Leadership/Followership Similarities Between People in a Developed and a Developing Country: The Case of Dominicans in NYC and Dominicans on the Island
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online February, 2003
Leadership/Followership Similarities Between People in a Developed and a Developing Country: The Case of Dominicans in NYC and Dominicans on the Island
This article presents the descriptive findings of two small-scale surveys regarding four organizational-behavior dimensions conducted in the Dominican Republic (a developing country) and New York City (in a developed country) with subjects of Dominican origin. The four dimensions studied are: managerial styles, followership types, power bases at work, and delegation of authority. The comparison of the two groups showed that they share more similarities than differences in terms of the four organizational-behavior dimensions investigated. The study provided an opportunity to begin to explore how much the workplace values of the mother culture prevail and how much the values of the host country's culture influence organization behavior in the case of immigrants at work. The implications of this small-scale study for leadership development in the Dominican Republic and for managing workplace diversity in the U.S. are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adler, N. (2002). International dimensions of organizational behavior , Cincinnati, Ohio: SouthWestern.
2.
Almond, G., and Verba, S. (1963). The civic culture: Political attitudes and democracy in five nations, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
3.
Bjerke, B. (1999). Business leadership and culture: national management styles in the global economy, Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc.
4.
Booth, J. & Seligson, M.A. (1984). 'The political culture of authoritarianism in Mexico: a reexamination', Latin American Research Review, 19(1), 106-124.
5.
Brea, R. (1987). 'Authoritarianism and the democratization process in the Dominican Republic [El autoritarismo y el proceso de democratizacion en la Republica Dominicana]', Ciencia y Sociedad12(2), 180-209.
6.
Clime, D.P. (1994). Caudillismo and social structure in Latin America: a study of the Dominican case [Caudillismo y estructura social en America Latina: un estudio del caso Dominicano]. Santo Domingo, The Dominican Republic: Ediciones del Instituto para el Estudio de la ConductaPolitica .
7.
Duarte, I.; Brea, R.; Tejada-Holguin, R.; & Baez, C. (1995). The political culture of the Dominicans: between authoritarianism and democracy [La culture politica de los dominicanos: entre el autoritarismo y la democracia]. Santiago de los Caballeros , The Dominican Republic: Pontificia Universidad Catolica Madre y Maestra.
8.
Duarte, I.; Brea, R.; Tejada-Holguin, R.; Baez, C. (1996). Political culture and democracy in the Dominican Republic [Culture politica y democracia en la Republica Dominicana]. Santiago de los Caballeros, The Dominican Republic: Pontificia Universidad Catolica Madre y Maestra.
9.
Duarte, I. ; Brea, R.; & Tejada-Holguin, R. (1998). The Dominican political culture: between paternalism and participation [La culture politica dominicana: entre el paternalismo y la partacipacion]. Santiago de los Caballeros, The Dominican Republic: Pontificia Universidad Catolica Madre y Maestra.
10.
Erasmus, C.J. (1968). 'Community development and the "encogido" syndrome ', Human Organization, 27(Spring), 65- 74.
11.
Farris, G.F.; & Butterfield, D.A. (1972). 'Control theory in Brazilian organizations', Administrative Science Quarterly,17(4), 574-585.
12.
French, J., & Raven, B.H. (1959). 'The bases of social power', In D. Cartwright (ed.) Studies of Social power , Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.
13.
Fromm, E. & Maccoby M. (1970). Social character in a Mexican village: a sociopsychoanalytic study, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall .
14.
Fuller, L. (1992). Work and democracy in socialistCuba, Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
15.
Gaitan, C.; Davila, C.; & Zarruk, L. (1985). Productivity and participation: the experience of quality circles in Colombian enterprises [Productividad y participacion: la experiencia de los circulos de participacion en empresas Colombianas], BucaramangaColombia: Talleres de la Camara de Comercio de Bucaramanga.
16.
Greenberg, J., & Baron, R.A. (1997). Behavior in organizations, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
17.
Harrison, L.E. (1985). Underdevelopment is a state of mind: the Latin American case, Lanham, MD: University Press of America, Inc.
18.
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences: international differences in work-related values, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
19.
Jorgensen, J.J.; Hafsi, T.; & Kiggundu, M.N. (1986). 'Towards a market imperfections theory of organizational structure in developing countries', Journal of Management Studies, 23(4), 417-442.
20.
Kelley, R.E. (1988). 'In praise of followers', Harvard Business Review, 66(6), 142-148
21.
Kiggundu, M.N. (1989). Managing organizations in developing countries: an operational and strategic approach, West Hartford, Connecticut : Kumarian Press, Inc.
22.
Kras, E. (1994). Modernizing Mexican management style: with insights for U.S. companies working in Mexico, Las Cruces, NM: Editts...Publishing.
23.
Lauterbach, A. (1966). Enterprise in Latin America: business attitudes in a developing country, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
24.
Montesino, M. (2001). "Dominicans in NYC and Dominicans on the island: Similarities in terms of workplace behavior," Proceedings of the 2001 Meeting of the Midwest Academy of International Business , March 7-9, 2001. Chicago, Illinois.
25.
Montesino, M. (2000a). 'Exploring the convergence of political and managerial cultures in the Dominican Republic: implications for management development and training', Proceedings of the 2000 National Conference of the Academy of Human Resource Development, March 8-12, 2000 . Raleigh-Durham, North Carolina.
26.
Montesino, M. (2000b). 'Comparing power orientations at work between Dominicans in New York City and Dominicans on the Island: Implications for human resource development. Proceedings of the Conference Adult Learning in the New Millennium, University of Helsinki-Northern Illinois University, Lahti, Finland, August 21-22, 2000.
27.
Popham, W.J., & Sirotnik, K.A. (1992). Understanding statistics in education. Itasca, Illinois: F. E. Peacock Publishers, Inc.
28.
Oviedo, J. (1987). 'The authoritarian tradition [La tradicion autoritaria]' , Ciencia y Sociedad, 12(2), 180-209.
29.
Ronen, S. & Shenkar, O. (1985). 'Clustering countries on attitudinal dimensions: a review and synthesis'. Academy of Management Review, 10(3), 435-454.
30.
Ronen, S. & Kraut, A. (1997). 'Similarities among countries based on employee work values and attitudes.' Columbia Journal of World Business , 12(2), 89-97.
31.
Schaupp, D.L. (1978). A cross-cultural study of a multinational company: attitudinal responses to participative management, New York: Praeger Publishers.
32.
Tannembaum, R. & Schmidt, W.H. (1958). 'How to choose a leadership pattern', Harvard Business Review, 36(March-April), 95-101.
33.
Tannenbaum, A.S.; & Rozgonyi, T. (1986). Authority and reward in organizations: an international research, Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research, The University of Michigan.
34.
Todaro, M. (1974). 'Social psychology and Latin American studies ', Latin American Research Review, 9(1), 141-153.
35.
Torres-Saillant, S., & Hernandez, R. (1998). The Dominican Americans, Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press.
36.
Tulchin, J.S. (1983). 'Emerging patterns of research in the study of Latin America', Latin American Research Review, 18(1), 85-94.
37.
Veliz, C. (1980). The centralist tradition of Latin America. Princeton, NJ: University Press.
38.
Weis, A. (1994). The Colombian enterprise between technocracy and participation: from Taylorism to total quality [La empresa Colombiana entre la tecnocracia y la participacion: del Taylorismo a la calidad total], Santa Fe deBogota, Colombia: Universidad Nacional de Colombia.
