In an effort to present a multiple level theory of leadership, we suggest a set of conditions that may moderate the acceptance of a leader's behavioral patterns. By considering leadership theories at multiple levels of analysis and by conceptualizing culture at a higher level of analysis, we suggest that it depends on culture whether subordinates accept a leader's behavioral pattern. We consider the following patterns: a leader (1) displays a consistent style through the use of consideration and initiating structure, (2) differentiates between in- and out-groups of subordinates via delegation, or (3) interacts with subordinates on a one-to-one or dyadic basis via providing a sense of self-worth. We also discuss the implications of this approach and suggest directions for future research.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ayman, R. (1993). Leadership perception: The role of gender and culture. In M. M. Chemers & R. Ayman (Eds.), Leadership theory and research (pp. 137-166). San Diego: Academic Press.
2.
Ayman, R.,. Chemers, M.M., & Fiedler, F. (1995). The contingency model of leadership effectiveness: Its levels of analysis. Leadership Quarterly, 6, 147-167.
3.
Bass, B.M. (1990). Bass and Stogdill's handbook of leadership: Theory, research, and managerial application (3rd ed.). New York: Free Press.
4.
Chen, C.C., Meindl, J.R., & Hunt, R.G. (1997). Testing the effects of horizontal and vertical collectivism: A study of rewards allocation preferences in China. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 28, 23-43.
5.
Crouch, A., & Yetton, P. (1988). Manager-subordinate dyads: Relationships among tasks and social contact, manager friendliness and subordinate performance in management groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 41, 65-82.
6.
Dansereau, F. (1995). A dyadic approach to leadership: Creating and nurturing the approach under fire. Leadership Quarterly, 6, 479-490.
7.
Dansereau, F., Alutto, J.A., & Yammarino, F.J. (1984). Theory testing in organizational behavior: The varient paradigm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
8.
Dansereau, F., Graen, G.B., & Haga, W.J. (1975). A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership in formal organizations. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13, 46-78.
9.
Dansereau, F., & Yammarino, F.J. (2000). Within and between analysis: The varient paradigm as an underlying approach to theory building and testing . In K. J. Klein & S.W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 425-466). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass .
10.
Dansereau, F., Yammarino, F.J., Markham, S.E., Alutto, J.A., Newman, J., Dumas, M., Nachman, S., Naughton, T.Kim, K., Al-Kelabi, S., Lee, S., & Keller, T. (1995). Individualized leadership: A new multiple level approach. Leadership Quarterly, 6, 413-450.
11.
Dienesch, R.M., & Liden, R.C. (1986). Leader-member exchange model of leadership: A critique and further development. Academy of Management Review , 11, 618-634.
12.
Dorfman, P.W., Howell, J.P., Lee, J.K., Tate, U., & Bautista, A. (1997). Leadership in Western and Asian countries: Commonalities and differences in effective leadership processes across cultures. Leadership Quarterly, 8, 233-274.
13.
Eden, D. (1990). Pygmalion without interpersonal contrast effects: Whole groups gain from raising manager expectations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 394-398.
14.
Erez, M., & Earley, P.C. (1993). Culture, self-identity, and work. New York: Oxford University Press.
15.
Fiedler, F.E. (1967). A theory of leadership effectiveness. New York: McGraw-Hill.
16.
Fleishman, E.A. (1957). A leader behavior description for industry. In R. M. Stogdill & A. E. Coons (Eds.), Leader behavior: Its description and measurement. Columbus: Ohio State University, Bureau of Business Research.
17.
Fleishman, E.A. (1998). Consideration and structure: Another look at their role in leadership research. In F. Dansereau & F.J. Yammarino (Eds.), Leadership: The multiple-level approaches (pp. 51-60). Stamford, CT : JAI Press, 1998.
18.
Graen, G.B., Liden, R.C., & Hoel, W. (1982). Role of leadership in the employee withdrawal process. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 868-872.
19.
Graen, G.B., & Scandura, T.A. (1987). Toward a psychology of dyadic organizing. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 175-208). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
20.
Graen, G.B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1985). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. Leadership Quarterly , 6, 219-247.
21.
Hartog, D.N.D., House, R.J., Hanges, P.J., Ruiz-Quintanilla, S.A., et al. (1999). Culture specific and cross-culturally generalizable implicit leadership theories: Are attributes of charismatic/transformational leadership universally endorsed?Leadership Quarterly, 10, 219-256.
22.
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences. Beverly Hills. CA: Sage.
23.
Hofstede, G. (2001). Cultures' consequences: Comparing, values, behaviours, institutions, and organisations across nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24.
House, R.J. (1995). Leadership in the 21st century: A speculative enquiry. In Howard, A. (Ed.), The changing nature of work. SanFrancisco: Jossey Bass.
25.
House, R.J., Hanges, P.J., Ruiz-Quintanilla, S.A., Dorfman, P.W., Javidan, M., Dickson, M., Gupta, V., et al. (1999). Cultural influences on leadership and organization: Project GLOBE. In W. H. Mobley, M. J. Gessner, & V. Arnold (Eds.), Advances in Global Leadership (pp. 171-233). Stamford, CT: JAI Press.
26.
Kagitcibasi, C. (1997). Individualism and collectivism. In J. W. Berry, M. H. Segall , & C. Kagitcibasi (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (2nd, pp. 1-50). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
27.
Kagitcibasi, C., & Berry, J.W. (1989). Cross-cultural psychology: Current research and trends. Annual Review ofPsychology, 40, 493-531. Kerr, S., & Jermier, J. (1978). Substitutes for leadership: Their meaning and measurement. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance , 22, 374-403.
28.
Kim, U., Triandis, H.C., Kagitcibasi, C., Choi, S., & Yoon, G. (1994). Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and applications. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
29.
Liden, R.C., & Maslyn, J.M. (1998). Multidimensionality of leader-member exchange: An empirical assessment through scale development. Journal of Management, 24, 43-72.
30.
Likert, R. (1961). New patterns of management. New York: McGraw-Hill.
31.
Markus, H.R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and self: Implications for cognition, emotion and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.
32.
Misumi, J. (1995). The development in Japan of the performance-maintenance (PM) theory of leadership. Journal of Social Issues, 51, 213-228.
33.
Misumi, J., & Peterson, M.F. (1985). The performance-maintenance (PM) theory of leadership: Review of a Japanese research program. Administrative Science Quarterly,30, 198-223.
34.
Mumford, M.D. (1998). Situations, interactions and followers: The case of individualized leadership. In F. Dansereau & F. J. Yammarino (Eds.), Leadership: The multiple level approaches (pp. 421-427). Stamford, CT : JAI Press.
35.
Mumford, M.D., Dansereau, F., & Yammarino. F. J. (2000). Followers, motivations, and level of analysis: The case of individualized leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 11, 313-340.
36.
Offermann, L.R., & Hellmann, P.S. (1997). Culture's consequences for leadership behavior: National values in action. Joumal of Cross CulturalPsychology, 28, 342-351.
37.
Pascal, R.T., & Athos, A.G. (1981). The art of Japanese management. New York: Simon & Schuster.
38.
Podsakoff, P.M., & MacKenzie, S.B. (1998). An examination of substitutes for leadership within a levels-of-analysis framework. In F. Dansereau & F. J. Yammarino (Eds.), Leadership: The multiple-level approaches (pp. 215-258). Stamford, Connecticut: JAI Press.
39.
Roberts, K.H., Hulin, C.L., & Rousseau, D.M. (1978). Developing an interdisciplinary science of organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
40.
Rousseau, D. (1985). Issues of level in organizational research: Multilevel and cross-level perspectives. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 1-37). Greenwich, CT : JAI Press.
Schein, E.H. (1992). Organizational culture and leadership (2nd, Ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
43.
Schriesheim, C.A., Cogliser, C.C., & Neider, L.L. (1995). Is it trustworthy? A multiple levels of analysis reexamination of an Ohio leadership study with implications for future research . Leadership Quarterly, 6, 111-145.
44.
Schriesheim, C.A., Castro, S.L., & Cogliser, C.C. (1999). Leader-member exchange (LMX) research: A comprehensive review of theory, measurement, and data-analytic practices. Leadership Quarterly, 10, 63-113.
45.
Schriesheim, C.A., Castro, S.L., & Yammarino, F.J. (2000). Investigating contingencies: An examination of the impact of span of supervision and upward controllingness and leader-member exchange using traditional and multivariate within- and between-entities analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology. 85, 659-677.
46.
Schrieshiem, C.A., Neider. L.L. & Scandura. T. A. (1998). Delegation and leader-member exchange: Main effects, moderators, and measurement issues. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 298-318.
47.
Schwartz, S.H. (1990). Individualism-collectivism: Critique and proposed refinements. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 21, 139-157.
48.
Singelis, T.M., Triandis, H.C., Bhawuk, D., & Gelfand, M.J. (1995). Horizontal and vertical dimensions of individualism and collectivism: A theoretical and measurement refinement. Cross-Cultural Research, 29, 240-275.
49.
Smith, P.B. (2002). Culture's consequences: Something old and something new. Human Relations, 55, 119-135.
50.
Stogdill, R.M., & Coons, A.E. (1957). Leader behavior: Its description and measurement . Columbus: Ohio State University, Bureau of Business Research.
51.
Triandis, H.C. (1990). Cross-cultural studies of individualism and collectivism . In J. Berman (Ed.), NebraskaSymposium on Motivation (pp. 41-133). Lincoln : University of Nebraska Press.
52.
Triandis, H.C. (1993). Collectivism and individualism as cultural syndromes . Cross-Cultural Research, 27, 155-180.
53.
Triandis, H.C. (1994). Culture and social behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill.
54.
Triandis, H.C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
55.
Triandis, H.C. (1996). The psychological measurement of cultural syndromes . American Psychologist, 51, 407-415.
56.
Triandis, H.C., & Gelfand, M.J. (1998). Converging measurement of horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 118-128.
57.
Vandello, J.A., & Cohen, D. (1999). Patterns of individualism and collectivism across the United States. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 77, 279-292.
58.
Vroom, V.H., & Jago, A.G. (1988). The new leadership: Managing participation in organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
59.
Wayne, S.J., Shore, L.M., & Liden, R.C. (1997). Perceived organizational support and leader-member exchange: A social exchange perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 40,82-111.
60.
Weick, K.E. (1978). The social psychology of organizing. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.
61.
Yammarino, F.J. (1998). Multivariate aspects of the varient/WABA approach: A discussion and leadership illustration. Leadership Quarterly , 9, 203-227.
62.
Yammarino, F.J., Dubinsky, A.J., Comer, L.B., & Jolson, M.A. (1997). Women and transformational and contingent reward leadership: A multiple-levels-of-analysis perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 205-222.
63.
Yukl, G. (1998). Leadership in organizations (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NK: Prentice-Hall.
