Considerable discussion stresses the importance of implementing employee monitoring systems in ways that enhance perceived fairness. Less attention focuses on the organizational context in which such systems are implemented. A longitudinal field experiment examined the effects of advance notice, justification, and trust on employee reactions to Internet monitoring. Results indicate that formal characteristics of monitoring implementation were less important than organizational climate in determining employee reactions. Neither advance notice nor justification significantly affected perceptions of monitoring fairness. In contrast, trust significantly influenced these perceptions, which in turn positively affected employees' job attitudes.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aiello, J.R. (1993). Computer-based work monitoring: Electronic surveillance and its effects. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 499-507.
2.
Aiello, J.R., & Kolb, K.J. (1995). Electronic performance monitoring and social context: Impact on productivity and stress. Journal of Applied Psychology , 80, 339-353.
3.
Aiello, J.R., & Svec, C.M. (1993). Computer monitoring of work performance: Extending the social facilitation framework to electronic presence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 537-548.
4.
Aiken, L., & /West, S. (1991). Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
5.
Alder, G.S. (2001). Employee reactions to electronic performance monitoring: A consequence of organizational culture. Journal of High TechnologyManagement Research, 12, 323-342.
6.
Alder, G.S. (1998). Ethical issues in electronic performance monitoring: A consideration of deontological and teleological perspectives. Journal of Business Ethics, 17, 729 — 743.
7.
Alexander, S., & Ruderman, M. (1987). The role of procedural and distributive justice in organizational behavior. Social Justice Research, 1, 177-198.
8.
Alge, B.J. (2001). Effects of computer surveillance on perceptions of privacy and procedural justice. Journal of Applied Psychology , 86, 797-804.
9.
Ambrose, M.L., & Alder, G.S. (2000). Designing, implementing, and utilizing computerized performance monitoring: Enhancing organizational justice. In G. Ferris (ed.) Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management, vol. 18: 187-220. Greenwich, CT: JAI, Press.
10.
Ambrose, M.L., Alder, G.S., & Noel, T.W. (1998). Electronic performance monitoring: A consideration of rights. In Schminke, M. (Ed.), Managerial ethics: Moral management of people and processes (pp. 61-80). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
11.
Attewell, P. (1991). Big Brother in the sweatshop: Computer surveillance in the automated sweatshop. In C. Dunlop & R. Kling (Eds.) Computerization and Controversy (pp. 236-256). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
12.
Ball, G.A., Trevino, L.K., & Sims, H.P., Jr. (1994). Just and unjust punishment: Influences on subordinate performance and citizenship. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 299-322.
13.
Bies, R.J., & Shapiro, D. (1988). Voice and justification: Their influence on procedural fairness judgments. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 676-685
14.
Boehle, S. (2000). They're watching you. Training , 37, 68-72.
15.
Bies, R.J. (1987). The predicament of injustice: The management of moral outrage. In L.L. Cummings & B.M. Staw (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, vol. 9: 289-319. Greenwich, Conn: JAI Press.
16.
Brayfield, A.H., & Rothe, H.F. (1951). An index of job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 35, 307-311.
17.
Brockner, J., Ackerman, G., & Fairchild, G. (2001). When do elements of procedural fairness make a difference? A classification of moderating influences. In J. Greenberg and R. Cropanzano (Eds.), Advances in organizational justice, (pp. 179-212). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
18.
Brockner, J., Grover, S., & Reed, T. (1990). When it is especially important to explain why: Factors affecting the relationship between managers' explanations of a layoff and survivors' reactions to the layoff. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 26, 389-407.
19.
Brockner, J., Konovsky, M., Cooper-Schneider, R., Folger, R., Martin, C., & Bies, R.J. (1994). Interactive effects of procedural justice and outcome negativity on victims and survivors of job loss. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 397-409.
20.
Brockner, J., Tyler, T.R., & Cooper-Schneider, R. (1992). The influence of prior commitment to an institution on reactions to perceived unfairness: The higher they are, the harder they fall. Administrative Science Quarterly , 37, 241-261.
21.
Chalykoff, J. & Kochan, T.A. (1989). Computer-aided monitoring: Its influence on employee job satisfaction and turnover. Personnel Psychology, 42, 807-834.
22.
Colquitt, J.A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology , 86, 386-400.
23.
Corbin, D.E. (2000). Keeping a virtual eye on employees. Occupational Health & Safety, 69, 24-28.
24.
Dailey, R.C., & Kirk, D.J. (1992). Distributive and procedural justice as antecedents of job dissatisfaction and intent to turnover. Human Relations , 45, 305-317.
25.
De Tienne, K.B., & Alder, G.S. (1995). The Privacy for Consumers and Workers Act: Panacea or problem? Managerial Law, 37(2), 1-32.
26.
Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Palo, Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
27.
Firoz, N.M., Taghi, R., & Souckova, J. (2005). E-mails in the workplace: The electronic equivalent of `DNA' evidence. Journal of American Academy of Business , 8, 71-78.
28.
Folger, R., & Konovsky, M. (1989). Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to pay raise decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 115-130.
29.
Folger, R., Konovsky, M.A., & Cropanzano, R.1992. A due process metaphor for performance appraisal. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior, vol. 14: 129-177. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
30.
Fulk, J., Brief, A.P., & Barr, S.H. (1985). Trust-in-supervisor and perceived fairness and accuracy of performance evaluations. Journal of Business Research , 13, 299-313.
31.
Greenberg, J. (1993). Stealing in the name of justice: Informational and interpersonal moderators of theft reactions to underpayment inequity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 54, 81-103.
32.
Greenberg ER, Canzoneri C., Annamma J. (2000, April 12). Workplace testing, monitoring & surveillance: Summary of key findings. American Management Association. Accessed via internet on July 21, 2000 at: http://www.amanet.org/research/pdfs/monitrsurv.pdf
33.
Harris, R.J. (1985). A primer of multivariate statistics (2nd ed.). New York: Academic Press.
34.
Hovorka-Mead, A.D., Ross, W.H., Whipple, T., & Renchin, M.B. (2002). Watching the detectives: Seasonal student employee reactions to electronic monitoring with and without advance notification. Personnel Psychology, 55, 329-362.
35.
Inam, A. (2000). Big brother is here. Global Finance , 14, 31.
36.
Kelly, S. (2001). Is someone watching you? Information World Review, 165, 18-19.
37.
Kidwell, R.E., JR., & Bennett, N. (1994). Employee reactions to electronic control systems: The role of procedural fairness. Group and Organization Management, 19, 203-218.
38.
Konovsky, M., & Cropanzano, R. (1991). Perceived fairness of employee drug testing as a predictor employee attitudes and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 698-707.
39.
Konovsky, M.A., & Pugh, S.D. (1994). Citizenship behavior and social exchange. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 656-669.
40.
Leventhal, G.S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? In K.J. Gergen, M.S. Greenberg, & R.H. Willis (Eds.) Social exchange: Advances in theory and research (pp. 27-55). New York: Plenum.
41.
Lewicki, R.J., & Bunker, B.B. (1996). Developing and maintaining trust in work relationships . In Kramer, R. M., & Tyler, T. R. (Eds.), Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research (114-139). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
42.
MacInnis, P. (1998). Don't count on privacy when you're at work. Computing Canada, 24, 29.
43.
Marx, G.T., & Sherizen, S. (1987). Corporations that spy on their employees. Business and Society Review, 60, 32-37.
44.
McAllister, D. (1999). Cynicism at work: The social dynamics of extreme distrust in organizations. Paper presented as part of a symposium on “Cynicism and Trust in Workplace Relationships” at the annual meetings of the Academy of Management, August, 1999. Chicago, Illinois.
45.
Meckbach, G. (1997). Using software to monitor corporate Internet use: Big Brother tactic or wise network management? Computing Canada , 23, 45.
46.
Meyer, J.P., & Allen, N. (1984). Testing the `side bet theory` of organizational commitment: Some methodological considerations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 372-378.
47.
Organ, D.W. (1990). The motivational basis of organizational citizenship behavior. In B.M. Staw & L.L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior, vol. 12: 43-72. Greenwich, CT : JAI Press.
48.
Organ, D.W., & Moorman, R.H. (1993). Fairness and organizational citizenship behavior: What are the connections?Social Justice Research, 6, 5-18.
49.
Pedhazur, E.J. (1997). Multiple regression in behavioral research (3rd ed.). Forth Worth: Harcourt Brace.
50.
Rousseau, D.M., Sitkin, S.B., Burt, R.S., & Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23, 393—404.
51.
Stanton, J.M. (2000a). Reactions to employee performance monitoring: Framework, review, and research directions. Human Performance , 13, 85-113.
52.
Stanton, J.M. (2000b). Traditional and electronic monitoring from an organizational justice perspective. Journal of Business and Psychology, 15, 129-148.
53.
Stanton, J.M., & Weiss, E.M. (2000). Electronic monitoring in their own words: An exploratory study of employees' experiences with new types of surveillance. Computers in Human Behavior, 16, 423-440.
54.
Stone, D.L., O'Brien, T., & Bommer, W. (1989). Individuals' reaction to job applicant drug testing . Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Psychological Society, Washington DC.
55.
Swanson, S. (2001). Beware: Employee monitoring is on the rise. Informationweek, 851, 57-58.
56.
Tabak, F. & Smith, W.P. (2005). Privacy and electronic monitoring in the workplace: A model of managerial cognition and relational trust development. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 17, 173-189.
57.
Thomas, R. (2003, August). Good practice guide for workplace snoopers . Credit Management, p. 11.
58.
Tyler, T.R., & Lind, E.A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 115-191.
59.
Vaught B.C., Taylor, R.E., & Vaught, S.F. (2000). The attitudes of managers regarding the electronic monitoring of employee behavior: Procedural and ethical considerations. American Business Review, 18, 107--114.
60.
Weekes, S. (2004, November 23). Keep yourself protected. Personnel Today, p. 19.
