One fundamental barrier to eliminating health disparities, particularly with regard to the determinants of health, is the persistence of discrimination. Civil rights law is the primary legal mechanism used to address discrimination. Federal civil rights laws have been the subject of wider analyses as a determinant of health as well as a tool to address health disparities. The research on state civil rights laws, while more limited, is growing. This article will highlight a few examples of how some states are using civil rights laws to combat discrimination, particularly in more expansive ways and in the interest of new populations, presenting tools that can target determinants and address the goal of reducing health disparities.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
B. I.Trumanet al., “Measuring Progress in Reducing Disparities in HIV, Tuberculosis, Viral Hepatitis, and Sexually Transmitted Diseases in the United States: A Summary of This Theme Issue,”American Journal of Public Health108, no. S4 (2018): S240-S241.
T. R.Frieden, “A Framework for Public Health Action: The Health Impact Pyramid,”American Journal of Public Health100, no. 4 (2010): 590-595; Truman et. al., supra note 1.
4.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, “Social Determinants of Health: Know What Affects Health,”available at <https://www.cdc.gov/socialdeterminants/> (last updated February 15, 2019).
5.
D. R.Williams and S. A.Mohammed, “Discrimination and Racial Disparities in Health: Evidence and Needed Research,”Journal of Behavioral Medicine32, no. 1 (2008): 20-47; G. C. Gee and C. L. Ford, “Structural Racism and Health Inequities: Old Issues, New Directions,” Du Bois Review 8, no. 1 (2011): 115-132.
6.
A. K.McGowanet al., “Civil Rights Laws as Tools to Advance Health in the Twenty-First Century,”Annual Review of Public Health37, no. 1 (2016): 185-204.
J. F.Dovidio, “Disparities and Distrust: The Implications of Psychological Processes for Understanding Racial Disparities in Health and Health Care,”Social Science & Medicine67, no. 3: 478-486 (2008); S. R. Rosenbaum et al., “Civil Rights in a Changing Health Care System,” Health Affairs 16, no. 1 (1997): 90-105.
Id.; A.Mayset, “Race, Race-Based Discrimination, and Health Outcomes among African Americans,”Annual Review of Psychology58 (2007): 201-225.
13.
Gee and Ford, supra note 5.
14.
J.Brand, “The Far-Reaching Impact of Job Loss and Unemployment,”Annual Review of Sociology41 (2015): 359-375; R. M. Tolman and H.-C. Wang, “Domestic Violence and Women's Employment: Fixed Effects Models of Three Waves of Women's Employment Study Data,” American Journal of Community Psychology 36, nos. 1-2 (2005): 147-158.
15.
Id.
16.
See Brand, supra note 14; Williams and Emamdjomeh, supra note 10.
17.
J.Dovidio,et al.,Federal Register81 (2008): at 31444.
18.
Supra note 7.
19.
B. J.Dierenfield, The Civil Rights Movement (New York: Routledge, 2004): at xv-xxi; G. A. Rutherglen, Civil Rights in the Shadow of Slavery: The Constitution, Common Law, and the Civil Rights Act of 1866 (New York: Oxford University Press, 2013): at 126.
20.
Id., at xv-xxi.
21.
O.Raban, “Conflicts of Rights: When the Federal Constitution Restricts Civil Liberties,”Rutgers Law Review64 (2012): 381-408, at 383.
22.
T.Wood, “Preempting Discrimination: Lessons from the Genetic Information and Nondiscrimination Act,”University of the Pacific Law Review49 (2018): 309.
23.
National Institutes of Health, “Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008,”available at <https://www.genome.gov/10002328/genetic-discrimination-fact-sheet/> (last visited February 15, 2019); see Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300gg-53, 1320d-9, 2000ff, 200ff-1-2000ff-11.
A.Chandra,et al., “Challenges to Reducing Discrimination and Health Inequity through Existing Civil Rights Laws,”Health Affairs36, no. 6 (2017): 1041-1047.
