Four decades of forensic research have left unanswered a fundamental issue regarding the best conceptualization of competency to stand trial vis-à-vis the Dusky standard. The current study investigated three competing models (discrete abilities, domains, and cognitive complexity) on combined data ( N = 411) from six forensic and correctional samples. Using the Evaluation of Competency to Stand Trial–Revised (ECST-R), items representative of the Dusky prongs were used to test the three models via maximum-likelihood confirmatory factor analyses (CFA). Of the three, only the discrete abilities model evidenced a good fit, indicating that competency to stand trial should consider separately each defendant’s factual understanding of the proceedings, rational understanding of the proceedings, and ability to consult with counsel. ECST-R competency scales, based on the current CFA, have excellent alphas (.83 to .89) and interrater reliabilities (.97 to .98).
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abrams, A. A. (2002). Assessing competency in criminal proceedings. In B. Van Dorsten (Ed.), Forensic psychology from classroom to courtroom(pp. 105-141). New York: Kluwer Academic .
2.
American Bar Association. (1989). ABA criminal justice mental health standards(Part IV). Washington DC: Author .
3.
Bagby, R. M., Nicholson, R. A., Rogers, R.,& Nussbaum, D. (1992). Domains of competency to stand trial . Law and Human Behavior, 16, 491-507 .
4.
Bentler, P. M. (1995). EQS structural equations program manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software .
5.
Bonnie, R. J. (1992). The competence of criminal defendants: Atheoretical reformulation . Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 10, 291-316 .
6.
Bonnie, R. J. (1993). The competence of criminal defendants: Beyond Dusky and Drope . Miami Law Review, 47, 539-601 .
7.
Bonnie, R. J.,& Grisso, T. (2000). Adjudicative competence and youthful offenders. In T. Grisso & R. G. Schwartz (Eds.), Youth on trial: A developmental perspective on juvenile justice(pp. 73-103). Chicago: University of Chicago Press .
8.
Bonnie, R. J., Hoge, S. K., Monahan, J., Poythress, N., Eisenberg, M., & Feucht-Haviar, T. (1997). The MacArthur adjudicative competence study: Acomparison of criteria for assessing the competence of criminal defendants . Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law, 25, 249-259 .
9.
Borum, R., & Grisso, T. (1995). Psychological test use in criminal forensic evaluations . Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 26, 465-473 .
10.
Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1995). Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development . Psychological Assessment, 7, 309-319 .
11.
Cooper v. Oklahoma, 116 S. Ct. 1373 (1996).
12.
Drope v. Missouri, 420 U.S. 162 (1975).
13.
Dunn, G., Everitt, B.,& Pickles, A. (1993). Modeling covariances and latent variables using EQS. London: Chapman and Hall .
14.
Dusky v. United States, 362 U.S. 402 (1960).
15.
Godinez v. Moran, 113 S.Ct. 2680 (1993).
16.
Grisso, T. (2003). Evaluating competencies: Forensic assessments and instruments(2nd ed.). New York: Kluwer Academic .
17.
Hu, L.,& Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification . Psychological Methods, 3, 424-453 .
18.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives . Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55 .
19.
Laboratory of Community Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School. (1973). Competency to stand trial and mental illness(DHEW Publication No. ADM-77-103). Rockville, MD: Department of Health, Education, and Welfare .
20.
Lipsitt, P., Lelos, D., & McGarry, A. (1971). Competency for trial: A screening instrument . American Journal of Psychiatry, 128, 105-109 .
21.
McGarry, A. L. (1973). Competency to stand trial and mental illness. Washington, DC: National Institute of Mental Health .
22.
Melton, G. B., Petrila, J., Poythress, N. G., & Slobogin, C. (1997).Psychological evaluations for the courts(2nd ed.). NewYork: Guilford .
23.
Miller, H. A. (2001). Miller Forensic Assessment of Symptoms Test (MFAST). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources .
24.
Miller, R. D. (2003). Criminal competence. In R. Rosner (Ed.), Principles and practice of forensic psychiatry(2nd ed., pp. 186-212). London: Arnold .
25.
Otto, R. K., Poythress, N. G., Nicholson, R. A., Edens, J. F., Monahan, J., Bonnie, R. J., et al. (1998). Psychometric properties of the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool–Criminal Adjudication . Psychological Assessment, 10, 435-443 .
26.
Pate v. Robinson, 383 U.S. 375 (1966).
27.
Poythress, N. G., Nicholson, R., Otto, R. K., Edens, J. F., Bonnie, R. J., Monahan, J., et al. (1999). Professional manual for the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool–Criminal Adjudication. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources .
28.
Riggins v. Nevada, 504 U.S. 127 (1992).
29.
Robey, A. (1965). Criteria for competency to stand trial: A checklist for psychiatrists . American Journal of Psychiatry, 122, 616-623 .
30.
Rogers, R. (2001). Focused forensic interviews. In R. Rogers (Ed.)?, Handbook of diagnostic and structured interviewing(pp. 296-337). New York: Guilford .
31.
Rogers, R., Bagby, R. M., & Dickens, S. E. (1992). Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms (SIRS) and professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources .
32.
Rogers, R., & Grandjean, N. R. (2000, March). Competency measures and the Dusky standard: A conceptual mismatch? Biennial convention of the American Psychology-Law Society, New Orleans, LA.
33.
Rogers, R., Grandjean, N. R., Tillbrook, C. E., Vitacco, M. J., & Sewell, K. W. (2001). Recent interview-based measures of competency to stand trial: A critical review augmented with research data . Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 19, 503-518 .
34.
Rogers, R., Jackson, R. L., Sewell, K. W., & Harrison, K. S. (2003). An examination of the ECST-R as a screen for feigned incompetency to stand trial. Manuscript submitted for publication.
35.
Rogers, R., Sewell, K. W., Grandjean, N. R.,& Vitacco, M. J. (2002). The detection of feigned mental disorders on specific competency measures . Psychological Assessment, 14, 177-183 .
36.
Rogers, R., Tillbrook, C. E.,& Sewell, K. W. (1998). Evaluation of Competency to Stand Trial–Revised (ECST-R). Unpublished test, University of North Texas, Denton.
37.
Rogers, R., Ustad, K. L., Sewell, K. W., & Reinhart, V. (1996). Dimensions of incompetency: A factor analytic study of the Georgia Court Competency Test . Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 14, 323-330 .
38.
Shuman, D. W. (1996). Psychiatric and psychological evidence(2nd ed.). Colorado Springs, CO: Shepherds/McGraw-Hill .
39.
Skeem, J. L., Golding, S. L., Cohn, N. B., & Berge, G. (1998). Logic and reliability of evaluations of competence to stand trial . Law and Human Behavior, 22, 519-547 .
40.
Spitzer, R. L., & Endicott, J. (1978). Schedule of Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia—Change version. New York: Biometrics Research .
41.
Tillbrook, C. E. (2000). Competency to proceed: A comparative appraisal of approaches to assessment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa.
42.
Ustad, K. L., Rogers, R., Sewell, K. W.,& Guarnaccia, C. A. (1996). Restoration of competency to stand trial: Assessment with the GCCTMSH and the CST . Law and Human Behavior, 20, 131-146 .
43.
Wildman, R., Batchelor, E., Thompson, L., Nelson, F., Moore, J., Patterson, et al. (1980). The Georgia Court Competency Test: An attempt to develop a rapid, quantitative measure for fitness to stand trial. Unpublished manuscript, Forensic Services Division, Central State Hospital, Milledgeville, GA.
