The FDA's new table of surrogate endpoints used for drug approvals is an important step forward for overseeing the use of biomarkers in clinical trials. Nevertheless, we present several ways in which the table can be improved.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
A. S.Kesselheim and J.Karlawish, “Biomarkers Unbound — The Supreme Court's Ruling on Diagnostic-Test Patents,”New England Journal of Medicine366, no. 25 (2012): 2338-2340.
2.
T. R.Fleming and D. L.DeMets, “Surrogate End Points in Clinical Trials: Are We Being Misled?”Annals of Internal Medicine125, no. 7 (1996): 605-613.
E. L.Korn, P. S.Albert, and L. M.McShane, “Assessing Surrogates as Trial Endpoints Using Mixed Models,”Statistics in Medicine24, no. 2 (2005): 163-182.
7.
K. J.Lipska and H. M.Krumholz, “Is Hemoglobin A1c the Right Outcome for Studies of Diabetes?”JAMA317, no. 10 (2017): 1017-1018.
8.
H. K.Reddel, D. R.Taylor, E. D.Bateman, L. P.Boulet, H. A.Boushey, W. W.Busse, T. B.Casale, P.Chanez, P. L.Enright, P. G.Gibson, and J.C.de Jongste, “An official American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society Statement: Asthma Control and Exacerbations: Standardizing Endpoints for Clinical Asthma Trials and Clinical Practice,”American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine180, no. 1 (2009): 59-99.
9.
I. J.Saldanha, K.Dickersin, X.Wang, and T.Li, “Outcomes in Cochrane Systematic Reviews Addressing Four Common Eye Conditions: An Evaluation of Completeness and Comparability,”PloS One9, no. 10 (2014): e109400.