There is an emerging paradigm that views leadership as the result of social processes rather than as the result of a set of goals and activities conceived and conducted by the leader. This paradigm necessarily emphasizes the process of leadership as something apart from the characteristics, traits, style, motivations, or actions of the leader, or from merely some interaction of leader style and situational variables. The insights of the Dead Leaders Society are used to explore the nature, context, and role of leadership and to distinguish leadership from management.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Barker, R.A. (1994). The rethinking of leadership. The Journal of LeadershipStudies. 1(2), 46-54.
2.
Barker, R.A. (1995). The philosophical links between leadership and total quality. The Journal of LeadershipStudies, 2(2), 27-41.
Bryson, J.M., & Crosby, B.C. (1992). Leadership for the common good. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
5.
Burns, J.M. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper & Row.
6.
Burtis, J.O. (1995). Grouping and leading as citizen action. The Journal of LeadershipStudies, 2,(2), 51-64.
7.
Campbell, D. (1984). Forward. In W. Rosenbach & R. Taylor (Eds.), Contemporary issues in leadership. Boulder, CO: Westview.
8.
Capra, F. (1983). The tao of physics. New York : Bantam.
9.
Deming, W.E. (1986). Out of the crisis. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Center for Advanced Engineering Study.
10.
DePree, M. (1992). Leadership iazz. New York: Currency Doubleday.
11.
Foster, W. (1986). The reconstruction of leadership. Victoria, Australia : Deakin University Press.
12.
Gastil, J. (1994). A definition and illustration of democratic leadership . Human Relations, 47, 953-975.
13.
Gemmill, G., & Oakley, J. (1992). Leadership: An alienating social myth?Human Relations, 45, 113-129.
14.
Harré, R. (1970). The principles of scientific thinking. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
15.
Harré, R., Clarke, D., & DeCarlo, N. (1985). Motives and mechanisms. London : Methuen.
16.
Jantsch, E. (1980). The self-organizing universe: Scientific and human implications of the emerging paradigm of evolution. Elmsford, NY: Pergamon.
17.
Jung, D.I., Bass, B.M., & Sosik, J.J. (1995). Bridging leadership and culture: A theoretical consideration of transformational leadership and collectivistic cultures. The Journal of LeadershipStudies, 2(4), 3-18.
18.
Kuhn, T.S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions, (2nd ed). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
19.
Machiavelli, N. (1981). The prince. (G. Bull, Trans.) Middlesex, England : Penguin Books.
20.
Palmer, P. (1987). Community, conflict and ways of knowing. Change Magazine, 19(5), 20-25.
21.
Priesmeyer, H.R. (1992). Organizations and chaos: Defining the methods of nonlinear management. Westport, CN: Quorum.
22.
Putnam, R. (1993). Making democragy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
23.
Rost, J.C. (1991). Leadership for the twenty-first century. New York: Praeger.
24.
Rost, J.C. (1993). Leadership development in the new millennium. The Journal of LeadershipStudies, 1 (1), 92-110.
25.
Rost, J.C. (1995). Leadership: A discussion about ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly, 5(1), 129-142.
26.
Russell, B. (1972). A history of Western philosophy. New York: Simon & Schuster.
27.
Senge, P. (1990). The fifth discipline. New York : Doubleday.
28.
Tucker, R. (1981). Politics as leadership. Columbia, MO: University of Missouri Press.
29.
Weber, M. (1947). The theory of social and economic organization. (Trans. by A. M. Henderson & T. Parsons). New York : The Free Press.
30.
Wren, J.T. (1995). The problem of cultural leadership: The lessons of the Dead Leaders Society and a new definition of leadership. The Journal of LeadershipStudies, 2(4), 122-139.
31.
Yammarino, F.J. (1995). Dyadic leadership. The Journal of Leadership Studies, 2,(4), 50-74.
