A Psychometric Evaluation of the Core Bereavement Items

Abstract

Despite being a routinely administered assessment of grieving, few studies have empirically examined the psychometric properties of the Core Bereavement Items (CBI). The present study investigated the factor structure, internal reliability, and concurrent validity of the CBI in a large, diverse sample of bereaved young adults (N = 1,366). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses (conducted on randomly selected halves of the sample) supported a two-factor structure, with items tapping into grief-related Thoughts and Emotional Response to loss. These factors showed strong internal consistency and unique associations with demographic variables, circumstantial factors surrounding the loss, and a measure of prolonged/severe grief—highlighting the potential applicability of the identified factor structure.

Keywords

grief bereavement measurement psychological assessment death and dying

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bentler

(1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238-246. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238

Boelen

P. A.

van den Bout

de Keijser

Hoijtink

(2003). Reliability and validity of the Dutch version of the Inventory of Traumatic Grief (ITG). Death Studies, 27, 227-247. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.162.11.2175

Browne

Cudeck

(1993). Alternate ways of assessing model fit. In Bollen

Long

(Eds.), Testing structural equations models (pp. 1136-1162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Burnett

Middleton

Raphael

Martinek

(1997). Measuring core bereavement phenomena. Psychological Medicine, 27, 49-57. doi:10.1017/S0033291796004151

Futterman

Holland

J. M.

Brown

P. J.

Thompson

L. W.

Gallagher-Thompson

(2010). Factorial validity of the Texas Revised Inventory of Grief-Present scale among bereaved older adults. Psychological Assessment, 22, 675-687. doi:10.1037/a0019914

Holland

J. M.

Futterman

Thompson

L. W.

Moran

Gallagher-Thompson

(in press). Difficulties accepting the loss of a spouse: A precursor for intensified grieving among widowed older adults. Death Studies.

Bentler

(1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118

Kline

R. B.

(2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford.

Middleton

Raphael

Burnett

Martinek

(1998). A longitudinal study comparing bereavement phenomena in recently bereaved spouses, adult children, and parents. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 32, 235-241. doi:10.3109/00048679809062734

10.

Muthén

L. K.

Muthén

B. O.

(1998-2010). Mplus user’s guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén. Retrieved from http://www.statmodel.com/ugexcerpts.shtml

11.

Neimeyer

R. A.

Hogan

N. S.

Laurie

(2008). The measurement of grief: Psychometric considerations in the assessment of reactions to bereavement. In Stroebe

M. S.

Hansson

R. O.

Schut

Stroebe

Van den Blink

(Eds.), Handbook of bereavement research and practice: Advances in theory and intervention. (pp. 133-161). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

12.

Prigerson

H. G.

Jacobs

S. C.

(2001). Diagnostic criteria for traumatic grief: A rationale, consensus criteria, and a preliminary empirical test. In Stroebe

M. S.

Hansson

R. O.

Stroebe

Schut

(Eds.), Handbook of bereavement research: Consequences, coping, and care (pp. 613-645). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

13.

Velicer

W. F.

Eaton

C. A.

Fava

J. L.

(2000). Construct explication through factor or component analysis: A review and evaluation of alternative procedures for determining the number of factors or components. In Goffin

R. D.

Helmes

(Eds.), Problems and solutions in human assessment (pp. 41-71). Boston, MA: Kluwer.