Rectal prolapse is a lifestyle-altering disability which has been treated with over 100 surgical options. The specific goals of surgical management of full thickness rectal prolapse are to minimize the operative risk in this typically elderly population, eradicate the external prolapse of the rectum, improve continence, improve bowel function, and reduce the risk of recurrence. The theoretical advantages of a laparoscopic approach are to couple reductions in surgical morbidity and good postoperative outcome. Studies which compare the same laparoscopic and open surgical approach for rectal prolapse have demonstrated that laparoscopy confers benefits related to postoperative pain, length of hospital stay, and return of bowel function. Virtually every type of open transabdominal surgical approach to rectal prolapse has been laparoscopically accomplished. Current laparoscopic surgical techniques include suture rectopexy, stapled rectopexy, posterior mesh rectopexy with artificial material, and resection of the sigmoid colon with colorectal anastomosis, with or without rectopexy. The growing body of literature supports the concept that laparoscopic surgical techniques can safely provide the benefits of low recurrence rates and improved functional outcome for patients with full thickness rectal prolapse.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
1. Madden MV , Kamm MA , Nicholls RJ , et al: Abdominal rectopexy for complete rectal prolapse: prospective study evaluating changes in symptoms and anorectal function . Dis Colon Rectum35: 301-307 , 1995.
2.
2. Keighley MRB , Fielding JWL , Alexander-Williams J : Results of Marlex mesh abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapse in 100 consecutive patients . Br J Surg70: 229-232 , 1983.
3.
3. Madoff RD , Williams JG , Wong WD , et al: Long-term functional results of colon resection and rectopexy for overt rectal prolapse . Am J Gastroenterol87: 101-104 , 1992.
4.
4. Metcalf AM , Loening-Baucke V : Anorectal function and defecation dynamics in patients with rectal prolapse . Am J Surg155: 206-210 , 1988.
5.
5. Keighley MRB , Shouler PJ : Abnormalities of colonic function in patients with rectal prolapse and faecal incontinence . Br J Surg71: 892-895 , 1984.
6.
6. Matheson DM , Keighley MRB : Manometric evaluation of rectal prolapse and faecal incontinence . Gut22: 126-129 , 1981.
7.
7. Gordon PH : Rectal procidentia. In Gordon PH , Nivatvongs S (eds): Principles and Practice of Surgery for the Colon, Rectum, and Anus. St Louis, Missouri: Quality Medical Publishers , 1999.
8.
8. Madoff RD : Rectal prolapse and intussusception. In Beck WE , Wexner SD (eds): Fundamentals of Anorectal Surgery. New York, McGraw-Hill , 1992:89-103.
9.
9. Watts JD , Rothenberger DA , Buls JG , et al: The management of procidentia: Thirty years' experience . Dis Colon Rectum28: 96-102 , 1985.
10.
10. Eu K-W , Seow-Choen F : Functional problems in adult rectal prolapse and controversies in surgical treatment. (Review) . Br J Surg84: 904-911 , 1997.
11.
11. Douard R , Frileux P , Brunel M , et al: Functional results after the Orr-Loygue transabdominal rectopexy for complete rectal prolapse . Dis Colon Rectum46: 1089-1096 , 2003.
12.
12. Watkins BP , Landercasper J , Belzer E , et al: Long-term follow-up of the modified Delorme procedure for rectal prolapse . Arch Surg138: 498-503 , 2003.
14. Duthie GS , Bartolo DC : Abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapse: a comparison of techniques . Br J Surg79: 107-113 , 1992.
15.
15. Huber FT , Stein H , Siewert JR : Functional results after treatment of rectal prolapse with rectopexy and sigmoid resection . World J Surg19: 138-143 , 1995.
16.
16. Kimmins MH , Evetts BK , Isler J , et al: The Altemeier repair: Outpatient treatment of rectal prolapse . Dis Colon Rectum44: 565-570 , 2001.
17.
17. Berman IR : Sutureless laparoscopic rectopexy for procidentia: technique and implications . Dis Colon Rectum35: 689-693 , 1992.
18.
18. Circco WC , Brown AC : Anterior resection for the treatment of rectal prolapse: a 20 year experience . Am Surg59: 265-269 , 1993.
19.
19. Giordano P.Wexner SD : The assessment of fecal incontinence in women . [Review]. J Am Coll Surg193(4): 397-406 , 2001.
20.
20. Baker R , Senagore AJ , Luchtefeld M : Laparoscopic-assisted vs. open resection: Rectopexy offers excellent results . Dis Colon Rectum38: 199-201 , 1995.
21.
21. Boccasanta P: Laparotomic vs. laparoscopic rectopexy in complete rectal prolapse. Dig Surg 16(5):415-419, 1999.
22.
22. Boccasanta P , Rosati R , Venturi M , et al: Comparison of laparoscopic rectopexy with open technique in the treatment of complete rectal prolapse: Clinical and functional results . Surg Laparosc Endosc8(6): 460-465 , 1998.
23.
23. Kessler H , Jerby BL , Milsom JW : Successful treatment of rectal prolapse by laparoscopic suture rectopexy . Surg Endosc13: 858-861 , 1999.
24.
24. Darzi A , Henry MM , Guillou PJ , et al: Stapled laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse . Surg Endosc9: 301-303 , 1995.
25.
25. Rose J , Schneider C , Scheidbach H , et al Laparoscopic treatment of rectal prolapse: experience gained in a prospective multicenter study . Langebecks Arch Surg387(3-4): 130-137 , 2002.
26.
26. Solomon MJ , Young CJ , Eyers AA , et al: Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapse . Br J Surg89: 35-39 , 2002.
27.
27. Himpens J , Cadiere GB , Bruyns J , et al: Laparoscopic rectopexy according to Wells . Surg Endosc13: 139-141 , 1999.
28.
28. Kairaluoma MV , Viljakka MT , Kellokumpu IH : Open vs laparoscopic surgery for rectal prolapse . Dis Colon Rectum46: 355-360 , 2003.
29.
29. Xynos E , Chrysos E , Tsiaoussis J , et al: Resection rectopexy for rectal prolapse: The laparoscopic approach .Surg Endosc13: 862-864 , 1999.
30.
30. Heah SM , Hartley JE , Hurley J , et al: Laparoscopic suture rectopexy without resection is effective treatment for fullthickness rectal prolapse . Dis Colon Rectum43(5): 638-643 , 2000.
31.
31. Madbouly KM , Senagore AJ , Delaney CP , et al: Clinically based management of rectal prolapse . Surg Endosc17(1): 99-103 , 2003.
32.
32. Zittel TT , Manncke K , Haug S , et al: Functional results after laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse . J Gastrointest Surg4 (6): 632-641 , 2000.
33.
33. Bruch HP , Herold A , Schiedeck T , et al: Laparoscopic surgery for rectal prolapse and outlet obstruction . Dis Colon Rectum42: 1889-1995 , 1999.
34.
34. Kellopkumpu IH , Virozen J , Scheinin T : Laparoscopic repair of rectal prolapse: A prospective study evaluating surgical outcome and changes in symptoms and bowel function . Surg Endosc14: 634-640 , 2000.
35.
35. Benoist S , Taffinder N , Gould S , et al: Functional results two years after laparoscopic rectopexy . Am J Surg182: 168-173 , 2001.32. 33.
36.
36. Stevenson AR , Stitz RW , Lumley JW : Laparoscopic assisted resection rectopexy for rectal prolapse. Early and medium follow up . Dis Colon Rectum41: 46-54 , 1998
37.
37. Poen AC , de Brauw M , Felt-Bersma RJ , et al: Laparoscopic rectopexy for complete rectal prolapse. Clinical outcome and anorectal function tests . Surg Endosc10: 904-908 , 1996.
38.
38. Herold A , Bruch HP : Laparoscopic rectopexy . Zentralbl Chir122: 578-585 , 1997.
