International,Collaborative Experience of 1789 Patients Having Multifetal Pregnancy Reduction: A Plateauing of Risks and Outcomes

Abstract

Objective: To develop the most up-to-date, complete data base of multifetal pregnancy reduction (MFPR) from cases, and to provide the best counseling for couples with multifetal pregnancies.

Methods: From nine centers in five countries, 1789 completed MFPR cases were collected and outcomes evaluated. Pregnancy losses were defined as through 24 weeks and deliveries categorized in groups of 25-28, 29-32, 33-36, and 37 or more weeks.

Results: Overall, the pregnancy loss rate was 11.7% but varied from a low of 7.6% for triplets to twins and increased with each additional starting number to 22.9% for sextuplets or higher. Early premature deliveries (25-28 weeks) were 4.5% and varied with starting number. Loss rates by finishing number were highest for triplets and lowest for twins, but gestational age at delivery was highest for singletons.

Conclusions: Multifetal pregnancy reduction has been shown to be a safe and effective method to improve outcome in multifetal pregnancies. Outcomes are worse with higher-order gestations and support the need for continued vigilance of fertility therapy.

Keywords

Multifetal pregnancy reduction MFPR prematurity multiple gestation infertility therapy assisted reproductive techniques

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. Dumez Y , Oury JF . Method for first trimester selective abortion in multiple pregnancy. Contrib Gynecol Obstet 1986;15:50-50.

2. Evans MI , Fletcher JC , Zador IE , Newton BW , Quigg MH , Struyk CD . Selective first trimester temination in octuplet and quadruplet pregnancies: Clinical and ethical issues. Obstet Gynecol 1988;71:289-296.

3. Berkowitz RL , Lynch L , Chitkara U , et al. Selective reduction of multiple pregnancies in the first trimester. N Engl J Med 1988: 318;1043-1047.

4. Wapner RJ , Davis GH , Johnson A . Selective reduction of multifetal pregnancies. Lancet 1990;355:90-93.

5. Evans MI , May M , Drugan A , Fletcher JC , Johnson MP , Sokol RJ . Selective termination: Clinical experience and residual risks. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990;162:1568-1575.

6. Lynch L . Berkowitz RL , Chitkara U , Alvarez M . First trimester transabdominal multiple pregnancy reduction: A report of 85 cases. Obstet Gynecol 1990;75:735-738.

7. Tabsh KM . Transabdominal multifetal pregnancy reduction: Report of 40 cases. Obstet Gynecol 1990;75:739-741.

8. Evans MI , Dommergues M , Wapner RJ , et al. Efficacy of transabdominal multifetal pregnancy reduction: Collaborative experience among the world's largest centers. Obstet Gynecol 1993;82:61-66.

9. Evans MI , Dommergues M , Timor-Tritsch I , et al. Transabdominal versus transcervical and transvaginal multifetal pregnancy reduction: International collaborative experience of more than one thousand cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994;170:902-909.

10.

10. Timor-Tritsch IE , Peisner DB , Monteagudo A , Lercner JP , Sharma S . Multifetal pregnancy reduction by transvaginal puncture: Evaluation of the technique used in 134 cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993;168:799-804.

11.

11. Evans MI , Littman L , St. Louis L . et al. Evolving patterns of iatrogenic multifetal pregnancy generation: Implications for aggressiveness of infertility treatments. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995;172:1750-1753.