Military physicians are often perceived to be in a position of ‘dual loyalty’ because they have responsibilities towards their patients but also towards their employer, the military institution. Further, they have to ascribe to and are bound by two distinct codes of ethics (i.e., medical and military), each with its own set of values and duties, that could at first glance be considered to be very different or even incompatible. How, then, can military physicians reconcile these two codes of ethics and their distinct professional/institutional values, and assume their responsibilities towards both their patients and the military institution? To clarify this situation, and to show how such a reconciliation might be possible, we compared the history and content of two national professional codes of ethics: the Defence Ethics of the Canadian Armed Forces and the Code of Ethics of the Canadian Medical Association. Interestingly, even if the medical code is more focused on duties and responsibility while the military code is more focused on core values and is supported by a comprehensive ethical training program, they also have many elements in common. Further, both are based on the same core values of loyalty and integrity, and they are broad in scope but are relatively flexible in application. While there are still important sources of tension between and limits within these two codes of ethics, there are fewer differences than may appear at first glance because the core values and principles of military and medical ethics are not so different.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
V. W.Sidel and B. S.Levy, “Physician-Soldier: A Moral Dilemma,” in T. E.Beam and L. R.Sparino, Military Medical Ethics (Falls Church, VA: Office of the Surgeon General, 2003): at 293-312; E. D. Pellegrino, “The Moral Foundations of the Patient-Physician Relationship: The Essence of Medical Ethics,” in T. E. Beam and L. R. Sparino, Military Medical Ethics (Falls Church, VA: Office of the Surgeon General, 2003): at 3-21; G. J. Annas, “Military Medical Ethics—Physician First, Last, Always,” New England Journal of Medicine 359, no. 11 (2008): 1087-1090; World Medical Association, “WMA Declaration of Geneva,” January 10, 2006, available at <http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/g1/> (last visited November 1, 2016).
2.
F.Allhoff, ed., Physicians at War: The Dual Loyalty Challenge (New York, NY: Springer, 2008).
3.
See Sidel and Levy, supra note 1; T. E.Beam and E. G.Howe, “A Proposed Ethic for Military Medicine,” in Military Medical Ethics, in T. E.Beam and L. R.Sparino, Military Medical Ethics (Falls Church, VA: Office of the Surgeon General, 2003): at 851-865.
4.
L.London, L. S.Rubenstein, I.Baldwin-Ragaven, and A.Van Es, “Dual Loyalty among Military Health Professionals: Human Rights and Ethics in Times of Armed Conflict,”Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics15, no. 4 (2006): 381-391; S. R. Benatar and R. E.G. Upshur, “Dual Loyalty of Physicians in the Military and in Civilian Life,” American Journal of Public Health 98, no. 12 (2008): 2161-2167.
5.
M. L.Gross, Bioethics and Armed Conflict: Moral Dilemmas of Medicine and War (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2006).
6.
S.Eriksson, A. T.Höglund, and G.Helgesson, “Do Ethical Guidelines Give Guidance? A Critical Examination of Eight Ethics Regulations,”Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics17, no. 1 (January 2008): 15-29; E. E. Morrison, Ethics in Health Administration: A Practical Approach for Decision Makers (Jones & Bartlett Publishers, 2010).
7.
C.Rochon, “Dilemmas in Military Medical Ethics: A Call for Conceptual Clarity,”BioéthiqueOnline4, no. 26 (December 17, 2015), available at <http://bioethiqueonline.ca/4/26> (last visited November 1, 2016).
T.Koch, “Weaponising Medicine: ‘Tutti Fratelli,’ No More,”Journal of Medical Ethics32, no. 5 (May 1, 2006): 249-255; Gross, supra note 5; M. L. Gross, “Military Medical Ethics: A Review of the Literature and a Call to Arms,” Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 22, no. 1 (2013): 92-109; London et al., supra note 4; S. H. Miles, “The New Military Medical Ethics: Legacies of the Gulf Wars and the War on Terror,” Bioethics 27, no. 3 (March 2013): 117-123; Sidel and Levy, supra note 1.
10.
P.Robinson, N.de Lee, and D.Carrick, eds., Ethics Education in the Military (Ashgate Publishing, Ltd., 2013).
11.
A. E.Hartle, “The Profession of Arms and the Officer Corps,” in T. E.Beam and L. R.Sparino, eds., Military Medical Ethics (Falls Church, VA: Office of the Surgeon General, 2003): 127-156.
12.
Department of National Defence, “Canadian Forces Officer General Specification,”Government of Canada, October 1994, at p. ii-iii.
P. C.Kasurak, “Civilianization and the Military Ethos: Civil-Military Relations in Canada,”Canadian Public Administration25, no. 1 (1982): 108-129, at 108, available at <http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1754-7121.1982.tb02067.x/full> (last visited November 2, 2016); see Robinson, de Lee, and Carrick, supra note 10.
15.
Id. (Kasurak).
16.
Department of National Defence, Duty with Honour: The Profession of Arms in Canada, 2nd ed. (Ottawa, ON: Government of Canada, 2009): at 2.
Department of National Defence, “Fundamentals of Canadian Defence Ethics,”supra note 3; Department of National Defence, “DND and CF Code of Values and Ethics,” supra note 8.
25.
This “values-based” approach to ethics is explicitly articulated in the DEP as being in contrast to other common approaches that are either compliance-based (i.e., formal rule following, a traditional feature of strongly hierarchical military institutions) or prevention-based (to identify and manage patterns or departments where risks are greatest); Department of National Defence, “Fundamentals of Canadian Defence Ethics,” supra note 3.
26.
Department of National Defence, “Defence Ethics Programme,”supra note 17.
27.
Department of National Defence, Introduction to Defence Ethics: Student Manual, 2nd ed. (Ottawa, ON: Government of Canada, 2005): 20.
28.
J.Rest, “Background: Theory and Research,” in Moral Development in the Professions: Psychology and Applied Ethics (New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., 1994): 1-26, at 8.
29.
Department of National Defence, “Fundamentals of Canadian Defence Ethics,”supra note 3.
30.
See Hartle, supra note 11.
31.
Id.
32.
Department of National Defence, “Fundamentals of Canadian Defence Ethics,”supra note 3.
33.
Id., at 7-8.
34.
M.Walzer, “Two Kinds of Military Responsibility,” in L. J.Matthews and D. E.Brown, eds., The Parameters of Military Ethics (Toronto: Pergamon Press Canada, 1989): 67-72.
35.
Department of National Defence, “Fundamentals of Canadian Defence Ethics,”supra note 3.
G.Durand, Introduction générale à la bioéthique: histoire, concepts et outils (Les Editions Fides, 2005); N. Didier, L'évolution de la pensée en éthique médicale (Paris: Connaissances et Savoirs, 2005).
World Medical Association, “WMA International Code of Medical Ethics,” “WMA International Code of Medical Ethics,”January 10, 2006, available at <http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/c8/> (last visited November 2, 2016).
Canadian Medical Association, “CMA Code of Ethics,”2004, available at <http://www.cma.ca/code-of-ethics>. It is important to note that in Canada, each province has its own medical association, working under the umbrella of the Canadian Medical Association. An exception is the Quebec the Code of Ethics of Physicians Gouvernement du Québec, Code of Ethics of Physicians., which is written into the Medical Act and Professional Act of the Quebec Civil Code, and so is somewhat distinct from the CMA Code of Ethics because it also has the force of law. Also, in Canada, the medical profession is characterized by a distinction between primary care physicians (General practitioners) and specialists. The latter are represented by The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, whose bylaws adhere to the CMA code of ethics. See Gouvernement du Québec, Code of Ethics of Physicians, CQLR c M-9, R. 17, available at <http://www2.publicationsduquebec.gouv.qc.ca/dynamicSearch/telecharge.php?type=3&file=/M_9/M9R17_A.HTM> (last visited November 3, 2016)..
50.
Veatch, 1995.
51.
D.Callahan and B.Jennings, “Ethics and Public Health: Forging a Strong Relationship,”American Journal of Public Health92, no. 2 (2002): 169-176; see Durand, supra note 45.
52.
M.Marchand, “La déontologie médicale,” in Histoire de l'éthique médicale et infirmière, Les Presses de l'Universtié de Montréal (Montréal, Canada: Durand, G. et coll., 2000): at 353-361.
L.Blank, H.Kimball, W.McDonald, and J.Merino, “Medical Professionalism in the New Millennium: A Physician Charter 15 Months Later,”Annals of Internal Medicine138, no. 10 (May 20, 2003): 839-841.
60.
ABIM Foundation, ACP–ASIM Foundation, and European Federation of Internal Medicine, “Medical Professionalism in the New Millennium: A Physician Charter,”Annals of Internal Medicine136, no. 3 (February 5, 2002): 243-246.
61.
P.Allmark, “An Argument for the Use of Aristotelian Method in Bioethics,”Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy9, no. 1 (March 2006): 69-79.
62.
See Canadian Medical Association, supra note 49.
63.
See Department of National Defence, supra note 27.
64.
See Department of National Defence, supra note 23.
65.
Department of National Defence, supra note 8.
66.
Canadian Medical Association, supra note 49.
67.
S.Eriksson, G.Helgesson, and A. T.Höglund, “Being, Doing, and Knowing: Developing Ethical Competence in Health Care,”Journal of Academic Ethics5, nos. 2-4 (2007): 207-216; Eriksson, Höglund, and Helgesson, supra note 6.
68.
Id. (Eriksson, Helgesson, and Höglund, “Being, Doing, and Knowing”); Eriksson, Höglund, and Helgesson, supra note 6.
69.
See Department of National Defence, supra note 3.
70.
See Department of National Defence, supra note 8.
71.
See Canadian Medical Association, “CMA Code of Ethics,” supra note 49.
72.
Id.
73.
Id.
74.
Id.
75.
N. E.Kass, “Public Health Ethics from Foundations and Frameworks to Justice and Global Public Health,”Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics32, no. 2 (2004): 232-342; M. J. Roberts and M. R. Reich, “Ethical Analysis in Public Health,” The Lancet 359, no. 9311 (March 23, 2002): 1055-1059.
76.
R.Bayer and A. L.Fairchild, “The Genesis of Public Health Ethics,”Bioethics18, no. 6 (November2004): 473-492.
77.
B. W.Levin, B.Wolder, and A. R.Fleischman, “Public Health and Bioethics: The Benefits of Collaboration,”American Journal of Public Health92, no. 2 (February1, 2002): 165-167; see Kass, supra note 76; Callahan and Jennings, supra note 52.
78.
J. F.Childress, R. R.Faden, R. D.Gaare, L. O.Gostin, J.Kahn, R. J.Bonnie, N. E.Kass, A. C.Mastroianni, J. D.Moreno, and P.Nieburg, “Public Health Ethics: Mapping the Terrain,”Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethic30, no. 2 (2002): 170-178, at 177.
79.
Canadian Medical Association, “CMA Code of Ethics,”supra note 49.
80.
See Benatar and Upshur, supra note 4.
81.
J.Woodgate, “An Analysis of the Canadian Defense Ethics Program Decision-Making Guidance,”Faculty of the U.S. ArmyCommand and General Staff College, 2004, available at <http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a428670.pdf> (last visited November 3, 2016).
82.
M. R.Hunt, C.Sinding, and L.Schwartz, “Tragic Choices in Humanitarian Health Work,”Journal of Clinical Ethics23, no. 4 (2012): 338-344, at 3.
83.
See Eriksson, Helgesson, and Höglund, “Being, Doing, and Knowing,” supra note 68.
