This study assessed the effectiveness of Greiffenstein’s Reliable Digit Span (RDS) score for the detection of malingered neurocognitive dysfunction. Participants were 54 traumatic brain injury patients referred for neuropsychological evaluation. Twenty-four met the Slick, Sherman, and Iverson criteria for at least probable malingered neurocognitive dysfunction. The control group was composed of 30 patients without external incentive and who thus did not meet the Slick criteria. All patients completed the digit span test as part of either the WAIS-R or WAIS-III. The RDS scores were calculated, and sensitivity, specificity, and predictive power were examined for several cutoffs. Classification accuracy for the RDS was excellent. Issues related to the clinical application of this technique are discussed.
Axelrod, B. N.
, & Rawlings, D. B. (1999). Clinical utility of incomplete effort WAIS-R formulas: A longitudinal examination of individuals with traumatic brain injuries. Journal of Forensic Neuropsychology, 1, 15-27.
2.
Beetar, J. T.
, & Williams, J. M. (1995). Malingering response styles on the Memory Assessment Scales and Symptom Validity Tests. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 10, 57-72.
3.
Bianchini, K. J.
, Mathias, C. W., & Greve, K. W. (2001). Symptom validity testing: A critical review. Clinical Neuropsychologist, 15, 19-45.
4.
Binder, L. M.
(1993). Assessment of malingering after mild head trauma with the Portland Digit Recognition Test. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 15, 170-182.
5.
Binder, L. M.
, & Kelly, M. P. (1996). Portland Digit Recognition Test performance by brain dysfunction patients without financial incentives. Assessment, 3, 403-409.
6.
Binder, L. M.
, & Willis, S. C. (1991). Assessment of motivation after financially compensable minor head trauma. Psychological Assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 3, 175-181.
7.
Duncan, S. A.
, & Ausborn, D. L. (in press). The use of reliable digits to detect mal ingering in a criminal forensic pretrial population. Assessment.
8.
Greiffenstein, M. F.
, Baker, W. J., & Gola, T. (1994). Validation of malingered amnesic measures with a large clinical sample. Psychological Assessment, 6, 218-224.
9.
Greiffenstein, M. F.
, Gola, T., & Baker, W. J. (1995). MMPI-2 validity scales versus domain specific measures in detection of factitious traumatic brain injury. Clinical Neuropsychologist, 9, 230-240.
10.
Greve, K. W.
, Bianchini, K. B., Mathias, C. W., Houston, R. J., & Crouch, J. A. (in press). Detecting malingered performance on the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale: Validation of Mittenberg’s approach in traumatic brain injury. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology.
11.
Hartlage, L.
(1998). Clinical detection of malingering. In C. R. Reynolds (Ed.), Detection of malingering during head injury litigation (pp. 239-260). New York: Plenum.
12.
Hennekens, C. H.
, & Buring, J. E. (1987). Epidemiology in medicine. Boston: Little, Brown.
13.
Heubrock, D.
, & Petermann, F. (1998). Neuropsychological assessment of suspected malingering: Research results, evaluation techniques, and further directions of research and application. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 14, 211-225.
14.
Iverson, G. L.
, & Franzen, M. D. (1994). The Recognition Memory Test, Digit Span, and Knox Cube Test as markers of malingered memory impairment. Assessment, 1, 323-334.
15.
Iverson, G. L.
, & Franzen, M. D. (1996). Using multiple objective memory procedures to detect simulated malingering. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 18, 38-51.
16.
Lezak, M. D.
(1995). Neuropsychological assessment (3rd. ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
17.
Meyers, J. E.
, & Volbrecht, M. (1998). Validation of reliable digits for the detection of malingering. Assessment, 5, 303-307.
18.
Millis, S. R.
, Putnam, S. H., Adams, K. M., & Ricker, J. H. (1995). The California Verbal Learning Test in the detection of incomplete effort in neuropsychological evaluation. Psychological Assessment, 7, 463-471.
19.
Millis, S. R.
, Ross, S. R., & Ricker, J. H. (1998). Detection of incomplete effort on the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale–Revised: A cross-validation. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 20, 167-173.
20.
Mittenberg, W.
, Theroux-Fichera, S., Heilbronner, R. L., & Zielinski, R. E. (1995). Identification of malingered head injury on the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale–Revised. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 5, 491-498.
21.
Nies, K. J.
, & Sweet, J. L. (1994). Neuropsychological assessment and malingering: A critical review of past and present strategies. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 9, 501-552.
22.
Owens, R. G.
(1995). The psychological signatures of malingering: Assessing the legitimacy of claims. American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 13, 61-75.
23.
Slick, D. J.
, Sherman, E. M. S., & Iverson, G. L. (1999). Diagnostic criteria for malingering neurocognitive dysfunction: Proposed standards for clinical practice and research. Clinical Neuropsychologist, 13, 545-561.
24.
Strauss, E.
, Hultsch, D. F., Hunter, M., Slick, D. J., Paltry, B., & Levy Bencheton, J. (2000). Using intraindividual variability to detect malingering in cognitive performance. Clinical Neuropsychologist, 14, 420-432.
25.
Teasdale, G.
, & Jennett, B. (1974). Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness: A practical scale. Lancet, 2, 81-84.
26.
Tombaugh, T. N.
(1996). Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM).New York: Multi Health Systems.
27.
Tombaugh, T. N.
(1997). The Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM): Normative data from cognitively impaired individuals. Psychological Assessment, 9, 260-268.
28.
Wechsler, D. A.
(1981). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale–Revised.New York: Psychological Corporation.
29.
Wechsler, D. A.
(1987). Wechsler Memory Scale–Revised manual.New York: Psychological Corporation.
30.
Wechsler, D. A.
(1997a). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale–III.New York: Psychological Corporation.
31.
Wechsler, D. A.
(1997b). Wechsler Memory Scale–III. New York: Psychological Corporation.
32.
Youngjohn, J. R.
(1995). Confirmed attorney coaching prior to neuro-psychological evaluation. Assessment, 2, 279-283.
