The Behavioural Status Index (BEST-Index) has been introduced into Dutch forensic psychiatry to measure change in risk level of future violence. The BEST-Index is a structured observational measure that assesses aggressive behavior, degree of insight, social skills, self-care, and work and leisure skills during inpatient treatment. Thus far, limited information regarding the psychometric properties of the Dutch version of the BEST-Index is available. The present study examines the reliability and validity of the Dutch BEST-Index in a sample of 291 mentally disordered offenders admitted to a forensic psychiatric hospital. Interrater reliability was investigated in a sample of 182 raters. Findings show that the Dutch BEST-Index can be used reliably and is significantly associated with risk of future violence and institutional aggression. Furthermore, this study revealed a different and clearer factor structure compared with the original one. Further research is needed to examine how these derived factors predict future recidivism.
Byrne, B.M. ( 2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications and programming. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
4.
Cima, M. ( 2003). Faking good, bad, and ugly: Malingering in forensic psychiatric inpatients. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Maastricht University, The Netherlands.
5.
Douglas, K.S., Guy, L.S., & Weir, J. ( 2006). HCR-20 violence risk assessment scheme: Overview and annotated bibliography. Retrieved May 26, 2008, from http://kdouglas.wordpress.com/hcr-20/
6.
Douglas, K.S., & Kropp, P.R. ( 2002). A prevention-based paradigm for violence risk assessment: Clinical and research applications. Criminal Justice and Behavior , 29, 617-658.
7.
Douglas, K.S., & Skeem, J. ( 2005). Violence risk assessment: Getting specific about being dynamic. Psychology, Public Policy, & Law, 11, 347-383.
8.
Dvoskin, J., & Heilbrun, K. ( 2001). Risk assessment and release decision-making: Toward resolving the great debate. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 29, 6-10.
9.
de Vogel, V., & de Ruiter, C. ( 2006). Structured professional judgment of violence risk in forensic clinical practice: A prospective study into the predictive validity of the Dutch HCR-20. Psychology, Crime and Law, 12, 321-336.
10.
de Vogel, V., de Ruiter, C., Hildebrand, M., Bos, B., & van de Ven, P. (2004). Type of discharge and risk of recidivism measured by the HCR-20: A retrospective study in a Dutch sample of treated forensic psychiatric patients. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 3, 149-165.
11.
Fabrigar, L.R., Wegener, D.T., MacCallum, R.C., & Strahan, E.J. ( 1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4, 272-299.
Heilbrun, K. ( 1997). Prediction versus management models relevant to risk assessment: The importance of legal decision-making context. Law and Human Behavior, 21, 347-359.
14.
Hornsveld, R.H.J., Nijman, H.L.I., Hollin, C.R., & Kraaimaat, F.W. (2006). Development of the Observation Scale for Aggressive Behavior (OSAB) for Dutch forensic psychiatric inpatients with an antisocial personality disorder. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 30, 480-491.
15.
Hu, L.T., & Bentler, P. ( 1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
16.
MacCallum, R.C., Widaman, K.F., Zhang, S., & Hong, S. ( 1999). Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 4, 84-99.
17.
Mahgoub, N.A. ( 1988). "Bridging" therapy in hospital and community-based psychiatric care: A comparative study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Sheffield CityLibrary, Sheffield, UK.
18.
Nicholls, T.L., Brink, J., Desmarais, S.L., Webster, C.D., & Martin, M.L. ( 2006). The Short-Term Assessment of Risk and Treatability (START): A prospective validation study in a forensic psychiatric sample. Assessment, 13, 313-327.
19.
Nijman, H.L.I., Evers, C., Merckelbach, H.L.G. J., & Palmstierna, T. (2002). Assessing aggression severity with the revised Staff Observation Aggression Scale (SOAS-R). Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 190, 198-200.
20.
Nunnally, J.C. ( 1967). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
21.
Reed, V., Woods, P., & Robinson, D. ( 2000). Behavioural Status Index (BEST-Index): A "life skills" assessment for selecting and monitoring therapy in mental health care. Sheffield, UK: Psychometric Press.
22.
Robinson, D., Reed, V., & Lange, A. ( 1996). Developing risk assessment scales in forensic psychiatric care. Psychiatric Care, 3, 146-152.
23.
Rogers, R. (Ed.). (1997). Clinical assessment of malingering and deception (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
24.
Ross, T., Woods, P., Reed, V., Sookoo, S., Dean, A., Kettles, A.M., et al. (2008). Selecting and monitoring living skills in forensic mental health care: Cross-border validation of the BEST-Index . International Journal of Mental Health, 36, 3-16.
SPSS Inc. (2005). SPSS 13.0 for Windows. [Computer software]. Chicago: SPSS, Inc.
27.
Strand, S., & Belfrage, H. ( 2001). Comparison of HCR-20 scores in violent mentally disordered men and women: Gender differences and similarities. Psychology, Crime and Law, 7, 71-79.
28.
Timmerman, I.G., Vastenburg, N.C., & Emmelkamp, P.M.G. (2001). The Forensic Inpatient Observation Scale (FIOS): Development, reliability and validity. Criminal Behavior and Mental Health, 11, 144-162.
29.
Van Erven, A. ( 1999). Behavioural Status Index, Dutch version (BSI-D). A broad risk assessment for mental health workers. Eindhoven, The Netherlands: GGzE.
30.
Webster, C.D., Douglas, K.S., Eaves, D., & Hart, S.D. ( 1997). HCR-20. Assessing risk for violence, Version 2. Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada: Simon Fraser University, Mental Health, Law and Policy Institute.
31.
Woods, P. ( 2000). The Behavioural Status Index: Descriptive studies within a forensic context. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Anglia Polytechnic University, Chlemsford, UK.
32.
Woods, P., Reed, V., & Collins, M. ( 2001a). Measuring insight in a high security forensic setting using the Behavioural Status Index. British Journal of Forensic Practice, 3, 3-12.
33.
Woods, P., Reed, V., & Collins, M. ( 2001b). Measuring risk in a high security forensic setting using the Behavioural Status Index. International Journal of Psychiatric Nursing Research, 7, 793-805.
34.
Woods, P., Reed, V., & Collins, M. ( 2001c). Measuring communication and social skills in a high security forensic setting using the Behavioural Status Index. International Journal of Psychiatric Nursing Research, 7, 761-777.
35.
Woods, P., Reed, V., & Collins, M. ( 2003a). Relationships between risk and insight in a high security forensic setting. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 10, 510-517.
36.
Woods, P., Reed, V., & Collins, M. ( 2003b). Exploring core relationships between insight, and communication and social skills in mentally disordered offenders. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 10, 518-525.
37.
Woods, P., Reed, V., & Collins, M. ( 2004). Relationships between risk and communication and social skills in a high security forensic setting. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 8, 769-782.
38.
Woods, P., Reed, V., & Collins, M. ( 2005). The Behavioural Status Index: Testing a social risk assessment model in a high security forensic setting. Journal of Forensic Nursing, 1, 9-19.
39.
Woods, P., Reed, V., & Robinson, D. ( 1999). The Behavioural Status Index: Therapeutic assessment of risk, insight, communication and social skills. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 6, 79-90.
40.
Yudofsky, S.C., Silver, J.M., Jackson, W., Endicott, J., & Williams, D. ( 1986). The Overt Aggression Scale for the objective rating of verbal and physical aggression. American Journal of Psychiatry , 143, 35-39.
