This article discusses the implications of technology as it is affecting the evolution and the management of the contemporary organization. Key trends that are facilitating the increased interest in applying technologies, particularly information technologies, are discussed. Also, reasons for the relatively slow deployment of technologies are identified. Finally, recommendations for accommodating the needed changes are presented.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Agor, W.H. (November/December, 1989). "Intuition & Strategic Planning: How organizations Can Make Productive Decisions". The Futurist. pp. 20-23.
2.
Coates, J.F. and Jarratt, J. (1989). Forces and Factors ShapingEducation . Washington, D. C.: J. F. Coates Inc.
3.
Coates, J., Jarratt, J. & Mahaffie, J. (1990). Future Work: Seven Critical Forces Reshaping Work and the Work Force in North America. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
4.
Davis, F., Bagozzi, R. and Warshaw, P. (1989). "User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models". Journal of Management Science , Vol. 35, no. 8. pp. 982-1002.
5.
Drucker, P. (January-February, 1988). "The Coming of the New Organization ". Harvard Business Review. pp. 45-53.
6.
Ellis, P. (October-December, 1984). "Office Planning and Design: The impact of Organization Change Due to Advanced Information Technology". Behaviour and Information Technology (3:3). pp. 221-233.
7.
Enhancing American Competitiveness: A Progress Report to the President and Congress. October, 1993 . Competitive Policy Council, 11 Dupont Circle, Washington, D.C.
8.
Gerrity, T. and Rockart, J. (Summer, 1986). "End-User Computing: Are You a Leader or Laggard?" Sloan Management Review. pp. 25-34.
9.
Henderson, J. and Treacy, M. (Winter, 1986). "Managing End-User Computing for Competitive Advantage". Sloan Management Review, Winter, 1986, p. 3;
10.
Kiechel, W. (May, 1993). "How we will Work in the Year 2000". Fortune. pp. 38-52.
11.
Lorsch, J. (Winter, 1986). "Managing Culture: The Invisible Barrier to Strategic Change". California Management Review, Vol. XXVIII, no. 2. pp. 95-109.
12.
Lundin, S.C. and Lancaster, L.C. (May/June, 1990). "Beyond Leadership: The Importance of Followership". The Futurist pp. 18-24.
13.
Mettler, R. (March, 1993). "Forging the Future: Policy for American Manufacturing". Report of the Manufacturing Subcouncil to the Competitive Policy Council. Washington, D.C. Competitiveness Policy Council, 11 Dupont Circle.
14.
Morrison, R. (July/August, 1990). The Shape of IS to Come. Indications , a publication of Index Group, Inc., Vol.7, no 4. pp 1-7.
15.
Parnell, D. (1990). Dateline 2000: The New Higher Education Agenda . Washington, D. C.: American Association of Community and Junior Colleges.
16.
Pinsonneault, A. and Kraemer, K. (September,1993). "The Impact of Information Technology on Middle Managers". MIS Quarterly, September, 1993.
17.
Rockart, J.F. and Flannery, L. (October, 1983). "The Management of End-User Computing". Communications of theACM. pp. 777-84.
18.
Selig, F. (1991). "Managing Information Technology in the Nineties". information &Management. No. 21. pp. 251-255.
19.
Swanson, E. (1974). "Management InformationSystems: Applications and Involvement". Management Science, 21. pp. 178-188.
20.
U. S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics (1986). Employment and Earnings. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
21.
Wildavsky, A. (January, 1983). "Information as an Organizational Problem ". Journal of Management Studies (20:1). pp. 29-40.
