This study examined the impact of overreporting on the validity of Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2—Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF) substantive scale scores by comparing correlations with relevant external criteria (i.e., validity coefficients) of individuals who completed the instrument under instructions to (a) feign psychopathology or (b) feign somatic complaints, with validity findings for a control group of individuals who completed the MMPI-2-RF under standard instructions. Validity coefficients for MMPI-2-RF substantive scale scores were much weaker for feigners than for controls. The authors also found mean profiles to be more elevated for feigners than for controls. Effects were more extreme for psychopathology feigners than for somatic feigners. The results demonstrate the detrimental effect that overreporting psychopathology or somatic problems has on the validity of MMPI-2-RF scale scores. The findings illustrate the need for validity indices in self-report measures of personality and psychopathology.
Arbisi, P.A., & Ben-Porath, Y.S. (1998). The ability of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 validity scales to detect fake-bad responses in psychiatric inpatients. Psychological Assessment, 10, 221-228.
2.
Arbisi, P.A., Ben-Porath, Y.S., & McNulty, J. ( 2006). The ability of the MMPI-2 to detect feigned PTSD within the context of compensation seeking. Psychological Services , 3, 249-261.
3.
Babor, T.F., Higgins-Biddle, J.C., Saunders, J.B., & Monteiro, M.G. (2001). The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test: Guidelines for use in primary care (2nd ed.). Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
4.
Ballenger, J.F., Caldwell-Andrews, A., & Baer, R.A. ( 2001). Effects of positive impression management on the NEO Personality Inventory-Revised in a clinical population. Psychological Assessment, 13, 254-260.
5.
Ben-Porath, Y.S., & Tellegen, A. ( 2008). MMPI-2-RF manual for administration, scoring, and interpretation . Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
6.
Buss, A.H., & Plomin, R. ( 1975). A temperament theory of personality development. New York, NY: Wiley.
7.
Caldwell-Andrews, A., Baer, R.A., & Berry, D.T.R. ( 2000). Effects of response sets on NEO-PI-R scores and their relations to external criteria. Journal of Personality Assessment , 74, 472-488.
8.
Cocco, K., & Carey, K. ( 1998). Psychometric properties of the Drug Abuse Screening Test in psychiatric outpatients. Psychological Assessment, 10, 408-414.
9.
Cohen, J. ( 1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (Rev. ed.). New York, NY: Academic Press.
10.
Costa, P.T., Jr., & McCrae, R.R. (1992a). Normal personality assessment in clinical practice: The NEO Personality Inventory. Psychological Assessment, 4, 5-13.
Derouesné, C., Dealberto, M.J., Boyer, P., Lubin, S., Sauron, B., Piette, F., . . ., Alperovitch, A. (1993). Empirical evaluation of the "Cognitive Difficulties Scale" for assessment of memory complaints in general practice: A study of 1628 cognitively normal subjects aged 45-75 years. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 8, 599-607.
14.
Gervais, R.O., Ben-Porath, Y.S., Wygant, D.B., & Green, P. ( 2007). Development and validation of a Response Bias Scale (RBS) for the MMPI-2. Assessment, 14, 196-208.
15.
Gervais, R.O., Ben-Porath, Y.S., Wygant, D.B., & Sellbom, M. ( 2010). Incremental validity of the MMPI-2-RF over-reporting scales and RBS in assessing the veracity of memory complaints. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 25, 274-284.
16.
Graham, J.R., Watts, D., & Timbrook, R.E. (1991). Detecting fake-good and fake-bad MMPI-2 profiles. Journal of Personality Assessment , 57, 264-277.
17.
Hirschi, T., Hindelang, M.J., & Weis, J.G. ( 1980). The status of self-report measures. In M. W. Klein & K. S. Teilman (Eds.), Handbook of criminal justice evaluation (pp. 473-478). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
18.
Lilienfeld, S.O., & Andrews, B.P. ( 1996). Development and preliminary validation of a self-report measure of psychopathic personality traits in noncriminal populations. Journal of Personality Assessment, 66, 488-524.
19.
Lynam, D.R., Whiteside, S., & Jones, S. ( 1999). Self-reported psychopathy: A validation study. Journal of Personality Assessment, 73, 110-132.
20.
McNair, D., & Kahn, R. ( 1983). The Cognitive Difficulties Scale. In T. Crook, S. Ferris, & R. Bartus (Eds.), Assessment in geriatric psychopharmacology (pp. 137-143). New Canaan, CT : Powley.
21.
Rogers, R. ( 2008). Researching response styles. In R. Rogers (Ed.), Clinical assessment of malingering and deception (3rd ed., pp. 411-434). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
22.
Rosenberg, M. ( 1989). Society and the adolescent self-image. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.
23.
Scholz, U., Doña, B.C., Sud, S., & Schwarzer, R. ( 2002). Is general self-efficacy a universal construct? Psychometric findings from 25 countries. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 18, 242-251.
24.
Schwarzer, R. ( 2008). Everything you wanted to know about the General Self-Efficacy Scale but were afraid to ask. Berlin, Germany: Free University of Berlin, Health Psychology Department. Retrieved from http://www.mentalhealthpromotion.net/resources/swe_faq_english.pdf
25.
Schwarzer, R., & Born, A. ( 1997). Optimistic self-beliefs: Assessment of general perceived self-efficacy in thirteen cultures. World Psychology, 3, 177-190.
26.
Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. ( 1995). Generalized Self-Efficacy Scale. In J. Weinman, S. Wright, & M. Johnston (Eds.), Measures in health psychology: A user’s portfolio. Causal and control beliefs (pp. 35-37). Windsor, England: NFER-NELSON.
27.
Sellbom, M. ( 2007). Locating psychopathy in abnormal range personality dimensions: The MMPI-2 Restructured Clinical (RC) Scales as a road map (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Kent State University, Kent, OH.
28.
Sellbom, M., & Bagby, R.M. ( 2008a). Response styles on multi-scale inventories. In R. Rogers (Ed.), Clinical assessment of malingering and deception (3rd ed., pp. 182-206). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
29.
Sellbom, M., & Bagby, R.M. ( 2008b). Validity of the MMPI-2-RF (Restructured Form) L-r and K-r scales in detecting underreporting in clinical and nonclinical samples . Psychological Assessment, 20, 370-376.
30.
Sellbom, M., Ben-Porath, Y.S., Graham, J.R., Arbisi, P.A., & Bagby, R.M. ( 2005). Susceptibility of the MMPI-2 Clinical, Restructured Clinical (RC), and Content Scales to detect overreporting and underreporting. Assessment, 12, 79-85.
31.
Sellbom, M., Toomey, J.A., Wygant, D.B., Kucharski, L.T., & Duncan, S. ( 2010). Utility of the MMPI-2-RF (Restructured Form) Validity Scales in detecting malingering in a criminal forensic setting: A known-groups design. Psychological Assessment, 22, 22-31.
32.
Sellbom, M., & Verona, E. ( 2004, October). Differential neuro-psychological mechanisms for two psychopathy factors. Poster session presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Research in Psychopathology, St. Louis, MO.
33.
Sivec, H.J., Lynn, S.J., & Garske, J.P. ( 1994). The effect of somatoform disorder and paranoid psychotic role-related dissimulations as a response set on the MMPI-2. Assessment, 1, 69-81.
34.
Skinner, H. ( 1982). The Drug Abuse Screening Test. Addictive Behaviors, 7, 363-371.
35.
Tellegen, A. &, Ben-Porath, Y.S. ( 2008). MMPI-2-RF technical manual. Minneapolis : University of Minnesota Press.
36.
Tellegen, A., Ben-Porath, Y.S., McNulty, J.L., Arbisi, P.A., Graham, J.R., & Kaemmer, B. ( 2003). The MMPI-2 Restructured Clinical (RC) Scales: Development, validation, and interpretation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
37.
Winkelspecht, C., Lewis, P., & Thomas, A. ( 2006). Potential effects of faking on the NEO-PI-R: Willingness and ability to fake changes who gets hired in simulated selection decisions . Journal of Business and Psychology, 21, 243-259.
38.
Wygant, D.B., Ben-Porath, Y.S., Arbisi, P.A., Berry, D.T.R., Freeman, D.B., & Heilbronner, R.L. (2009). Examination of the MMPI-2 Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF) Validity Scales in civil forensic settings: Findings from simulation and known group samples. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 24, 671-680.
39.
Wygant, D.B., Sellbom, M., Ben-Porath, Y.S., Stafford, K.P., Freeman, D.B., & Heilbronner, R.L. (2007). The relation between symptom validity testing and MMPI-2 scores as a function of forensic evaluation context . Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 22, 489-499.
40.
Yudko, E., Lozhkina, O., & Fouts, A. ( 2007). A comprehensive review of the psychometric properties of the Drug Abuse Screening Test. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 32, 189-198.
