In this paper, we explore the perspectives of expert stakeholders about who owns data in a medical information commons (MIC) and what rights and interests ought to be recognized when developing a governance structure for an MIC. We then examine the legitimacy of these claims based on legal and ethical analysis and explore an alternative framework for thinking about participants' rights and interests in an MIC.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
J.H.Davis, “President Weighs In on Data From Genes,”The New York Times, February25, 2016, available at <https://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/26/us/politics/president-obama-weighs-in-on-data-from-genes.html> (last visited January 11, 2019). See also K.A. Mikk, H.A. Sleeper, and E.J. Topol, “The Pathway to Patient Data Ownership and Better Health,” Journal of the American Medical Association 318, no. 15 (2017): 1433-1434; L.J. Kish and E.J. Topol, “Unpatients — Why Patients Should Own their Medical Data,” Nature Biotechnology 33, no. 9 (2015): 921-924; M.A. Hall and K.A. Schulman, “Ownership of Medical Information,” Journal of the American Medical Association 301, no. 12 (2009): 1282-1284.
2.
For example, LunaDNA states on their home webpage “…we believe that you should always control your data, even as you contribute your health data to the advancement of science,” and their FAQs explain: “You own your data so it is completely in your control at all times.” See LunaDNA website, available at <https://www.lunadna.com/> (last visited October 18, 2018).
3.
A.M.Honoré, “Ownership,” in A.G.Guest, eds., Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1961): at 107.
4.
Id., at 129.
5.
G.S.Alexander and E.M.Peñalver, An Introduction to Property Theory (Cambridge University Press, 2012): at 2; B. Björkman and S.O. Hansson, “Bodily Rights and Property Rights,” Journal of Medical Ethics 32 no. 4 (2006): at 210 (citing H. Sidgwick, Elements of Politics (London: Cambridge University Press, 1891)); P.N. Ossorio, “Property and Human Bodies,” in D. Magnus, A. Caplan, and G. McGee, eds., Who Owns Life? (Amherst: Prometheus Books, 2002): at 224-225.
6.
See Lexmark Intern., Inc. v. Impression Prods., Inc., 816 F.3d 721, 741 (Fed. Cir. 2016). (“It has long been a familiar feature of our legal landscape that property rights in a particular thing — like the separate interests in making, selling, using, etc., an invention — are viewed as a ‘bundle’ of rights (or sticks) that can generally be transferred separately.”).
7.
Ossorio, supra note 5, at 225.
8.
Björkman and Hansson, supra note 5, at 210 (citing H. Sidgwick, Elements of Politics (1891)).
9.
Ossorio, supra note 5, at 226.
10.
Ossorio, supra note 5, at 225.
11.
G.Hardin, “The Tragedy of the Commons,”Science162, no. 3859 (1968): 1243-1244.
12.
E.Berge and F.van Laerhoven, “Governing the Commons for Two Decades: A Complex Story,”International Journal of the Commons5, no. 2 (2011): at 160-161.
13.
D.Mishori, “Reclaiming Commons Rights: Resources, Public Ownership and the Rights of Future Generations,”The Law and Ethics of Human Rights8, no. 2 (2014): 335, 337, 348-349.
14.
E.Ostrom and C.Hess, “A Framework For Analyzing the Knowledge Commons,” in C.Hess and E.Ostrom, eds., Understanding Knowledge as a Commons (Cambridge: MIT Press, 2007): at 3-26 and 41-81, available at <http://www.wtf.tw/ref/hess_ostrom_2007.pdf> (last visited January 11, 2019).
15.
B.H.Weston and D.Bollier, Green Governance: Ecological Survival, Human Rights, and the Law of the Commons (New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2013): at 124.
16.
P.A.Deverka, M.A.Majumder, A.G.Villanueva, M.Anderson, et al., “Creating a Data Resource: What Will It Take to Build a Medical Information Commons?”Genome Medicine9, no. 84 (2017): 1-5, available at <https://genomemedicine.biomed-central.com/articles/10.1186/s13073-017-0476-3> (last visited January 11, 2019).
17.
R.Cook-Deegan, M.A.Majumder, and A.L.McGuire, “Introduction: Sharing Data in a Medical Information Commons,”Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics47, no. 1 (2019): 7-11; A.G. Villanueva, R. Cook-Deegan, B.A. Koenig, and P.A. Deverka et al., “Characterizing the Biomedical Data-Sharing Landscape,” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 47, no. 1 (2019): 21-30.
18.
J.M.Bollinger, P.D.Zuk, M.A.Majumder, and E.Versalovicet al., “What is a Medical Information Commons?”Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics47, no. 1 (2019): 41-50.
19.
J.Lipton, “Information Property: Rights and Responsibilities,”Florida Law Review56 (2004): 135-194, at 135, 141.
Bishop Clarkson Memorial Hospital v. Reserve Life Ins. Co., 350 F.2d 1006 (8th Cir. 1965); Pyramid Life Ins. Co. v. Masonic Hospital Asso., 191 F. Supp. 51 (W.D. Okla. 1961).
28.
Ala. Stat. § 18.13.010(a)(2).
29.
Colo. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 10-3-1104.7(1)(a).
30.
Fla. Stat. Ann. §760.40(2)(a).
31.
Ga. Code Ann. § 33-54-1(1).
32.
La.Stat. Ann. §22: 1023(2016).
33.
Moore v. Regents of the University of California, 51 Cal. 3d 120, 142-43, 793 P.2d 479, 493-94 (1990) (en banc).
34.
Greenberg v. Miami Children's Hosp. Res. Inst., Inc., 264 F. Supp. 2d 1064, 1074-75 (S.D. Fla. 2003).
35.
Washington University v. Catalona, 490 F.3d 667, 675-76 (8th Cir. 2007).
36.
United States v. Kriesel, 720 F.3d 1137, 1144-47 (9th Cir. 2013).
37.
Amended Counterclaim at 19, Peerenboom v. Perlmutter, No. 2013-CA015257 (Fla. Cir. Ct. Apr. 7, 2017).
38.
Cole v. Gene by Gene, Ltd., No. 1:14-cv-00004-SLG, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 101761, at *2 (D. Alaska June 30, 2017).
39.
SeeB.J.Evans, “Much Ado About Data Ownership,”Harvard Journal of Law and Technology25 (Fall2011); University of Houston Law Center No. 1857986, available at <https://ssrn.com/abstract=1857986> (last visited January 11, 2019). (Noting that rights individuals enjoy under federal privacy law are strikingly similar to rights people would enjoy under a regime of property ownership); 45 C.F.R. §164.524; Privacy Act of 1974, PL 93–579 (Dec. 31, 1974), 88 Stat 1896 (codified at 5 U.S.C. § 552a). See 5 U.S.C. § 552a(d). (Providing an individual right of access to data held in governmental databases, including governmentally held Medicare data); Roberts, supra note 20, at 1130-1133.
40.
See J. Buchwalter, P.M. Coltoff, and C. Fuhr et al., 14 Corpus Juris Secundum Civil Rights §§ 1, 3 (June 2017 update) (Distinguishing natural rights and rights inherent in property ownership from civil rights as exemplified by the privacy rights created under federal privacy statutes and regulations).
41.
F.G.Miller, “Research on Medical Records Without Informed Consent,”Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics36, no. 3 (2008): 560-566.
42.
R.A.Johnson and D.Wendler, “Challenging the Sanctity of Donorism: Patient Tissue Providers as Payment-Worthy Contributors,”Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal25, no. 3 (2015): 291–333.
43.
For the anti-commons, see M.A.Heller and R.S.Eisenberg, “Can Patents Deter Innovation? The Anticommons in Biomedical Research,”Science280, no. 5364 (1998): 698–701. As applied to medical information: R.A. Spinello, “Property Rights in Genetic Information,” Ethics and Information Technology 6, no. 1 (2004): 29–42.
44.
For a regime that allows some ongoing control, see P.Samuelson, “Privacy as Intellectual Property?”Stanford Law Review52, no. 5 (2000): 1125–1173.
