The authors propose a framework for analyzing the dynamics of the leader-follower relationship in a mentoring context. To illustrate their framework, they use personal disclosure and personal case analysis. This framework addresses a power imbalance that can characterize the charismatic leader-follower relatonship, affecting motivational assessment, resource allocation and evaluation processes. The authors conclude with guidelines for follower self empowerment and leader preventive maintenanace to help avoid such power imbalances in the future.
Perhaps there needs to be a label announcing that "having a charismatic mentor may be hazardous to your mental health." While there is great appeal in working with someone of charisma, subtle forces at work within the relationship may undermine the follower's sense of self. In this article, we present a framework for analyzing the dynamics of the leader-follower relationship in a mentoring context. This framework addresses a power imbalance that can characterize the charismatic leader-follower relationship, and which affects motivational assessment, resource allocation, and evaluation processes. Following along a newly established path of scholarly disclosure (Neck, Godwin & Spence, 1996; Sankowsky, 1997; Gould, 1989), the authors will illustrate this framework using examples from their experiences with charismatic mentors.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alderfer, C.P. (1987). An intergroup perspective on group dynamics. In J. Lorsch (Ed.), Handbook of organizational behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Bass, B.M. (1988).Evolving perspectives on charismatic leadership . In J.A. Conger and R.N. Kanungo (Eds.) Charismatic leadership: The elusive factor in organizational effectiveness (pp. 40-77). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
4.
Bennis, W. (1989). Why leaders can't lead. The Unconscious conspiracy continues. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass .
5.
Conger, J.A. (1989). The charismatic leader: . Behind the mystique of exceptional leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
6.
Conger, J.A. (1990). The dark side of leadership. Organizational Dynamics, 19(2), 44-55.
7.
Conger, J.A., & Kanungo, R.N. (1987). Toward a behavioral theory of charismatic leadership in organizational settings. Academy of Management Review, 12, 637-647.
8.
Devereux, G. (1955). Charismatic leadership and crisis. In W. Muensterberger and S. Axelrod (Eds.), Psychoanalysis and the social sciences . Volume 4. (pp.145-157). New York: International University Press.
9.
Ehrenberg. D. (1986). Countertransference resistance. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 22, 563-576.
10.
French, J. & Raven, B. (1959). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in social power, MIUniversity of Michigan Publications.
11.
Galanter, M. (1982). Charismatic religious sects and psychiatry: An overview. American Journal of Psychiatry, 139, 1539-1548.
12.
Gardner, W.L., and Avolio, B.J. (1998). The charismatic relationship: A dramaturgical perspective. Academy of Management Review, 23(1), 32-58.
13.
Gill, M. (1982). Analysis of transference. Volume. 1. New York: International University Press.
14.
Gould, S.J. (1989). Wonderful life: The Burgess Shale and the nature of history. New York: W. W. Norton .
15.
House, R.J., Spangler, W.D., & Woycke, J. (1991). Personality and charisma in the U.S. Presidency: A psychological theory of leader effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 364-396.
16.
Howell, J.M. (1988). Two faces of charisma: Socialized and personalized leadership in organizations. In J.A. Conger & R.N. Kanungo (Eds.), Charismatic leadership: The elusive factor in organizational effectiveness (pp. 213-236). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
17.
Kets de Vries, M.F.K. (1989). The leader as mirror: Clinical reflections. Human Relations, 42, 607-623.
18.
Kets de Vries, M.F.K. (1988). Origins of charisma: Ties that bind the leader and the led. In J.A.Conger and R.N. Kanungo (Eds.), Charismatic leadership. The elusive factor in organizational effectiveness, (pp. 237-252). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
19.
Kets de Vries, M.F.K., and Miller, D. (1985). Narcissism and leadership: An object relations perspective. Human Relations, 33, 583-601.
20.
Klein, K.J., & House, R.J. (1995). On fire: Charismatic leadership and levels of analysis. Leadership Quarterly, 6, 183-198.
21.
Kohut, H. (1985). Self-psychology and the humanities. Reflections on a new psychoanalytic approach. (edited by C.B. Strozier). New York: W.W. Norton.
22.
Kohut, H. (1971). The analysis of the self: A systematic approach to the psychoanalytic treatment of narcissistic disorders. New York: International University Press.
23.
Kohut, H., and Wolf, E.S. (1978). The disorders of the self and their treatment: An outline. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 59, 413-425.
24.
Langs, R. (1976). The bipersonal field. New York : Jason Aronson.
25.
McGregor Bums, J.M. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper and Row.
26.
Neck, C.P., Godwin, J.L., & Spence, E.S. (1996). Understanding researcher "projection" in interpreting case study: The South Canyon fire tragedy. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 32, 48-61.
27.
Pauchant, T.C., and Dumas, C. (1991). Abraham Maslow and Heinz Kohut. A Comparison. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 31(2), 49-71.
28.
Roberts, N.C. and Bradley, R.T. (1988). Limits of charisma. In J.A. Conger and R.N. Kanungo (Eds), Charismatic leadership. The elusive factor in organizational effectiveness . (pp. 253-275). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass .
29.
Sankowsky, D. (1997). To share or not to share: The place of personal disclosure in scholarly writing. Journal of Adult Development , 4, 237-242.
30.
Sankowsky, D. (1995). The charismatic leader as narcissist: Understanding the abuse of power. Organizational Dynamics, 23, 57-71.
31.
Sankowsky, D. (1989). A psychoanalytic attributional model for subordinate poor performance. Human Resource Management, 28, 125-139.
32.
Seligman, M.E.P. (1975). Helplessness: On depression, development, and death. Freeman.
33.
Stolorow, R.D., and Atwood, G.E. (1984). Psychoanalytic phenomenology: Toward a science of human experience. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 4, 87-105.
34.
Shamir, B. (1991). The charismatic relationship: Alternative explanations and predictions. Leadership Quarterly, 2, 81-104.
35.
Shamir, B. (1994). Ideological position, leaders' charisma, and voting preferences: Personal versus partisan elections. Political Behavior, 16(2), 265-287.
36.
Shamir, B. (1995). Social distance and charisma: Theoretical notes and an exploratory study. Leadership Quarterly, 6, 19-47.
37.
Tichy, N.M., and Devana, M.A. (1986). The transformational leader. New York: Wiley.
38.
Weierter, S.J.M. (1997). Who wants to play "follow the leader?" A theory of charismatic relationships based on routinized charisma and follower characteristics . Leadership Quarterly, 8, 171-193.
39.
Zaleznik, A. (1989). The managerial mystique. Restoring leadership in business. New York: Harper and Row.
40.
Zaleznik, A. (1974). Charismatic and consensus leaders: A psychological comparison. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, 32, 222-238.
