The nomothetic approach (i.e., the study of interindividual variation) dominates analyses of clinical data, even though its assumption of homogeneity across people and time is often violated. The idiographic approach (i.e., the study of intraindividual variation) is best suited for analyses of heterogeneous clinical data, but its person-specific methods and results have been criticized as unwieldy. Group iterative multiple model estimation (GIMME) combines the assets of the nomothetic and idiographic approaches by creating person-specific maps that contain a group-level structure. The maps show how intensively measured variables predict and are predicted by each other at different time scales. In this article, GIMME is introduced conceptually and mathematically, and then applied to an empirical data set containing the negative affect, detachment, disinhibition, and hostility composite ratings from the daily diaries of 25 individuals with personality pathology. Results are discussed with the aim of elucidating GIMME’s potential for clinical research and practice.
AkaikeH. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, AC19, 716-723.
2.
BeltzA. M.BeekmanC.MolenaarP. C. M.BussK. A. (2013). Mapping temporal dynamics in social interactions with unified structural equation modeling: A description and demonstration revealing time-dependent sex differences in play behavior. Applied Developmental Science, 17, 152-168.
3.
BeltzA. M.GatesK. M.EngelsA. S.MolenaarP. C. M.PulidoC.TurrisiR.. . . WilsonS. J. (2013). Changes in alcohol-related brain networks across the first year of college: A prospective pilot study using fMRI effective connectivity mapping. Addictive Behaviors, 38, 2052-2059.
4.
BeltzA. M.MolenaarP. C. M. (2015). A posteriori model validation for the temporal order of directed functional connectivity maps. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 9, 304.
5.
BeltzA. M.MolenaarP. C. M. (2016). Dealing with multiple solutions in structural vector autoregressive models. Multivariate Behavioral Research. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/00273171.2016.1151333
BorkenauP.OstendorfF. (1998). The Big Five as states: How useful is the five-factor model to describe intraindividual variations over time?Journal of Research in Personality, 32, 202-221.
8.
BringmannL. F.LemmensL.HuibersM. J. H.BorsboomD.TuerlinckxF. (2015). Revealing the dynamic network structure of the Beck Depression Inventory-II. Psychological Medicine, 45, 747-757.
9.
BrownT. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
10.
CattellR. B. (1952). The three basic factor-analytic designs: Their interrelations and derivatives. Psychological Bulletin, 49, 499-520.
11.
ChouC. P.BentlerP. M. (1990). Model modification in covariance structure modeling: A comparison among likelihood ratio, Lagrange multiplier, and Wald tests. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 115-136.
12.
CramerA. O. J.Van der SluisS.NoordhofA.WichersM.GeschwindN.AggenS. H.. . . BorsboomD. (2012). Dimensions of normal personality as networks in search of equilibrium: You can’t like parties if you don’t like people. European Journal of Personality, 26, 414-431.
13.
GatesK. M.MolenaarP. C. M. (2012). Group search algorithm recovers effective connectivity maps for individuals in homogeneous and heterogeneous samples. NeuroImage, 63, 310-319.
14.
GatesK. M.MolenaarP. C. M.HillaryF. G.RamN.RovineM. J. (2010). Automatic search for fMRI connectivity mapping: An alternative to Granger causality testing using formal equivalences among SEM path modeling, VAR, and unified SEM. NeuroImage, 50, 1118-1125.
15.
GatesK. M.MolenaarP. C. M.HillaryF. G.SlobounovS. (2011). Extended unified SEM approach for modeling event-related fMRI data. NeuroImage, 54, 1151-1158.
16.
GranicI.HollensteinT. (2003). Dynamic systems methods for models of developmental psychopathology. Development and Psychopathology, 15, 641-669.
17.
HaynesS. N.MummaG. H.PinsonC. (2009). Idiographic assessment: Conceptual and psychometric foundations of individualized behavioral assessment. Clinical Psychology Review, 29, 179-191.
18.
HoermannS.ClarkinJ. F.HullJ. W.LevyK. N. (2005). The construct of effortful control: An approach to borderline personality disorder heterogeneity. Psychopathology, 38, 82-86.
19.
HoffmanL.StawskiR. S. (2009). Persons as contexts: Evaluating between-person and within-person effects in longitudinal analysis. Research in Human Development, 6, 97-120.
20.
InselT.CuthbertB.GarveyM.HeinssenR.PineD. S.QuinnK.. . . WangP. (2010). Research Domain Criteria (RDoC): Toward a new classification framework for research on mental disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry, 167, 748-751.
21.
InselT. R. (2014). The NIMH Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) project: Precision medicine for psychiatry. American Journal of Psychiatry, 171, 395-397.
22.
JonesC. J.NesselroadeJ. R. (1990). Multivariate, replicated, single-subject, repeated measures designs and P-technique factor analysis: A review of intraindividual change studies. Experimental Aging Research, 16, 171-183.
KarchJ. D.SanderM. C.von OertzenT.BrandmaierA. M.Werkle-BergnerM. (2015). Using within-subject pattern classification to understand lifespan age differences in oscillatory mechanisms of working memory selection and maintenance. NeuroImage, 118, 538-552.
25.
KazdinA. E. (2013). Advancing new frontiers with Clinical Psychological Science: Editorial. Clinical Psychological Science, 1, 3-4.
26.
KimJ.ZhuW.ChangL.BentlerP. M.ErnstT. (2007). Unified structural equation modeling approach for the analysis of multisubject, multivariate functional MRI data. Human Brain Mapping, 28, 85-93.
27.
LiuS.MolenaarP. C. M. (2014). iVAR: A program for imputing missing data in multivariate time series using vector autoregressive models. Behavioral Research Methods, 46, 1138-1148.
28.
LütkepohlH. (2005). New introduction to multiple time series analysis. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
29.
MacCallumR. C.WegenerD. T.UchinoB. N.FabrigarL. R. (1993). The problem of equivalent models in applications of covariance structure analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 185-199.
30.
MathWorks. (2010). MATLAB [Computer software]. Natick, MA: The Mathworks, Inc.
31.
MolenaarP. C. M. (1985). A dynamic factor model for the analysis of multivariate time series. Psychometrika, 50, 181-202.
32.
MolenaarP. C. M. (2004). A manifesto on psychology as idiographic science: Bringing the person back into scientific psychology, this time forever. Measurement, 2, 201-218.
33.
MolenaarP. C. M.BeltzA. M.GatesK. M.WilsonS. J. (2016). State space modeling of time-varying contemporaneous and lagged relations in connectivity maps. NeuroImage, 125, 791-802.
34.
MolenaarP. C. M.CampbellC. G. (2009). The new person-specific paradigm in psychology. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 112-117.
35.
MolenaarP. C. M.LoL. L. (2015). Alternative forms of Granger causality, heterogeneity and non-stationarity. In von EyeA.WiedermannW. (Eds.), Statistics and causality (pp. 205-230). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
36.
MolenaarP. C. M.NesselroadeJ. R. (2009). The recoverability of P-technique factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 44, 130-141.
37.
MolenaarP. C. M.SmitD. J. A.BoomsmaD. I.NesselroadeJ. R. (2012). Estimation of subject-specific heritabilities from intra-individual variation: iFACE. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 15, 393-400.
38.
OlbertC. M.GalaG. J.TuplerL. A. (2014). Quantifying heterogeneity attributable to polythetic diagnostic criteria: Theoretical framework and empirical application. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 123, 452-462.
39.
PervinL. A. (2001). A dynamic systems approach to personality. European Psychologist, 6, 172-176.
40.
RamN.GrimmK. (2007). Using simple and complex growth models change: Matching theory to articulate developmental to method. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 31, 303-316.
41.
RamN.NesselroadeJ. R. (2007). Modeling intraindividual and intracontextual change: Operationalizing developmental contextualism. In LittleT. D.BovairdJ. A.CardN. A. (Eds.), Modeling contextual effects in longitudinal studies (pp. 325-342). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
42.
SmithS. M.MillerK. L.Salimi-KhorshidiG.WebsterM.BeckmannC. F.NicholsT. E.. . . WoolrichM. W. (2011). Network modelling methods for FMRI. NeuroImage, 54, 875-891.
43.
SongH. R.ZhangZ. Y. (2014). Analyzing multiple multivariate time series data using multilevel dynamic factor models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 49, 67-77.
44.
SpencerJ. P.SchönerG. (2003). Bridging the representational gap in the dynamic systems approach to development. Developmental Science, 6, 392-412.
45.
ThelenE.SmithL. B. (1998). Dynamic systems theories. In DamonW. (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 1: Theoretical models of human development (5th ed., pp. 563-634). New York, NY: Wiley.
46.
WangQ.MolenaarP.HarshS.FreemanK.XieJ.GoldC.. . . UlbrechtJ. (2014). Personalized state-space modeling of glucose dynamics for type 1 diabetes using continuously monitored glucose, insulin dose, and meal intake: An extended Kalman filter approach. Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, 8, 331-345.
47.
WatsonD.ClarkL. A. (1994). The PANAS-X: Manual for the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule–Expanded Form. Ames: University of Iowa.
48.
WrightA. G. C.BeltzA. M.GatesK. M.MolenaarP. C. M.SimmsL. J. (2015). Examining the dynamic structure of daily internalizing and externalizing behavior at multiple levels of analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1914.
49.
WrightA. G. C.HallquistM. N.MorseJ. Q.ScottL. N.SteppS. D.NolfK. A.PilkonisP. A. (2013). Clarifying interpersonal heterogeneity in borderline personality disorder using latent mixture modeling. Journal of Personality Disorders, 27, 125-143.
50.
WrightA. G. C.HopwoodC. J.ZanariniM. C. (2015). Associations between changes in normal personality traits and borderline personality disorder symptoms over 16 years. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 6, 1-11.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
