National and Gender Measurement Invariance of the Utrecht-Management of Identity Commitments Scale (U-MICS)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the psychometric properties of the Utrecht-Management of Identity Commitments Scale (U-MICS), a self-report measure aimed at assessing identity processes of commitment, in-depth exploration, and reconsideration of commitment. We tested its factor structure in university students from a large array of cultural contexts, including 10 nations located in Europe (i.e., Italy, the Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Romania, and Switzerland), Middle East (i.e., Turkey), and Asia (i.e., China, Japan, and Taiwan). Furthermore, we tested national and gender measurement invariance. Participants were 6,118 (63.2% females) university students aged from 18 to 25 years (M_age = 20.91 years). Results indicated that the three-factor structure of the U-MICS fitted well in the total sample, in each national group, and in gender groups. Furthermore, national and gender measurement invariance were established. Thus, the U-MICS can be fruitfully applied to study identity in university students from various Western and non-Western contexts.

Keywords

identity U-MICS gender cross-national measurement invariance Europe Asia Middle East

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aish

A. M.

Jöreskog

K. G.

(1990). A panel model for political efficacy and responsiveness: An application in LISREL 7 with weighted least squares. Quality & Quantity, 19, 716-723.

Arnett

J. J.

(2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55, 469-480.

Arnett

J. J.

(2004). Emerging adulthood: The winding road from the late teens through the twenties. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Arnett

J. J.

(Ed.). (2007). International encyclopedia of adolescence. New York, NY: Routledge.

Balistreri

Busch-Rossnagel

N. A.

Geisinger

K. F.

(1995). Development and preliminary validation of the Ego Identity Process Questionnaire. Journal of Adolescence, 18, 179-192.

Bennion

L. D.

Adams

G. R.

(1986). A revision of the extended version of the objective measure of ego identity status: An identity instrument for use with late adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Research, 1, 183-198.

Berman

S. L.

(2011). International perspectives on identity development. Child & Youth Care Forum, 40, 1-5.

Berman

S. L.

You

Schwartz

Teo

Mochizuki

(2011). Identity exploration, commitment, and distress: A cross national investigation in China, Taiwan, Japan, and the United States. Child & Youth Care Forum, 40, 65-75.

Browne

M. W.

Cudeck

(1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In Bollen

K. A.

Long

J. S.

(Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

10.

Byrne

B. M.

(2012). Structural equation modeling with Mplus: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge, Taylor & Francis.

11.

Byrne

B. M.

Oakland

Leong

F. T. L.

van de Vijver

F. J. R.

Hambleton

R. K.

Cheung

F. M.

Bartram

(2009). A critical analysis of cross-cultural research and testing practices: Implications for improved education and training in psychology. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 3, 94-105.

12.

Byrne

B. M.

Shavelson

R. J.

Muthén

(1989). Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: The issue of partial measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 456-466.

13.

Byrne

B. M.

van de Vijver

F. J. R.

(2010). Testing for measurement and structural equivalence in large-scale cross-cultural studies: Addressing the issue of nonequivalence. International Journal of Testing, 10, 107-132.

14.

Chen

Curran

P. J.

Bollen

K. A.

Kirby

Paxton

(2008). An empirical evaluation of the use of fixed cutoff points in RMSEA test statistic in structural equation models. Sociological Methods & Research, 36, 462-494.

15.

Chen

F. F.

(2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 464-504.

16.

Cheung

G. W.

(2008). Testing equivalence in the structure, means, and variances of higher-order constructs with structural equation modeling. Organizational Research Methods, 11, 593-613.

17.

Cheung

G. W.

Rensvold

R. B.

(2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233-255.

18.

Cramer

(2000). Development of identity: Gender makes a difference. Journal of Research in Personality, 34, 42-72.

19.

Crocetti

Avanzi

Hawk

S. T.

Fraccaroli

Meeus

(2014). Personal and social facets of job identity: A person-centered approach. Journal of Business and Psychology, 29, 281-300.

20.

Crocetti

Jahromi

Meeus

(2012). Identity and civic engagement in adolescence. Journal of Adolescence, 35, 521-532.

21.

Crocetti

Klimstra

T. A.

Hale

W. W.

III Koot

H. M.

Meeus

(2013). Impact of early adolescent externalizing problem behaviors on identity development in middle to late adolescence: A prospective 7-year longitudinal study. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42, 1745-1758.

22.

Crocetti

Meeus

(2014). Identity statuses: Advantages of a person-centered approach. In McLean

K. C.

Syed

(Eds.), The Oxford handbook of identity development (pp. 97-114). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

23.

Crocetti

Rubini

Berzonsky

M. D.

Meeus

(2009). Brief report: The Identity Style Inventory: Validation in Italian adolescents and college students. Journal of Adolescence, 32, 425-433.

24.

Crocetti

Rubini

Meeus

(2008). Capturing the dynamics of identity formation in various ethnic groups: Development and validation of a three-dimensional model. Journal of Adolescence, 31, 207-222.

25.

Crocetti

Schwartz

S. J.

Fermani

Klimstra

Meeus

(2012). A cross-national study of identity status in Dutch and Italian adolescents: Status distributions and correlates. European Psychologist, 17, 171-181.

26.

Crocetti

Schwartz

S. J.

Fermani

Meeus

(2010). The Utrecht-Management of Identity Commitments Scale (U-MICS): Italian validation and cross-national comparisons. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 26, 172-186.

27.

Crocetti

Sica

L. S.

Schwartz

S. J.

Serafini

Meeus

(2013). Identity styles, processes, statuses, and functions: Making connections among identity dimensions. European Review of Applied Psychology, 63, 1-13.

28.

Cumming

(2012). Understanding the new statistics: Effect sizes, confidence intervals, and meta-analysis. New York, NY: Routledge.

29.

Dimitrova

Crocetti

Buzea

Kosic

Tair

Tausova

. . . Jordanov

(2015). The Utrecht-Management of Identity Commitments Scale (U-MICS): Measurement invariance and cross-national comparisons of youth from seven European countries. European Journal of Psychological Assessment. Advance online publication. doi:10.1027/1015-5759/a000241

30.

Erikson

(1950). Childhood and society. New York, NY: Norton.

31.

Erikson

(1968). Identity, youth and crisis. New York, NY: Norton.

32.

Eryigit

Kerpelman

J. L.

(2011). Cross-cultural investigation of the link between identity processing styles and the actual work of identity in the career domain. Child & Youth Care Forum, 40, 43-64.

33.

Graf

S. C.

Mullis

R. L.

Mullis

A. K.

(2008). Identity formation of United States American and Asian Indian adolescents. Adolescence, 43, 57-69.

34.

Jensen

Kristiansen

Sandbekk

Kroger

(1998). Ego identity status in cross-cultural context: A comparison of Norwegian and United States university students. Psychological Reports, 83, 455-460.

35.

Karaś

Cieciuch

Negru

Crocetti

(2014). Relationships between identity and well-being in Italian, Polish, and Romanian emerging adults. Social Indicators Research, 121, 727-743. doi:10.1007/s11205-014-0668-9

36.

Klimstra

T. A.

Hale

W. W.

Raaijmakers

Q. A. W.

Branje

S. J. T.

Meeus

W. H. J.

(2010). Identity formation in adolescence: Change or stability? Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39, 150-162.

37.

Klimstra

T. A.

Luyckx

Hale

W. W.

Frijns

van Lier

P. A. C.

Meeus

W. H. J.

(2010). Short-term fluctuations in identity: Introducing a micro-level approach to identity formation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 191-202.

38.

Kline

R. B.

(2013). Beyond significance testing: Statistics reform in the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

39.

Kroger

(1997). Gender and identity: The intersection of structure, content, and context. Sex Roles, 36, 747-770.

40.

Little

T. D.

Card

N. A.

Slegers

D. W.

Ledford

E. C.

(2007). Representing contextual effects in multiple-group MACS models. In Little

T. D.

Bovaird

J. A.

Card

N. A.

(Eds.), Modeling contextual effects in longitudinal studies (pp. 121-147). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

41.

Low

J. M.

Akande

Hill

(2005). A cross-cultural comparison of identity development: South Africa and the United States. Identity, 5, 303-314.

42.

Luyckx

Goossens

Soenens

(2006). A developmental contextual perspective on identity construction in emerging adulthood: Change dynamics in commitment formation and commitment evaluation. Developmental Psychology, 42, 366-380.

43.

Luyckx

Schwartz

S. J.

Berzonsky

M. D.

Soenens

Vansteenkiste

Smits

Goossens

(2008). Capturing ruminative exploration: Extending the four-dimensional model of identity formation in late adolescence. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 58-82.

44.

Marcia

J. E.

(1966). Development and validation of ego-identity status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3, 551-558.

45.

Marcia

J. E.

(1980). Identity in adolescence. In Adelson

(Ed.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (pp. 159-187). New York, NY: Wiley.

46.

Meeus

(2011). The study of adolescent identity formation 2000–2010: A review of longitudinal research. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21, 75-94.

47.

Meeus

van de Schoot

Keijsers

Branje

(2012). Identity statuses as developmental trajectories: A five-wave longitudinal study in early-to-middle and middle-to-late adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 41, 1008-1021.

48.

Meeus

van de Schoot

Keijsers

Schwartz

S. J.

Branje

(2010). On the progression and stability of adolescent identity formation: A five-wave longitudinal study in early-to-middle and middle-to-late adolescence. Child Development, 81, 1565-1581.

49.

Morsunbul

Crocetti

Cok

Meeus

(2014). Brief report: The Utrecht-Management of Identity Commitments Scale (U-MICS): Gender and age measurement invariance and convergent validity of the Turkish version. Journal of Adolescence, 37, 799-805.

50.

Muthén

L. K.

Muthén

B. O.

(1998-2012). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Author.

51.

Rossi

Elklit

Simonsen

(2010). Empirical evidence for a four factor framework of personality disorder organization: Multigroup confirmatory factor analysis of the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory-III personality disorder scales across Belgian and Danish data samples. Journal of Personality Disorders, 24, 128-150.

52.

Satorra

Bentler

P. M.

(1994). Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis. In von Eye

Clogg

C. C.

(Eds.), Latent variables analysis: Applications for developmental research (pp. 399-419). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

53.

Schwartz

S. J.

Adamson

Ferrer-Wreder

Dillon

F. R.

Berman

S. L.

(2006). Identity status measurement across contexts: Variations in measurement structure and mean levels among White American, Hispanic American, and Swedish emerging adults. Journal of Personality Assessment, 86, 61-76.

54.

Schwartz

S. J.

Zamboanga

B. L.

Meca

Ritchie

R. A.

(2012). Identity around the world: An overview. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 138, 1-18.

55.

Selig

J. P.

Card

N. A.

Little

T. D.

(2008). Latent variable structural equation modelling in cross-cultural research: Multigroup and multilevel approaches. In van de Vijver

F. J. R.

van Hemert

D. A.

Poortinga

Y. H.

(Eds.), Multilevel analysis of individuals and cultures (pp. 93-119). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

56.

Steinmetz

(2013). Analyzing observed composite differences across groups: Is partial measurement invariance enough? Methodology, 9, 1-12.

57.

Stringer

K. J.

Kerpelman

J. L.

(2010). Career identity development in college students: Decision making, parental support, and work experience. Identity, 10, 181-200.

58.

van de Schoot

Lugtig

Hox

(2012). A checklist for testing measurement invariance. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9, 486-492.

59.

Van de Vijver

F. J. R.

Leung

(1997). Methods and data analysis for cross-cultural research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

60.

Van De Vijver

F. J. R.

Leung

(2000). Methodological issues in psychological research on culture. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31, 33-51.

61.

Vandenberg

R. J.

(2002). Toward a further understanding of and improvement in measurement invariance methods and procedures. Organizational Research Methods, 5, 139-158.

62.

von Eye

Bogat

G. A.

(2006). Person-oriented and variable-oriented research: Concepts, results, and development. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly—Journal of Developmental Psychology, 52, 390-420.

63.

Watzlawick

Born

(Eds.). (2007). Capturing identity: Quantitative and qualitative methods. Lahnam, MD: University Press of America.

64.

Zimmermann

Mahaim

E. B.

Mantzouranis

Genoud

P. A.

Crocetti

(2012). Brief report: The Identity Style Inventory (ISI-3) and the Utrecht-Management of Identity Commitments Scale (U-MICS): Factor structure, reliability, and convergent validity in French-speaking university students. Journal of Adolescence, 35, 461-465.