The purpose of this study was to determine whether the Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles (PICTS) was capable of predicting recidivism in 322 male sex offenders released from prison-based sex offender programs in a Midwestern state. The Static-99R and PICTS General Criminal Thinking (GCT), Reactive (R), and Entitlement (En) scores all correlated significantly with general recidivism, the Static-99R correlated significantly with violent recidivism, and the Static-99R score and PICTS GCT, Proactive (P), and En scores correlated significantly with failure to register as a sex offender (FTR) recidivism. Area under the curve effect size estimates varied from small to large, and Cox regression analyses revealed that the PICTS En score achieved incremental validity relative to the Static-99R in predicting general recidivism and the PICTS GCT, P, and En scores achieved incremental validity relative to the Static-99R in predicting FTR recidivism. It is speculated that the PICTS in general and the En scale in particular may have utility in risk management and treatment planning for sex offenders by virtue of their focus on antisocial thinking.
BlancheP.DartiguesJ.-F.Jacqmin-GaddaH. (2013). Estimating and comparing time-dependent areas under receiver operating characteristic curves for censored event times with competing risks. Statistics in Medicine, 32, 5381-5397.
2.
ColemanC.MoynihanJ. (1996). Understanding crime data: Haunted by the dark figure. Buckingham, England: Open University Press.
3.
DuweG.DonnayW. (2010). The effects of failure to register on sex offender recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37, 520-536.
4.
FabianJ. M. (2006). A literature review of the utility of selected violence and sexual violence risk assessment instruments. Journal of Psychiatry & Law, 34, 307-350.
5.
GendreauP.LittleT.GogginC. (1996). A meta-analysis of the predictors of adult offender recidivism: What works!Criminology, 34, 575-608.
6.
GilbertR.WidomC. S.BrowneK.FergussonD.WebbE.JansonS. (2009). Burden and consequences of child maltreatment in high-income countries. Lancet, 373, 68-81.
7.
GreenfeldL. A. (1997). Sex offenses and offenders: An analysis of data on rape and sexual assault. Bureau of Justice Statistics Research Bulletin (NCJ 163392). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.
8.
GrubinD. (1998). Sex offending against children: Understanding the risk (Police Research Series Paper 99). London, England: Home Office.
9.
HansonR. K. (1997). The development of a brief actuarial scale for sexual offense recidivism (User Report 1997-04). Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Department of the Solicitor General of Canada. Retrieved from http://www.publications.gc.ca/site/eng/72871/publication.html
10.
HansonR. K.BussièreM. T. (1998). Predicting relapse: A meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 348-362.
11.
HansonR. K.HarrisA. J. R. (2000). Where should we intervene? Dynamic predictors of sexual offence recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 27, 6-36.
12.
HansonR. K.Morton-BourgonK. E. (2009). The accuracy of recidivism risk assessments for sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of 118 prediction studies. Psychological Assessment, 21, 1-21.
13.
HansonR. K.ThorntonD. (2000). Improving risk assessments for sex offenders: A comparison of three actuarial scales. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 119-136.
14.
HarrisA. J. R.HansonR. K. (2004). Sex offender recidivism: A simple question (Cat No. PS3-1/2004-3). Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Public Works and Government Services.
15.
HarrisD. A.SmallboneS.DennisonS.KnightR. A. (2009). Specialization and versatility in sexual offenders referred for civil commitment. Journal of Criminal Justice, 37, 37-44.
16.
Hatch-MailletteM. A.ScaloraM. J.HussM. T.BaumgartnerJ. V. (2001). Criminal thinking patterns: Are child molesters unique?International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 45, 102-117.
17.
HillM. S.FischerA. R. (2001). Does entitlement mediate the link between masculinity and rape related variables?Journal of Counseling Psychology, 48, 39-50.
18.
KnightR. A. (1999, September). Unified theory of sexual coercion. Paper presented at the 18th Annual Research and Treatment Conference of the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers, Lake Buena Vista, FL.
19.
KnightR. A.ThorntonD. (2007). Evaluating and improving risk assessment schemes for sexual recidivism: A long-term follow-up of convicted sexual offenders (Final Report, NCJ 217618). Rockville, MD: National Criminal Justice Reference Service. Retrieved from https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/217618.pdf
20.
LanganP. A.SchmittE. L.DuroseM. R. (2003). Recidivism of sex offenders released from prison in 1994 (Bureau of Justice Statistics Research Bulletin; NCJ 198281). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.
21.
LevensonJ.LetourneauE.ArmstrongK.ZgobaM. (2010). Failure to register as a sex offender: Is it associated with recidivism?Justice Quarterly, 27, 305-331.
22.
LöselF.SchmuckerM. (2005). The effectiveness of treatment for sexual offenders: A comprehensive meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 1, 117-146.
23.
MannR. E.HansonR. K.ThorntonD. (2010). Assessing risk for sexual recidivism: Some proposals on the nature of psychologically meaningful risk factors. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 22, 191-217.
24.
MillsJ. F.AndersonD.KronerD. G. (2004). The antisocial attitudes and associates of sex offenders. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 14, 134-145.
25.
PembertonA. E.WakelingH. C. (2009). Entitled to sex: Attitudes of sexual offenders. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 15, 289-303.
26.
R Core Team. (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org
27.
RiceM. E.HarrisG. T. (2005). Comparing effect sizes in follow-up studies: ROC area, Cohen’s d, and r. Law and Human Behavior, 29, 615-620.
28.
RobertsC. F.DorenD. M.ThorntonD. (2002). Dimensions associated with assessments of sex offender recidivism risk. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 29, 569-589.
29.
SPSS. (2008). SPSS statistics for windows: Version 17.0. Chicago, IL: SPSS, Inc.
30.
WaltersG. D. (1995). The Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles: Part I. Reliability and preliminary validity. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 22, 307-325.
31.
WaltersG. D. (2002). The Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles (PICTS): A review and meta-analysis. Assessment, 9, 278-291.
32.
WaltersG. D. (2009a). Anger management training in incarcerated male offenders: Differential impact on proactive and reactive criminal thinking. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 8, 214-217.
33.
WaltersG. D. (2009b). Effect of a longer versus shorter test-release interval on recidivism prediction with the Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles (PICTS). International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 53, 665-678.
34.
WaltersG. D. (2012a). Crime in a psychological context: From career criminals to criminal careers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
35.
WaltersG. D. (2012b). Criminal thinking and recidivism: Meta-analytic evidence on the predictive and incremental validity of the Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles (PICTS). Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17, 272-278.
36.
WaltersG. D. (2013). The Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles (PICTS) professional manual. Allentown, PA: Center for Lifestyle Studies.
37.
WaltersG. D.DemingA.ElliottW. N. (2009). Assessing criminal thinking in male sex offenders with the Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles (PICTS). Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36, 1025-1036.
38.
WaltersG. D.GeyerM. D. (2005). Construct validity of the Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles in relationship to the PAI, disciplinary adjustment, and program completion. Journal of Personality Assessment, 84, 252-260.
39.
WaltersG. D.HagmanB. T.CohnA. M. (2011). Towards a hierarchical model of criminal thinking: Evidence from item response theory and confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Assessment, 23, 925-936.
40.
WardT.HudsonS. M.JohnstonL.MarshallW. L. (1997). Cognitive distortions in sex offenders: An integrative review. Clinical Psychology Review, 17, 479-507.
41.
Washington State Institute for Public Policy. (2006). Sex offender sentencing in Washington State: Failure to register as a sex offender—revised. Olympia, WA: Author.
42.
ZgobaK. M.LevensonJ. (2012). Failure to register as a predictor of sex offense recidivism: The big bad wolf or a red herring?Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 24, 328-349.
43.
ZgobaK. M.MinerM.KnightR.LetourneauE.LevenonJ.ThorntonD. (2012). A multi-state recidivism study using Static-99R and Static-2002 risk scores and tier guidelines from the Adam Walsh Act (Final Report, NCJ 240099). Retrieved from https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/240099.pdf
