The Washington Assessment of Risks and Needs of Students is a youth self-report screening instrument developed for use by high school and juvenile court personnel faced with the legal and practical challenges of high truancy and dropout rates. It purports to measure six facets of risks and needs of youth relevant to improving school outcomes. In this study, a bifactor model measuring a general factor and six specific factors was examined for fit and invariance across different groups defined by sex and race/ethnicity, with a sample of court-petitioned high school students (N = 937; ages 13-17 years). The results of multigroup confirmatory factor analysis revealed an essentially invariant bifactor structure across the groups. Further analysis of reliability support the use of the general factor to guide decision making for youth at risk for truancy and school failure, and scores deriving from the six specific factors as providing insight on specific areas of risk and need.
American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
2.
ArchambaultI.JanoszM.FalluJ.PaganiL. S. (2009). Student engagement and its relationship with early high school dropout. Journal of Adolescence, 32, 651-670. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2008.06.007
3.
BakerM. L.SigmonJ. N.NugentM. E. (2001). Truancy reduction: Keeping students in school. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
4.
BarrettD. E.JuS.KatsiyannisA.ZhangD. (2015). Females in the juvenile justice system: Influences on delinquency and recidivism. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 24, 427-433.
5.
BarrettD. E.KatsiyannisA. (2016). Juvenile offending and crime in early adulthood: A large sample analysis. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 25, 1086-1097.
6.
BelfieldC.LevinH. M. (Eds.). (2007). The price we pay: Economic and social consequences of inadequate education. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
7.
BrownT. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford.
8.
BuckleyJ. A.EpsteinM. H. (2004). The Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scale-2 (BERS-2): Providing a comprehensive approach to strength-based assessment. The California School Psychologist, 9(1), 21-27.
9.
BurnsG. L.de MouraM. A.BeauchaineT. P.McBurnettK. (2014). Bifactor latent structure of ADHD/ODD symptoms: Predictions of dual-pathway/trait-impulsivity etiological models of ADHD. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 55, 393-401. https://ntserver1.wsulibs.wsu.edu:6117/docview/1519509099?accountid=14902
10.
ChenF. F.SousaK. H.WestS. G. (2005). Testing measurement invariance of second-order factor models. Structural Equation Modeling, 12, 471-492.
11.
CheungG. W.RensvoldR. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233-255.
12.
ComreyA. L.LeeH. B. (1992). A first course in factor analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13.
CrosbyJ. W. (2011). Test review of social skills improvement system rating scales. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 29, 292-296.
14.
CullenF. T. (1994). Social support as an organizing concept for criminology: Presidential address to the Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences. Justice Quarterly, 11, 527-559.
15.
DansecoE. R.MarquesP. R. (2002). Development and validation of a POSIT-short form: Screening for problem behaviors among adolescent at risk for substance use. Journal of Child & Adolescent Substance Abuse, 11, 17-36.
16.
DemboR.GulledgeL. M. (2009). Truancy intervention programs: Challenges and innovations to implementation. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 20, 437-456.
17.
DennisM. L.ChanY.FunkR. R. (2006). Development and validation of the GAIN short screener (GSS) for internalizing, externalizing and substance use disorders and Crime/Violence problems among adolescents and adults. American Journal on Addictions, 15, 80-91.
18.
FarringtonD. P. (2003), Developmental and life-course criminology: Key theoretical and empirical issues-The 2020 Sutherland Award Address. Criminology, 41, 221-225. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.2003.tb00987.x
19.
FinneyS. J.DiStefanoC. (2013). Non-normal and categorical data in structural equation modeling. In HancockG. R.MuellerR. O (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: A second course (2nd ed.), pp. 439-492. Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
20.
ForbesM. K.TackettJ. L.MarkonK. E.KruegerR. F. (2016). Beyond comorbidity: Toward a dimensional and hierarchical approach to understanding psychopathology across the life span. Development and Psychopathology, 28, 971-986.
21.
GeorgeT.CokerE.FrenchB.StrandP.GotchC.McBrideC.McCurleyC. (2015). Washington Assessment of the risks and needs of students, WARNS user manual. Olympia, WA: Center for Court Research, Administrative Office of the Courts.
22.
GlaserR. R.Van HornM. L.ArthurM. W.HawkinsJ. D.CatalanoR. F. (2005). Measurement properties of the communities that care® youth survey across demographic groups. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 21(1), 73-102.
23.
GrissoT.BarnumR.FletcherK. E.CauffmanE.PeuscholdD. (2001). Massachusetts youth screening instrument for mental health needs of juvenile justice youths. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 40, 541-548.
24.
HammondC.LintonD.SminkJ.DrewS. (2007). Dropout risk factors and exemplary programs: A technical report. Clemson, SC: National Dropout Prevention Center, Clemson University.
25.
HenryK. L.HuizingaD. H. (2007). School-related risk and protective factors associated with truancy among urban youth placed at risk. Journal of Primary Prevention, 28, 505-519.
26.
HowellJ. C. (2003). Preventing and reducing juvenile delinquency: A comprehensive framework. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
27.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55.
28.
IversonA.FrenchB.StrandP. S.GotchC. M.McCurleyC. (2016). Understanding school truancy: Risk-need latent profiles of adolescents. Assessment. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1073191116672329
29.
JohnsonC. L.WrightK. A.StrandP. S. (2012). Transitions of truants: Community truancy board as a turning point in the lives of adolescents. Journal of Juvenile Justice, 1, 34-51.
30.
KaneM. T. (2013). Validating the interpretations and uses of test scores. Journal of Educational Measurement, 50, 1-73.
31.
KearneyC. A. (2008). School absenteeism and school refusal behavior in youth: A contemporary review. Clinical Psychology Review, 28, 451-471.
32.
LaubJ. H.SampsonR. J. (2003). Shared beginnings, divergent lives: Delinquent boys to age 70. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
33.
LoeberR.FarringtonD. P. (Eds.). (1998). Serious and violent juvenile offenders: Risk factors and successful interventions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
34.
MillsapR. E. (2011). Statistical approaches to measurement invariance. New York, NY: Routledge.
35.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (1998-2012). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
36.
National Institute on Drug Abuse. (2009). Problem oriented screening instrument for children. Washington, DC: Author.
37.
National Juvenile Justice Network. (2011). Telling it like it is: Youth speak out on the school to prison pipeline. Washington, DC: Author.
38.
NunnallyJ. C.BernsteinI. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
39.
NyeC. D.DrasgowF. (2011). Assessing goodness of fit: Simple rules of thumb simply do not work. Organizational Research Methods, 14, 548-570.
40.
PettM. A.LackeyN. R.SullivanJ. J. (2003). Making sense of factor analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
41.
ReiseS. P. (2012). The rediscovery of bifactor measurement models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 47, 667-696.
42.
ReiseS. P.BonifayW. E.HavilandM. G. (2013). Scoring and modeling psychological measures in the presence of multidimensionality. Journal of Personality Assessment, 95, 129-140.
43.
ReynoldsC. R.KamphausR. W. (2004). BASC-2: Behavior assessment system for children. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
44.
RodriguezA.ReiseS. P.HavilandM. G. (2016). Applying bifactor statistical indices in the evaluation of psychological measures. Journal of Personality Assessment, 98, 223-237.
45.
SampsonR. J.LaubJ. H. (1993). Crime in the making: Pathways and turning points through life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
46.
SampsonR. J.LaubJ. H. (2005). A general age-graded theory of crime: Lessons learned and the future of life-course criminology. In FarringtonD. P. (Ed.), Integrated developmental & life course theories of offending: Advances in criminological theory (Vol. 14, pp. 165-182). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
47.
SAS Institute. (2014). SAS 9.4 Software. Cary, NC: Author.
48.
SinclairM. F.ChristensonS. L.EveloD. L.HurleyC. M. (1998). Dropout prevention for youth with disabilities: Efficacy of a sustained school engagement procedure. Exceptional Children, 65, 7-21.
49.
StrandP. S.LovrichN. P. (2014). Graduation outcomes for truant students: An evaluation of a school-based, court-engaged community truancy board with case management. Children and Youth Services Review, 43, 138-144.
50.
SutphenR. D.FordJ. P.FlahertyC. (2010). Truancy interventions: A review of the research literature. Research on Social Work Practice, 20, 161-171.
51.
WidamanK. F. (2006). Best practices in quantitative methods for developmentalists: III. Missing data: What to do with or without them. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 71(3), 42-64.
