The purpose of this study was to identify the elements of the interior environment and their attributes that contribute to interior wayfinding. While the majority of the literature on wayfinding has examined specific causal relationships, few studies have systematically investigated the wayfinding process of users to uncover several environmental elements and attributes that may influence wayfinding, particularly from a qualitative approach. Thus, an exploratory research design comprising qualitative methods and quantitative descriptive techniques was adopted. Eleven participants (female, n = 6; male, n = 5) were asked to locate 12 destinations in two university buildings. The primary data types were a think-aloud protocol and digital video recording. Findings showed that the environmental elements that contributed to wayfinding were landmarks, corridors, nodes, regions, stairs, central spaces, courtyards, entrances, connecting halls, voids, doors, interior windows, and outdoor views. The attributes of identified environmental elements that influence wayfinding are reported. The outcomes of the present study are expected to further our theoretical understanding of the phenomena and provide a foundation for additional investigations to develop guidelines and recommendations for design decision-making in practice.
Abu-ObeidN.Abu-SafiehS. (2010). The effect of the angle between navigation paths and transitional spaces on spatial knowledge. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 27(1), 57–68.
2.
ArthurP.PassiniR. (1992). Wayfinding: People, signs, and architecture. McGraw-Hill Book Co.
BaskayaA.WilsonC.ÖzcanY. Z. (2004). Wayfinding in an unfamiliar environment: Different spatial settings of two polyclinics. Environment and Behavior, 36(6), 839–867. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916504265445
5.
BuckleyM. G.SmithA. D.HaselgroveM. (2016). Blocking spatial navigation across environments that have a different shape. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Learning and Cognition, 42(1), 51–66. https://doi.org/10.1037/xan0000084
6.
ButlerD. L.AcquinoA. L.HissongA. A.ScottP. A. (1993). Wayfinding by newcomers in a complex building. Human Factors, 35(1), 159–173.
7.
CartheyJ. (2008). Reinterpreting the hospital corridor: “Wasted space” or essential for quality multidisciplinary clinical care?Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 2(1), 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/193758670800200103
8.
ChenC. H.ChangW. C.ChangW. T. (2009). Gender differences in relation to wayfinding strategies, navigational support design, and wayfinding task difficulty. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(2), 220–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.07.003
9.
DavisR. L.TherrienB. A.WestB. T. (2008). Cue conditions and wayfinding in older and younger women. Research in Gerontological Nursing, 1(4), 252–263. https://doi.org/10.3928/19404921-20081001-06
10.
FrankensteinJ.BrüssowS.RuzzoliF.HölscherC. (2012). The language of landmarks: The role of background knowledge in indoor wayfinding. Cognitive Processing, 13(Suppl_1), S165–S170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-012-0482-8
11.
GolledgeR. G.StimsonR. J. (1997). Spatial behavior: A geographic perspective. Guilford Press.
12.
HaqS.ZimringC. (2003). Just down the road a piece: The development of topological knowledge of building layouts. Environment and Behavior, 35(1), 132–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916502238868
13.
HashimM. J.AlkaabiM. S. K.M.BharwaniS. (2014). Interpretation of way-finding healthcare symbols by a multicultural population: Navigation signage design for global health. Applied Ergonomics, 45(3), 503–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2013.07.002
14.
HidayetogluM. L.YildirimK.AkalinA. (2012). The effects of color and light on indoor wayfinding and the evaluation of the perceived environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32(1), 50–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2011.09.001
15.
HölscherC.BrösamleM.VrachliotisG. (2012). Challenges in multilevel wayfinding: A case study with the space syntax technique. Environment and Planning B, Planning & Design, 39(1), 63–82. https://doi.org/10.1068/b34050t
16.
HölscherC.MeilingerT.VrachliotisG.BrösamleM.KnauffM. (2006). Up the down staircase: Wayfinding strategies in multi-level buildings. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 26(4), 284–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.09.002
17.
JamshidiS. (2021). Identifying elements of the interior environment that contribute to wayfinding cognitive processes [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Texas Tech University.
18.
JamshidiS.EnsafiM.PatiD. (2020). Wayfinding in interior environments: An integrative review. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 549628. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.549628
19.
JamshidiS.HashemiS. (2020, October9). Interior wayfinding: Two different approaches in addressing wayfinding problems within interior environments[Conference presentation]. IDEC Virtual Symposium.
20.
JamshidiS.PatiD. (2020). A narrative review of theories of wayfinding within the interior environment. Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 14(1), 290–303. https://doi.org/10.1177/1937586720932276
21.
Jansen-OsmannP.FuchsP. (2006). Wayfinding behavior and spatial knowledge of adults and children in a virtual environment: The role of landmarks. Experimental Psychology, 53(3), 171–181. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169.53.3.171
22.
Jansen-OsmannP.SchmidJ.HeilM. (2007). Wayfinding behavior and spatial knowledge of adults and children in a virtual environment: The role of environmental structure. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 66(1), 41–50. https://doi.org/10.1024/1421-0185.66.1.41
23.
Jansen-OsmannP.WiedenbauerG. (2004). Wayfinding performance in and the spatial knowledge of a color-coded building for adults and children. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 4(4), 337–358. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15427633scc0404_3
JiangS.VerderberS. (2017). On the planning and design of hospital circulation zones: A review of the evidence-based literature. Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 10(2), 124–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/1937586716672041
26.
KarimiH. A. (Ed.). (2015). Indoor wayfinding and navigation. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group.
27.
LiR.KlippelA. (2016). Wayfinding behaviors in complex buildings: The impact of environmental legibility and familiarity. Environment and Behavior, 48(3), 482–510. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916514550243
28.
LuY.YeY. (2019). Can people memorize multilevel building as volumetric map? A study of multilevel atrium building. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 46(2), 25–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808317705659
29.
LynchK. (1960). The image of the city. Technology Press and Harvard University Press.
30.
McNamaraT. P.SluzenskiJ.RumpB. (2008). Human spatial memory and navigation. In ByrneJ. H. (Ed.), Learning and memory: A comprehensive reference (pp. 157–178). Elsevier.
31.
MontelloD. R. (2005). Navigation. In ShahP.MiyakeA. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of visuospatial thinking (1st ed., pp. 257–294). Cambridge University Press.
32.
MontelloD. R.PickH. L. (1993). Integrating knowledge of vertically aligned large-scale spaces. Environment and Behavior, 25(3), 457–484. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916593253002
33.
MontelloD. R.SasC. (2006). Human factors of wayfinding in navigation. In KarwowskiW. (Ed.), International encyclopedia of ergonomics and human factors (pp. 2003–2008). CRC Press/Taylor & Francis, Ltd.
34.
MouW.WangL. (2015). Piloting and path integration within and across boundaries. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41(1), 220–234. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000032
35.
O’NeillM. J. (1991a). A biologically based model of spatial cognition and wayfinding. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 11(4), 299–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80104-5
36.
O’NeillM. J. (1991b). Effects of signage and floor plan configuration on wayfinding accuracy. Environment and Behavior, 23(5), 553–574. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916591235002
37.
O’NeillM. J. (1991c). Evaluation of a conceptual model of architectural legibility. Environment and Behavior, 23(3), 259–284. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916591233001
38.
O’NeillM. J. (1992). Effects of familiarity and plan complexity on wayfinding in simulated buildings. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 12(4), 319–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80080-5
39.
PatiD.HarveyT. E.WillisD. A.PatiS. (2015). Identifying elements of the health care environment that contribute to wayfinding. Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 8(3), 44–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/1937586714568864
PiagetJ.InhelderB. (1956). The child’s conception of space. Routledge.
42.
RichardsonA. E.MontelloD. R.HegartyM. (1999). Spatial knowledge acquisition from maps and from navigation in real and virtual environments. Memory & Cognition, 27(4), 741–750. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211566
43.
SharmaG.KaushalY.ChandraS.SinghV.MittalA. P.DuttV. (2017). Influence of landmarks on wayfinding and brain connectivity in immersive virtual reality environment. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1220. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01220
44.
ShumakerS. A.ReizensteinJ. E. (1982). Environmental factors affecting inpatient stress in acute care hospitals. In EvansG. W. (Ed.), Environmental stress (pp. 179–223). Cambridge University Press.
45.
SiegelA. W.WhiteS. H. (1975). The development of spatial representations of large-scale environments. In ReeseH. W. (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 10, pp. 9–55). Elsevier.
46.
SloneE.BurlesF.RobinsonK.LevyR. M.IariaG. (2015). Floor plan connectivity influences wayfinding performance in virtual environments. Environment and Behavior, 47(9), 1024–1053. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916514533189
47.
TangC.-H.WuW. T.LinC. Y. (2009). Using virtual reality to determine how emergency signs facilitate way-finding. Applied Ergonomics, 40(4), 722–730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2008.06.009
48.
VilarE.RebeloF.NoriegaP. (2014a). Indoor human wayfinding performance using vertical and horizontal signage in virtual reality. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 24(6), 601–615. https://doi.org/10.1002/hfm.20503
49.
VilarE.RebeloF.NoriegaP.DuarteE.MayhornC. B. (2014b). Effects of competing environmental variables and signage on route-choices in simulated everyday and emergency wayfinding situations. Ergonomics, 57(4), 511–524. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2014.895054
50.
VilarE.RebeloF.NoriegaP.TelesJ.MayhornC. (2013). The influence of environmental features on route selection in an emergency situation. Applied Ergonomics, 44(4), 618–627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2012.12.002
51.
VilarE.RebeloF.NoriegaP.TelesJ.MayhornC. (2015). Signage versus environmental affordances: Is the explicit information strong enough to guide human behavior during a wayfinding task?Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 25(4), 439–452. https://doi.org/10.1002/hfm.20557
52.
VilarE.TeixeiraL.RebeloF.NoriegaP.TelesJ. (2012). Using environmental affordances to direct people natural movement indoors. Work, 41(Suppl 1), 1149–1156. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-2012-0295-1149
WangR. F.BrockmoleJ. R. (2003). Human navigation in nested environments. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29(3), 398–404. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.29.3.398
55.
WeismanJ. (1981). Evaluating architectural legibility: Way-finding in the built environment. Environment and Behavior, 13(2), 189–204. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916581132004
56.
WerkhovenP.van ErpJ. B. F.PhilippiT. G. (2014). Navigating virtual mazes: The benefits of audiovisual landmarks. Displays, 35(3), 110–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.displa.2014.04.001
57.
WernerS.SchindlerL. E. (2004). The role of spatial reference frames in architecture: Misalignment impairs way-finding performance. Environment and Behavior, 36(4), 461–482. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916503254829
58.
WienerJ. M.HölscherC.BüchnerS.KoniecznyL. (2012). Gaze behaviour during space perception and spatial decision making. Psychological Research, 76(6), 713–729. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-011-0397-5
ZimringC. (1990). The costs of confusion: Non-monetary and monetary costs of the Emory University hospital wayfinding system. Atlanta, GA: Georgia Institute of Technology.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
