Leadership from the edge implies that subordinates are able and authorized to take the initiatives that are necessary to deal with the situations they encounter. Although leadership from the edge is considered important in crisis response operations that the military perform, on-scene commanders are often closely supervised. The reasons behind this tendency are explored by developing and using an analytical framework consisting of nine leadership dimensions. For each dimension the requirements of leadership from the edge are elaborated and compared to actual practice in the armed forces. The conclusion is that many leadership aspects in the military do not match with the requirements of leadership from the edge.
Barbuto, J.E. (2005). Motivation and transactional, charismatic, and transformational leadership: A test of antecedents. Journal of Leadership andOrganizational Studies, 11(4), 26-40.
7.
Baron, J.N., & Kreps, D.M. (1999). Strategic human resources: Frameworks for general managers. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
8.
Bass, B.M. (1996). A new paradigm of leadership: An inquiry into transformational leadership. Alexandria, Virginia: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences.
9.
Buijs, B. (2001). `Train your people so you can trust them, then, trust them!' Preparation of B-Coy SFOR7. In P. Essens, A. Vogelaar, E. Tanercan, & D. Winslow (Eds.), The human in command: Peace support operations (pp. 223-230). Amsterdam/Breda, The Netherlands: Mets & Schilt/KMA.
10.
Caforio, G. (2001). The effectiveness of officer preparation for “Operations Other Than War” (OOTWs): A comparison among several European countries . In P. Essens, A. Vogelaar, E. Tanercan, & D. Winslow (Eds.), The human in command: Peace support operations (pp. 113-125). Amsterdam/ Breda, The Netherlands: Mets & Schilt/ KMA.
11.
Camerer, C., & Vepsalainen, A. (1988). The economic efficiency of corporate culture. Strategic Management Journal, 9, 115-126.
12.
Carroll, S.J., & Tosi, H.L. (1992). The nature of human resource management systems and the structure of organizations. In H. L. Tosi (ed.), The Environment/Organization/Person contingency model: A meso approach to the study of organizations. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
13.
Child, J., & Rodrigues, S.B. (2003). Corporate governance and new organizational forms: issues of double and multiple agency. Journal of Management and Governance, 7, 337-360.
14.
Conger, J.A., & Kanungo, R.N. (1988). The empowerment process: Integrating theory and practice. Academy of Management Review, 13, 471-482.
Das, T.K. & Teng, B.S. (1998). Between trust and control: Developing confidence in partner cooperation in alliances. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 491-512.
17.
D'Aveni, R. (1994). Hypercompetition: Managing the dynamics of strategic maneuvering. New York: The Free Press.
18.
Dekker, A.H. (2003). Centralisation and decentralization in network centric warfare. Journal of Battlefield Technology, 6(2), 1-6.
19.
Dhanaraj, C., & Parkhe, A. (2006). Orchestrating innovating networks. Academy of Management Review, 31(3), 659-669.
20.
Dixon, N. (1976). On the psychology of military incompetence. London: Jonathan Cape.
21.
Doctrine Committee of the Netherlands Army ( 1996). Landmacht doctrine publicatie I: Militaire doctrine [Army doctrine publications I: Military doctrine]. The Hague : Sdu.
22.
Doctrine Committee of the Netherlands Army ( 2002). Handboek leidinggeven in de Koninklijke Landmacht [Handbook of leadership in the Royal Army]. The Hague.
23.
Duncan, W.J., LaFrance, K.G., & Ginter, P.M. (2003). Leadership and decision making: A retrospective application and assessment. The Journal of Leadership andOrganizational Studies, 9 (4), 1-20.
24.
Essens, P.J.M.D., Vogelaar, A.L.W., Mylle, J.J.C., Blendell, C., Paris, C., Halpin, S.M., & Baranski, J.V. (2005). Military command team effectiveness: Model and instrument for assessment and improvement. NATO/RTO Technical Report, TR-HFM-087.
25.
Essens, P., Vogelaar, A. , Tanercan, E., & Winslow, D. (Eds.) (2001). The human in command: Peace support operations. Amsterdam/ Breda, The Netherlands: Mets & Schilt/ KMA.
26.
Garrett, A.R. (1999). Information superiority and the future of mission orders. Military Review, November-December, 61-69.
27.
Greenleaf, R.K. (1977). Servant leadership: A journey into the nature of legitimate power and greatness. New York: Paulist Press.
28.
Harries-Jenkins, G. (Ed.) (1999). Leadership for change. London, England: United States Army Research Institute, European Research Office of the US Army, Final Technical Report.
29.
Houghton, J.D., & Yoho, S.K. (2005). Towards a contingency model of leadership and psychological empowerment: When should self-leadership be encouraged? Journal of Leadership andOrganizational Studies, 11(4), 65-83.
30.
House, R.J. (1971). A path-goal theory of leader effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly,16, 321-339.
Kala, H.B. (2003). Demystifying military leadership. New Delhi, India: Manas Publications.
33.
Kelley, R.E. (1989). De volgeling geprezen [Praise to the follower] , Harvard Holland Review, 19, Summer, 74-80.
34.
Kolenda, C.D. (2000). Technology, leadership and effectiveness. Military Review, July-August, 87-91.
35.
Kouzes, J.M. & Posner, B.Z. (1987). The leadership challenge: How to get extraordinary things done in organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
36.
Kramer, F.J. (2004). Organizing doubt. Self-organization and army units in crisis operations. Eindhoven, The Netherlands: Technische UniversiteitEindhoven.
37.
Kramer, F.J. (2007). Organizing doubt. Grounded theory, army units and dealing with dynamic complexity. Malmo, SE: Liber. (In press).
Leser, J.W.S. (1997). Initiative: The power behind intent. Military Review, September/October,59-64.
40.
Lewicki, R.J., McAllister, D.J., & Bies, R.J. (1998). Trust and distrust: New relationships and realities . Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 438-458.
41.
Lindqvist, L. (2004). Governing project-based firms: Promoting market-like processes within hierarchies. Journal of Management and Governance , 8, 3-25.
42.
Locke, E.A. (2003). Leadership: Starting at the top. In C. L. Pearce, & J. A. Conger (eds.), Shared leadership. Reframing the hows and whys of leadership. (pp. 271-284). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
43.
Manz, C.C., & Neck, C.P. (2004). Mastering self-leadership: Empowering yourself for personal excellence (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall .
44.
Manz, C.C., & Sims, H.P. (2001). The new SuperLeadership: Leading others to lead themselves. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler .
45.
McClelland, D.C., & Boyatzis, R.E. (1982). Leadership motive pattern and long-term success in management. Journal of Applied Psychology , 67, 737-743.
46.
Meindl, J.R., Ehrlich, S.B., & Dukerich, J.M. (1985). The romance of leadership . Administrative Science Quarterly,30, 78-102.
47.
Miller, L. (1997). Do soldiers hate peacekeeping? The case of preventive diplomacy operations in Macedonia. Armed Forces & Society , 23(3), Spring, 415-449.
48.
Mishra, A.K. (1996). Organizational responses to crisis: The centrality of trust. In R. M. Kramer & T. R. Tyler (eds.), Trust in organizations. Frontiers of theory and research. (pp. 261-287). Thousand Oaks : Sage Publications.
49.
Murray, W. (1992). German military effectiveness. Baltimore, Maryland: The Nautical and Aviation Publishing Company of America.
50.
Pearce, C.L., & Conger, J.A. (2003). Shared leadership. Reframing the hows and whys of leadership. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
51.
Pearce, C.L., & Manz, C.C. (2005). The new silver bullets of leadership: The importance of self- and shared leadership in knowledge work. Organizational Dynamics, 34(2), 130-140.
52.
Pfeffer, J. (1977). The ambiguity of leadership. Academy of Management Review, 2, 104-112.
53.
Pfeffer, J. (1981). Power in organizations. Marshfield, MA: Pittman.
Quinn, R.E. (1988). Beyond rational management: Mastering the paradoxes and competing demands of high performance. San Francisco : Jossey-Bass.
56.
Reed, B.J., & Segal, D.R. (2000). The impact of multiple deployments on soldiers' peacekeeping attitudes, morale, and retention. Armed Forces & Society, 27(1), Fall, 57-78.
57.
Reimer, D.J. (1996). Leadership for the 21st century: Empowerment, environment and the golden rule. Military Review, January/February, 5-9.
58.
Rosener, J.B. (1990). Ways women lead. Harvard Business Review, 68(6), 119-145.
59.
Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1992). Pygmalion in the classroom; Teacher expectation and pupils' intellectual development.New York: Irvington Publishers.
60.
Sashkin, M., & Rosenbach, W.E. (2005). A view of leadership that matters. In R. L. Taylor, & W. E. Rosenbach (Eds.), Military Leadership; In Pursuit of Excellence (5th ed.) (pp. 39-52). Cambridge, MA: Westview Books.
61.
Segal, D.R., & Tiggle, R.B. (1997). Attitudes of citizen-soldiers toward military missions in the post-cold war world. Armed Forces & Society , 23(3), Spring, 373-390.
62.
Sendjaya, S., & Sarros, J.C. (2002). Servant leadership: Its origin, development, and application in organizations. Journal of Leadership andOrganization Studies, 9(2), 57-64.
63.
Shamir, E., & Catignani, S. (2005). Mission command and bitsuism in the Israeli defence forces: Are they complementary or contradictory in today's counter-insurgency campaign? Paper Presented at the IUS Conference , Chicago, 21-23 October 2005.
64.
Soeters, J. (2002). Cultuur in geuniformeerde organisaties [Culture in uniformed organizations]. In R. Richardson , D. Verweij, A. Vogelaar, & H. Kuipers (eds.). Mens en organisatie: De krijgsmacht in verandering [Human and organization: The changing armed forces]. Amsterdam: Mets & Schilt.
65.
Spacie, K. (2001). Mission command in peace support operations: Does it apply? In P. Essens, A. Vogelaar, E. Tanercan , & D. Winslow (Eds.) The Human in Command: Peace Support Operations (pp. 205-211). Amsterdam/Breda, The Netherlands: Mets & Schilt/KMA.
66.
Spreitzer, G.M. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal , 39, 1442-1465.
67.
Stewart, G.L. (2006). A meta-analytic review of relationships between team design features and team performance. Journal of Management , 32(1), 29-55.
68.
Stogdill, R.M. (1974). Handbook of leadership: A survey of the literature . New York: Free Press.
69.
Tannenbaum, R., & Schmidt, W.H. (1958). How to choose a leadership pattern. Harvard Business Review, 36 (March-April), 95-101.
70.
Taylor, R. L., & Rosenbach, W. E. (Eds.). (2005). Military leadership; In pursuit of excellence (5th ed.). Cambridge, MA: Westview Books.
71.
Thomas, J.B., & Velthouse, B.A. (1990). Cognitive elements of empowerment: An interpretive model of intrinsic task motivation. Academy of Management Review, 15, 666-681.
72.
Tjosvold, D. (1991). Team organization; An enduring competitive advantage . Chichester: John Wiley & Sons .
73.
Ulrich, D., & Lake, D. (1990). Organizational capability. New York: Wiley.
74.
Verheul, I. (2003). Commitment or control? Human resource management in female-and male-led businesses. Zoetermeer, Netherlands: EIM Business & Policy Research.
75.
Verheul, I., & Thurik, A.R. (2001). Start-up capital: Does gender matter?Small Business Economics, 16(4), 329-345.
Vogelaar, A.L.W., Kramer, F.J., Buijs, T. P. op den, & Peters, N.C.W. (2001). Leiderschap bij vredesoperaties: Onderzoek naar de ervaringen van militairen bij een SFOR-missie [Leadership during peace support operations: Study of the experiences of the military in an SFOR-mission]. Breda, The Netherlands: KMA.
78.
Vroom, V.H., & Jago, A.G. (1988). The new leadership: Managing participation in organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
79.
Vroom, V.H., & Yetton, P.W. (1973). Leadership and decision making. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
80.
Webb, E.J. (1996). Trust and crisis. In R. M. Kramer & T. R. Tyler (eds.), Trust in organizations. Frontiers of theory and research. (pp. 288-301). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
81.
Wilson, J.O. (1989). Bureaucracy: What government agencies do and why they do it. New York: Basic Books .
82.
Yukl, G.A. (2006). Leadership in organizations (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
83.
Yukl, G.A., & Fu, P. (1999). Determinants of delegation and consultation by managers. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 219-232.
