Scales to assess the eight octants and two axes of the interpersonal circumplex (IPC) using items from the revised NEO Personality Inventory were introduced by Traupman et al. Item changes in the revised and renormed third edition of the NEO instrument (NEO-PI-3) have affected item content in all eight octant scales, underscoring the need to reexamine the IPC scales. The current study examines the circumplex structure of the revised octant scales in the NEO-PI-3 and their correlations with the Dominance and Warmth scales of the Personality Assessment Inventory in 568 undergraduate students. The data show perfect fit to circumplex structure, suggesting equivalent or better assessment of the IPC with the NEO-PI-3 octant scales. Convergence of the eight octants with the Personality Assessment Inventory interpersonal scales further supports their saturation with interpersonal content and appropriate location within the IPC.
AldenL. E.WigginsJ. S.PincusA. L. (1990). Construction of circumplex scales for the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems. Journal of Personality Assessment, 55, 521-536.
2.
AnsellE. B.KurtzJ. E.DeMoorR. M.MarkeyP. M. (2011). Validity of the PAI interpersonal scales for measuring dimensions of the interpersonal circumplex. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93, 33-39.
3.
AyearstL. E.SellbomM.TrobstK. K.BagbyM. (2013). Evaluating the interpersonal content of the MMPI-2-RF interpersonal scales. Journal of Personality Assessment, 95, 187-196.
4.
BaronC. E.SmithT. W.UchinoB. N.BaucomB. R.BirminghamW. C. (2016). Getting along and getting ahead: Affiliation and dominance predict ambulatory blood pressure. Health Psychology, 35, 253-261.
5.
BenjaminL. S. (1993). Interpersonal diagnosis and treatment of personality disorders. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
6.
BrowneM. W.CudeckR. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods & Research, 21, 230-258.
7.
CainN. M.AnsellE. B.WrightA. G. C.HopwoodC. J.ThomasK. M.PintoA.. . . GriloC. M. (2012). Interpersonal pathoplasticity in the course of major depression. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 80, 78-86.
8.
CarsonR. C. (1969). Interaction concepts of personality. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
9.
CostaP. T.McCraeR. R. (1992). NEO PI-R professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
10.
CundiffJ. M.SmithT. W.UchinoB. N.BergC. A. (2011). An interpersonal analysis of subjective social status and psychosocial risk. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 30, 47-74.
11.
de FruytF.de BolleM.McCraeR. R.TerraccianoA.CostaP. T. (2009). Assessing the universal structure of personality in early adolescence: The NEO-PI-R and NEO-PI-3 in 24 cultures. Assessment, 16, 301-311.
12.
GoldbergL. R.JohnsonJ. A.EberH. W.HoganR.AshtonM. C.CloningerC. R.GoughH. G.(2006). The international personality item pool and the future of public-domain personality measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 84-96.
13.
GurtmanM. B. (1992). Construct validity of interpersonal personality measures: The interpersonal circumplex as a nomological net. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 105-118.
14.
GurtmanM. B.BalakrishnanJ. (1998). Circular measurement redux: The analysis and interpretation of interpersonal circle profiles. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 5, 344-360.
15.
GurtmanM. B.PincusA. L. (2000). Interpersonal Adjective Scales: Confirmation of circumplex structure from multiple perspectives. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 374-384.
16.
HopwoodC. J.WrightA. G. C.AnsellE. B.PincusA. L. (2013). The interpersonal core of personality pathology. Journal of Personality Disorders, 27, 270-295.
17.
HorowitzL. M. (1979). On the cognitive structure of interpersonal problems treated in psychotherapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 47, 5-15.
18.
HorowitzL. M.RosenbergS. E.BaerB. A.UreñoG.VillaseñorV. S. (1988). Inventory of interpersonal problems: Psychometric properties and clinical applications. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 885-892.
19.
HorowitzL. M.RosenbergS. E.BartholomewK. (1993). Interpersonal problems, attachment styles, and outcome in brief dynamic psychotherapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61, 549-560.
20.
HubertL.ArabieP. (1987). Evaluating order hypotheses within proximity matrices. Psychological Bulletin, 102, 172-178.
21.
KieslerD. J. (1983). The 1982 interpersonal circle: A taxonomy for complementarity in human transactions. Psychological Review, 90, 185-214.
22.
KieslerD. J. (1996). Contemporary interpersonal theory and research: Personality, psychopathology, and psychotherapy. New York, NY: Wiley.
23.
KurtzJ. E.LeeP. A.SherkerJ. L. (1999). Internal and temporal reliability estimates for informant ratings of personality using the NEO PI-R and IAS. Assessment, 6, 103-113.
24.
LearyT. (1957). Interpersonal diagnosis of personality. New York, NY: Ronald Press.
25.
MarkeyP. M.MarkeyC. N. (2009). A brief assessment of the interpersonal circumplex: The IPIP-IPC. Assessment, 16, 352-361.
26.
McCraeR. R.CostaP. T. (1989). The structure of interpersonal traits: Wiggin’s circumplex and the five-factor model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 586-595.
27.
McCraeR. R.CostaP. T. (2010). NEO Inventories professional manual. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
28.
McCraeR. R.CostaP. T.Jr.MartinT. A. (2005). The NEO–PI–3: A more readable revised NEO Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 84, 261-270.
29.
McCraeR. R.CostaP. T.TerraccianoA.ParkerW. D.MillsC. J.de FruytF. D.MervieldeI. (2002). Personality trait development from age 12 to age 18: Longitudinal, cross-sectional, and cross-cultural analyses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1456-1468.
30.
MoreyL. C. (2007). The Personality Assessment Inventory professional manual (2nd ed.). Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
31.
RoundsJ.TraceyT. J.HubertL. (1992). Methods for evaluating vocational interest structural hypotheses. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 40, 239-259.
32.
SmithT. W.RuizJ. M.CundiffJ. M.BaronK. G.Nealey-MooreJ. (2013). Optimism and pessimism in social context: An interpersonal perspective on resilience and risk. Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 553-562.
33.
SoldzS.BudmanS.DembyA.MerryJ. (1995). A short form of the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems Circumplex scales. Assessment, 2, 53-63.
34.
SomersR. H. (1962). A new asymmetric measure of association for ordinal variables. American Sociological Review, 27, 799-811.
35.
SullivanH. S. (1953). The interpersonal theory of psychiatry. New York, NY: Norton.
36.
TellegenA.Ben-PorathY. S. (2008). Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2-restructured form: Technical manual. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
37.
ThomasK. M.HopwoodC. J.DonnellanM. B.WrightA. G. C.SanislowC. A.McDevitt-MurphyM.. . . MoreyL. C. (2014). Personality heterogeneity in PTSD: Distinct temperament and interpersonal typologies. Psychological Assessment, 26, 23-34.
38.
TraceyT. J. (1997). RANDALL: A Microsoft FORTRAN program for a randomization test of hypothesized order relations. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57, 164-168.
39.
TrapnellP.WigginsJ. S. (1990). Extension of the Interpersonal Adjective Scales to include the Big Five dimensions of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 781-790.
40.
TraupmanE. K.SmithT. W.UchinoB. N.BergC. A.TrobstK. K.CostaP. T. (2009). Interpersonal circumplex octant, control, and affiliation scales for the NEO-PI-R. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 457-463.
41.
WigginsJ. S. (1979). A psychological taxonomy of trait-descriptive terms: The interpersonal domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 395-412.
42.
WigginsJ. S. (1995). Interpersonal Adjective Scales: Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
43.
WigginsJ. S. (2003). Paradigms of personality assessment. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
44.
WigginsJ. S.PincusA. L. (1989). Conceptions of personality disorders and dimensions of personality. Psychological Assessment, 1, 305-316.
45.
WigginsJ. S.TrobstK. K. (1998, August). A circumplex model for the NEO-PI-R. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, San Francisco, CA.
46.
WrightA. G. C.PincusA. L.ConroyD.HilsenrothM. (2009). Integrating methods to optimize circumplex description and comparison of groups. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91, 311-322.
