The medicalization model of poverty leads us to devote considerable resources to treating the healthcare problems caused by poverty while neglecting the root cause of those problems — the poverty itself. Treating symptoms rather than causes is far less effective than treating causes. When correctly understood, poverty is a major public health problem that needs to be addressed directly with effective anti-poverty programs. Only then can we properly serve the healthcare needs of the poor.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
R.DeVol and A.Bedroussian, An Unhealthy America: The Economic Burden of Chronic Disease, Charting a New Course to Save Lives and Increase Productivity and Economic Growth, Milken Institute (2007), available at <http://www.milkeninstitute.org/publications/view/321> (last visited May 23, 2018).
2.
R.Chettyet al., “The Association between Income and Life Expectancy in the United States, 2001-2014,”JAMA315, no. 16 (2016): 1750–1766, at 1753.
3.
Id. at 1758.
4.
D. U.Himmelsteinet al., “Medical Bankruptcy in the United States, 2007: Results of a National Study,”American Journal of Medicine122, no. 8 (2009): 741–746, at 743 (finding that people cited illness or medical bills as a cause in 62% of bankruptcies in 2007).
5.
M. M.Glymouret al., “Socioeconomic Status and Health,” in L. F.Berkmanet al., eds., Social Epidemiology (New York: Oxford University Press, 2014): at 28.
6.
M.M.Plucinskiet al., “Health Safety Nets Can Break Cycles of Poverty and Disease: A Stochastic Ecological Model,”Journal of the Royal Society Interface8, no. 65 (2011): 1796–1803.
7.
S. A.Schroeder, “We Can Do Better—Improving the Health of the American People,”New England Journal of Medicine357, no. 12 (2007): 1221-224, at 1222.
8.
See Chetty et al., supra note 2, at 1763.
9.
Under pre-ACA Medicaid, able-bodied adults generally did not qualify for Medicaid even if very poor when they did not have children or were not pregnant. D.Orentlicher, “Rights to Healthcare in the United States: Inherently Unstable,”American Journal of Law and Medicine38, nos. 2 & 3 (2012): 327–347, at 331.
10.
B.D.Sommerset al., “Mortality and Access to Care among Adults after State Medicaid Expansions,”New England Journal of Medicine367, no. 11 (2012): 1025–1034, at 1028. A forthcoming update of the study reports a 6 % reduction in mortality, available at <https://dash.harvard.edu/handle/1/27305958> (last visited September 10, 2018).
11.
B.D.Sommerset al., “Changes in Mortality after Massachusetts Health Care Reform,”Annals of Internal Medicine160, no. 9 (2014): 585–593, at 587–588. The researchers included heart disease, stroke, cancer, and infections as illnesses responsive to healthcare. Id. at 586.
12.
A.Finkelstein and R.McKnight, “What Did Medicare Do? The Initial Impact of Medicare on Mortality and Out of Pocket Medical Spending,”Journal of Public Economics92, no. 7 (2008): 1644–1668, at 1650. This study possibly says more about the benefits of healthcare insurance than the benefits of healthcare itself. Uninsured seniors may generally have sought care for illnesses that could be treated effectively, regardless of insurance status. Id. at 1650–1653. While researchers saw limited benefits for the physical health of Medicare recipients, they found striking benefits for the financial health of Medicare beneficiaries. For the top quartile in out-of-pocket medical spending, the introduction of Medicare was associated with a 40% decline in out-of-pocket spending by 1970. Id. at 1658.
13.
Id. at 1665–1666.
14.
B.Blacket al., “The Long-term Effect of Health Insurance on Near-Elderly Health and Mortality,”American Journal of Health Economics3, no. 3 (2017): 281–311. The studied age group was chosen because younger persons are generally healthier and therefore not in great need of healthcare, and older persons would receive healthcare via Medicare. Id. at 281. The mild mortality benefit at 16-20 years is counterintuitive. By then, all of the people studied would have qualified for Medicare so mortality differences should have narrowed rather than widened. It seems more likely that the difference in mortality reflected factors other than access to healthcare insurance. Id. at 284.
15.
K.Baickeret al., “The Oregon Experiment: Effects of Medicaid on Clinical Outcomes,”New England Journal of Medicine368, no. 18 (2013): 1713–1722, at 1715–1718.
16.
O.Lenhart, “The Impact of Minimum Wages on Population Health: Evidence from 24 OECD Countries,”European Journal of Health Economics18, no. 8 (2017): 1031–1039, at 1035, 1037.
17.
A.Caseet al., “Economic Status and Health in Childhood: The Origins of the Gradient,”American Economic Review92, no. 5 (2002): 1308–1334, at 1331. Moreover, the impact of parental income on a child's health in adulthood cannot be attributed to the child's access to better healthcare coverage. Id. at 1327–1328.
18.
A.Aizeret al., “The Long-Run Impact of Cash Transfers to Poor Families,”American Economic Review106, no. 4 (2016): 935–971, at 936.
19.
Id. at 936. The benefits comprised 12–25% of a recipient family's income and typically lasted about three years. Id. at 936.
20.
Id. at 937 (examining sons because daughters typically changed their names upon marriage, making it difficult to track them over time).
21.
Id. at 965. Because the control group was made up of children whose mothers applied for the program but were denied, usually because the family income was too high, the actual benefits for health may have been higher than the measured benefit. Id. at 936-937.
22.
E. L.Forget, “The Town with No Poverty: The Health Effects of a Canadian Guaranteed Annual Income Field Experiment,”Canadian Public Policy37, no. 3 (2011): 283–305, at 289–290. Some residents of Winnipeg also received a guaranteed minimum income. Id. at 288.
23.
Id. at 290.
24.
Id. at 290-291.
25.
Id. at 294–295.
26.
E. L.Forget, “New Questions, New Data, Old Interventions: The Health Effects of a Guaranteed Annual Income,”Preventive Medicine57, no. 6 (2013): 925–928, at 926–927.
27.
See Forget, supra note 22, at 295-296.
28.
Id. at 295–297.
29.
Id. at 297.
30.
Id. at 299.
31.
P.Arnoet al., “Bringing Health and Social Policy Together: The Case of the Earned Income Tax Credit,”Journal of Public Health Policy30, no. 2 (2009): 198–207, at 203–204.
32.
J.Wicks-Lim and P. S.Arno, Improving Population Health by Reducing Poverty: New York's Earned Income Tax Credit, Public Economy Research Institute, available at <https://www.peri.umass.edu/media/k2/attachments/WP377.pdf> (last visited February 17, 2018).
S.Averett and Y.Wang, “The Effects of Earned Income Tax Credit Payment Expansion on Maternal Smoking,”Health Economics22, no. 11 (2013): 1344–1359.
35.
E.Aguilaet al., “Effects of Income Supplementation on Health of the Poor Elderly: The Case of Mexico,”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America112, no. 1 (2015): 70–75, at 74-75.
36.
Taking into account differences in smoking rates, cholesterol, blood pressure, exercise, and height explained no more than a third of the gradient. M.Marmot, “Multilevel Approaches to Understanding Social Determinants,” in L. F.Berkman and I.Kawachi, eds., Social Epidemiology (New York: Oxford University Press, 2000): at 363.
37.
G.Sreenivasan, “Health Care and Equality of Opportunity,”Hastings Center Report37, no. 2 (2007): 21–31, at 25 (citing D.Blacket al., “The Black Report,” in P.Townsendet al., eds., Inequalities in Health: The Black Report (London: Penguin, rev. ed. 1992): 31-209, at 59, and M.Whitehead, “The Health Divide,” in P.Townsendet al., 219-437, at 231.
38.
J. A. W.Baidal and E. M.Taveras, “Childhood Obesity: Shifting the Focus to Early Prevention,”Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine166, no. 12 (2012): 1179-1181, at 1180.
39.
C.Chaufanet al., “You Can't Walk or Bike Yourself Out of the Health Effects of Poverty: Active School Transport, Child Obesity, and Blind Spots in the Public Health Literature,”Critical Public Health25, no. 1 (2015): 32–47, at 39-40, 42.
40.
R.Mendenhall, “The Medicalization of Poverty in the Lives of Low-Income Black Mothers and Children,”Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics46, no. 3 (2018): 644-650.
41.
G. B.Dahl and L.Lochner, “The Impact of Family Income on Child Achievement: Evidence from the Earned Income Tax Credit,”American Economic Review102, no. 5 (2012): 1927–1956, at 1951 (finding increases in math and reading scores of elementary and middle school students).
See Chetty et al., supra note 2, at 1764. In addition to moving poor families to higher-income neighborhoods, policymakers can increase the wealth of low-income neighborhoods by encouraging higher-income families to move into the lower-income neighborhoods — which college admissions policy reforms can do. D.Orentlicher, “Economic Inequality and College Admissions Policies,”Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy26, no. 1 (2016): 101–123.
46.
R.Chetty and N.Hendren, “The Impacts of Neighborhoods on Intergenerational Mobility I: Childhood Exposure Effects,”NBER Working Paper no. 23001, available at <http://www.nber.org/papers/w23001> (last visited February 18, 2018).
