Executive Summary Advances in information technology (IT) are providing leadership opportunities for women both in upper and middle management. This paper aims to fill the gap in the literature concerning the effects of IT on these leadership opportunities by examining IT's potential as a leveler of the corporate playing field, facilitating the entry of women into the upper ranks of management and allowing those in middle management to emerge as leaders in decision-making groups. Specifically, the explosive growth of talent-driven Internet-related businesses has opened up opportunities in upper management for women, while the very nature of the Internet and computer-mediated communication (CMC) has the potential for increasing the opportunities for emergent leadership by women within middle management. Four interrelated factors are suggested as to why Internet companies are playing the role of the "great leveler" of leadership opportunities in upper management: (a) the demand for qualified top managers; (b) the nonexistence of an "old boy" network; (c) the existence of diversified, mixed gender personal networks; and (d) an organizational culture open to diversity, which is typical of Web-related firms. Two factors are suggested as enablers of leadership emergence by women in middle management in decision-making groups: (a) technology-based information accessibility, and (b) potentially increased participation in decision-making through CMC.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abelson, R. (1999, October 27). A network of their own. The New York Times, pp. C1, C12.
2.
Antal, A.B., & Krebsbach-Gnath, C. (1988). Women in management: Unused resources in the Federal Republic of Germany. In N. J. Adler & D. N. Izraeli (Eds.), Women in management worldwide (pp. 141-156). Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
3.
Anthes, G.H. (2000, June 26). Software development goes global. ComputerWorld, pp. 94-95.
4.
Baird, J.E. (1977). Some nonverbal elements of leadership emergence . Southern Speech Communication Journal, 42, 352-361.
5.
Barge, J.K. (1996). Leadership skills and the dialectics of leadership in group decision making. In R. Y. Hirokawa & M. S. Poole, Communication and group decision making (pp. 301-342). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6.
Bunyi, J.M., & Andrews, P.H. (1985). Gender and leadership emergence: An experimental study. Southern Speech Communication Journal, 50, 246-260.
7.
Byrne, D., & Neuman, J.H. (1992). The implication of attraction research for organizational issues. In K. Kelley (Ed.), Issues, theory, and research in industrial/organizational psychology (pp. 29-70). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
8.
Cadwalader, E., Lehr, C., Whitaker, M., Araracap, A., Canney C., Ernisse, J., Lam, Y., Martinez, P., Reid, K., Reyes, E., Rychlinski-Fontana, G., & Wilch, J. (1999). Leadership, cohesion, and collaboration in small electronic computer mediated work groups. Manuscript in preparation, West Chester University, West Chester, Pennsylvania [On-line]. Available: http://albie.wcupa.edu/ttreadwell/99elegroups,htm.
9.
Carless, S.A. (1998). Gender differences in transformational leadership: An examination of superior, leader, and subordinate perspectives. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 39, 887-902.
10.
Carter, B. (2000, March 29). ABC network president is quitting to run an Internet company. The New York Times, pp. C1, C8.
11.
Centra Software, Inc. (2000). Live eBusiness collaboration for the new Internet economy [Press release] [On-line] Available: http://www.centra.net/corporate/press/000606.html .
12.
Cohen, L.E., Broschak, J.P., & Haveman, H.A. (1998). And then there were more? The effect of organizational sex composition on the hiring and promotion of managers. American Sociological Review, 63, 711-727.
13.
Conlin, M., & Zellner, W. (1999, November 22). The CEO still wears wingtips: Jobs that lead to the top remain overwhelmingly female-free. Business Week, 3656, 82.
14.
Dunham, K.J. (2000, July 18). Getting ahead: Judith A. Spreiser. The Wall Street Journal, p. B14.
15.
Dunn, J. (2000, March 22). Sleepless in Cyberspace. The New York Times, p. C12.
16.
Eagly, A.H., & Karau, S.J. (1991). Gender and the emergence of leaders: A meta-analysis . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 685-710.
17.
Eagly, A.H., Makhijani, M.G., & Klonsky, B.G. (1992). Gender and the evaluation of leaders: A meta-analysis . Psychological Bulletin,111, 3-32.
18.
Forsyth, D.R. (1990). Group dynamics (2nd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/ Cole.
19.
French, J., & Raven, B. (1959). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in social power (pp. 150-167). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press .
20.
Fulk, J., & DeSanctis, G. (1995). Electronic organization and changing organizational forms. Organizational Science, 6, 337-349.
21.
Fulk, J., & DeSanctis, G. (1999). Articulation of communication technology and organizational form. In G. DeSanctis & J. Fulk (Eds.), Shaping organizational form: Communication, connection, and community (pp. 5-32). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22.
Gopal, A., Miranda, S.M., Robichaux, B.P., & Bostrom, R.P. (1997). Leveraging diversity with information technology: Gender, attitude, and intervening influences in the use of group support systems . Small Group Research, 28, 29-71.
23.
Herschel, R.T. (1994). The impact of varying gender composition on group brainstorming performance in a GSS environment. Computers in Human Behavior, 10, 209-222.
24.
Hoffman, J. (2000, March 9). Executive names her own price and style . The New York Times, p. B2.
25.
Huber, G.P., Valacich, J.S., & Jessup, L.M. (1993). A theory of the effects of group support systems on an organization's nature and decisions. In L. M. Jessup & J. S. Valacich (Eds.), Group support systems: New perspectives (pp.255-269). New York: Macmillan.
26.
Hughes, R.L., Ginnett, R.C., & Curphy, G.J. (1996). Leadership: Enhancing the lessons of experience (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
27.
Kanter, R.M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.
28.
Kaufman, L. (2000, March 9). The dot-com world opens new opportunities for women to lead. The New York Times, pp. C1, C4.
29.
Klein, E.E. (2000). The problem of intimidation as a barrier to participation and creativity in small groups: An investigation into computer-mediated communication . Proceedings of the 2000 Decision Sciences Institute Conference, 710.
30.
Klein, E.E., & Amoo, T. (2000). Integrating the World Wide Web into the statistics and decision sciences curriculum. Proceedings of the 2000 Northeast Decision Sciences Institute Conference, 38-41.
31.
Klein, E.E., Chi, E.C., & Klibaner, R. (2000). The impact of information technology on organizational structure: Flattening the hierarchy. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Global Business and Economic Development: Managing Global Business in the Internet Age.
32.
Klein, E.E., & Dologite, D.G. (2000). The role of computer support tools and gender in innovative information system idea generation by small groups. Computers in Human Behavior, 16, 111-139.
33.
Klenke, K. (1996). Women and leadership: A contextual perspective . New York: Springer Publishing Co.
34.
Lockheed, M.E., & Hall, K.P. (1976). Conceptualizing sex as a status characteristic: Applications to leadership training strategies. Journal of Social Issues, 32, 111-124.
35.
Lumsden, G.B. (1974). An experimental study of the effect of verbal agreement on leadership maintenance in problem-solving discussion. Central States Speech Journal, 25, 270-276.
36.
Marshall, J. (1984). Women managers: Travelers in a male world. New York: Wiley.
37.
Matheson, K. (1992). Women and technology: Communicating for herself . In M. Lea (Ed.), Contexts of computer-mediated communication, (pp. 66-88). New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
38.
McGeehan, P. (2000, February 24). Web concern hires officer of Citigroup . The New York Times, C1, C12.
39.
McGrath, J.E. & Hollingshead, A.B. (1994). Groups interacting with technology: Ideas, evidence, issues, and an agenda. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
40.
Meeker, B.F., & Weitzel-O'Neill, P.A. (1977). Sex roles and interpersonal behavior in task oriented groups. American Sociological Review , 42, 91-105.
41.
Mitchell, W.J. ( 1999). E-topia: "Urban life, Jim — but not as we know it." Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
42.
Mullen, B., Salas, E., & Driskell, J.E. (1989). Salience, motivation, and artifact as contribution to the relation between participation rate and leadership . Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 545-559.
43.
Newcomb, T.M. (1961). The acquaintance process. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
44.
Northouse, Peter G. Leadership : Theory and Practice. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications, 1997.
Nunamaker, J.F. Jr. (1997). Future research in group support systems: Needs, some questions and possible directions. International Journal of Human-ComputerStudies, 47, 357-385.
47.
Ostroff, F. (1999). The horizontal organization: What the organization of the future looks like and how it delivers value to customers. New York: Oxford University Press.
48.
Palmer, J. (2000, July 24). Marry me a little. Barron's, pp. 25-27.
49.
Pfeil, S. (2000, June). Women find success in IT. Employment Review Online [On-line]. Available: http://www.employmentreview.com/2000-06/features/Cnfeat04.asp.
50.
Poole, M.S., & DeSanctis, G. (1990). Understanding the use of group decision support systems: The theory of adaptive structuration. In C. W. Steinfeld & J. Fulk (Eds.), Organizations and communication technology (pp. 173-193). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
51.
Powell, G.N. (1993). Women and men in management (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage .
52.
Powell, G.N. (1999). Reflections on the glass ceiling: Recent trends and future prospects. In G. N. Powell (Ed.), Handbook of Gender and Work (pp. 325-345). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
53.
Rice, M.L., Bishop, H., Acker-Hocevar, M., & Pounders, B. (2000). Power and leadership practices by the superintendent: What do they mean to leaders and followers? National Forum [On-line]. Available: http://www.nationalforum.com/RICEaer10e3.html.
54.
Riecken, H. (1975). The effects of talkativeness on ability to influence group solutions of problems. In P. Crosbie (Ed.), Interaction in small groups (pp. 238-249). New York: Macmillan.
55.
Rosener, J.B. (1990, November-December). Ways women lead. Harvard Business Review, pp. 119-125.
56.
Savicki, V., Kelley, M., & Lingenfelter, D. (1996). Gender and group composition in small task groups using computer-mediated communication. Computers in Human Behavior, 12, 209-224.
57.
Sell, J. (1997). Gender, strategies, and contributions to public goods. Social Psychology Quarterly, 60 (3), 252-265.
58.
Seybold, P.B. (1998). Customers.com: How to create a profitable business strategy for the Internet and beyond. New York: Times Business/ Random House.
59.
Shaw, M.E. (1981). Group dynamics: The psychology of small group behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill .
60.
Siegel, J., Dubrovsky, V.Kiesler, S., & McGuire, T.W. (1986). Group processes in computer-mediated communication . Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37, 157-187.
61.
Smith, D.M. (1997). Women and leadership. In P. G. Northouse (Ed.), Leadership: Theory and practice (pp. 204-238). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
62.
Sosik, J.J. (1997). Effects of transformational leadership and anonymity on idea generation in computer-mediated groups. Group and Organization Management, 22, 460-487.
63.
Sosik, J.J., Avolio, B.J., & Kahai, S.S. (1997). Effects of leadership style and anonymity on group potency and effectiveness in a group decision support system environment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 89-104.
64.
Spencer, C. (2000, June 26). Smashing the silicon ceiling. Washington Techway [On-line]. Available: http://bart.washtech.com/washtechway/113/cover/2396-1.html.
65.
U.S. Department of Labor. (1991). A report on the Glass Ceiling Initiative. (Document 92052275). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
66.
Wysocki, B., Jr. (2000, March 30). Yet another hazard of the New Economy: The Pied Piper effect. The Wall Street Journal, pp. A1, A16.
