Food Labeling and Consumer Associations with Health,Safety,and Environment

Abstract

The food supply is complicated and consumers are increasingly calling for labeling on food to be more informative. In particular, consumers are asking for the labeling of food derived from genetically modified organisms (GMO) based on health, safety, and environmental concerns. At issue is whether the labels that are sought would accurately provide the information desired. The present study examined consumer (n = 181) perceptions of health, safety and the environment for foods labeled organic, natural, fat free or low fat, GMO, or non-GMO. Findings indicated that respondents consistently believed that foods labeled GMO are less healthy, safe and environmentally-friendly compared to all other labels (ps < .05). These results suggest that labels mean something to consumers, but that a disconnect may exist between the meaning associated with the label and the scientific consensus for GMO food. These findings may provide insight for the development of labels that provide information that consumers seek.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

“Campbell Announces Support for Mandatory GMO Labeling,” (2016), available at <http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20160107006458/en/Campbell-Announces-Support-Mandatory-GMO-Labeling> (last visited October 28, 2016).

E.g.,

Hamblin

, “No One Is Denying a ‘Right to Know What's in My Food,’” The Atlantic, July 24, 2015, available at <http://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2015/07/no-one-is-deny-ing-a-right-to-know-whats-in-my-food/399536/> (last visited October 28, 2016).

“GE Food Labeling: States Take Action” (2014), available at <http://www.centerforfoodsafety.org/fact-sheets/3067/ge-food-labeling-states-take-action> (last visited October 28, 2016).

9 V.S.A. §3041 et seq. (2013-14), An Act Relating to the Labeling of Food Produced with Genetic Engineering.

Id .

“National Bioengineered Food Disclosure Standard,”

available at <http://www.agriculture.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/Mandatory%20Labeling%20Bill.pdf> (last visited October 28, 2016) (amending The Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946, 7 U.S.C. 1621 et. seq.).

“FDA Takes Several Actions Involving Genetically Engineered Plants and Animals for Food,”

November 19, 2015, available at <http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm473249.htm> (last visited October 28, 2016).

Id .

FDA, “What Is the Meaning of ‘Natural’ on the Label of Food?” available at <http://www.fda.gov/aboutfda/transparency/basics/ucm214868.htm> (last visited October 28, 2016).

10.

Id .

11.

E.g.,

Leyser

, “Moving beyond the GM Debate,” PLoS Biology 12, no. 6 (2014): e1001887.

12.

Miah ,

M. Y.

Rafii ,

M. R.

Ismail ,

A. B.

Puteh ,

H. A.

Rahim ,

Asfaliza , and

M. A.

Latif ., “Blast Resistance in Rice: A Review of Conventional Breeding to Molecular Approaches,” Molecular Biology Reports 40, no. 3 (2013): 2369-2388; G. Conko, D. L. Kershen, H. Miller, and W. A. Parrott, “A Risk-Basaed Appraoch to the Regulation of Genetically Engineered Organisms,” Nature Biotechnology 34, no. 5 (2016): 493-503.

13.

Id .

14.

FDA, “Consumer Info about Food from Genetically Engineered Plants,” 2015, available at <http://www.fda.gov/Food/FoodScienceResearch/GEPlants/ucm461805.htm> (last visited October 28, 2016).

15.

See Miah et al., supra note 13;

S. H.

Strauss and

J. K.

Sax , “Ending Event-Based Regulation of GMO Crops,” Nature Bio-technology 34, no. 5 (2016): 474-477; N. Weber, C. Halpin, L. C. Hannah, J. M. Jez, J. Kough, and W. Parrott, “Editor's Choice: Crop Genome Plasticity and Its Relevance to Food and Feed Safety of Genetically Engineered Breeding Stacks,” Plant Physiology 160, no.4 (2012): 1842-53.

16.

J. P.

Holdren ,

Shelanski ,

Vetter , and

Goldfuss , “Improving Transparency and Ensuring Continued Safety in Biotechnology,” July 2, 2015, available at <https://www.white-house.gov/blog/2015/07/02/improving-transparency-and-ensuring-continued-safety-biotechnology> (last visited October 28, 2016).

17.

FDA, “Statement of Policy - Foods Derived from New Plant Varieties,” available at <http://www.fda.gov/Food/Guidance-Regulation/GuidanceDocumentsRegulatoryInformation/Bio-technology/ucm096095.htm> (last visited October 28, 2016).

18.

See Weber et al., supra note 16.

19.

Id; see Conko et al., supra note 13; see Strauss and Sax, supra note 16.

20.

American Association for the Advancement of Science, Statement by the AAAS Board of Directors On Labeling of Genetically Modified Foods (2012), available at <http://www.aaas.org/sites/default/files/migrate/uploads/AAAS_GM_statement.pdf> (last visited October 28, 2016); C. Snell, A. Bernheim, J. B. Berge, M. Kuntz, G. Pascal, A. Paris, and A. E. Ricroch, “Assessment of the Health Impact of GM Plant Diets in Long-Term and Multigenerational Animal Feeding Trials: A Literature Review,” Food and Chemical Toxicology 50, nos. 3-4 (2012): 1134-1148; National Academy of Sciences, Genetically Engineered Crops: Experiences and Prospects, May 17, 2016, available at <http://www.nap.edu/catalog/23395/genetically-engineered-crops-experiences-and-prospects> (last visited October 28, 2016).

21.

Deloitte, Deloitte 2010 Food Survey Genetically Modified Foods (2010), avilable at <https://web.archive.org/web/20101227135642/http://www.deloitte.com/assets/Dcom-UnitedStates/Local%20Assets/Documents/Consumer%20Business/us_cp_2010FoodSurveyFactSheetGeneticallyModifiedFoods_05022010.pdf> (last visited October 28, 2016); A. Kopicki, “Strong Support for Labeling Modified Foods,” New York Times, July 27, 2013, available at <http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/28/science/strong-support-for-labeling-modified-foods.html?_r=1> (last visited October 28, 2016); Wikipedia, “Genetically Modified Food Controversies,” February 2016, available at <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetically_modified_food_controversies> (last visited October 28, 2016).

22.

Id. (Kopicki).

23.

Faber

, “Demand for Organic Food Growing Faster than Domestic Supply,” 2006, available at <https://www.organic-consumers.org/news/demand-organic-food-growing-faster-domestic-supply> (last visited October 28, 2016).

24.

United States Department of Agriculture, “Organic Agriculture,” 2015, available at <http://www.usda.gov/wps/portal/usda/usdahome?contentidonly=true&contentid=organic-agriculture.html> (last visited October 28, 2016).

25.

R. S.

Hughner ,

McDonagh ,

Prothero ,

C. J.

Shultz II , and

Stanton , “Who are Organic Food Consumers? A Compilation and Review of Why People Purchase Organic Food,” Journal of Consumer Behavior 6 (2007): 94-110.

26.

Id .

27.

See Kopicki, supra note 21;

Anderson

, “Amid Debate over Labeling GM Foods, Most Americans Believe They're Unsafe,” 2015, available at <http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/08/11/amid-debate-over-labeling-gm-foods-most-americans-believe-theyre-unsafe/> (last visited October 28, 2016).

28.

A. S.

Bawa , and

K. R.

Anilakumar , “Genetically Modified Foods: Safety, Risks and Public Concerns—A Review,” Journal of Food Science and Technology 50, no. 6 (2013): 1035-1046.

29.

Id .

30.

Popoff ,

Moore , and

Wager , “Organics versus GMO: Why the Debate?” 2013, available at <http://www.geneticli-teracyproject.org/2013/10/15/organics-versus-gmo-why-the-debate/> (last visited October 28, 2016).

31.

Mukherjee ,

Speh ,

Dyck , and

Diez-Gonzalez , “Pre-harvest Evaluation of Coliforms, Escherichia coli, Salmonella, and Escherichia coli O157:H7 in Organic and Conventional Produce Grown by Minnesota Farmers,” Journal of Food Protection 67, no. 5 (2004): 894-900.

32.

Id .

33.

E.g., California Western School of Law, “Standard 509 Information Report,” 2015, available at <https://www.cwsl.edu/search-results?search=509> (last visited October 28, 2016).

34.

See American Association for the Advancement of Science, supra note 21.

35.

American Medical Association, “H-480.958 Bioengineered (Genetically Engineered) Crops and Foods,” 2012, available at <https://www.cga.ct.gov/2013/KIDdata/Tmy/2013HB-06527-R000305-AMA%20Bioenginerred%20Crops%20and%20Foods-TMY.PDF (last visited November 9, 2016).

36.

See National Academy of Sciences, supra note 21.

37.

H. I.

Miller

, “Why Organic Isn't ‘Sustainable,” November 19, 2014, available at <http://www.forbes.com/sites/henrymiller/2014/11/19/why-organic-isnt-sustainable/#49af3b5937aa> (last visited October 28, 2016).

38.

L. L.

Blaisdell ,

Gutheil ,

N. A. M.

Hootsmans , and

P. K. J.

Han , “Unknown Risks: Parental Hesitation about Vaccination,” Medical Decision Making 36, no. 4 (2016): 479-489; D. Ellsberg, “Risk, Ambiguity, and the Savage Axioms,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 75, no. 4 (1961): 643-669; C. Camerer and M. Weber, “Recent Developments in Modeling Preferences: Uncertainty and Ambiguity,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 5, no. 4 (1992): 325-370.

39.

P. M.

Wiedemann and

Schutz , “The Precautionary Principle and Risk Perception: Experimental Studies in the EMF Area,” Environmental Health Perspectives 113, no. 4 (2005): 402-405; see also Strauss and Sax, supra note 16.