Correlated Trait–Correlated Method Minus One Analysis of the Convergent and Discriminant Validities of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire

Abstract

This study used the correlated trait–correlated method minus one model to examine the convergent and discriminant validity of the scales of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). The SDQ scales are emotional symptoms (ES), conduct problems (CP), hyperactivity (HY), peer problems (PP), and prosocial behaviors (PS). A total of 202 adolescents provided self-ratings and were also rated by their mothers and teachers. The findings indicated support for convergent validity for all five SDQ scales for all three respondents. Generally there was more convergence between mother–adolescent ratings than mother–teacher and adolescent–teacher ratings, especially for ES and PP. There was support for the discriminant validity between the traits in all scales, except between CP and HY. The findings are discussed in relation to the construct validity and clinical use of the SDQ.

Keywords

Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire correlated trait–correlated method minus one model mother teacher and adolescent ratings

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Achenbach

T. H.

McConaughy

S. H.

Howell

C. Y.

(1987). Child/adolescent behavior and emotional problems: Implications for cross-informant correlations for situational specificity. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 213-232.

Australian Bureau of Statistics. (1997). Australian standard classification of occupations (2nd ed.). Canberra, ACT: Author.

Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2007). Ancestry by country of birth of parents: Time series statistics (2001, 2006 census years)—Australia. Canberra, ACT: Author.

Becker

Hagenberg

Roessner

Woerner

Rothenberger

(2004). Evaluation of the self-reported SDQ in a clinical setting: Do self-reports tell us more than ratings by adults informants? European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 13(Suppl. 2), ii17-ii24.

Brown

T. A.

(2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Campbell

D. T.

Fiske

D. W.

(1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 2, 81-105.

Choudhury

M. S.

Pimentel

S. S.

Kendall

P. C.

(2003). Childhood anxiety disorders: Parent-child (dis)agreement using a structured interview for the DSM-IV. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 42, 957-964.

De Los Reyes

Kazdin

A. E.

(2005). Informant discrepancies in the assessment of childhood psychopathology: A critical review, theoretical framework, and recommendations for further study. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 483-509.

Dickey

W. C.

Blumberg

S. J.

(2004). Revisiting the factor structure of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: United States, 2001. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 43, 1159-1167.

10.

Eid

(2000). A multitrait–multimethod model with minimal assumptions. Psychometrika, 65, 241-261.

11.

Eid

Lischetzke

Nussbeck

F. W.

Trierweiler

L. I.

(2003). Separating trait effects from trait-specific method effects in multitrait–multimethod models: A multiple-indicator CT-C(M − 1) model. Psychological Methods, 8, 38-60.

12.

Eid

Nussbeck

F. W.

Geiser

Cole

D. A.

Gollwitzer

Lischetzke

(2008). Structural equation modeling of multitrait-multimethod data: Different models for different types of methods. Psychological Methods, 13, 230-253.

13.

Geiser

Eid

Nussbeck

F. W.

(2008). On the meaning of the latent variables in the CT-C(M_1) model: A comment on Maydeu-Olivares and Coffman (2006). Psychological Methods, 13, 49-57.

14.

Goodman

Lamping

D. L.

Ploubidis

G. B.

(2010). When to use broader internalising and externalising subscales instead of the hypothesised five subscales on the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ): Data from British parents, teachers and children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 38, 1179-1191.

15.

Goodman

(1997). The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: A research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 38, 581-586.

16.

Goodman

(2001). Psychometric properties of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 40, 1337-1345.

17.

Goodman

Meltzer

Bailey

(1998). The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: A pilot study on the validity of the self-report version. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 75, 125-130.

18.

Goodman

Meltzer

Bailey

(2003). The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: A pilot study on the validity of the self-report version. International Review of Psychiatry, 15, 173-177.

19.

Green

D. P.

Goldman

S. L.

Salovey

(1993). Measurement error masks bipolarity in affect ratings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 1029-1041.

20.

Grills

A. E.

Ollendick

T. H.

(2002). Issues in parent–child agreement: The case of structured diagnostic interviews. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 5, 57-83.

21.

Hemphill

J. F.

(2003). Interpreting the magnitudes of correlation coefficients. American Psychologist, 58, 78-79.

22.

Hill

C. R.

Hughes

J. N.

(2007). An examination of the convergent and discriminant validity of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. School Psychology Quarterly, 22, 380-406.

23.

Höfling

Schermelleh-Engel

Moosbrugger

(2009). Analyzing multitrait-multimethod data. Methodology, 5, 99-111.

24.

L. T.

Bentler

P. M.

(1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3, 424-453.

25.

Iacobucci

(2010). Structural equations modeling: Fit indices, sample size, and advanced topics. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20, 90-98.

26.

Joreskog

K. G.

Goldberger

A. S.

(1975). Estimation of a model with multiple indicators and multiple causes of a single latent variable. Journal of American Statistical Association, 70, 631-639.

27.

Lance

C. E.

Noble

C. L.

Scullen

S. E.

(2002). A critique of the correlated trait-correlated method and correlated uniqueness models for multitrait-multimethod data. Psychological Methods, 7, 228-244.

28.

Mellor

Stokes

(2007). The factor structure of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 23, 105-112.

29.

Muthén

(1988). Some uses of structural equation modeling in validity studies: Extending IRT to external variables. In Wainer

Braun

(Eds.), Test Validity (pp. 213-238). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.

30.

Muthén

L. K.

Muthén

B. O.

(2010). Mplus user’s guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Author.

31.

Nussbeck

F. W.

Eid

Geiser

Courvoisier

D. S.

Lischetzke

(2009). A CTC(M-1) model for different types of raters. Methodology, 5, 88-98.

32.

Rønning

J. A.

Handegaard

B. H.

Sourander

Mørch

W. T.

(2004). The Strengths and Difficulties Self-Report Questionnaire as a screening instrument in Norwegian community samples. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 13, 73-82.

33.

Sanne

Torsheim

Heiervang

Stormark

K. M.

(2009). The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in the Bergen Child Study: A conceptually and methodically motivated structural analysis. Psychological Assessment, 21, 352-364.

34.

Van Leeuwen

Meerschaert

Bosmans

De Medts

Braet

(2006). The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in a community sample of young children in Flanders. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 22, 189-197.

35.

Van Roy

Grøholt

Heyerdahl

Clench-Aas

(2006). Self-reported strengths and difficulties in a large Norwegian population 10-19 years: Age and gender specific results of the extended SDQ-questionnaire. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 15, 189-198.