We must resist thoroughly reframing climate change as a health issue. For human health–centric ethical frameworks omit dimensions of value that we must duly consider. We need a new, an environmental, research ethic, one that we can use to more completely and impartially evaluate proposed research on mitigation and adaptation strategies.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
For a summary, see the Editors’ Introduction in this special issue: C.Ganesh, M.Schmeltz, and J.Smith, “Introduction: Climate Change and the Legal, Ethical and Health Issues Facing Healthcare and Public Health Systems,”Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics48, no. 4 (2020): 636-642.
2.
D.Jamieson, Reason in a Dark Time: Why the Struggle against Climate Change Failed — and What It Means for Our Future (New York: Oxford University Press, 2014): at 4.
3.
Nick Watts celebrated the greater tangibility of reframing climate change as human health issue and its connection to advancing the mitigation agenda in G.Humphreys, “Reframing Climate Change as a Health Issue,”Bulletin of the World Health Organization92, no. 8 (2014): 551–552.
4.
E. W.Malbach, M.Nisbet, and P.Baldwinet al., “Reframing Climate Change as a Public Health Issue: An Exploratory Study of Public Reactions,”BMC Public Health10, no. 1 (2010): 299.
5.
L.White, Jr., “The Historical Roots of Our Ecological Crisis,”Science155, no. 3767 (1967): 1203–1207.
6.
W. H. S.Jones, ed., Hippocrates Collected Works, vol. I (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1868): at 320, available at <www.perseus.tufts.edu> (last visited September 24, 2020).
National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research, The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research, April18, 1979, available at <http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/belmont-report> (last visited September 24, 2020); 45 C.F.R. § 46.111 (2018); 21 C.F.R. § 56.111 (2019).
11.
W. M. S.Russell and R. L.Burch, The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique (London: Methuen, 1959).
12.
P.Singer, Animal Liberation: A New Ethics for Our Treatment of Animals (New York: The New York Review, 1975).
13.
T.Regan, The Case for Animal Rights (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1983).
14.
B.Steinbock, “Speciesism and the Idea of Equality,”Philosophy53, no. 204 (1978): 247–256.
15.
D.DeGrazia and T. L.Beauchamp, Principles of Animal Research Ethics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019).
16.
C. M.Korsgaard, Fellow Creatures: Our Obligations to the Other Animals (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018).
17.
D.DeGrazia. “Moral Status as a Matter of Degree?”The Southern Journal of Philosophy46, no. 2 (2008): 181–198.
18.
L.Gruen, D.Jamieson, and C.Schlottman, eds., Reflecting on Nature: Readings in Environmental Ethics and Philosophy, 2nd ed. (New York: Oxford University Press, 2013): at 46.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, Negative Emissions Technologies and Reliable Sequestration: A Research Agenda (Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2019).
22.
National Research Council, Climate Intervention: Reflecting Sunlight to Cool Earth (Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2015).
23.
W. N.Rom and K. E.Pinkerton, “Introduction: Consequences of Global Warming to the Public’s Health,” in Global Climate Change and Public Health, ed. K. E.Pinkerton and W. N.Rom (New York: Human Press, 2014), 1–20: at 9–15.
24.
Royal Society, Geoengineering the Climate: Science, Governance, and Uncertainty (London: Royal Society, 2009).
25.
See Adelman, supra note 24; see Corner and Pidgeon, supra note 24; see Jamieson, supra note 24.
26.
C. J.Preston, ed., Climate Justice and Geoengineering: Ethics and Policy in the Atmospheric Anthropocene (London: Rowman & Littlefield, 2016).
27.
H.Lawford-Smith, “Democratic Authority to Geoengineer,”Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy23, no. 5 (2020): 600–617.
28.
See Adelman, supra note 24; see Jamieson, supra note 24.
29.
J.Stilgoe, “Geoengineering as Collective Experimentation,”Science and Engineering Ethics22, no. 3 (2015): 851–869.
30.
C. J.Preston, “Ethics and Geoengineering: Reviewing the Moral Issues Raised by Solar Radiation Management and Carbon Dioxide Removal,”Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews — Climate Change4, no. 1 (2013): 23–37.
31.
and D. R.Morrow, R. E.Kopp, and M.Oppenheimer, “Toward Ethical Norms and Institutions for Climate Engineering Research,”Environmental Research Letters4, no. 4 (2009): 045106. This list is not exhaustive, but just a sample of the literature on geoengineering research ethics.
32.
See Morrow, Kopp, and Oppenheimer, supra note 31: at 2.
33.
Id.
34.
See National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research, supra note 10.
35.
See Russell and Burch, supra note 11.
36.
See Morrow, Kopp, and Oppenheimer, supra note 31: at 4.
37.
Id.
38.
P.Friesen, L.Kearns, B.Redman, and A. L.Caplan, “Rethinking the Belmont Report?”The American Journal of Bioethics17, no. 7 (2017): 15–21.
39.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency on the Internet: Strategies for Climate Change Adaptation, Climate Change Adaptation Resource Center (ARC-X), available at <https://www.epa.gov/arc-x/strategies-climate-change-adaptation> (last visited September 23, 2020).
40.
See Rom and Pinkerton, supra note 23: at 12.
41.
P. T.Leftwich, M. P.Edgington, and T.Harvey-Samuelet al., “Recent Advances in Threshold-Dependent Gene Drives for Mosquitoes,”Biochemical Society Transactions46, no. 5 (2018): 1203–1212.
42.
M.Scudellari, “Self-Destructing Mosquitoes and Sterilized Rodents: The Promise of Gene Drives,”Nature571, no 7764 (2019): 160–162.
43.
R.Swart, R.Biesbroek, and T. CapelaLourenço, “Science of Adaptation to Climate Change and Science for Adaptation,”Frontiers in Environmental Science2 (2014): 1-29.
44.
J.Lacey, S. M.Howden, C.Cvitanovic, and A.-M.Dowd. “Informed Adaptation: Ethical Considerations for Adaptation Researchers and Decision-Makers.”Global Environmental Change32 (2015): 200–210.
45.
A. M.S. Shelton, S. J.Long, and A.S.Walkeret al., “First Field Release of a Genetically Engineered, Self-Limiting Agricultural Pest Insect: Evaluating Its Potential for Future Crop Protection,”Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology7 (2020), article 482.
46.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency on the Internet: “EPA Approves Experimental Use Permit to Test Innovative Biopesticide Tool to Better Protect Public Health,”Office of Pesticide Programs Update, available at <https://content.govdelivery.com/accounts/USAEPAOPPT/bulletins/2896a76> (last visited September 24, 2020).
47.
C. P.Neuhaus and A. L.Caplan, “Ethical Lessons from a Tale of Two Genetically Modified Insects,”Nature Biotechnology35, no. 8 (2017): 713–716.
48.
Z.Meghani, “Autonomy of Nations and Indigenous Peoples and the Environmental Release of Genetically Engineered Animals with Gene Drives,”Global Policy10, no. 4 (2019): 554–568.
49.
D. B.Resnik, “Ethics of Community Engagement in Field Trials of Genetically Modified Mosquitoes,”Developing World Bioethics18, no. 2 (2018): 135–143.
50.
See Meghani and Boëte, supra note 49.
51.
Z.Meghani and J.Kuzma, “Regulating Animals with Gene Drive Systems: Lessons from the Regulatory Assessment of a Genetically Engineered Mosquito,”Journal of Responsible Innovation5, suppl. 1 (2018): S203–S222.
52.
See Laverly et al., supra note 47.
53.
See Adelman, supra note 24; see Jamieson, supra note 24.
54.
See Meghani and Kuzma, supra note 51.
55.
See Neuhaus and Caplan, supra note 47.
56.
See National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, supra note 47. Cited in Neuhaus and Caplan, supra note 47.
57.
Id.
58.
See Emerson et al., supra note 47, at 1136.
59.
See National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, supra note 47, at 69.
60.
Id., at 23.
61.
Id. at 65.
62.
See Singer, supra note 12.
63.
See Regan, supra note 13.
64.
For a valuable discussion of these alternatives, see D.Jamieson, Ethics and the Environment: An Introduction (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008): chapter 6.
65.
L.Gruen, D.Jamieson, and C.Schlottman, eds., Reflecting on Nature: Readings in Environmental Ethics and Philosophy, 2nd ed. (New York: Oxford University Press, 2013): 72–81.
66.
J. B.Callicott, Beyond the Land Ethic (Albany: SUNY Press, 1999).
67.
A.Leopold, A Sand County Almanac and Sketches Here and There (New York: Oxford University Press, 1949).
68.
See Taylor, supra note 65, at 73.
69.
Id., at 74.
70.
Id., at 76.
71.
Id., at 78.
72.
L. M.Lee, “A Bridge Back to the Future: Public Health Ethics, Bioethics, and Environmental Ethics,”The American Journal of Bioethics17, no. 9 (2017): 5–12.
