Self-determination theory is potentially useful for understanding reasons why individuals with mental illness do or do not engage in psychiatric treatment. The current study examined the psychometric properties of three questionnaires based on self-determination theory—The Treatment Entry Questionnaire (TEQ), Health Care Climate Questionnaire (HCCQ), and the Short Motivation Feedback List (SMFL)—in a sample of 348 Dutch adult outpatients with primary diagnoses of mood, anxiety, psychotic, and personality disorders. Structural equation modeling showed that the empirical factor structures of the TEQ and SMFL were adequately represented by a model with three intercorrelated factors. These were interpreted as identified, introjected, and external motivation. The reliabilities of the Dutch TEQ, HCCQ, and SMFL were found to be acceptable but can be improved on; congeneric estimates ranged from 0.66 to 0.94 depending on the measure and patient subsample. Preliminary support for the construct validities of the questionnaires was found in the form of theoretically expected associations with other scales, including therapist-rated motivation and treatment engagement and with legally mandated treatment. Additionally, the study provides insights into the relations between measures of motivation based on self-determination theory, the transtheoretical model and the integral model of treatment motivation in psychiatric outpatients with severe mental illness.
AlexanderL. B.LuborskyL. (1986). The Penn Helping Alliance Scales. In GreenbergL. S.PinsofW. M. (Eds.), The psychotherapeutic process: A research handbook (pp. 325-366). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
2.
BabyakM. A.GreenS. B. (2010). Confirmatory factor analysis: An introduction for psychosomatic medicine researchers. Psychosomatic Medicine, 72, 587-597. doi:10.1097/PSY.0b013e3181de3f8a
3.
CampbellD. T.FiskeD. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81-105.
4.
ChoiJ.MogamiT.MedaliaA. (2010). Intrinsic Motivation Inventory: An adapted measure for schizophrenia research. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 36, 966-976.
5.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (Vol. 2). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
6.
De Weert-Van OeneG. H.De JongC. A.JorgF.SchrijversG. J. (1999). The Helping Alliance Questionnaire: Psychometric properties in patients with substance dependence. Substance Use & Misuse, 34, 1549-1569. doi:10.3109/10826089909039414
7.
DeciE. L.EghrariH.PatrickB. C.LeoneD. R. (1994). Facilitating internalization: The self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Personality, 62, 119-142. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1994.tb00797.x
8.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry: An International Journal for the Advancement of Psychological Theory, 11, 227-268.
9.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (2008). Facilitating optimal motivation and psychological well-being across life’s domains. Canadian Psychology, 49(1), 14-23.
10.
DrakeR. E.GoldmanH. E.LeffH.LehmanA. F.DixonL.MueserK. T.TorreyW. C. (2001). Implementing evidence-based practices in routine mental health service settings. Psychiatric Services, 52, 179-182.
11.
DrieschnerK. H.BoomsmaA. (2008a). The Treatment Motivation Scales for Forensic Outpatient Treatment (TMS-F): Construction and psychometric evaluation. Assessment, 15, 224-241. doi:10.1177/1073191107311650
12.
DrieschnerK. H.BoomsmaA. (2008b). Validation of the Treatment Motivation Scales for Forensic Outpatient Treatment (TMS-F). Assessment, 15, 242-255. doi:10.1177/1073191107311651
13.
DrieschnerK. H.LammersS. M. M.van der StaakC. P. F. (2004). Treatment motivation: An attempt for clarification of an ambiguous concept. Clinical Psychology Review, 23, 1115-1137. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2003.09.003
14.
ElliotA. J. (2006). The hierarchical model of approach-avoidance motivation. Motivation & Emotion, 30, 111-116.
15.
HemphillJ. F. (2003). Interpreting the magnitudes of correlation coefficients. American Psychologist, 58, 78-79.
16.
HuL.-T.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
17.
JochemsE. C.MulderC. L.van DamA.DuivenvoordenH. J. (2011). A critical analysis of the utility and compatibility of motivation theories in psychiatric treatment. Current Psychiatry Reviews, 7, 298-312. doi:10.2174/157340011797928204
18.
JochemsE. C.MulderC. L.van DamA.DuivenvoordenH. J.SchefferS. C.van der SpekW.van der Feltz-CornelisC. M. (2012). Motivation and treatment engagement intervention trial (MotivaTe-IT): The effects of motivation feedback to clinicians on treatment engagement in patients with severe mental illness. BMC Psychiatry, 12, 209. doi:10.1186/1471-244X-12-209
19.
JongeJ. M. D.SchaapC. P. D. R.SchippersG. M. (2002). Motivatie voor verandering: Een Nederlandse versie van de University of Rhode Island Change Assessment (URICA-NL) [Motivation for change: A Dutch version of the University of Rhode Island Change Assessment (URICA-NL)]. Diagnostiek-wijzer, 5(3), 114-122.
20.
MartinoF.MenchettiM.PozziE.BerardiD. (2012). Predictors of dropout among personality disorders in a specialist outpatients psychosocial treatment: A preliminary study. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 66, 180-186. doi:10.1111/j.1440-1819.2012.02329.x
21.
McBrideC.ZuroffD. C.RavitzP.KoestnerR.MoskowitzD. S.QuiltyL.BagbyR. M. (2010). Autonomous and controlled motivation and interpersonal therapy for depression: Moderating role of recurrent depression. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 49, 529-545. doi:10.1348/014466509X479186
22.
McConnaughyE. A.ProchaskaJ. O.VelicesW. F. (1983). Stages of change in psychotherapy: Measurement and sample profiles. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 20, 368-375.
23.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (1998-2012). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
24.
NideckerM.DiClementeC. C.BennettM. E.BellackA. S. (2008). Application of the transtheoretical model of change: Psychometric properties of leading measures in patients with co-occurring drug abuse and severe mental illness. Addictive Behaviors, 33, 1021-1030. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2008.03.012
25.
NunnallyJ. C.BernsteinI. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (Vol. 3). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
26.
PelletierL. G.TusonK. M.HaddadN. K. (1997). Client Motivation for Therapy Scale: A measure of intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, and amotivation for therapy. Journal of Personality Assessment, 68, 414-435.
27.
ProchaskaJ. O.DiClementeC. C. (1983). Stages and processes of self-change in smoking: Toward an integrative model of change. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 5, 390-395.
28.
ReuterbergS.-E.GustafssonJ.-E. (1992). Confirmatory factor analysis and reliability: Testing measurement model assumptions. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 795-811.
29.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2008). A self-determination theory approach to psychotherapy: The motivational basis for effective change. Canadian Psychology, 49, 186-193. doi:10.1037/a0012753
30.
RyanR. M.LynchM. F.VansteenkisteM.DeciE. L. (2010). Motivation and autonomy in counseling, psychotherapy, and behavior change: A look at theory and practice. Counseling Psychologist, 39, 193-260. doi:10.1177/0011000009359313
31.
RyanR. M.PatrickH.DeciE. L.WilliamsG. C. (2008). Facilitating health behaviour change and its maintenance: Interventions based on self-determination theory. European Health Psychologist, 10, 2-5.
32.
RyanR. M.PlantR. W.O’MalleyS. (1995). Initial motivations for alcohol treatment: Relations with patient characteristics, treatment involvement, and dropout. Addictive Behaviors, 20, 279-297. doi:10.1016/0306-4603(94)00072-7
33.
SilversteinS. M. (2010). Bridging the gap between extrinsic and intrinsic motivation in the cognitive remediation of schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 36, 949-956.
34.
SmithG. T. (2005). On construct validity: Issues of method and measurement. Psychological Assessment, 17, 396-408.
35.
StaringA. B.Van der GaagM.KoopmansG. T.SeltenJ. P.Van BeverenJ. M.HengeveldM. W.. . . MulderC. L. (2010). Treatment adherence therapy in people with psychotic disorders: Randomised controlled trial. British Journal of Psychiatry, 197, 448-455. doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.110.077289
36.
TaitL.BirchwoodM.TrowerP. (2002). A new scale (SES) to measure engagement with community mental health services. Journal of Mental Health, 11, 191-198. doi:10.1080/09638230020023570-2
37.
UrbanoskiK. A.WildT. C. (2012). Assessing self-determined motivation for addiction treatment: Validity of the Treatment Entry Questionnaire. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 43(1), 70-79. doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2011.10.025
38.
van VeldhuizenJ. R. (2007). FACT: A Dutch version of ACT. Community Mental Health Journal, 43, 421-433. doi:10.1007/s10597-007-9089-4
39.
VansteenkisteM.WilliamsG. C.ResnicowK. (2012). Toward systematic integration between self-determination theory and motivational interviewing as examples of top-down and bottom-up intervention development: Autonomy or volition as a fundamental theoretical principle. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition & Physical Activity, 9, 23.
40.
WildT.CunninghamJ. A.RyanR. M. (2006). Social pressure, coercion, and client engagement at treatment entry: A self-determination theory perspective. Addictive Behaviors, 31, 1858-1872. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2006.01.002
41.
WilliamsG. C.GrowV. M.FreedmanZ. R.RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (1996). Motivational predictors of weight-loss and weight-loss maintenance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 115-126.
42.
ZeldmanA.RyanR. M.FiscellaK. (2004). Motivation, autonomy support, and entity beliefs: Their role in methadone maintenance treatment. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 23, 675-696.
43.
ZuroffD. C.KoestnerR.MoskowitzD.McBrideC.MarshallM.BagbyM. (2007). Autonomous motivation for therapy: A new common factor in brief treatments for depression. Psychotherapy Research, 17, 137-147.
