Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The present investigation is the first examination of the factor structures, reliability, external validity, longitudinal invariance, and stability of the De Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scale (DJGLS), as used with early adolescents. It is based on a two-wave, large, representative sample of Polish primary school pupils. The results demonstrate that the model most reflective of the factor structure of the DJGLS is the bifactor model, which assumes the occurrence of one, highly reliable, general factor (overall sense of loneliness) and two, relatively irrelevant, subfactors. Essential unidimensionality (the general factor accounting for three fourth of the common variance) suggest that the interpretation of the subfactors over and above the general factor is inappropriate. The longitudinal confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the bifactor structure of the DJGLS is invariant over time. Correlations with self-rated loneliness, sociometric acceptance/rejection, social self-efficacy, identification with class group, family structure, and gender provide support for the validity of the DJGLS. This implies that it could be used as a measure of loneliness in adolescence, which does not involve references to the school context, making it possible to conduct studies that go beyond school period and compare the intensity of the feeling of loneliness in that group with other age groups.

Keywords

loneliness psychometric properties factor structure bifactor longitudinal invariance external validation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson

T. W.

(1957). Maximum likelihood estimates for a multivariate normal distribution when some observations are missing. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 52, 200-203. doi:10.1080/01621459.1957.10501379

Asher

S. R.

Hymel

Renshaw

P. D.

(1984). Loneliness in children. Child Development, 55, 1456-1464. doi:10.2307/1130015

Asher

S. R.

Weeks

M. S.

(2013). Loneliness and belongingness in the college years. In Coplan

R. J.

Bowker

J. C.

(Eds.), The handbook of solitude (pp. 283-301). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.

Asher

S. R.

Wheeler

V. A.

(1985). Children’s loneliness: A comparison of rejected and neglected peer status. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53, 500-505. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.53.4.500

Asparouhov

Muthén

B. O.

(2009). Exploratory structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 16, 397-438. doi:10.1080/10705510903008204

Beauducel

Herzberg

P. Y.

(2006). On the performance of maximum likelihood versus means and variance adjusted weighted least squares estimation in CFA. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 13, 186-203. doi:10.1207/s15328007sem1302_2

Bentler

P. M.

(1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238-246. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238

Brown

T. A.

(2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Browne

M. W.

(1972a). Oblique rotation to a partially specified target. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 25, 207-212. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8317.1972.tb00492.x

10.

Browne

M. W.

(1972b). Orthogonal rotation to a partially specified target. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 25, 115-120. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8317.1972.tb00482.x

11.

Browne

M. W.

(2001). An overview of analytic rotation in exploratory factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 36, 111-150. doi:10.1207/S15327906MBR3601_05

12.

Bukowski

W. M.

Brendgen

Vitaro

(2007). Peer and socialization: Effects on externalizing and internalizing problems. In Grusec

J. E.

Hastings

P. D.

(Eds.), Handbook of socialization: Theory and research (pp. 355-381). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

13.

Buz

Urchaga

Polo

M. E.

(2014). Análisis factorial confirmatorio de la escala de soledad de De Jong Gierveld en personas mayores españolas [Factor structure of the De Jong Gierveld loneliness scale in Spanish elderly adults]. Anales de Psicología, 30, 588-596. doi:10.6018/analesps.30.2.148371

14.

Byrne

B. M.

(2011). Structural equation modeling with Mplus: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. New York, NY: Routledge.

15.

Cacioppo

J. T.

Cacioppo

Boomsma

D. I.

(2014). Evolutionary mechanisms for loneliness. Cognition and Emotion, 28, 3-21. doi:10.1080/02699931.2013.837379

16.

Cassidy

Asher

S. R.

(1992). Loneliness and peer relations in young children. Child Development, 63, 350-365. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1992.tb01632.x

17.

Cattan

White

Bond

Learmouth

(2005). Preventing social isolation and loneliness among older people: A systematic review of health promotion interventions. Ageing & Society, 25, 41-67. doi:10.1017/S0144686X04002594

18.

Çivitci

Fiyakali

N. C.

(2009). Loneliness and life satisfaction in adolescents with divorced and non-divorced parents. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 9, 513-525.

19.

Cohen

(1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

20.

Coie

J. D.

Dodge

K. A.

Coppotelli

(1982). Dimensions and types of social status: A cross-age perspective. Developmental Psychology, 18, 557-570.

21.

Cronbach

L. J.

(1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297-334. doi:10.1007/BF02310555

22.

de Jong Gierveld

. (1987). Developing and testing a model of loneliness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 119-128. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.53.1.119

23.

de Jong Gierveld

Kamphuls

. (1985). The development of a Rasch-type loneliness scale. Applied Psychological Measurement, 9, 289-299. doi:10.1177/014662168500900307

24.

de Jong Gierveld

van Tilburg

. (1999). Living arrangements of older adults in the Netherlands and Italy: Coresidence values and behaviour and their consequences for loneliness. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 14, 1-24.

25.

de Jong Gierveld

van Tilburg

. (2010). The De Jong Gierveld short scales for emotional and social loneliness: Tested on data from 7 countries in the UN generations and gender surveys. European Journal of Ageing, 7, 121-130. doi:10.1007/s10433-010-0144-6

26.

de Jong Gierveld

van Tilburg

Dykstra

P. A

. (2006). Loneliness and social isolation. In Perlman

Vangelisti

(Eds.), Cambridge handbook of personal relationships (pp. 485-500). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

27.

Dimitrov

D. M.

(2010). Testing for factorial invariance in the context of construct validation. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 43, 121-149. doi:10.1177/0748175610373459

28.

Dodeen

(2014). The effects of positively and negatively worded items on the factor structure of the UCLA Loneliness Scale. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 33, 259-267. doi:10.1177/0734282914548325

29.

Dolata

Hawrot

Humenny

Jasińska-Maciążek

Koniewski

Majkut

(2014). Kontekstowy model efektywności nauczania po pierwszym etapie edukacyjnym. Edukacyjna Wartość Dodana [The contextual model of teaching efficiency after the first educational stage. Educational Value Added]. Warsaw, Poland: Instytut Badań Edukacyjnych.

30.

Dolata

Hawrot

Humenny

Jasińska-Maciążek

Koniewski

Majkut

. . . Otręba-Szklarczyk

(2015). (Ko)warianty efektywności nauczania: wyniki badania w klasach IV-VI [(Co-)Variants of teaching efficiency: Results of research within the 4th-6th Grades]. Warsaw, Poland: Instytut Badań Edukacyjnych.

31.

Dweck

C. S.

(2002). The development of ability conceptions. In Wigfield

Eccles

J. S.

(Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 57-88). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

32.

Dykstra

P. A.

de Jong Gierveld

(2004). Gender and marital-history differences in emotional and social loneliness among Dutch older adults. Canadian Journal on Aging/La Revue Canadienne du Vieillissement, 23, 141-155. doi:10.1353/cja.2004.0018

33.

Dykstra

P. A.

Fokkema

(2007). Social and emotional loneliness among divorced and married men and women: Comparing the deficit and cognitive perspectives. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 29, 1-12. doi:10.1080/01973530701330843

34.

Ebesutani

Drescher

C. F.

Reise

S. P.

Heiden

Hight

T. L.

Damon

J. D.

Young

(2012). The importance of modeling method effects: Resolving the (uni)dimensionality of the loneliness questionnaire. Journal of Personality Assessment, 94, 186-195. doi:10.1080/00223891.2011.627967

35.

Enders

C. K.

Bandalos

D. L.

(2001). The relative performance of full information maximum likelihood estimation for missing data in structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 8, 430-457. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0803_5

36.

Flora

D. B.

Curran

P. J.

(2004). An empirical evaluation of alternative methods of estimation for confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data. Psychological Methods, 9, 466-491. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.9.4.466

37.

Freeman

L. C.

(1978). Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1, 215-239. doi:10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7

38.

Furman

Buhrmester

(1992). Age and sex differences in perceptions of networks of personal relationships. Child Development, 63, 103-115. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1992.tb03599.x

39.

Galanaki

E. P.

Kalantzi-Azizi

(1999). Loneliness and social dissatisfaction: Its relation with children’s self-efficacy for peer interaction. Child Study Journal, 29, 1-22.

40.

Gallini

(1983). Misspecifications that can result in path analysis structures. Applied Psychological Measurement, 7, 125-137.

41.

Graham

J. W.

(2009). Missing data analysis: Making it work in the real world. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 549-576. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085530

42.

Grygiel

(2015). Test ukrytej struktury kwestionariusza “Poczucie Integracji Rówieśniczej.” Częściowo konfirmacyjny model podwójnego czynnika z ładunkami krzyżowymi [The test of latent structure of the Perceived Peer Integration Questionnaire. Partially confirmatory bifactor model with cross-loadings]. In Niemierko

Szmigel

M. K.

(Eds.), Zastosowania diagnozy edukacyjnej [Applications of educational diagnosis] (pp. 438-458). Krakow: Poland: Polskie Towarzystwo Diagnostyki Edukacyjnej.

43.

Grygiel

Humenny

Rębisz

Bajcar

Świtaj

(2018). Peer rejection and perceived quality of relations with schoolmates among children with ADHD. Journal of Attention Disorders, 22, 738-751.

44.

Grygiel

Humenny

Rębisz

Świtaj

Sikorska

(2013). Validating the Polish adaptation of the 11-item De Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scale. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 29, 129-139. doi:10.1027/1015-5759/a000130

45.

Guidubaldi

Perry

J. D.

(1984). Divorce, socioeconomic status, and children’s cognitive-social competence at school entry. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 54, 459-468. doi:10.1111/j.1939-0025.1984.tb01511.x

46.

Haeberlin

Moser

Bless

Klaghofer

(1989). Integration in die Schulklasse: Fragebogen zur Erfassung von Dimensionen der Integration von Schülern: FDI 4-6 [Integration in the classroom: Questionnaire for the assessment of pupil’s dimensions of integration: QDI 4-6]. Bern, Switzerland: Haupt.

47.

Hartup

W. W.

Stevens

(1997). Friendships and adaptation in the life course. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 355-370. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.121.3.355

48.

Heinrich

L. A.

Gullone

(2006). The clinical significance of loneliness: A literature review. Clinical Psychology Review, 26, 695-718. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2006.04.002

49.

Higbee

K. R.

Roberts

R. E.

(1994). Reliability and validity of a brief measure of loneliness with Anglo-American and Mexican American adolescents. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 16, 459-474. doi:10.1177/07399863940164005

50.

Holgado–Tello

F. P.

Chacón–Moscoso

Barbero–García

Vila–Abad

(2010). Polychoric versus Pearson correlations in exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of ordinal variables. Quality & Quantity, 44, 153-166. doi:10.1007/s11135-008-9190-y

51.

Horn

J. L.

Mcardle

J. J.

(1992). A practical and theoretical guide to measurement invariance in aging research. Experimental Aging Research, 18, 117-144. doi:10.1080/03610739208253916

52.

Howard

J. L.

Gagne

Morin

A. J. S.

Forest

(2018). Using bifactor exploratory structural equation modeling to test for a continuum structure of motivation. Journal of Management, 44, 2638-2664.

53.

Howe

T. R.

Parke

R. D.

(2001). Friendship quality and sociometric status: Between-group differences and links to loneliness in severely abused and nonabused children. Child Abuse & Neglect, 25, 585-606. doi:10.1016/S0145-2134(01)00230-7

54.

Humenny

Grygiel

(2015). Poza ścisłą jedno- i wielowymiarowość. Struktura czynnikowa skali samotności de Jong Gierveld wśród dzieci [Beyond strict uni - and multidimensionality. The factorial structure of the De Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scale among children]. In Pokropek

(Ed.), Modele cech ukrytych w badaniach edukacyjnych, psychologii i socjologii. Teoria i zastosowania [Models of latent traits in educational, psychological and sociological research. Theory and praxis] (pp. 400-424). Warsaw, Poland: Instytut Badań Edukacyjnych.

55.

Jobe-Shields

Cohen

Parra

G. R.

(2011). Patterns of change in children’s loneliness: Trajectories from third through fifth grades. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 57, 25-47.

56.

Jose

P. E.

Lim

B. T. L.

(2014). Social connectedness predicts lower loneliness and depressive symptoms over time in adolescents. Open Journal of Depression, 3, 154-163. doi:10.4236/ojd.2014.34019

57.

Ladd

G. W.

Burgess

K. B.

(1999). Charting the relationship trajectories of aggressive, withdrawn, and aggressive/withdrawn children during early grade school. Child Development, 70, 910-929. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00066

58.

Ladd

G. W.

Ettekal

(2013). Peer-related loneliness across early to late adolescence: Normative trends, intra-individual trajectories, and links with depressive symptoms. Journal of Adolescence, 36, 1269-1282. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2013.05.004

59.

Larson

R. W.

(1999). The uses of loneliness in adolescence. In Rotenberg

K. J.

Hymel

(Eds.), Loneliness in childhood and adolescence (pp. 244-262). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

60.

Larson

R. W.

Richards

M. H.

Moneta

Holmbeck

Duckett

(1996). Changes in adolescents’ daily interactions with their families from ages 10 to 18: Disengagement and transformation. Developmental Psychology, 32, 744-754. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.32.4.744

61.

Laursen

Hartl

A. C.

(2013). Understanding loneliness during adolescence: Developmental changes that increase the risk of perceived social isolation. Journal of Adolescence, 36, 1261-1268. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2013.06.003

62.

Levitt

M. J.

Guacci-Franco

Levitt

J. L.

(1993). Convoys of social support in childhood and early adolescence: Structure and function. Developmental Psychology, 29, 811-818. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.29.5.811

63.

C.-H.

(2016). Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: Comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares. Behavior Research Methods, 48, 936-949. doi:10.3758/s13428-015-0619-7

64.

Little

R. J. A.

(1988). A Test of Missing Completely at Random for Multivariate Data with Missing Values. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83, 1198–1202. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1988.10478722

65.

Little

T. D.

(2013). Longitudinal structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

66.

Maes

Klimstra

Van den Noortgate

Goossens

(2015). Factor structure and measurement invariance of a multidimensional loneliness scale: Comparisons across gender and age. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 24, 1829-1837. doi:10.1007/s10826-014-9986-4

67.

Maes

Van den Noortgate

Vanhalst

Beyers

Goossens

(2017). The Children’s Loneliness Scale: Factor structure and construct validity in Belgian children. Assessment, 24, 244-251.

68.

Mahon

N. E.

Yarcheski

T. J.

Cannella

B. L.

Hanks

M. M.

(2006). A meta-analytic study of predictors for loneliness during adolescence. Nursing Research, 55, 308-315.

69.

Marcoen

Goossens

Caes

(1987). Loneliness in pre-through late adolescence: Exploring the contributions of a multidimensional approach. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 16, 561-577. doi:10.1007/bf02138821

70.

Marsh

H. W.

Hau

K.-T.

Grayson

(2005). Goodness of fit evaluation in structural equation modeling. In Maydeu-Olivares

McArdle

J. J.

McDonald

R. P.

(Eds.), Contemporary psychometrics: A festschrift for Roderick P. McDonald (pp. 275-340). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

71.

Marsh

H. W.

Liem

G. A. D.

Martin

A. J.

Morin

A. J. S.

Nagengast

(2011). Methodological measurement fruitfulness of exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM): New approaches to key substantive issues in motivation and engagement. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 29, 322-346. doi:10.1177/0734282911406657

72.

Marsh

H. W.

Morin

A. J. S.

Parker

P. D.

Kaur

(2014). Exploratory structural equation modeling: An integration of the best features of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 10, 85-110. doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032813-153700

73.

Marsh

H. W.

Shavelson

(1985). Self-concept: Its multifaceted, hierarchical structure. Educational Psychologist, 20, 107-123. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep2003_1

74.

McDonald

R. P.

(1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

75.

Meade

A. W.

Johnson

E. C.

Braddy

P. W.

(2008). Power and sensitivity of alternative fit indices in tests of measurement invariance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 568-592. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.3.568

76.

Milanzi

Molenberghs

Alonso

Verbeke

De Boeck

(2015). Reliability measures in item response theory: Manifest versus latent correlation functions. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 68, 43-64. doi:10.1111/bmsp.12033

77.

Millsap

R. E.

(2011). Statistical approaches to measurement invariance. New York, NY: Psychology Press.

78.

Morin

A. J. S.

Arens

A. K.

Marsh

H. W.

(2015). A bifactor exploratory structural equation modeling framework for the identification of distinct sources of construct-relevant psychometric multidimensionality. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 23, 116-139. doi:10.1080/10705511.2014.961800

79.

Morin

A. J. S.

Marsh

H. W.

Nagengast

(2013). Exploratory structural equation modeling. In Hancock

G. R.

Mueller

R. O.

(Eds.), Structural equation modeling: A second course (2nd ed., pp. 395-436). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.

80.

Mouratidis

A. A.

Sideridis

G. D.

(2009). On social achievement goals: Their relations with peer acceptance, classroom belongingness, and perceptions of loneliness. Journal of Experimental Education, 77, 285-308. doi:10.3200/JEXE.77.3.285-308

81.

Muris

(2001). A brief questionnaire for measuring self-efficacy in youths. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 23, 145-149. doi:10.1023/A:1010961119608

82.

Muris

(2002). Relationships between self-efficacy and symptoms of anxiety disorders and depression in a normal adolescent sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 337-348. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00027-7

83.

Muthén

B. O.

Muthén

L. K.

(1998-2015). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Author.

84.

Nunnally

J. C.

(1978). Psychometric theory (2d ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

85.

Olatunji

B. O.

Ebesutani

Reise

S. P.

(2015). A bifactor model of disgust proneness: Examination of the Disgust Emotion Scale. Assessment, 22, 248-262. doi:10.1177/1073191114541673

86.

Olsson

(1979). Maximum likelihood estimation of the polychoric correlation coefficient. Psychometrika, 44, 443–460. doi: 10.1007/BF02296207

87.

Parker

J. G.

Asher

S. R.

(1993). Friendship and friendship quality in middle childhood: Links with peer group acceptance and feelings of loneliness and social dissatisfaction. Developmental Psychology, 29, 611-621. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.29.4.611

88.

Parkhurst

J. T.

Hopmeyer-Gorman

(1999). Developmental change in the sources of loneliness in childhood and adolescence: Constructing a theoretical model. In Rotenberg

Hymel

(Eds.), Loneliness in childhood and adolescence (pp. 56-80). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

89.

Penning

M. J.

Liu

Chou

P. H. B.

(2014). Measuring loneliness among middle-aged and older adults: The UCLA and de Jong Gierveld loneliness scales. Social Indicators Research, 118, 1147-1166. doi:10.1007/s11205-013-0461-1

90.

Peplau

L. A.

(1982). Perspectives on loneliness. In Peplau

L. A.

Perlman

(Eds.), Loneliness: A sourcebook of current theory, research, and therapy (pp. 135-151). New York, NY: Wiley Interscience.

91.

Perlman

, (1990, 10-14 August). Age differences in loneliness: A meta-analysis. Paper presented at the 98th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, Boston, MA.

92.

Perlman

Landolt

M. A.

(1999). Examination of loneliness in children–adolescents and in adults: two solitudes or unified enterprise? In Rotenberg

K. J.

Hymel

(Eds.), Loneliness in childhood and adolescence (pp. 325–347). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

93.

Pfeifer

J. H.

Peake

S. J.

(2012). Self-development: Integrating cognitive, socioemotional, and neuroimaging perspectives. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 2, 55-69. doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2011.07.012

94.

Post

W. J.

van Duijn

M. A. J.

van Baarsen

(2001). Single-peaked or monotone tracelines? On the choice of an IRT model for scaling data. In Boomsma

van Duijn

M. A. J.

Snijders

T. A. B.

(Eds.), Essays on item response theory (Vol. 157, pp. 391-414). New York, NY: Springer.

95.

Qualter

(2003). Loneliness in children and adolescents: What do schools and teachers need to know and how can they help? Pastoral Care in Education, 21(2), 10-18. doi:10.1111/1468-0122.00257

96.

Quay

L. C.

(1992). Personal and family effects on loneliness. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 13, 97-110. doi:10.1016/0193-3973(92)90008-6

97.

Quinn

H. O.

(2014). Bifactor models, explained common variance (ECV), and the usefulness of scores from unidimensional item response theory analyses (Master’s thesis). Retrieved from https://cdr.lib.unc.edu/indexablecontent/uuid:efa83eb6-add5-4d21-a252-823ca4a043f3

98.

Reise

S. P.

Bonifay

W. E.

Haviland

M. G.

(2013). Scoring and modeling psychological measures in the presence of multidimensionality. Journal of Personality Assessment, 95, 129-140. doi:10.1080/00223891.2012.725437

99.

Reise

S. P.

Moore

Maydeu-Olivares

(2011). Target rotations and assessing the impact of model violations on the parameters of unidimensional item response theory models. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 71, 684-711. doi:10.1177/0013164410378690

100.

Reise

S. P.

Scheines

Widaman

K. F.

Haviland

M. G.

(2013). Multidimensionality and structural coefficient bias in structural equation modeling: A bifactor perspective. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73, 5-26. doi:10.1177/0013164412449831

101.

Revelle

Zinbarg

R. E.

(2009). Coefficients alpha, beta, omega, and the glb: Comments on Sijtsma. Psychometrika, 74, 145-154. doi:10.1007/s11336-008-9102-z

102.

Revenson

T. A.

(1986). Debunking the myth of loneliness in late life. In Seidman

Rappaport

(Eds.), Redefining social problems (pp. 115-135). New York, NY: Springer.

103.

Rodriguez

Reise

S. P.

Haviland

M. G.

(2015). Applying bifactor statistical indices in the evaluation of psychological measures. Journal of Personality Assessment, 98, 1-15. doi:10.1080/00223891.2015.1089249

104.

Russell

D. W.

(1996). UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3): Reliability, validity, and factor structure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 66, 20-40. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa6601_2

105.

Samuelsson

(1995). Children’s social networks and their association with behavioural disturbances in single-parent families: A comparison between a clinical group and a control group. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry, 49, 275-284. doi:10.3109/08039489509011917

106.

Samuelsson

(1997). Social networks of children in single-parent families: Differences according to sex, age, socioeconomic status and housing-type and their associations with behavioural disturbances. Social Networks, 19, 113-127. doi:10.1016/S0378-8733(95)00284-7

107.

Steiger

J. H.

(1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 173-180. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr2502_4

108.

Stephan

Fäth

Lamm

(1988). Loneliness as related to various personality and environmental measures: Research with the German adaptation of the UCLA Loneliness Scale. Social Behavior and Personality, 16, 169-174. doi:10.2224/sbp.1988.16.2.169

109.

Stout

W. F.

(1987). A nonparametric approach for assessing latent trait unidimensionality. Psychometrika, 52, 589-617. doi:10.1007/BF02294821

110.

Stout

W. F.

(1990). A new item response theory modeling approach with applications to unidimensionality assessment and ability estimation. Psychometrika, 55, 293-325. doi:10.1007/BF02295289

111.

Szumski

Karwowski

(2015). Emotional and social integration and the big-fish-little-pond effect among students with and without disabilities. Learning and Individual Differences, 43, 63-74. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2015.08.037

112.

Ten Berge

J. M. F.

Sočan

. (2004). The greatest lower bound to the reliability of a test and the hypothesis of unidimensionality. Psychometrika, 69, 613-625. doi:10.1007/BF02289858

113.

Thomaes

Reijntjes

Orobio

Castro

Bushman

B. J.

Poorthuis

Telch

M. J.

(2010). I like me if you like me: On the interpersonal modulation and regulation of preadolescents’ state self-esteem. Child Development, 81, 811-825. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01435.x

114.

Trinke

S. J.

Bartholomew

(1997). Hierarchies of attachment relationships in young adulthood. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 14, 603-625. doi:10.1177/0265407597145002

115.

Tucker

L. R.

Lewis

(1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 38, 1-10. doi:10.1007/BF02291170

116.

Uruk

A. C.

Demir

(2003). The role of peers and families in predicting the loneliness level of adolescents. Journal of Psychology, 137, 179-193. doi:10.1080/00223980309600607

117.

van Baarsen

Smit

J. H.

Snijders

T. A.

Knipscheer

K. P

. (1999). Do personal conditions and circumstances surrounding partner loss explain loneliness in newly bereaved older adults? Ageing & Society, 19, 441-469.

118.

van Tilburg

de Leeuw

. (1991). Stability of scale quality under various data collection procedures: A mode comparison on the “de Jong-Gierveld Loneliness Scale.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 3, 69-85. doi:10.1093/ijpor/3.1.69

119.

van Tilburg

Havens

de Jong Gierveld

. (2004). Loneliness among older adults in the Netherlands, Italy, and Canada: A multifaceted comparison. Canadian Journal on Aging/La Revue Canadienne du Vieillissement, 23, 169-180.

120.

Vandenberg

R. J.

Lance

C. E.

(2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 4-70. doi:10.1177/109442810031002

121.

Verhaeghen

Salthouse

T. A.

(1997). Meta-analyses of age-cognition relations in adulthood: Estimates of linear and nonlinear age effects and structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 122, 231-249. doi:10.1037//0033-2909.122.3.231

122.

Victor

Scambler

Bond

Bowling

(2000). Being alone in later life: Loneliness, social isolation and living alone. Reviews in Clinical Gerontology, 10, 407-417. doi:10.1017/S0959259800104101

123.

Wasserman

Faust

(1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

124.

Weeks

M. S.

Asher

S. R.

(2012). Loneliness in childhood: Toward the next generation of assessment and research. In Benson

J. B.

(Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 42, pp. 1-39). San Diego, CA: Elsevier.

125.

Wei

Russell

D. W.

Zakalik

R. A.

(2005). Adult attachment, social self-efficacy, self-disclosure, loneliness, and subsequent depression for freshman college students: A longitudinal study. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52, 602-614. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.52.4.602

126.

Weiss

R. S.

(1973). Loneliness: The experience of emotional and social isolation. Cambridge: MIT Press.

127.

Wigfield

Eccles

J. S.

Yoon

K. S.

Harold

R. D.

Arbreton

A. J. A.

Freedman-Doan

Blumenfeld

P. C.

(1997). Change in children’s competence beliefs and subjective task values across the elementary school years: A 3-year study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 451-469. doi:10.1037/}0022-0663.89.3.451

128.

Woodhouse

S. S.

Dykas

M. J.

Cassidy

(2012). Loneliness and peer relations in adolescence: Loneliness in adolescence. Social Development, 21, 273-293. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9507.2011.00611.x

129.

Yarcheski

Mahon

N. E.

(1986). Future time perspective and loneliness: A comparison between adolescents from father-absent and two-parent families. Journal of Pediatric Nursing: Nursing Care of Children and Families, 1, 102-110.

130.

(2002). Evaluating cutoff criteria of model fit indices for latent variable models with binary and continuous outcomes. Los Angeles: University of California.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.02 MB

Using the De Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scale With Early Adolescents: Factor Structure,Reliability,Stability,and External Validity

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material