The panel assembled for this session has been asked to think metaphorically about the theme of the Meeting and how it relates to our profession. The invited panelists represent diverse perspectives in human factors and ergonomics, and this should make for stimulating discussion.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CaseyS. (1993). Set Phasesrs on Stun and Other True Tales of Design, Technology and Human Error. Santa Barbara: Aegean Publishing Company.
2.
CastiJ. (1994). Complexification. New York: Harper Collins.
3.
ConradC. (1983). Adaptability: The Significance of Variability from Molecule to Ecosystem. New York: Plenum Press.
4.
FlachHancockJ. P.CairdJ.VincenteK. (Eds). (1995). Global Perspectives on the Ecology of Human-Machine Systems. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
5.
KarwowskiW. (1991). Complexity, Fuzziness and Ergonomic Incompatibility Issues in the Control of Dynamic Work Environments, Ergonomics, 34 (6), 671–686.
6.
KarwowskiW.MarekT.NoworolC. (1994). The Complexity-Incompatibility Principle in the Science of Ergonomics, In Advances in Industrial Ergonomics & Safety VI, AghazadehF., London: Taylor & Francis: 37–40.
7.
TennerE. (1996). Why Things Bite Back. Technology and the Revenge of Unintended Consequences. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
