. (2010). A new look at the Big Five factor structure through exploratory structural equation modeling. Psychological Assessment, 22, 471-491.
24.
MillerJ. D.CroweM.WeissB.Maples-KellerJ.LynamD. R. (2017). Using online, crowdsourcing platforms for data collection in personality disorder research: The example of Amazon’s Mechanical Turk. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 8, 26-34.
25.
MuthénB.du ToitS. H. C.SpisicD. (1997). Robust inference using weighted least squares and quadratic estimating equations in latent variable modeling with categorical and continuous outcomes. Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Los Angeles.
PatrickC. J.KramerM. D.KruegerR. F.MarkonK. E. (2013). Optimizing efficiency of psychopathology assessment through quantitative modeling: Development of a brief form of the Externalizing Spectrum Inventory. Psychological Assessment, 25, 1332-1348.
29.
PincusA. L.AnsellE. B.PimentelC. A.CainN. M.WrightA. G. C.LevyK. N. (2009). Initial construction and validation of the Pathological Narcissism Inventory. Psychological Assessment, 21, 365-379.
30.
RaskinR.TerryH. (1988). A principal-components analysis of the narcissistic personality inventory and further evidence of its construct validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 890-902.
31.
RawlingsD.Barrantes-VidalN.ClaridgeG.McCreeryC.GalanosG. (2000). A factor analytic study of the Hypomanic Personality Scale in British, Spanish and Australian samples. Personality and Individual Differences, 28, 73-84.
32.
SchaletB. D.DurbinC. E.RevelleW. (2011). Multidimensional structure of the Hypomanic Personality Scale. Psychological Assessment, 23, 504-522.
33.
SharpC.WrightA. G. C.FowlerJ. C.FruehB. C.AllenJ. G.OldhamJ.ClarkL. A. (2015). The structure of personality pathology: Both general (“g”) and specific (“s”) factors?Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 124, 387-398.
34.
SiedorL.Maples-KellerJ.MillerJ. D.CampbellW. K. (2016). Narcissism and hypomania revisited: A test of the similarities and differences in their empirical networks. Current Psychology: A Journal for Diverse Perspectives on Diverse Psychological Issues, 35, 244-254.
35.
StantonK.DalyE.Stasik-O’BrienS. M.Ellickson-LarewS.ClarkL. A.WatsonD. (2016). An integrative analysis of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory and the Hypomanic Personality Scale: Implications for construct validity. Assessment. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1073191115625801
StantonK.WatsonD. (2015). Replicable facets of positive emotionality and their relations to psychopathology. Assessment, 22, 665-680.
38.
Tang-SmithE.JohnsonS. L.ChenS. (2015). The dominance behavioural system: A multidimensional transdiagnostic approach. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 88, 394-411.
39.
VelicerW. F. (1976). Determining the number of components from the matrix of partial correlations. Psychometrika, 41, 321-327.
40.
WalshM. A.DeGeorgeD. P.Barrantes-VidalN.KwapilT. R. (2015). A 3-year longitudinal study of risk for bipolar spectrum psychopathology. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 124, 486-497.
41.
WatsonD. (2005). Rethinking the mood and anxiety disorders: A quantitative hierarchical model forDSM-V. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 114, 522-536.
42.
WatsonD.Naragon-GaineyK. (2014). Personality, emotions, and the emotional disorders. Clinical Psychological Science, 2, 422-442.
43.
WatsonD.O’HaraM. W.Naragon-GaineyK.KoffelE.ChmielewskiM.KotovR.. . . RuggeroC. J. (2012). Development and Validation of New Anxiety and bipolar symptom scales for an expanded version of the IDAS (the IDAS-II). Assessment, 19, 399-420.
44.
WrightA. G. C.LukowitskyM. R.PincusA. L.ConroyD. E. (2010). The higher order factor structure and gender invariance of the Pathological Narcissism Inventory. Assessment, 17, 467-483.
45.
WrightA. G. C.SimmsL. J. (2014). On the structure of personality disorder traits: Conjoint analyses of the CAT-PD, PID-5, and NEO-PI-3 trait models. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 5, 43-54.
46.
WuthrichV.BatesT. C. (2005). Reliability and validity of two Likert versions of the Schizotypal Personality Questionnaire (SPQ). Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 1543-1548.
47.
ZimmermanM.GalioneJ. N.ChelminskiI.YoungD.DalrympleK. (2011). Psychiatric diagnoses in patients who screen positive on the Mood Disorder Questionnaire: Implications for using the scale as a case-finding instrument for bipolar disorder. Psychiatry Research, 185, 444-449.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
