Personality traits are known to be associated with a host of important life outcomes, including interpersonal dysfunction. The interpersonal circumplex offers a comprehensive system for articulating the kinds of interpersonal problems associated with personality traits. In the current study, traits as measured by the Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire in a sample of 124 young women were correlated with interpersonal dysfunction as measured by the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems–Circumplex. Results suggest that Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire traits vary in their associations with interpersonal distress and in their coverage of specific kinds of interpersonal difficulties among women undergoing the transition to adulthood.
AldenL. E.WigginsJ. S.PincusA. L. (1990). Construction of circumplex scales for the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems. Journal of Personality Assessment, 55, 521-536.
2.
AnsellE. B.PincusA. L. (2004). Interpersonal perceptions of the five-factor model of personality: An examination using the structural summary method for circumplex data. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 167-201.
3.
ArnettJ. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55, 469-480.
4.
CritchfieldK. L.BenjaminL. S. (2010). Assessment of repeated relational patterns for individual cases using the SASB-based Intrex questionnaire. Journal of Assessment of Personality, 92, 480-489.
5.
GruczaR. A.GoldbergL. R. (2007). The comparative validity of 11 modern personality inventories: Predictions of behavioral acts, informant reports, and clinical indicators. Journal of Personality Assessment, 89, 167-187.
6.
GurtmanM. B. (1992). Construct validity of interpersonal personality measures: The interpersonal circumplex as a nomological net. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 105-118.
7.
GurtmanM. B.BalakrishnanJ. (1998). Circular measurement redux: The analysis and interpretation of interpersonal circle profiles. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 5, 344-360.
8.
HopwoodC. J.DonnellanM. B.BlonigenD. M.KruegerR. F.McGueM.IaconoW. G.BurtS. A. (2011). Genetic and environmental influences on personality trait stability and growth during the transition to adulthood: A three wave longitudinal study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 545-556.
9.
HopwoodC. J.KoonceE. A.MoreyL. C. (2009). An exploratory study of integrative personality pathology systems and the interpersonal circumplex. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 31, 331-339.
10.
KlumpK. L.BurtS. A. (2006). The Michigan State University Twin Registry (MSUTR): Genetic, environmental, and neurobiological influences on behavior across development. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 9, 971-977.
11.
MarkeyP. M.MarkeyC. N. (2009). A brief assessment of the interpersonal circumplex: The IPIP-IPC. Assessment, 16, 352-361.
12.
MarkonK. E.KruegerR. F.WatsonD. (2005). Delineating the structure of normal and abnormal personality: An integrative hierarchical approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 139-157.
13.
McCraeR. R.CostaP. T.Jr. (1989). The structure of interpersonal traits: Wiggin’s circumplex and the five-factor model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 586-595.
14.
MezulisA. H.FunasakiK. S.CharbonneauA. M.HydeJ. S. (2010). Gender differences in the cognitive vulnerability-stress model of depression in the transition to adolescence. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 34, 501-513.
15.
MonsenJ. T.HagtvetK. A.HavikO. E.EilertsenD. E. (2006). Circumplex structure and personality disorder correlates of the interpersonal problems model (IIP-C): Construct validity and clinical implications. Psychological Assessment, 18, 165-173.
16.
NysaeterT. E.LangvikE.BerthelsenM.NordvikH. (2009). Interpersonal problems and personality traits: The relation between IIP64C and NEO-FFI. Nordic Psychology, 61, 82-93.
17.
OzerD.Benet-MartínezV. (2006). Personality and the prediction of consequential outcomes. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 401-421.
18.
PatrickC. J.CurtinJ. C.TellegenA. (2002). Development and validation of a brief form of the Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire. Psychological Assessment, 14, 150-163.
19.
PincusA. L.WigginsJ. S. (1989). Interpersonal problems and conceptions of personality disorders. Journal of Personality Disorders, 4, 342-352.
20.
SimonsenS.SimonsenE. (2009). The Danish DAPP-BQ: Reliability, factor structure, and convergence with the SCID-II and IIP-C. Journal of Personality Disorders, 23, 629-646.
21.
TellegenA.WallerN. G. (1994). Exploring personality through test construction: Development of the Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire. In BriggsS. R.CheekJ. M. (Eds.), Personality measures: Development and evaluation (Vol. 1, pp. 133-161). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
22.
TrapnellP. D.WigginsJ. S. (1990). Extension of the interpersonal adjective scales to include the big five dimensions of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 781-790.
23.
WatsonD.ClarkL. A.HarknessA. R. (1994). Structures of personality and their relevance for psychopathology. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103, 18-31.
24.
WigginsJ. S. (1979). A psychological taxonomy of trait-descriptive terms: The interpersonal domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 395-412.
25.
WigginsJ. S.BroughtonR. (1991). A geometric taxonomy of personality scales. European Journal of Personality, 5, 343-365.
26.
WigginsJ. S.PincusA. L. (1989). Conceptions of personality disorders and dimensions of personality. Psychological Assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1, 305-316.
