The relationships between two measures proposed to describe personality pathology, that is the Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-3) and the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5), are examined in an undergraduate sample (N = 240). The NEO inventories are general trait measures, also considered relevant to assess disordered personality, whereas the PID-5 measure is specifically designed to assess pathological personality traits, as conceptualized in the DSM-5 proposal. A structural analysis of the 25 PID-5 traits confirmed the factor structure observed in the U.S. derivation sample, with higher order factors of Negative Affectivity, Detachment, Antagonism, Disinhibition, and Psychoticism. A joint factor analysis of, respectively, the NEO domains and their facets with the PID-5 traits showed that general and maladaptive traits are subsumed under an umbrella of five to six major dimensions that can be interpreted from the perspective of the five-factor model or the Personality Psychopathology Five. Implications for the assessment of personality pathology and the construction of models of psychopathology grounded in personality are discussed.
American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.-Text revision). Washington, DC: Author.
2.
AndersonJ. L.SellbomM.BagbyR. M.QuiltyL. C.VeltriC. O. C.MarkonK. E.KruegerR. F. (2013). On the convergence between PSY-5 domains and PID-5 domains and facets: Implications for assessment of DSM-5 personality traits. Assessment. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1073191112471141
3.
ClarkL. A. (1993). Manual for the Schedule for Non-adaptive and Adaptive Personality (SNAP)Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
4.
ClarkL. A. (2007). Assessment and diagnosis of personality disorder: Perennial issues and an emerging reconceptualization. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 227-257.
5.
CloningerC. R.PrzybeckT. R.SvrakicD. M.WetzelR. D. (1994). The Temperament and Character Inventory (TCI): A guide to its development and use. St. Louis, MO: Center for Psychobiology and Personality, Washington University.
6.
ConnellyB. S.OnesD. S. (2010). Another perspective on personality: Meta-analytic integration of observers’ accuracy and predictive validity. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 1092-1122.
7.
CostaP. T.McCraeR. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory and Five-Factor Inventory professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
8.
CostaP. T.McCraeR. R. (2010). Bridging the gap with the five-factor model. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 1, 127-130.
9.
CostaP. T.TerraccianoA.McCraeR. R. (2001). Gender differences in personality traits across cultures: Robust and surprising findings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 322-331.
10.
De BolleM.BeyersW.De ClercqB.De FruytF. (2012). General personality and psychopathology in referred and nonreferred children and adolescents: An investigation of continuity, pathoplasty and complication models. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 121, 958-970. doi:10.1037/a0027742
11.
De FruytF.De BolleM.McCraeR. R.TerraccianoA.CostaP. T. (2009). Assessing the universal structure of personality in early adolescence: The NEO-PI-R and NEO-PI-3 in 24 cultures. Assessment, 16, 301-311.
12.
De FruytF.De ClercqB. J.van de WieleL.Van HeeringenK. (2006). The validity of Cloninger’s psychobiological model versus the five-factor model to predict DSM-IV personality disorders in a heterogeneous psychiatric sample: Domain facet and residualized facet descriptions. Journal of Personality, 74, 479-510.
13.
De FruytF.MervieldeI.HoekstraH. A.RollandJ.-P. (2000). Assessing adolescents’ personality with the NEO PI-R. Assessment, 7, 329-345.
14.
EdmundsonM.LynamD. R.MillerJ. D.GoreW. L.WidigerT. A. (2011). A five-factor measure of schizotypal personality traits. Assessment, 18, 321-334.
15.
HaiglerE. D.WidigerT. A. (2001). Experimental manipulation of NEO-PI-R items. Journal of Personality Assessment, 77, 339-358.
16.
HarknessA. R.FinnJ. A.McNultyJ. L.ShieldsS. M. (2012). The Personality Psychopathology-Five (PSY-5): Recent constructive replication and assessment literature review. Psychological Assessment, 24, 432-443.
17.
HarknessA. R.McNultyJ. L. (1994). The personality psychopathology five (PSY-5): Issues from the pages of a diagnostic manual instead of a dictionary. In StrackS.LorrM. (Eds.), Differentiating normal and abnormal personality (pp. 291-315). New York, NY: Springer.
18.
HarknessA. R.McNultyJ. L.Ben-PorathY. S. (1995). The Personality Psychopathology Five (PSY-5): Constructs and MMPI-2 scales. Psychological Assessment, 7, 104-114.
19.
HavenS.ten BergeJ. M. F. (1977). Tucker’s coefficient of congruence as a measure of factorial invariance: An empirical study. Groningen, Netherlands: University of Groningen.
HoekstraH. A.OrmelJ.De FruytF. (1996). NEO PI-R en NEO-FFI: Big Five Persoonlijkheidsvragenlijsten [NEO PI-R en NEO-FFI: Big Five Personality Inventories]. Lisse, Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
22.
HopwoodC. J.DonnellanM. B. (2010). How should the internal structure of personality inventories be evaluated?Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 332-346.
23.
HopwoodC. J.ThomasK. M.MarkonK. E.WrightA. G. C.KruegerR. F. (2012). DSM-5 personality traits and DSM-IV personality disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 121, 424-432. doi:10.1037/a0026656
24.
Keulen-De-VosM.BernsteinD. P.ClarkL. A.ArntzA.LuckerT. P. C.de SpaE. (2011). Patient versus informant reports of personality disorders in forensic patients. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 22, 52-71.
25.
KruegerR. F. (2005). Continuity of axes I and II: Toward a unified model of personality, personality disorders, and clinical disorders. Journal of Personality Disorders, 19, 233-261.
26.
KruegerR. F.DerringerJ.MarkonK. E.WatsonD.SkodolA. E. (2012). Initial construction of a maladaptive personality trait model and inventory for DSM-5. Psychological Medicine, 42, 1879-1890. doi:10.1017/S0033291711002674.
27.
KruegerR. F.EatonN. R. (2010). Personality traits and the classification of mental disorders: Toward a more complete integration in DSM-5 and an empirical model of psychopathology. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 1, 97-118.
28.
LenzenwegerM. F. (2006). The longitudinal study of personality disorders: History, design, considerations, and initial findings. Journal of Personality Disorders, 20, 645-670.
29.
LivesleyW. J. (1990). Dimensional Assessment of Personality Pathology–Basic Questionnaire. Vancouver, Canada: University of British Columbia.
30.
LynamD. R.GaughanE. T.MillerJ. D.MillerD. J.Mullins-SweattS.WidigerT. A. (2011). Assessing the basic traits associated with psychopathy: Development and validation of the elemental psychopathy assessment. Psychological Assessment, 23, 108-124.
31.
MarkonK. E.KruegerR. F.WatsonD. (2005). Delineating the structure of normal and abnormal personality: An integrative hierarchical approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 139-157.
32.
MarshH. W.LüdtkeO.MuthénB.AsparouhovT.MorinA. J. S.TrautweinU.NagengastB. (2010). A new look at the big five factor structure through exploratory structural equation modeling. Psychological Assessment, 22, 471-491.
33.
McCraeR. R.CostaP. T.MartinT. A. (2005). The NEO-PI-3: A more readable revised NEO Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 84, 261-270.
34.
McCraeR. R.ZondermanA. B.BondM. H.CostaP. T.PaunonenS. V. (1996). Evaluating replicability of factors in the revised NEO personality inventory: Confirmatory factor analysis versus Procrustes rotation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 552-566.
35.
MillerJ. D.BagbyR. M.PilkonisP. A.ReynoldsS. K.LynamD. R. (2005). A simplified technique for scoring DSM-IV personality disorders with the five-factor model. Assessment, 12, 404-415.
36.
MillerJ. D.LynamD. R.RollandJ. P.De FruytF.ReynoldsS. K.Pham-ScottezA.BagbyM. (2008). Scoring the DSM-IV personality disorders using the Five-Factor Model: Development and validation of normative scores for North American, French and Dutch-Flemish samples. Journal of Personality Disorders, 22, 433-450.
37.
MoreyL. C.GundersonJ. G.QuigleyB. D.SheaM. T.SkodolA. E.McGlashanT. H.ZanariniM. C. (2002). The representation of Borderline, Avoidant, Obsessive-Compulsive, and Schizotypal Personality Disorders by the five-factor model. Journal of Personality Disorders, 16, 215-234.
38.
Mullins-SweattS. N.JamersonJ. E.SamuelD. B.OlsonD. R.WidigerT. A. (2006). Psychometric properties of an abbreviated instrument of the five-factor model. Assessment, 13, 119-137.
39.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (1998-2010). MPlus user’s guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
40.
O’ConnorB. P. (2000). SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer’s MAP test. Behavior Research Methods Instruments & Computers, 32, 396-402.
41.
PiedmontR. L.ShermanM. F.ShermanN. C.Dy-LiaccoG. S.WilliamsJ. E. G. (2009). Using the five-factor model to identify a new personality disorder domain: The case for experiential permeability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 1245-1258.
42.
SamuelD. B.WidigerT. A. (2008). A meta-analytic review of the relationships between the five-factor model and DSM-IV-TR personality disorders: A facet level analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 28, 1326-1342.
43.
SaulsmanL. M.PageA. C. (2004). The five-factor model and personality disorder empirical literature: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 23, 1055-1085.
44.
SouthS. C.OltmannsT. F.JohnsonJ.TurkheimerE. (2011). Level of agreement between self and spouse in the assessment of personality pathology. Assessment, 18, 217-226.
45.
SteppS. D.YuL.MillerJ. D.HallquistM. N.TrullT. J.PilkonisP. A. (2012). Integrating competing dimensional models of personality: Linking the SNAP, TCI and NEO using item response theory. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 3, 107-126.
46.
ThomasK. M.YalchM. M.KruegerR. F.WrightA. G. C.MarkonK. E.HopwoodC. J. (2012). The convergent structure of DSM-5 personality trait facets and five-factor model trait domains. Assessment. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1073191112457589
47.
TrullT. J.JahngS.TomkoR. L.WoodP. K.SherK. J. (2010). Revised NESARC personality disorder diagnoses: Gender, prevalence, and comorbidity with substance dependence disorders. Journal of Personality Disorders, 24, 412-426.
48.
TrullT. J.SherK. J. (1994). Relationship between the 5-factor model of personality and axis-I disorders in a nonclinical sample. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103, 350-360.
49.
VelicerW. F. (1976). Determining number of components from matrix of partial correlations. Psychometrika, 41, 321-327.
50.
WatsonD.ClarkL. A.ChmielewskiM. (2008). Structures of personality and their relevance to psychopathology: II. Further articulation of a comprehensive unified trait structure. Journal of Personality, 76, 1545-1586.
51.
WidigerT. A.CostaP. T.Jr. (2013). Personality disorders and the five-factor model of personality. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
52.
WidigerT. A.CostaP. T.McCraeR. R. (2002). A proposal for Axis II: Diagnosing personality disorders using the five-factor model. In CostaP. T.WidigerT. A. (Eds.), Personality disorders and the five-factor model of personality (2nd ed., pp. 431-456). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
53.
WidigerT. A.Mullins-SweattS. N. (2009). Five-factor model of personality disorder: A proposal for DSM-V. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 5, 197-220.
54.
WidigerT. A.SimonsenE. (2005). Alternative dimensional models of personality disorder: Finding a common ground. Journal of Personality Disorders, 19, 110-130.
55.
WidigerT. A.SimonsenE.SirovatkaP. J.RegierD. A. (2006). Dimensional models of personality disorders: Refining the research agenda for DSM-V. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
56.
WidigerT. A.TrullT. J. (1992). Personality and psychopathology—An application of the 5-factor model. Journal of Personality, 60, 363-393.
57.
WidigerT. A.TrullT. J. (2007). Plate tectonics in the classification of personality disorder: Shifting to a dimensional model. American Psychologist, 62, 71-83.
58.
WidigerT. A.TrullT. J.ClarkinJ. F.SandersonC.CostaP. T. (2002). A description of the DSM-IV personality disorders with the five-factor model of personality. In CostaP. T.WidigerT. A. (Eds.), Personality disorders and the five-factor model of personality (2nd ed., pp. 89-99). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
59.
WrightA. G. C.ThomasK. M.HopwoodC. J.MarkonK. E.PincusA. L.KruegerR. F. (2012). The hierarchical structure of the DSM-5 pathological personality traits. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 121, 951-957.
