The Five-Factor Borderline Inventory (FFBI) is a 120-item dimensional measure of borderline personality disorder (BPD) that was developed from the description of BPD from the perspective of the Five-Factor Model. The FFBI includes 12 subscales and 1 total score. The current study created a short form of the FFBI (FFBI-SF) using item response theory analyses based on an undergraduate student sample that completed the FFBI. Based on the results, the final FFBI-SF included 48 items, with 4 items per subscale. The construct validity of the short form was compared with the original FFBI in five additional samples. The FFBI-SF showed strong convergence with other BPD scales and comparable convergent and discriminant validity with the FFM compared with the FFBI. The correlational profiles generated by the total score and subscales were highly convergent. Results of the current study suggest that the FFBI-SF may be an accessible and useful assessment tool of BPD.
American Psychiatric Association. (1993). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
2.
American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., Text rev.). Washington, DC: Author.
3.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
4.
ArntzA.BernsteinD.GielenD.van NieuwenhuyzenM.PendersK.HaslamN.RuscioJ. (2009). Taxometric evidence for the dimensional structure of cluster-C, paranoid, and borderline personality disorders. Journal of Personality Disorders, 23, 606-628.
5.
BagbyR. M.FarvoldenP. (2004). The personality diagnostic questionnaire–4 (PDQ–4). In HilsenrothM. J.SegalD. L.HersenM. (Eds.), Comprehensive handbook of psychological assessment: Vol . 2.Personality assessment (pp. 122–133). New York, NY: Wiley.
6.
ClarkL. A. (1993). Manual for the Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
7.
CostaP. T.McCraeR. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
8.
CostaP. T.McCraeR. R. (1995). Domain and facets: Hierarchical personality assessment using the Revised NEO Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 64, 21-50.
9.
DeShongH. D.LengelG. J.Sauer-ZavalaS. E.O’MearaM.Mullins-SweattS. N. (2015). Construct validity of the Five-Factor Borderline Inventory. Assessment, 22, 319-331. doi:10.1177/1073191114548029
10.
DistelM. A.TrullT. J.WillemsenG.VinkJ. M.DeromC. A.LynskeyM. M.. . . BoomsmaD. I. (2009). The five-factor model of personality and borderline personality disorder: A genetic analysis of comorbidity. Biological Psychiatry, 66, 1131-1138.
11.
Ebner-PriemerU. W.KuoJ.WelchS.S.ThielgenT.WitteS.BohusM.LinehanM. (2006). A valence-dependent group-specific recall bias of retrospective self-reports: A study of borderline personality disorder in everyday life. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 194, 774-779.
12.
EdensJ. F.MarcusD. K.RuizM. A. (2008). Taxometric analyses of borderline personality features in a large-scale male and female offender sample. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 117, 705-711.
13.
GoldbergL. R. (1990). An alternative description of personality: The big-five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216-1229.
14.
HaslamN.JayasingheN. (1995). Negative affect and hindsight bias. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 8, 127-135.
15.
JohnO. P.NaumannL. P.SotoC. J. (2008). Paradigm shift to the integrative Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues. In JohnO. P.RobinsR. R.PervinL. A. (Eds.), Handbook of personality. Theory and research (3rd. ed., pp. 114-158). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
16.
KleinM. H.BenjaminL. S.RosenfeldR.TreeceC.HustedJ.GreistJ. H. (1993). The Wisconsin Personality Disorders Inventory: I. Development, reliability, and validity. Journal of Personality Disorders, 7, 285-303.
17.
LinehanM. (1993). Cognitive behavioral treatment of borderline personality disorder. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
18.
LorangerA. W. (2001). The OMNI personality inventories professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
19.
LynamD. R. (2013). Assessment of maladaptive variants of five-factor model traits. Journal of Personality, 80, 1593-1614.
20.
LynamD. R.ShermanE. D.SamuelD.MillerJ. D.FewL. R.WidigerT. A. (2013). Development of a short form of the elemental psychopathy assessment. Assessment, 20, 659-669.
21.
LynamD. R.SmithG. T.WhitesideS. P.CydersM. A. (2006). The UPPS-P: Assessing five personality pathways to impulsive behavior (Tech. Rep.). West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University.
22.
LynamD. R.WidigerT. A. (2001). Using the five-factor model to represent the DSM-IV personality disorders: An expert consensus approach. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 110, 401-412.
23.
McCraeR. R.CostaP. T. (2003). Personality in adulthood: A five-factor theory perspective (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
24.
MillerJ. D.MorseJ. Q.NolfK.SteppS. D.PilkonisP. A. (2012). Can DSM-IV borderline personality disorder be diagnosed via dimensional personality traits: Implications for the DSM-5 personality disorder proposal. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 121, 944-950.
25.
MillonT.MeagherS. E. (2004). The Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory (MCMI–III). In HilsenrothM. J.SegalD. L.HersenM. (Eds.), Comprehensive handbook of psychological assessment: Vol. 2. Personality assessment (pp. 108-121). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
26.
MoreyL. C. (1991). Personality Assessment Inventory: Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
27.
Mullins-SweattS. N.EdmundsonM.Sauer-ZavalaS.LynamD. R.MillerJ. D.WidigerT. A. (2012). Five-factor measure of borderline personality traits. Journal of Personality Assessment, 94, 475-487.
28.
Mullins-SweattS. N.LengelG. J. (2012). Clinical utility of the five-factor model of personality disorder. Journal of Personality, 80, 1615-1639.
29.
O’ConnorB. P. (2005). A search for consensus on the dimensional structure of personality disorders. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 61, 323-345.
30.
OzerD. J.Benet-MartínezV. (2006). Personality and the prediction of consequential outcome. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 401-421.
31.
ParisJ. (2006, May). Personality disorders: Psychiatry’s stepchildren come of age. Invited address at the 159th annual meeting of the American Psychiatric Association, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
32.
RothschildL.ClelandC.HaslamN.ZimmermanM. (2003). A taxometric study of borderline personality disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112, 657-666.
33.
SamejimaF. (2010). The general graded response model. In NeringM. L.OstiniR. (Eds.), Handbook of polytomous item response theory models (pp. 77-108). New York, NY: Routledge.
34.
SamuelD. B.WidigerT. A. (2004). Clinicians’ personality descriptions of prototypic personality disorders. Journal of Personality Disorders, 18, 286-308.
35.
SamuelD. B.WidigerT. A. (2008). A meta-analytic review of the relationships between the five-factor model and DSM-IV-TR personality disorders: A facet level analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 28, 1326-1342.
36.
SaulsmanL. M.PageA. C. (2004). The five-factor model and personality disorder empirical literature: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 23, 1055-1085.
37.
SchraedleyP. K.TurnerR. J.GotlibI. H. (2002). Stability of retrospective reports in depression: Traumatic events, past depressive episodes, and parental psychopathology. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 43, 307-316.
38.
ShermanE. D.MillerJ. D.FewL. R.CampbellW. K.WidigerT. A.CregoC.LynamD. R. (2015). Development of a Short Form of the Five-Factor Narcissism Inventory: The FFNI-SF. Psychological Assessment, 27, 1110-1116. doi:10.1037/pas0000100
39.
TrullT. J.BrownW. C. (2013). Borderline personality disorder: A five-factor model perspective. In WidigerT. A.CostaP. T. (Eds.), Personality disorders and the five-factor model of personality (3rd ed., pp. 119-132). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
40.
TrullT. J.DurrettC. A. (2005). Categorical and dimensional models of personality disorder. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 1, 355-380.
41.
TrullT. J.WidigerT. A.GuthrieP. (1990). Categorical versus dimensional status of borderline personality disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 99, 40-48.
42.
TrullT. J.WidigerT. A.LynamD. R.CostaP. T. (2003). Borderline personality disorder from the perspective of general personality functioning. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112, 193-202.
43.
WidigerT. A. (2005). Five factor model of personality disorder: Integrating science and practice. Journal of Research in Personality, 39, 67-83.
44.
WidigerT. A.BoydS. (2009). Assessing personality disorders. In ButcherJ. N. (Ed.), Oxford handbook of personality assessment (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
45.
WidigerT. A.LynamD. R.MillerJ. D.OltmannsT. F. (2012). Measures to assess maladaptive variants of the five-factor model. Journal of Personality Assessment. 94, 450-455.
46.
WidigerT. A.SamuelD. B.Mullins-SweattS.GoreW. L.CregoC. (2012). Integrating normal and abnormal personality structure: the five-factor model. In WidigerT. A. (Ed.), Oxford handbook of personality disorders (pp. 82-107). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
47.
WidigerT. A.TrullT. J. (2007). Plate tectonics in the classification of personality disorder: Shifting to a dimensional model. American Psychologist, 62, 71-83.
