This paper examines conditions under which empowerment (decision autonomy, dialogic leadership) is connected with positive and negative effects, respectively, in regard to managing transformational change in Eastern Europe. Acquisitions by foreign investors in Poland and Russia (N = 45 companies) and privatizations through employee buy-out in Romania (N = 5 companies) are contrasted in this study. It is shown that empowerment within these two variants of transformational change is connected in different ways with success indicators of crisis management. From these findings, we deduce practical consequences for empowerment and transformational change, along with suggestions for future research.
Baga, T. (2004). Transformationsprozesse in rumänischen Unternehmen und Unternehmenserfolg. Berlin: Technische Universität, Fachgebiet Organisation, Personalwesen und Führungslehre.
2.
Bartlett, C.A. & Ghoshal, S. (1987). Managing across borders: New organizational responses . Sloan Management Review, 29 (1), 43-53.
3.
Baum, J.R., Locke, E.A., & Kirkpatrick, S.A. (1998). A longitudinal study of the relation of vision and vision communication to venture growth in entrepreneurial firms. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83 (1), 43-54.
4.
Buono, A.F. & Bowditch, J.L. (1989). The human side of mergers and acquisitions: Managing collisions between people, cultures and organizations . San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
5.
Cartwright, S. & Cooper, C.L. (1996). Managing mergers, acquisitions and strategic alliances: Integrating people and cultures. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
6.
Crampton, S. & Wagner, J. (1994). Perceptpercept inflation in microorganizational research: An investigation of prevalence and effect. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79 ( 1 ), 67-76.
7.
Doz, Y.L. & Prahalad, C.J. (1981). Headquarters influence and strategic control in multinational enterprise. Sloan Management Review, Fall, 15-29.
8.
Gebert, D. (2002). Organization development. In: A. Sorge (Ed.), Organization. (pp. 432-455) London : Thomson Learning.
9.
Boerner, S. & Gebert, D. (1997). Unternehmen zwischen Resignation und Hoffnung- Ergebnisse einer Fallstudie in einem Moskauer Betrieb. Journal for East European Management Studies (JEEMS), 2 (3), 305-336.
10.
Fiol, C.M., Harris, D., & House, R. (1999). Charismatic leadership: Strategies for effecting social change. Leadership Quarterly, 10 (3), 449-482.
11.
Gebert, D. & Boerner, S. (1999). The open and the closed corporation as conflicting forms of organization. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science , 35 (3), 341-359.
12.
Gebert, D., Boerner, S., & Lanwehr, R. (2002). Promoting organizational innovativeness: Balancing chances and risks of situation control. Paper presented at The Academy of Management Meeting, August 9-14, Denver Colorado.
13.
Gebert, D., Boerner, S., & Lanwehr, R. (2004). The more situation control, the more innovation? Putting the linearity thesis to the test. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and InnovationManagement, 4 (1), 98-114.
14.
Gersick, C.J.G. (1991). Revolutionary change theories: A multilevel exploration of the punctuated equilibrium paradigm. Academy of Management Review, 16 (1), 10-36.
15.
Greenwood, R. & Hinings, C.R. (1996): Understanding radical organizational change: Bringing together the old and new institutionalism. Academy of Management Review, 21 (4), 1022-1054.
16.
Hambrick, D.C. & Canella, A.A. (1993). Relative standing: A framework for understanding departures of acquired executives. Academy of Management Journal , 36 (4), 733-762.
17.
Hardy, C. & Leiba-O`Sullivan, S. (1998). The power behind empowerment: Implications for research and practice. Human Relations, 51 (4), 451-483.
18.
Herrenkohl, R.C., Judson, G.T., & Heffner, J.A. (1999). Defining and measuring employee empowerment. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 35 (3), 373-389.
19.
James, L.R., Demaree, R.G., & Wolf, G. (1984). Estimating the within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology , 69 (1), 85-98.
20.
Jehn, K.A. (1995). A multimethod examination of the benefit and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly,40 (2), 256-282.
21.
Kane, A., Argote, L., & Levine, J.M. (2002). Social identity and knowledge transfer between groups. Paper presented at the The Academy of Management Meeting, Denver2002.
22.
Kelly, M.J., Schaan, J.-L., & Joncas, H. (2002). Managing alliance relationships: Key challenges in the early stages of collaboration. R&D Management, 32 (1), 11-22.
23.
Larsson, R. & Lubatkin, M. (2001). Achieving acculturation in mergers and acquisitions: An international case survey. Human Relations, 54 (12), 1573-1605.
24.
Lawrence, P.J. & Lorsch, J. (1967). Organization and environment. Boston: Harvard Graduate School of Business Administration .
25.
Lazarus, R.S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. New York: Oxford University Press.
26.
Leach, D.J., Wall, T.D., Rogelberg, S.G., & Jackson, P.R. (2005). Team autonomy, performance, and member job strain: Uncovering the teamwork KSA link. Applied Psychology: An international review, 54 (1), 1-24.
27.
Luthans, F. & Kreitner. R. (1985). Organizational behavior modification and beyond: An operand and social learning approach (2nd ed.). Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
28.
Marks, M.L. & Mirvis, P.H. (2001). Making mergers and acquisitions work: Strategic and psychological preparation. Academy of Management Executive , 15 (2), 80-94.
29.
Pearce, C.L. & Sims Jr., H.P. (2002). Vertical versus Shared Leadership as Predictors of the Effectiveness of Change Management Teams: An Examination of Aversive, Directive, Transactional, Transformational, and Empowering Leader Behaviors. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 6 (2), 172-197.
30.
Piske, R. (2003). Integration management as a moderator of the impact of cultural diversity on conflict and cooperation after German Acquisitions in Eastern Europe. Paper presented at the llth European Congress of Work and Organizational Psychology, May 14-17, Lisbon, Portugal.
31.
Romanelli, E. & Tushman, M.L. (1994). Organizational transformation as punctuated equilibrium: An empirical test. Academy of Management Journal, 37 (6), 1141-1166.
32.
Shamir, B., House, R.J., & Arthur, M.B. (1993). The motivational effects of charismatic leadership: A self-concept based theory. Organization Science, 4 (4), 577-594.
33.
Sheremata, W.A. (2000). Centrifugal and centripetal forces in radical new product development under time pressure. Academy of Management Review, 25 (2), 389-408.
34.
Staniszkis, J. (1991). Dilemmata der Demokratie in Osteuropa. In: R. Deppe, H. Dubiel, & U. Rödel (Hrsg.) Demokratischer Umbruch in Osteuropa. (S. 326-347). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
35.
Tushman, M.L. & Romanelli, E. (1985). Organization evolution: A metamorphosis model of convergence and reorientation. In: L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Volume 7). (pp. 171-222). Greenwich.
36.
Tyler, T.R. & Blader, S.L. (2000). Cooperation in groups. Procedural justice, social identity, and behavioral engagement. Ann Arbor: Braun-Brumfield.
37.
Uhlenbruck, K. & De Castro, J. (2000). Foreign acquisitions in central and eastern Europe: Outcomes of privatization in transitional economies. Academy of Management Journal, 43 (3), 381-402.
38.
Wageman, R. (2001). How leaders foster self-managing team effectiveness: Design choices versus hands-on coaching. Organization Science , 12 (5), 559-577.
