The Metacognitions Questionnaire–30 (MCQ-30) is a self-report measure that assesses metacognitive beliefs (i.e., beliefs about thinking). Prior research has supported a correlated five-factor model, but no known published study has examined the tenability of second-order or bifactor models of the MCQ-30. Results supported a bifactor model of the MCQ-30 in a sample of community adults from the United States (N = 785), as well as separately among men (n = 372) and women (n = 413). Multiple-groups confirmatory factor analysis supported the configural and metric/scalar invariance of the bifactor model among men and women. Results further supported the incremental validity of one of the MCQ-30 domain-specific factors in accounting for unique variance in an index of health anxiety beyond the general metacognition factor. Results provide support for a bifactor conceptualization of the MCQ-30 and the invariance of that model across men and women.
AsmundsonG. J. G.CarletonR. N.BovellC. V.TaylorS. (2008). Comparison of unitary and multidimensional models of the Whiteley Index in a nonclinical sample: Implications for understanding and assessing health anxiety. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 22, 87-96. doi:10.1891/0889-8391.22.2.87
2.
AsmundsonG. J. G.TaylorS. (2005). It’s not all in your head: How worrying about your health could be making you sick: And what you can do about it. New York, NY: Guilford.
BaileyR.WellsA. (2013). Does metacognition make a unique contribution to health anxiety when controlling for neuroticism, illness cognition, and somatosensory amplification. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 27, 327-337. doi:10.1891/0889-8391.27.4.327
5.
BrownT. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford.
6.
BuhrmesterM.KwangT.GoslingS. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data?Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3-5. doi:10.1177/1745691610393980
7.
Cartwright-HattonS.WellsA. (1997). Beliefs about worry and intrusions: The metacognitions questionnaire and its correlates. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 11, 279-296. doi:10.1016/S0887-6185(97)00011-X
8.
ChandlerJ.ShapiroD. (2016). Conducting clinical research using crowdsourced convenience samples. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 12, 53-81. doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-021815-093623
9.
ChenF. F.WestS. G.SousaK. H. (2006). A comparison of bifactor and second-order models of quality of life. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 41, 189-225. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr4102_5
10.
CheungC. W.RensvoldR. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233-255. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
11.
CooperM. J.GrocuttE.DeepakK.BaileyE. (2007). Metacognition in anorexia nervosa, dieting and non-dieting controls: A preliminary investigation. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 46, 113-117. doi:10.1348/014466506X115245
12.
EbesutaniC.McLeishA. C.LubertoC. M.YoungJ.MaackD. J. (2014). A bifactor model of anxiety sensitivity: Analysis of the Anxiety Sensitivity Index-3. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 36, 452-464.
13.
EsbjørnB. H.SømhovdM. J.HolmJ. M.LønfeldtN. N.BenderP. K.NielsenS. K.Reinholdt-DunneM. L. (2013). A structural assessment of the 30-item Metacognitions Questionnaire for Children and its relations to anxiety symptoms. Psychological Assessment, 25, 1211-1219. doi:10.1037/a0033793
14.
FergusT. A. (2013). Repetitive thought and health anxiety: Tests of specificity. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 35, 366-374. doi:10.1007/s10862-013-9340-y
15.
FergusT. A.KelleyL. P.GriggsJ. O. (2018). The Whiteley Index-6: An examination of measurement invariance among self-identifying Black, Latino, and White respondents in primary care. Assessment, 25, 247-258.
16.
GrøtteT.SolemS.MyersS. G.HjemdalO.VogelP. A.GüzeyI. C.. . . FisherP. (2016). Metacognitions in obsessive-compulsive disorder: A psychometric study of the Metacognitions Questionnaire-30. Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders, 11, 82-90. doi:10.1016/j.jocrd.2016.09.002
17.
GwilliamP.WellsA.Cartwright-HattonS. (2004). Does meta-cognition or responsibility predict obsessive-compulsive symptoms: A test of the metacognitive model. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 11, 137-144. doi:10.1002/cpp.402
18.
HuL. T.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
19.
IrakM.TosunA. (2008). Exploring the role of metacognition in obsessive-compulsive and anxiety symptoms. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 22, 1316-1325. doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2008.01.012
20.
JohnsonD. P.WhismanM. A. (2013). Gender differences in rumination: A meta-analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 55, 367-374. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2013.03.019
21.
JonesS. R.FernyhoughC. (2006). The roles of thought suppression and metacognitive beliefs in proneness to auditory verbal hallucinations in a non-clinical sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 1421-1432. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2006.06.003
22.
KlineR. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford.
23.
Maher-EdwardsL.FernieB. A.MurphyG.WellsA.SpadaM. M. (2011). Metacognitions and negative emotions as predictors of symptom severity in chronic fatigue syndrome. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 70, 311-317. doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2010.09.016
24.
McEvoyP. M.MahoneyA. E. J.MouldsM. L. (2010). Are worry, rumination, and post-event processing one and the same? Development of the Repetitive Thinking Questionnaire?Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 24, 509-519. doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2010.03.008
25.
MeadeA. W.JohnsonE. C.BraddyP. W. (2008). Power and sensitivity of alternative fit indices in tests of measurement invariance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 568-592. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.3.568
26.
MorrisonA. P.FrenchP.WellsA. (2007). Metacognitive beliefs across the continuum of psychosis: Comparison between patients with psychotic disorders, patients at ultra-high risk and non-patients. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 45, 2241-2246. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2007.01.002
27.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (2015). Mplus (Version 7.4) [Computer software]. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
28.
Nolen-HoeksemaS. (2012). Emotion regulation and psychopathology: The role of gender. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 8, 161-187. doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032511-143109
29.
NormannN.van EmmerikA. A. P.MorinaN. (2014). The efficacy of metacognitive therapy for anxiety and depression: A meta-analytic review. Depression and Anxiety, 31, 402-411. doi:10.1002/da.22273
30.
O’CarrollP. J.FisherP. (2013). Metacognitions, worry and attentional control in predicting OSCE performance test anxiety. Medical Education, 47, 562-568. doi:10.1111/medu.12125
31.
OlatunjiB. O.EbesutaniC.AbramowitzJ. S. (2017). Examination of a bifactor model of obsessive-compulsive symptom dimensions. Assessment, 24, 45-59.
32.
Palmier-ClausJ. E.DunnG.TaylorH.MorrisonA. P. (2013). Cognitive-self consciousness and metacognitive beliefs: Stress sensitization in individuals at ultra-high risk of developing psychosis. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 52, 26-41. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8260.2012.02043.x
33.
PapageorgiouC.WellsA. (2003). An empirical test of a clinical metacognitive model of rumination and depression. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 27, 261-273. doi:10.1023/A:1023962332399
34.
PaolacciG.ChandlerJ. (2014). Inside the Turk: Understanding Mechanical Turk as a participant pool. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23, 184-188. doi:10.1177/0963721414531598
35.
PeerE.VosgerauJ.AcquistiA. (2014). Reputation as a sufficient condition for data quality on Amazon Mechanical Turk. Behavior Research Methods, 46, 1023-1031. doi:10.3758/s13428-013-0434-y
36.
PilowskyI. (1967). Dimensions of hypochondriasis. British Journal of Psychiatry, 113, 89-93. doi:10.1192/bjp.113.494.89
37.
Ramos-CejudoJ.SalgueroJ. M.Cano-VindelA. (2013). Spanish version of the Meta-Cognitions Questionnaire 30 (MCQ-30). Spanish Journal of Psychology, 16, 1-8. doi:10.1017/sjp.2013.95
38.
ReiseS. P. (2012). The rediscovery of bifactor measurement models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 47, 667-696. doi:10.1080/00273171.2012.715555
39.
ReiseS. P.BonifayW. E.HavilandM. G. (2013). Scoring and modeling psychological measures in the presence of multidimensionality. Journal of Personality Assessment, 95, 129-140. doi:10.1080/00223891.2012.725437
40.
RodriguezA.ReiseS. P.HavilandM. G. (2016). Evaluating bifactor models: Calculating and interpreting statistical indices. Psychological Methods, 21, 137-150. doi:10.1037/met0000045
41.
RoussisP.WellsA. (2006). Posttraumatic stress symptoms: Tests of relationships with thought control strategies and beliefs as predicted by the metacognitive model. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 111-122. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2005.06.019
SpadaM. M.CaselliG.WellsA. (2013). A triphasic metacognitive formulation of problem drinking. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 20, 494-500. doi:10.1002/cpp.1791
44.
SpadaM. M.HiouK.NikčevićA. V. (2006). Metacognitions, emotions, and procrastination. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 20, 319-326. doi:10.1891/jcop.20.3.319
45.
SpadaM. M.MohiyeddiniC.WellsA. (2008). Measuring metacognitions associated with emotional distress: Factor structure and predictive validity of the Metacognitions Questionnaire 30. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 238-242. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2008.04.005
46.
SpadaM. M.NikčevićA. V.MonetaG. B.WellsA. (2007). Metacognition as a mediator of the relationship between emotion and smoking dependence. Addictive Behaviors, 32, 2120-2129. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2007.01.012
47.
SpadaM. M.NikčevićA. V.MonetaG. B.WellsA. (2008). Metacognition, perceived stress, and negative emotion. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 1172-1181. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2007.11.010
48.
StuckyB. D.EdelenM. O. (2015). Using hierarchical IRT to create unidimensional measures from multidimensional data. In ReiseS. P.RevickiD. A. (Eds.), Handbook of item response theory modeling: Applications to typical performance assessment (pp. 183-206). New York, NY: Routledge.
49.
WangM.RussellS. S. (2005). Measurement equivalence of the job descriptive index across Chinese and American workers: Results from confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 65, 709-732. doi:10.1177/0013164404272494
50.
WelchP. G.CarletonR. N.AsmundsonG. J. G. (2009). Measuring health anxiety: Moving past the dichotomous response option of the original Whiteley Index. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 23, 1002-1007. doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2009.05.006
51.
WellsA. (2009). Metacognitive therapy for anxiety and depression. New York, NY: Guilford.
52.
WellsA.CarterK. (1999). Preliminary test of a cognitive model of generalized anxiety disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 37, 585-594. doi:10.1016/S0005-7967(98)00156-9
53.
WellsA.CarterK. (2001). Further tests of a cognitive model of generalized anxiety disorder: Metacognitions and worry in GAD, panic disorder, social phobia, depression, and nonpatients. Behavior Therapy, 32, 85-102. doi:10.1016/S0005-7894(01)80045-9
54.
WellsA.Cartwright-HattonS. (2004). A short form of the Metacognitions Questionnaire: Properties of the MCQ-30. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 42, 385-396. doi:10.1016/S0005-7967(03)00147-5
55.
WellsA.MatthewsG. (1996). Modelling cognition in emotional disorder: The S-REF model. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 34, 881-888. doi:10.1016/S0005-7967(96)00050-2
