Although Canada has not yet enacted any biobanking-specific privacy law, guidance and oversight are provided via various federal and provincial health and privacy-related laws as well as via ethics and policy documents. The primary policy document governing health research, the Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans, provides the framework for the strong role of Research Ethics Boards in Canada, and limits research funding from Canada's three main federal funding agencies to those who agree to adhere to its policies. The broad consent model is gaining traction in Canada, although lack of legal and constitutional precedence for the broad consent or opt-out options makes this an evolving issue. In general, data is required to be coded; more specific security measures are outlined in guidelines that may be implemented by local policy. International sharing is allowed, and Canada meets the European Union's standards for receipt of data and samples.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
“Privacy: A Fundamental Right in Canada,”Health Canada, available at <http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/ewh-semt/pubs/occup-travail/privacy-protection/index-eng.php> (last visited January 14, 2016); “A Guide for Individuals Protecting Your Privacy,” OPC Guidance Documents, Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada, available at <https://www.priv.gc.ca/information/pub/guide_ind_e.asp> (last visited February 27, 2015); Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Part I of the Constitution Act, 1982, being Schedule B to the Canada Act 1982 (U.K. 1982): chapter 11 [Charter].
2.
Jones v. Tsige, 108 O.R. 3d) 241, 2012 ONCA 32.
3.
R. v. Dyment, [1988] 2 S.C.R. 417 at 427.
4.
R. v Tessling, [2004] 3 S.C.R. 432, 2004 SCC 67.
5.
Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (R.S.C. 2000, c. 5), [PIPEDA].
6.
Canadian Institute of Health Research, Best Practices for Protecting Privacy in Health Research, (November, 2005) at 110, [CIHR].
7.
Id., at 111.
8.
Id., at 5.
9.
See Charter, supra note 1.
10.
SeePIPEDA, supra note 5.
11.
Privacy Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. P-21) [Privacy Act].
12.
T.Lemmens and L.Austin, “The End of Individual Control over Health Information: Promoting Fair Information Practices and Governance of Biobank Research,” in J.Kaye and M.Stranger, eds., Principles and Practice in Biobank Governance (University of Oxford, 2009) at 252, [The End of Individual Control].
13.
U. S. Goh, “Canadian Privacy Legislation Requires Consent; U.S. Anti-Terrorism Legislation Takes Away Consent,”Carters’ Charity Law Bulletin No. 128, available at <http://www.carters.ca/pub/bulletin/charity/2007/chylb128.htm> (last visited January 25, 2016).
14.
Anti-Terrorism Act (S.C. 2015, c.51).
15.
“Legal Information Related to PIPEDA: Substantially Similar Provincial Legislation,”Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada, available at <https://www.priv.gc.ca/leg_c/legislation/ss_index_e.asp> (last visited January 25, 2016).
16.
Process for the Determination of “Substantially Similar,” Provincial Legislation by the Governor in Council, Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada, available at <https://www.priv.gc.ca/leg_c/legislation/leg-rp_030611_e.asp> (last visited January 25, 2016)
17.
Personal Health and Information Protection Act, S.O. 2004, ch. 3 (2004) (Ont.); Personal Health Privacy and Access Act, SNB, c P-7.05 (2009) (N.B.); Personal Health Information Act, SNL ch. P-7.01 (2011) (Nfld).
18.
Personal Information Protection Act, Chapter P6.5 (2003) (Alta); Personal Information Protection Act, SBC 2003 Chapter 63 (2003) (B.C.); An Act Respecting the Protection of Personal Information in the Private Sector, LRQ Chapter P-39.1 (1994) (Q.C.).
19.
“ “Questions and Answers regarding the application of PIPEDA, Alberta and British Columbia’s Personal Information Protection Acts,”Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada, available at <https://www.priv.gc.ca/resource/fsfi/02_05_d_26_e.asp> (last visited January 25, 2016).
20.
Loi sur les services de santé et les services sociaux, LRQ chap-itre S-4.2 (1991) (Q.C.); Public Hospitals Act, R.S.O. 1990, ch. p.40 (1990) (Ont.).
21.
Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act, Chapter 5 (1993)(N.S.)
22.
Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act, RSBC 1996 ch. 165 (1996) (B.C); Personal Information International Disclosure Protection Act, ch. 3 (2006) (N.S.); Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act, RSA 2000 ch. F-25 (2000), at s. 92(3).
23.
T.Caulfield, “Revisiting Core Principles: Autonomy, Consent, and the Biobanking Challenge,” in J.Downie and E.Gibson, eds., Health Law at the Supreme Court of Canada (Toronto: Irwin Law Inc., 2007) at 170.
24.
Id., at 172.
25.
McInerney v. MacDonald [1992] 2 S.C.R. 138.
26.
U.Ogbogu, S.Burningham, and T.Caulfield, “The Right to Control and Access Genetic Research Information: Does McInerney Offer a Way Out of the Consent/Withdrawal Conundrum?”UBC Law Review47, no. 1 (2014): 275–92.
Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans (2014) [TCPS2].
31.
SeeCIHR, supra note 6.
32.
See TCPS2, supra note 30.
33.
Id., at 8.
34.
Id., at 58.
35.
Id., at 55.
36.
Id., at 169.
37.
Id., at 170.
38.
Id., at 172.
39.
“Canadian Tissue Repository Network: About Us,”available at <http://www.ctrnet.ca/about/us> (last visited January 25, 2016).
40.
“CTRNet Policy Material Release: Policy 6 e2.0”, Canadian Tissue Repository Network (2012) at art. 6.1.2.
41.
Id., at art. 6.4.1
42.
See PIPEDA, supra note 5.
43.
Id., at 4.3.4.
44.
Id., at 4.7.1.
45.
Id., at 4.7.3.
46.
Id., at 4.7.5.
47.
Id., at 4.5.3.
48.
K.El Emam, “Methods for the De-identification of Electronic Health Records for Genomic Research,”Genome Medicine3, no. 4 (2011) at 2, [Methods for the de-identification].
49.
U.Ogbogu, S.Burningham, and A.Ollenberger, “Policy Recommendations for addressing Primary Challenges Associated with Cell-based Research and Interventions,”BMC Medical Ethics15, no.2 (2014) at 3.
50.
E.Lévesque and B.M.Knoppers, “Management Strategies for Ethics in International Research,”Current Genetic Medical Reports2, no. 4 (2014): 255–260.
51.
T.Caulfield, N.Ries, and G.Barr, “Variation in Ethics Review of Multi-Site Research Initiatives,”Amsterdam Law Forum3, no. 1 (2011): 85–100.
52.
“Questions and Answers Regarding the Application of PIPEDA, Alberta and British Columbia’s Personal Information Protection Acts,”Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada, available at <https://www.priv.gc.ca/resource/fsfi/02_05_d_26_e.asp> (last visited January 25, 2016.
53.
P.Kossem, E. S.Dove, and C.Baggaley, “Building a Data Sharing Model for Global Genomic Research,”Genome Biology15, no. 8 (2014):430-436 [Building a data sharing model].
D. J.Wilison, “Use of Data from the Electronic Health Record for Health Research-Current Governance Challenges and Potential Approaches,” commissioned by the Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada, 2009; E. S. Dove, B. M. Knoppers, and M. H. Zawati, “Towards an Ethics Safe Harbor for Global Biomedical Research,” Journal of Law and the Biosciences 1, no. 1 (2014): 3–51.
T.Lemmens and L.Austin, “Privacy, Consent, and Governance” in New Challenges for Biobanks: Ethics, Law and Governance, K.Dierickx and P.Borry, eds. (Antwerp/Portland, OR: Intersentia, 2009).
65.
T.Caulfield and B. M.Knoppers, “Consent, Privacy & Research Biobanks,”Genome Canada1, Policy Brief 7 (2010): 1.
66.
K. S.Steinsbekk, B. K.Myskja, and B.Solberg, “Broad Consent versus Dynamic Consent in Biobank Research: Is Passive Participation an Ethical Problem?”European Journal of Human Genetics21, no. 9 (2013): 97–902.
67.
C.Allen, Y.Joly, and P. G.Moreno, “Data Sharing, Biobanks, and Informed Consent: A Research Paradox,”McGill Journal of Law and Health7, no. 1 (2013): 85–120.
68.
L.D. (Guardian ad litem of) v. Provincial Health Services Authority, 2012 BCCA 491.
69.
K. C.O’Doherty, A. K.Hawkins, and M. M.Burgess, “Involving Citizens in the Ethics of Biobank Research: Informing Institutional Policy through Structured Public Deliberation,”Social Science and Medicine75, no. 9 (2012):1604–1611.
70.
See TCPS2, supra note 30.
71.
Id.
72.
T.Caulfield, C.Rachul, and E.Nelson, “Biobanking, Consent, and Control: A Survey of Albertans on Key Research Ethics Issues,”Biopreservation and Biobanking10, no. 5 (2012): 433–438.
73.
Id.
74.
Canadian Partnership for Tomorrow Project, available at <http://www.partnershipfortomorrow.ca> (last visited January 25, 2016); see also Allen supra note 64.
T.Caulfield, S.Burningham, and Y.Joly, “A Review of the Key Issues Associated with the Commercialization of Bio-banks,”Journal of Law and the Biosciences (2014): 94-110, at 106.
K. C.O’Doherty, M. M.Burgess, and K.Edwards, “From Consent to Institutions: Designing Adaptive Governance for Genomic Biobanks,”Social Science & Medicine73, no. 3 (2011): 367–374.
I.Mosby, “Administering Colonial Science: Nutrition Research and Human Biomedical Experimentation in Aboriginal Communities and Residential Schools, 1942-1952,”Social History, 46, no. 91 (2013):145-172; M. Castanello “Ethics of Aboriginal Research,”available at <http://www.naho.ca/jah/english/jah01_01/journal_p98-114.pdf> (last visited January 25, 2016); L. Vogel, “Broken Trust Drives Native Health Disparities,” Canadian Medical Association Journal 187, no. 1 (2014):E9-E10; L. Vogel, “The New Ethics of Aboriginal Health Research,” Canadian Medical Association Journal (epub ahead of print).
E.S.Dove, L.Black, D.Avard, “Charting the Privacy Landscape in Canadian Pediatric Biobanks,”Health Law Journal20, no. 1 (2013):1–46.
91.
E J.Samuel, B.M.Knoppers, and D.Avard, “Paediatric Bio-banks: What Makes Them So Unique?,”Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health48, no. 2 (2012):E1-E3.
92.
E E.S.Dove, L.Black, D.Avard, “Privacy in Canadian Paediatric Biobanks: A Changing Landscape: A Report Delivered to the Privacy Commissioner of Canada,”Centre of Genomics and Policy, 2011.
93.
Id., at 21.
94.
D.Avard, L.Black, J.Samuël, “Best Practices for Health Research Involving Children and Adolescents,”Centre of Genomics and Policy (CGP), Maternal Infant Child and Youth Research Network (MICYRN), 2012.
95.
Id. at 27.
96.
Constitution Act, 1982, being Schedule B to the Canada Act 1982 (UK), 1982, c 11.
