Interpretation of positive response distortion (socially desirable responding) in employment evaluations is an important validity issue. This study of police officer applicants examined the construct validity of the Paulhus Deception Scales (PDS)—Moralistic Bias (MB; exaggerated adjustment/agreeableness) and Egoistic Bias (EB; exaggerated power/ status)—in relation to validity scales of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory—2 (MMPI-2; L, K, and S) and Inwald Personality Inventory (IPI; Guardedness). In regression analyses, MB was significantly associated with each validity scale (particularly L and Guardedness), whereas EB was significantly, but weakly, associated with L only. MB is consistent with response distortion as reflected in L (“perfect” adjustment/personality) and Guardedness (denial of shortcomings/faults). EB is a unique form of response distortion that is not reflected in MMPI-2 or IPI validity scales. The relevance of EB to self-assessment among police officer applicants is an important practical concern in personnel selection and an important theoretical question for future response distortion research.
Baer, R.A., & Miller, J. (2002). Underreporting of psychopathology on the MMPI-2: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Assessment, 14, 16-26.
2.
Baer, R.A., Wetter, M.W., Nichols, D.S., Greene, R., & Berry, D.T.R. (1995). Sensitivity of MMPI-2 validity scales to underreporting of symptoms. Psychological Assessment, 7, 419-423.
3.
Bagby, R.M., Rogers, R., Nicholson, R.A., Buis, T., Seeman, M.V., & Rector, N.A. (1997). Effectiveness of the MMPI-2 validity indicators in the detection of defensive responding in clinical and nonclinical samples . Psychological Assessment, 9, 406-413.
4.
Barrick, M.R., & Mount, M.K. (1991). The big five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1-26.
5.
Barrick, M.R., & Mount, M.K. (2005). Yes, personality matters: Moving on to more important matters. Human Performance, 18, 359-372.
6.
Barthlow, D.L., Graham, J.R., Ben-Porath, Y.S., Tellegen, A., & McNulty, J.L. (2002). The appropriateness of the MMPI-2 K correction . Assessment, 9, 219-229.
7.
Baumeister, R.F. (1989). The optimal margin of illusion. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 8, 176-189.
8.
Ben-Porath, Y.S. (2002). Effective and responsible use of psychological tests in pre-employment selection. Minnetonka, MN: NCS Pearson.
9.
Blau, T.H. (1994). Psychological services for law enforcement. New York: John Wiley.
10.
Borkenau, P., & Ostendorf, F. (1992). Social desirability scales as moderator and suppressor variables. European Journal of Personality, 6, 199-214.
11.
Butcher, J.N. (1990). Education level and MMPI-2 measured psychopathology: A case of negligible influence. MMPI-2 News and Profiles , 1(2), 2.
12.
Butcher, J.N. (1994). Psychological assessment of airline pilot applicants with the MMPI-2. Journal of Personality Assessment, 62, 31-44.
13.
Butcher, J.N., Graham, J.R., Ben-Porath, Y.S., Tellegen, A., Dahlstrom, W.G., & Kaemmer, B. (2001). Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2: Manual for administration, scoring, and interpretation (Rev. ed.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
14.
Butcher, J.N., & Han, K. (1995). Development of an MMPI-2 scale to assess the presentation of self in a superlative manner: The S Scale. In J. N. Butcher & C. D. Spielberger (Eds.), Advances in personality assessment (Vol. 10, pp. 25-50). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15.
Chibnall, J.T., & Detrick, P. (2003). The NEO PI-R, Inwald Personality Inventory, and MMPI-2 in the prediction of police academy performance: A case for incremental validity. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 27, 233-248.
16.
Cofer, C.N., Chance, J., & Judson, A.J. (1949). A study of malingering on the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 27, 491-499.
17.
Detrick, P., Chibnall, J.T., & Rosso, M. (2001). Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 in police officer selection: Normative data and relation to the Inwald Personality Inventory. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice , 32, 484-490.
18.
Detrick, P., & Chibnall, J.T. (2002, Fall). Prediction of police officer performance with the Inwald Personality Inventory. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 17, 9-17.
19.
Donovan, J.J., Dwight, S.A., & Hurtz, G.M. (2003). An assessment of the prevalence, severity, and verifiability of entry-level applicant faking using the randomized response technique. Human Performance, 16, 81-106.
20.
Ellingson, J.E., Sackett, P.R., & Hough, L.M. (1999). Social desirability corrections in personality measurement: Issues of applicant comparison and construct validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 155-166.
21.
Emmons, R.A. (1984). Factor analysis and construct validity of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48, 291-300.
22.
Hathaway, S.R., & McKinley, J.C. (1940). A multiphasic personality schedule (Minnesota): I. Construction of the schedule. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 10, 249-254.
Hogan, R. (2005). In defense of personality measurement: New wine for old whiners. Human Performance, 18, 331-341.
25.
Hogan, R., & Nicholson, R.A. (1988). The meaning of personality test scores. American Psychologist, 43, 621-626.
26.
Hough, L.M., Eaton, N.K., Dunnette, M.D., Kamp, J.D., & McCloy, R.A. (1990). Criterion-related validities of personality constructs and the effect of response distortion on those validities . Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 581-595.
27.
Hough, L.M., & Oswald, F.L. (2005). They're right, well . . . mostly right: Research evidence and an agenda to rescue personality testing from 1960s insights. Human Performance, 18, 373-387.
28.
Inwald, R.E. (1988). Five-year follow-up study of departmental terminations as predicted by 16 pre-employment psychological indicators. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 703-710.
29.
Inwald, R.E., & Shusman, E.J. (1984). The IPI and MMPI as predictors of academy performance for police recruits. Journal of Police Science and Administration , 12, 1-11.
30.
John, O.P., & Robins, R.W. (1994). Accuracy and bias in self-perception: Individual differences in self-enhancement and the role of narcissism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 206-219.
31.
Kauder, B.S., & Thomas, J.C. (2003). Relationship between MMPI-2 and Inwald Personality Inventory (IPI) scores and ratings of police officer probationary performance . Applied HRM Research, 8(2), 81-84.
32.
Kornfeld, A.D. (1995). Police officer candidate MMPI-2 performance: Gender, ethnic, and normative factors. Journal of Clinical Psychology , 51, 536-540.
33.
Levin, J., & Montag, I. (1987). The effect of testing instructions for handling social desirability on the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 8, 163-167.
34.
Mabe, P.A., & West, S.G. (1982). Validity of self-evaluation of ability: A review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 280-296.
35.
McCrae, R.R., & Costa, P.T. (1983). Social desirability scales: More substance than style. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, 882-888.
36.
McHoskey, J.W., Worzel, W., & Szyarto, C. (1998). Machiavellianism and psychopathy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 192-210.
37.
McKinley, J.C., Hathaway, S.R., & Meehl, P.E. (1948). The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory: VI. The K scale. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 12, 20-31.
38.
Meehl, P.E., & Hathaway, S.R. (1946). The K factor as a suppressor variable in the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 30, 525-564.
39.
Mufson, D.W., & Mufson, M.A. (1998). Predicting police officer performance using the Inwald Personality Inventory: An illustration from Appalachia. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 29, 59-62.
40.
Murphy, K.R., & Dzieweczynski, J.L. (2005). Why don't measures of broad dimensions of personality perform better as predictors of job performance ? Human Performance, 18, 343-357.
41.
Nichols, D.S., & Greene, R.L. (1988, March). Adaptive or defensive: An evaluation of Paulhus' two-factor model of social desirability responding on the MMPI with non-college samples. Paper presented at the 23rd Annual Symposium on Recent Developments in the Use of the MMPI, St. Petersburg, FL.
42.
Nichols, D.S., & Greene, R.L. (1997). Dimensions of deception in personality assessment: The example of the MMPI-2. Journal of Personality Assessment , 68, 251-266.
43.
Nicholson, R.A., & Hogan, R. (1990). The construct validity of social desirability . American Psychologist, 45, 290-292.
44.
Ones, D.S., & Viswesvaran, C. (1998). The effects of social desirability and faking on personality and integrity assessment for personnel selection . Human Performance, 11, 245-269.
45.
Ones, D.S., Viswesvaran, C., & Dilchert, S. (2005). Personality at work: Raising awareness and correcting misconceptions. Human Performance, 18, 389-404.
46.
Ones, D.S., Viswesvaran, C., & Korbin, W.P. (1995, May). Meta-analyses of fakability estimates: Between-subjects versus within-subjects designs. Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Orlando, FL.
47.
Ones, D.S., Viswesvaran, C., & Reiss, A.D. (1996). Role of social desirability in personality testing for personnel selection: The red herring. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 660-679.
48.
Ones, D.S., Viswesvaran, C., & Schmidt, F.L. (1993). Comprehensive meta-analysis of integrity test validities: Findings and implications for personnel selection and theories of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 679-703.
49.
Paulhus, D.L. (1984). Two-component models of socially desirable responding . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 598-609.
50.
Paulhus, D.L. (1998a). Interpersonal and intrapsychic adaptiveness of trait self-enhancement: A mixed blessing? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1197-1208.
51.
Paulhus, D.L. (1998b). Paulhus Deception Scales: Manual of the Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding (BIDR-7). Toronto, Canada: Multi-Health Systems.
52.
Paulhus, D.L. (2002). Socially desirable responding: The evolution of a construct. In H. I. Braun, D. N. Jackson, & D. E. Wiley (Eds.), The role of constructs in psychological and educational measurement (pp. 49-69). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
53.
Paulhus, D.L., & John, O.P. (1998). Egoistic and moralistic biases in self-perception: The interplay of self-deceptive styles with basic traits and motives. Journal of Personality, 66, 1025-1060.
54.
Pauls, C.A., & Crost, N.W. (2004). Effects of faking on self-deception and impression management scales. Personality and Individual Differences , 37, 1137-1151.
55.
Pauls, C.A., & Crost, N.W. (2005). Cognitive ability and self-reported efficacy of self-presentation predict faking on personality measures. Journal of Individual Differences, 26, 194-206.
56.
Podsakoff, P.M., & Organ, D.W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12, 531-544.
57.
Reid-Seiser, H.L., & Fritzsche, B.A. (2001). The usefulness of the NEO PI-R Positive Presentation Management Scale for detecting response distortion in employment contexts. Personality and Individual Differences , 31, 639-650.
58.
Robins, R.W., & Paulhus, D.L. (2001). The character of self enhancers: Implications for organizations. In B. W. Roberts & R. Hogan (Eds.), Personality psychology in the workplace (pp. 193-222). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
59.
Rosse, J.G., Stecher, M.D., Miller, J.L., & Levin, R.A. (1998). The impact of response distortion on preemployment personality testing and hiring decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 634-644.
60.
Scogin, F., Schumacher, J., Gardner, J., & Chaplin, W. (1995). Predictive validity of psychological testing in law enforcement settings. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 26, 68-71.
61.
Surrette, M.A., & Serafino, G. (2003). Relationship between personality and law enforcement performance. Applied HRM Research, 8(2), 89-92.
62.
Tett, R.P., Jackson, D.N., & Rothstein, M. (1991). Personality measures as predictors of job performance: A meta-analytic review. Personnel Psychology, 44, 703-742.
63.
Topping, G.D., & O'Gorman, J.G. (1997). Effects of faking set on validity of the NEO-FFI. Personality and Individual Differences , 23, 117-124.
64.
Vincent, N.M., Linsz, N.L., & Greene, M.I. (1966). The L scale of the MMPI as an index of falsification . Journal of Clinical Psychology, 22, 214-215.
65.
Wallace, H.M., & Baumeister, R.F. (2002). The performance of narcissists rises and falls with perceived opportunity for glory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 819-834.
66.
Wiggins, J.S. (1959). Interrelationships among MMPI measures of dissimulation under standard and social desirability instruction. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 23, 419-427.
67.
Zerbe, W.J., & Paulhus, D.L. (1987). Socially desirable responding in organizational behavior: A reconception. Academy of Management Review, 12, 250-264.
